Guns Roar On Cambodia Border As War With Thailand Enters Day 5, Peace Talks On Brink In Malaysia?
U.S. President Donald Trump met with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen in Turnberry, Scotland, on Sunday to discuss trade negotiations. As White House-imposed deadline for new tariffs approaches, both sides are pushing to reach a deal. Talks follow recent tensions after Trump threatened to impose a steep 30% tariff on EU imports despite earlier progress. Watch
645 views | 8 hours ago

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
24 minutes ago
- Time of India
"Have we become so weak?" Congress MP Sukhdeo Bhagat on Trump's 25% tariff on India
Congress MP Sukhdeo Bhagat has criticised PM Modi's silence on the 25% tariff imposed by the US, questioning the government's vulnerability to US interference in strategic matters. Trump's announcement of tariffs and threats of further penalties for importing Russian oil have sparked concern. The government is examining the impact and engaging with stakeholders to safeguard national interests. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads New Delhi: Congress MP Sukhdeo Bhagat criticised Prime Minister Narendra Modi for his silence on the 25 per cent tariff imposed by US President Donald Trump on questioned whether the BJP government has become so vulnerable that discussions regarding strategic initiatives or oil procurement are subject to interference from US President Trump."Trump has created a state of confusion. Neither the government nor PM Modi made any statement in the House or took responsibility... Have we become so weak that even discussing strategies prompts interference from Trump?... The saddest part is when we discuss the trade balance, especially since we have about 130 billion dollars worth of trade with the US. Our position is strong on this, so there is no reason for America to dominate us... PM Modi should come forward and clarify the entire situation regarding India's decision... We are a sovereign country, but such interference contradicts the dignity of the nation," he on Wednesday made a shocking statement on his social media platform Truth Social after the announcement of 25 per cent tariffs against India and threatened an additional "penalty" for importing Russian oil."I don't care what India does with Russia. They can take their dead economies down together, for all I care. We have done very little business with India; their tariffs are too high, among the highest in the world," Trump later signed a fresh executive order imposing revised tariffs for 70 countries, including imposed on India's neighbouring countries are less than India's 25 per cent, except for Myanmar at 40 per cent. The new tariffs for Pakistan, Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Indonesia, Japan, and Sri Lanka are 19%, 15%, 20%, 19%, 15%, and 20%, new tariffs, outlined in a sweeping order signed on Friday (IST), will come into effect from 12:01 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time on August the government told the Parliament on Thursday that it is examining the impact of the recent events and will take all necessary steps to safeguard the national interest. Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal made a statement in the lower House of Parliament a day after Trump announced the tariff. He later made a similar statement in the Rajya said the Ministry of Commerce and Industry is holding talks with exporters, industries and all stakeholders and gathering information on their assessment of this issue.


United News of India
35 minutes ago
- United News of India
Hungarian PM Orban slams EU over handling trade talks with US
Budapest, Aug 1 (UNI) Taking another dig at the European Union, Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban slammed Brussels over its recent dealings with the United States on matters of trade and security, stating that all they really managed to do was succeed in projecting the EU as an insecure, weak, yet overconfident bloc with a penchant for lecturing others, reports RT. Speaking on Friday during his regular interview on Kossuth Radio, Orban sharpened his aim at the European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, slamming her over the handling of trade negotiations with US President Donald Trump. Claiming that she completely failed on the negotiating table with Washington, and instead was focused more on her side commitment regarding Ukraine's security – such as the purchase of American munitions and defence systems – something she lacked the capability to do so, Orban described the resulting trade arrangement as 'an economic own goal,' and suggested the EU had lost ground in a trade dispute that remains unresolved. Hungary, which has been one of the EU's most vocal critics in regards to the Russia – Ukraine conflict and the US trade deal, has been highly critical of the bloc's moves towards militarisation and its attempts to replace Russian oil. Orban further hammered down on Brussels, and blasted the bloc's policy approach, stating 'We are what we are. Weak, ridiculous, loud-mouthed. We educate others, but we have no strength when it comes to negotiating. We show neither talent nor ability. So, it's the worst combination.' He further likened the EU diplomacy to 'a little hamster huddling in the corner, hissing at everyone, arguing with everyone, humiliating ourselves, and then still thinking we are in a position to lecture others about human rights, democracy, and behaviour.' UNI ANV SSP


Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Why Smithsonian removed Donald Trump impeachment references from an exhibit
The Smithsonian Institution has quietly removed a reference to US President Donald Trump's two impeachment proceedings from a key exhibit at the National Museum of American History. The decision comes as the White House exerts pressure to offer a more positive and selective view of American history. A Smithsonian spokesperson confirmed its removal.(AFP) The label referencing all Presidential impeachment proceedings was added in 2021 to the museum's "American Presidency" exhibit under the section "Limits of Presidential Power." It also addressed Trump's unprecedented dual impeachments. A Smithsonian spokesperson confirmed its removal, which comes as the new Trump administration has called for intensified efforts to reshape how federal cultural institutions portray American history. Why were the impeachment exhibits removed? Smithsonian spokesperson Phillip Zimmerman said Friday that the section, which includes materials on President Bill Clinton's impeachment and the Watergate scandal that led to President Richard Nixon's resignation, needed to be overhauled. He said the decision came after the museum" reviewed our legacy content recently." "Because the other topics in this section had not been updated since 2008, the decision was made to restore the Impeachment case back to its 2008 appearance," Zimmerman said in an email. He said that in September 2021, the museum installed a temporary label on content concerning Trump's impeachment. "It was intended to be a short-term measure to address current events at the time," he said. But the label remained in place. "A large permanent gallery like The American Presidency that opened in 2000 requires a significant amount of time and funding to update and renew," he said. "A future and updated exhibit will include all impeachments." Did political pressure play a role? While museum officials framed the decision as part of routine exhibit maintenance, the timing has raised eyebrows. Since his return to the Oval Office, Trump and his allies have called for efforts to eliminate what they describe as divisive or unpatriotic narratives. In March, Trump issued an executive order entitled "Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History," in which he alleged that the Smithsonian was beholden to 'a divisive, race-centred ideology.' He has placed Vice President JD Vance in charge of an effort to ensure no funding goes to "exhibits or programmes that degrade shared American values, divide Americans based on race, or promote programmes or ideologies inconsistent with Federal law and policy."