Brian Cox says Donald Trump is 'talking boll***s' with indyref2 claim
The First Minister had just put forward his plans for Scottish independence, saying getting a second referendum could only be achieved if the SNP win a majority in Holyrood.
'I don't want to get involved in your politics, we got enough politics of our own,' Trump said/
'I will say that I predicted what was going to happen the last time.'
(Image: Chris Furlong)
He noted that he was opening his golf course in Aberdeenshire at the time and had called the result for Better Together, adding: 'I like to be correct.'
Trump added: 'I do say that when they made that deal, somebody said that it was, and I remember this very distinctly, I said, could they do this all the time?
'There was a little bit of a restriction like 50 or 75 years before you could take another vote because, you know, a country can't go through that too much.
Responding to the comments, the 79-year-old actor told Sky News: "He's talking bollocks. I'm sorry, but he does. It's rubbish. Let's get on with it and let's get it [independence] done. We can do it.
"It's been tough as there's a great deal of undermining that has gone on."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
39 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Now will the small minds of the SNP twig what voters care about?
Gus Connelly, Calderbank. Time to trim constituency Yet another bright light in Holyrood is dimmed, as Deputy First Minister [[Kate Forbes]] announces her intention to stand down from politics in 2026. Ms Forbes certainly lit up the Chamber back in 2020 as the first female to deliver a Scottish Budget (incidentally at short notice) and she brought great ability and commitment to her new-found position. To be an MSP in such a rural and geographically taxing constituency as Skye, Lochaber & Badenoch would be difficult for anyone, but for a mum with a young child it presents a scenario which raises questions. Should the Boundary Commission be considering geographically halving the constituency to make it manageable? Should Parliament be looking for options for such a widely-spread constituency? The make-up of constituencies should be manageable in the interest of constituents and their representatives. Catriona C Clark, Falkirk. Read more letters How much did Sturgeon cost us? In her paean of praise for Nicola Sturgeon's 'many achievements', Ruth Marr (Letters, August 2) draws a veil over the costs to the public purse of these policies. With regard to the SNP's abolition of prescription charges, perhaps one example will suffice to illustrate the financial impact of this policy. The cost to NHS Scotland in 2023-24 for paracetamol prescriptions alone was £14 million. Adding pharmacy dispensing charges of £7m brings the total cost to £21m. A Google search reveals that a pack of paracetamol can be bought for around 90p in any supermarket. Alan Ramage, Edinburgh. • It is notable that the list of "achievements" by Nicola Sturgeon given by Ruth Marr all involve her spending other people's money. I wonder if Ms Marr can come up with an example of Ms Sturgeon making a positive contribution to achieving economic growth in Scotland. She certainly made many negative contributions like destroying the ferry service to Arran and allowing her erstwhile allies in the Green Party to introduce measures like National Planning Framework 4 that are strangling economic development all over Scotland. I also wonder if Ms Marr is aware that her hero's actions in relation to the ferries, including having the Glen Sannox launched on her direct orders six months before the ship was ready so that she could upstage the Conservative Defence Secretary when he was announcing new jobs, and her contribution to the closure of the Grangemouth oil refinery by further high-handed actions, have resulted in the new "greener" ferries actually being responsible for more emissions of carbon dioxide than their conventionally powered predecessors. This is because the diesel fuel that the conventional ferries use can be brought to Ardrossan by electrically powered railway trains but the Liquefied Natural Gas needed to make the new ferries "greener" has to be transported from Essex on diesel-powered lorries. You couldn't make it up. Peter Wylie, Paisley. Indy target should be two-thirds As GR Weir (Letters, August 2) has not answered my simple question as to how he would define his 'stable majority" for independence, allow me to propose two-thirds for consideration. In my view, irrespective of how, when and by whom the decision to hold another inevitably divisive referendum on independence is taken, the stable polling majority sufficient to justify it must be understood in advance, and to achieve independence the actual voting result must at least confirm that polling majority. That result can then be taken as the settled will of the people at that time. The same requirements would apply to any subsequent calls for a rejoin referendum. As Mr Weir will know, to change the constitution of the [[SNP]], the principal advocate of independence, requires at least a two-thirds majority (Article 27), so nationalists should have no difficulty in supporting my proposal. Alan Fitzpatrick, Dunlop. Why can't they admit mistakes? Kevin McKenna's interview with Jackie Baillie on Saturday (''I hated how Sandie Peggie's daughter was used', says Scottish Labour deputy leader', The Herald, August 2) highlights an uncomfortable but increasingly familiar feature of our politics: an unwillingness to accept responsibility for past decisions. In December 2022 Scottish Labour gave full support to the Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill. The party whipped its MSPs to vote in favour and, with their backing, the legislation was passed by the Scottish Parliament. Since then, the well-publicised cases of Isla Bryson and Sandie Peggie have shown that public concern is widespread – particularly about allowing individuals to legally change their gender through self-identification, thereby acquiring all the rights of their preferred gender. Labour now appears to be pivoting in response to that unease. Jackie Baillie attempts to distance the party from the fallout by suggesting Labour's support of the bill was dependent on key amendments and a future consultation with the UK Government. This rings hollow. If those amendments were so crucial, why did the party not withdraw its support when they were not accepted? And what purpose does consultation serve after a bill has been passed? This kind of political hedging only deepens public distrust in the integrity of politicians. Would it not be more honest and more effective to simply say "Sorry. We got this wrong"? George Rennie, Inverness. How will Nicola Sturgeon be remembered? (Image: PA) Let the media into Gaza The first and continuing victim of war is truth. Despite evidence from non-Palestinians, western doctors among them, about the near-famine conditions in Gaza, it has not come as a surprise to watch and listen to Israeli officials claim it is a lie that Palestinians are facing starvation. From what I have seen from interviews with [[Israel]]i citizens, they too believe the world is subject to Hamas propaganda. There is a way for the world to see, without bias, the actual conditions under which Palestinians are now compelled to live – reverse the present [[Israel]]i policy and let the world's media into [[Gaza]] so that we can all see for ourselves from objective reporting. If not, why not, is the question Keir Starmer should put to his [[Israel]]i counterpart. As for Hamas, is it not past time for those in its leadership languishing in the safety of Qatar to be asked why, given its ability to construct miles of tunnels in Gaza, it did not build shelters for the population when it must have known that Israel would respond to the atrocity of October 7 with a fury not seen before? Jim Sillars, Edinburgh. Shame on Ian Murray The Secretary of State for Scotland's antipathy towards the Scottish Government is persistent, but surely reached a new low when he castigated Public Finance Minister Ivan McKee for using the word 'genocide' during a BBC broadcast discussion about recognising the state of Palestine ("Minister confirms Scottish Government 'genocide' in Gaza position", heraldscotland, August 3). Ian Murray wants the courts to decide what is genocide, presumably before the UK Government acts, and despite the fact that the UN Special Committee, Amnesty International and Médicin San Frontières have all used the term to describe the continuing Israeli actions in Gaza. In addition, reports from the front line bring us daily reports of massive fatalities, destruction of infrastructure, displacement of communities, murder of aid workers, and human rights abuses, all of which meet the criteria for genocide. But Ian Murray wants to wait on the courts, and by doing so extends the United Kingdom's complicity in the despicable acts of the Israeli state. Shame on him. Graeme Forbes, Edinburgh.
Scotsman
40 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Why loss of Kate Forbes will be bigger blow than SNP may realise
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... As we reveal today, the Scottish Government spent £1.3 million of taxpayers' money on a report into the idea of a minimum income guarantee, despite not having the authority to introduce it and seemingly knowing it was 'doomed to fail'. The question is, therefore, why would they do this. The answer, as ever with the SNP, is simple: the pursuit of independence, the guiding light behind too many decisions in government. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Wanting to appear progressive and to the left of Labour, they clearly felt the need to seem sympathetic to the idea of a minimum income. Commissioning a report was a way to signal this. Of course, the SNP may argue that it is a policy which could be considered in an independent Scotland and that the money was as well spent as that used to produce the Scottish Government's near-forgotten 'independence papers'. On the latter point, we would not disagree. Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes has announced she is standing down at the next Holyrood election (Picture: Paul Campbell) | Getty Images Dreamers vs pragmatists However, any such justification would only highlight what should be considered as a fundamental dividing line within the party – between the dreamers who think selling a vision of a promised land is the best way to achieve independence and the pragmatists who recognise it is important to run Scotland well in the here and now. The decision of Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes, a pragmatist with at least a degree of understanding of the needs of business, to stand down at the next election will therefore be a blow not just to the SNP government but to Scotland as a whole. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The simple truth is that there is no prospect of another referendum, let alone independence itself, while support remains at its current level. Selling dubious visions of the future is an easy, glib and ultimately empty way of trying to increase it.
Scotsman
40 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Union demands SNP and UK ministers act over Cesscon Decom energy firm collapse and 'decimated' industries
Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Union bosses have warned Scotland's two governments the impending closure of a key oil and gas decommissioning firm is proof plans for a just transition for energy workers are falling flat without jobs being 'decimated with no viable alternatives'. The GMB union has branded Livingston-based Cesscon Decom closing its doors as 'a worst-of-all-worlds outcome'. Jobs are poised to be lost, with staff potentially unable to obtain Universal Credit. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Cesscon Decom has told staff it faced ceasing trading | Contributed The Scotsman reported the chief executive of Cesscon, Lee Hanlon, emailed staff to tell them the company, which dismantles and recycles defunct offshore infrastructure, faces going into liquidation, with around 20 staff at risk of losing their jobs. It has now emerged the decommissioning firm is subject to a wind-up petition at Livingston Sheriff Court. Louise Gilmour, secretary of GMB Scotland, has penned a letter to SNP Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes and Scottish Secretary Ian Murray, warning about the situation at Cesscon and the wider just transition. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad In her letter, seen by The Scotsman, Ms Gilmour has cautioned the two governments 'the current status of Cesscon Decom Ltd needs to be investigated and clarified', as well as 'the use of public money given how much has been invested'. 'Our members have not received any wages since May,' she wrote. 'The firm has also not made payments into the pension funds since November 2023 despite making deductions to our members' payslips up to June 2025. 'Thousands are owed to our members who are being left in the lurch by Mr Hanlon.' GMB Scotland secretary Louise Gilmour. Picture: Andrew Cawley Ms Gilmour stressed that 'as a result of not being formally made redundant', workers are also 'unable to claim Universal Credit putting them into hardship'. She has called for 'urgent assistance' in obtaining social security for the workers involved. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad In May, a warning was issued that the oil and gas sector was 'sleepwalking into an unjust transition'. A report from the Just Transition Commission highlighted "urgent and ambitious action, investment and government leadership" was needed. Ms Gilmour said: 'It is just months since the fabrication yard at Methil was saved after the promises of a 'just transition' failed to materialise yet again. 'Millions of pounds of public funds have been put into Cesscon and developing the Methil site. It was heralded as a key component in the 'just transition'. Its closure is becoming an all too typical part of the story in Scotland's 'just transition'.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad She added: 'North Sea jobs are being decimated, with no viable alternatives in renewable energy, whilst even jobs in decommissioning are being lost. This is a worst-of-all-worlds outcome. 'The site at Methil is fit for purpose. We have rigs that need to be decommissioned, and more importantly, it has a workforce ready and able. There is no reason why decommissioning work cannot continue at the site. However, it will require political leaders to urgently broker a deal for the lease of the site and further contracts.' A Scottish Government spokesperson said: 'Funding to regenerate a derelict site into an industrial unit was provided to Fife Council. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'The council has indicated that the land, which is owned by Scottish Enterprise, was leased to Cesscon Decom on commercial terms and that the improvements made to the site remain in place and continue to represent a valuable asset for future use by other operators at the Energy Park in Methil." A UK government spokesperson said: "We understand this will be a deeply concerning time for the workers and their families. The UK government worked at pace to retain Harland & Wolff at the Methil site and will continue to work on delivering a fair and prosperous transition in our energy sector."
