logo
Donald Trump has discovered that Iran's supreme leader lies just as boldly as he does

Donald Trump has discovered that Iran's supreme leader lies just as boldly as he does

Irish Timesa day ago

Donald Trump
has finally met his match.
The Iranian supreme leader lies just as boldly, with just as much bombast, as the American supreme leader.
On Thursday,
Ayatollah Ali Khamenei
put out a video hailing Iran's victory over Israel and the United States.
Trump was shocked,
shocked
at this blatant lie.
READ MORE
'As a man of great faith, he is not supposed to lie,' the president marvelled on Truth Social.
Then Trump went on to his usual authoritarian etiquette lesson, complaining that the proper response by Khamenei to getting hit with 14 30,000-pound bombs should have been: 'THANK YOU, PRESIDENT TRUMP!'
Trump said that he deserved gratitude because he knew where the ayatollah was hiding and stopped Israeli and US forces from killing him. He said that he made Israel recall a group of planes headed for Tehran that were, perhaps, looking for 'the final knockout!'
'I wish the leadership of Iran would realise,' he tut-tutted, 'that you often get more with HONEY than you do with VINEGAR. PEACE!!!'
Half an hour later, Mr Honey put out a typically vinegary post abruptly cutting off 'ALL' trade talks with Canada.
Before Trump did it, with an assist from the supreme court on Friday, it was Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld who worked to erode checks and balances and Hoover all the power into the executive branch.
With the malleable George W Bush in the Oval Office, Cheney and Rumsfeld were able to create an alternate universe where they were never wrong – because they conjured up information to prove they were right.
The two malevolent regents had a fever about getting rid of Saddam, so they hyped up intelligence, redirecting Americans' vengeful emotions about Osama bin Laden and 9/11 into that pet project. Tony Blair scaremongered that it would take only 45 minutes for Saddam to send his WMDs westward.
But there were no WMDs.
When it comes to the Middle East, presidents can't resist indulging in a gasconade. Unlike Iraq, Iran was actually making progress on its nuclear programme. Trump did not need to warp intelligence to justify his decision. But he did anyway, to satisfy his unquenchable ego.
He bragged that the strikes had 'OBLITERATED' Iran's nuclear capabilities.
'I just don't think the president was telling the truth,' Connecticut Democratic senator Chris Murphy told reporters. He believes Iran still has 'significant remaining capability'.
When CNN's Natasha Bertrand and her colleagues broke the story that a preliminary classified US report suggested that the strikes had set back Iran by only a few months, Trump, Pete Hegseth and Karoline Leavitt smeared her and the New York Times, which confirmed her scoop, as inaccurate, unpatriotic and disrespectful to our military.
On Friday afternoon, CNN revealed that the military did not even use bunker-buster bombs on one of Iran's largest nuclear targets because it was too deep.
Though Trump likes to hug the flag – and just raised two huge ones on the White House North and South Lawns – he ignores a basic tenet of patriotism: It is patriotic to tell the public the truth on life-or-death matters, and for the press to challenge power. It is unpatriotic to mislead the public in order to control it and suppress dissent, or as a way of puffing up your own ego.
Although he was dubbed the 'Daddy' of Nato in The Hague on Wednesday, Trump clearly has daddy issues. (Pass the tissues!) He did not get the affirmation from his father that could have prevented this vainglorious vamping.
For Trump, it was not enough for the strikes to damage Iran's nuclear capabilities; they had to 'obliterate' them. It could not simply be an impressive mission; it had to be, as Hegseth said, 'the most complex and secretive military operation in history.' (Move over, D-Day and crossing the Delaware.)
The president was so eager to magnify the mission that he eerily compared it to Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
Trump has always believed in 'truthful hyperbole,' as he called it in The Art of the Deal. But now it's untruthful hyperbole. He has falsely claimed that an election was stolen and falsely claimed that $1.7 trillion in cuts to the social safety net in his Big, Unpopular Bill 'won't affect anybody; it is just fraud, waste and abuse'.
He's getting help on his alternate universe from all the new partisan reporters in the White House briefing room who are eager to shill for him.
'So many Americans still have questions about the 2020 election,' a reporter told Trump at the news conference on Friday, wondering if he would appoint someone at the Justice Department to investigate judges 'for the political persecution of you, your family and your supporters during the Biden administration?'
Trump beamed. 'I love you,' he said to the young woman. 'Who are you?'
She was, as it turned out, the reporter for Mike Lindell of MyPillow fame, who has his own 'news' network.
Talk about fluffing your pillows.
This article originally appeared in
The New York Times
.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Irish Times view on Trump vs the Fed: rocky times ahead
The Irish Times view on Trump vs the Fed: rocky times ahead

Irish Times

time40 minutes ago

  • Irish Times

The Irish Times view on Trump vs the Fed: rocky times ahead

Donald Trump is running serious risks in his hectoring of the US central bank, the Federal Reserve Board and its chair, Jay Powell. The Fed ignored Trump's demand for an immediate interest rate cut when it announced the outcome of the deliberations of its policy-making council at its recent meeting in mid-June. But since then the president has unleahed a stream of criticism at the Fed chair. Last Friday he said he would 'love' Powell to resign as he was doing a 'lousy' job. He has threatened to name a replacement, even though Powell's term still has 11 months to run, a move that would further undermine the incumbent. Trump thrives on conflict and the resulting publicity. No doubt previous presidents have, in private, tried to nudge the Fed to cut interest rates, or not to increase them. But in public, administrations have generally respected its independence. Trump is choosing a different course. The point of central bank independence is that the monetary authority often has to do unpopular things to bear down on inflation. This underpins investor and consumer confidence – and leads to a more stable economic environment in the long term. Were it to be seen to do Trump's bidding, the independence of the Fed would be undermined. Trump has made clear that a new nominee would have to be prepared to cut interest rates. The affair underlines the contradictions of the president's economic agenda. Trump is calling for lower rates at the same time as he is imposing tariffs and threatening more. And these import taxes push up US inflation. He is also trying to get Congressional agreement for his 'big, beautiful budget bill' which will add to US borrowing and the national debt. Investors look on nervously here, too, fearful of the huge borrowings the US government is going to have to engage in. To improve his budget numbers, Trump needs faster growth. Lower interest rates are one way to achieve this. By undermining Powell's position, Trump will only add further to existing nerves among investors about increasingly unpredictable US economic policy.

UK court rejects case against lawfulness of Britain exporting fighter jet parts to Israel
UK court rejects case against lawfulness of Britain exporting fighter jet parts to Israel

Irish Times

time2 hours ago

  • Irish Times

UK court rejects case against lawfulness of Britain exporting fighter jet parts to Israel

Britain's decision to allow the export of F-35 fighter jet components to Israel , despite accepting they could be used in breach of international humanitarian law in Gaza , was lawful, London's High Court ruled on Monday. Al-Haq, a group based in the Israeli-occupied West Bank , had taken legal action against Britain's department for business and trade over its decision to exempt F-35 parts when it suspended some arms export licences last year. The UK had assessed that Israel was not committed to complying with international humanitarian law in Israel's military campaign. But Britain did not suspend licences for F-35 components, which go into a pool of spare parts which Israel can use on its existing F-35 jets. READ MORE Britain said suspending those licences would disrupt a global programme that supplies parts for the aircraft, with a knock-on impact on international security. It said taking such action could 'undermine US confidence in the UK and Nato'. Al-Haq had argued at a hearing last month that the decision was unlawful as it was in breach of Britain's obligations under international law, including the Geneva Convention, but the High Court dismissed the group's challenge. Judges Stephen Males and Karen Steyn said the case was about whether the court could rule that Britain must withdraw from the international F-35 programme, which was 'a matter for the executive . . . not for the courts'. According to Gaza officials, Israel's bombardment has killed more than 56,000 Palestinians while displacing almost the whole population of more than two million and plunging the enclave into a humanitarian crisis. Israel launched its campaign in response to the October 2023 attack in which Hamas-led fighters killed 1,200 people and took 251 hostages. The court said Britain's business minister Jonathan Reynolds was 'faced with the blunt choice of accepting the F-35 carve-out or withdrawing from the F-35 programme and accepting all the defence and diplomatic consequences which would ensue'. Al-Haq said it was disappointed with the ruling, but that its legal challenge had contributed to Britain's partial suspension of arms export licences in 2024. Jennine Walker, a lawyer at the Global Legal Action Network which supported Al-Haq's case, said outside the Royal Courts of Justice in London: 'We are currently analysing the judgment for grounds of appeal. 'This is a regrettable setback after such a long battle for Al-Haq and all the Palestinians who have been following the case. However, this is not the end.' Charity Oxfam, Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch also criticised the ruling. A British government spokesperson said: 'This [ruling] shows that the UK operates one of the most robust export control regimes in the world. We will continue to keep our defence export licensing under careful and continual review.' – Reuters (c) Copyright Thomson Reuters 2025

Trump claims TikTok buyer group found, but China approval needed
Trump claims TikTok buyer group found, but China approval needed

Irish Examiner

time4 hours ago

  • Irish Examiner

Trump claims TikTok buyer group found, but China approval needed

US president Donald Trump said he has identified a buyer for the US operations of TikTok, the social media app owned by Chinese company ByteDance Ltd, without naming the winning bidder. Completing a sale would be contingent on Beijing and Chinese president Xi Jinping's agreement, Mr Trump added in a pre-taped interview on Fox News's Sunday Morning Futures with Maria Bartiromo. ByteDance and the Chinese government have long opposed such a deal. Mr Trump said: 'We have a buyer for TikTok, by the way. I think I'll need, probably, China approval, and I think President Xi will probably do it. It's a group of very wealthy people US and Chinese officials affirmed at the end of last week that they have agreed a trade framework, moving toward settling trade hostilities, following talks in London earlier in June. ByteDance's US future has hung in the balance for years, starting with the first Trump administration putting pressure on the Beijing company to sell the asset to an American entity. Further deadline pushback A January deadline for ByteDance to find a local buyer was pushed back twice by Mr Trump, who this month extended it again by a further 90 days from June 19. The US congress passed a law last year requiring the divestiture, citing national security concerns. Under the law, the US president was allowed to invoke one extension. However, Mr Trump has mused that TikTok in the US could be worth as much as $1tn (€852bn) and has repeatedly shown a willingness to broker a deal. Movement on a sale had largely stalled as US-China trade ties frayed due to a larger clash over tariff negotiations. Before Mr Trump announced tariffs in April, a deal was said to be close, advanced by a consortium of US investors that includes Oracle Corp, Blackstone Inc, and venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz. Bloomberg Read More David McNamara: Divergence grows between Fed and markets on rate expectation

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store