Battle to head off pyramid schemes makes ground
The retirees in south Auckland lead a humble life and have struggled to make ends meet after losing tens of thousands of dollars in a 2021 pyramid scheme.
Pita had seen the Tongi Tupe Nuusila (New Zealand) scheme on numerous Facebook feeds and posts – including live feeds from a business yard in Otara. Every Saturday, Tongans who had invested money in the scheme would line up to collect envelopes of cash from Ofa Siasau who ran the New Zealand arm.
1News exposed the illegal scheme in 2021 when it was at its height.
'Good morning Tongan community come and get some money,' Siasau said in Tongan to an eager social media audience. A promoter of the scheme Tomasi Ofanoa also saying in Tongan, 'get in touch don't wait, look at these people, they are happy to receive their money this morning'.
It did the trick. The promise the Hingano's heard was, for every $4500, you wait for three weeks and then get $2500 every week. So Pita put some money in the scheme and as the returns started coming in, he put in more.
'That was my retirement money from my account,' he says.
'I trust her."
Between April and July 2021 the amount came to $54,000 – and he got back $27,750 just over half of what he 'invested'.
'My heart is not very happy,' he says. Through Tionly Fatukala, who campaigns against pyramid schemes, they took their case to the Disputes Tribunal. They just recently got the decision – which found in their favour. Ofa Siasau was to pay them the outstanding amount of $26,250 by May 21. However she has since requested a re-hearing and so everything is currently on hold, no money needs to be paid, pending the outcome of the re-hearing request.
Ofa Siasau did not attend any of the hearings and she told 1News the Disputes Tribunal 'made the mistake of not advising me by email' about the last hearing date. In its April decision the Disputes Tribunal says Ofa Siasau had wanted an adjournment of a hearing last November saying that the notice of one of the hearings went to her junk mail. The referee says 'I sent her a direction saying in relation to the next hearing she will need to check her email at regular intervals and that I would not be granting an adjournment in relation to the next hearing date if the notice goes to her junk mail and she has not checked it'.
The Commerce Commission has recently successfully prosecuted three people for pyramid schemes targeting Pasifika. Joseph Liava'a from the Commerce Commission says there appears to be less of the schemes doing the rounds but the public really needs to be vigilant as 'this type of scam unfortunately never really goes away'.
He says, if there is no product or service being sold, it is likely a pyramid scheme.
'We rely on people coming forward, it's embarrassing you know if these things happen to you..it's happened to family members of mine and it's difficult for me to talk about but you know I guess that's another thing these scammers really prey upon."
Pita Hingano hopes to get his money back but knows it is now a waiting game. 'I'm not fighting for my money. I'm fighting for my right that's the main thing."
He hopes that by speaking up it will help others affected by pyramid schemes to get their own justice.
For Barbara Dreaver's full report, go to TVNZ+
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Energy reform has to go beyond cheaper off-peak power
First published on Photo: 123rf Opinion - The spotlight is again on New Zealand's energy sector , with a group of industry bodies and independent retailers pushing for a market overhaul, saying the sector was "broken" and "driving up the cost of living". The Commerce Commission and the Electricity Authority has already established a joint taskforce , after prices peaked in 2024, to investigate ways to improve the performance of the electricity market. The Authority recently announced new rules requiring larger electricity retailers to offer lower off-peak power prices from next year. The government is also expected to make further announcements on the sector. But the question is whether these changes will do enough to help New Zealanders live affordably in dry and warm homes. Some 30 percent of households face energy hardship . This means they struggle to afford or access sufficient energy to meet their daily needs. Caused by a combination of poor housing quality , high energy costs and the specific needs of vulnerable residents, energy hardship can lead to serious health issues and high hospital admission costs . We know from our own research over the past 18 years that having power disconnected can negatively affect health and wellbeing. People have told us that not being able to afford enough power to keep warm made them more likely to get sick and exacerbated existing health conditions. They described mental distress from unaffordable electricity and the threat of disconnection. Research participants used words such as "stressed", "anxious" or "depressed". They also spoke about having to choose between food and power bills. If power is disconnected, there can be additional costs from losing food in the fridge and freezer, as well as the problem of paying disconnection and reconnection fees when people already can't afford the bill. People have said not being able to afford enough power to keep warm made them more likely to get sick and exacerbated existing health conditions. Photo: 123RF In 2024, a "dry year" that increased the value of hydro generation, combined with lower-than-usual wind and declining supply of gas, resulted in wholesale electricity price spikes . But these winter shortages aren't the only factor pushing up power bills. Electricity bills reflect several costs along the supply chain from generation to getting the electricity to the sockets in our homes. A new regulatory period for lines charges from April 2025 increased bills by $10 to $25 per month, depending on where you live. At the same time, low fixed daily charges are being phased out . This means the cost of being connected to the grid is the same no matter how much power is used. It is the poorest New Zealanders who are being hardest hit. The lowest income households spend a bigger proportion of their income on power compared to higher income households. Having electricity prices increase faster than inflation will put even more families at risk. The average household electricity bill was up 8.7 percent in May 2025 compared to June 2024 . According to a recent Consumer NZ survey , 20 percent of respondents said they struggled to pay their power bill in the past year. The new Consumer Care Obligations might help reduce some of the risks. Power companies must now comply with these obligations when working with households struggling to pay their bills, are facing disconnection or have someone in the home who is medically dependent on electricity. If households feel their power company is not meeting these obligations, they can contact Utilities Disputes , a free independent electricity and gas complaint resolution service, or the Electricity Authority . But multiple changes are needed to address the different parts of the energy hardship problem. Improving home energy efficiency through schemes like Warmer Kiwi Homes is crucial. Introducing an Energy Performance Rating for houses would make it easier for home buyers and renters to know how much it will cost to power a home before they move in. This would also help target energy hardship support. The government can also make electricity more affordable by supporting not-for-profit power companies . Another good move would be to help more households to install rooftop solar by providing access to long-term low-interest finance . Lower prices during off-peak hours are a good start. But it is clear the sheer size and complexity of the problems mean government action, with community and industry collaboration, needs to go beyond slightly cheaper electricity when there is less demand. Kimberley O'Sullivan is a Senior Research Fellow, He Kāinga Oranga - Housing and Health Research Programme, University of Otago. - This story originally appeared on The Conversation.
1News
7 hours ago
- 1News
NZers are not getting a 'raw deal' on butter, says Nicola Willis
The Finance Minister does not believe New Zealanders are getting a "raw deal" on butter, but has accepted there is no getting away from how expensive it is right now. Nicola Willis met with Fonterra's chief executive Miles Hurrell at Parliament on Tuesday evening. While the two meet regularly, there was increased interest in the meeting due to the current price of butter. Willis had earlier said it was something she would discuss with Hurrell. Finance Minister Nicola Willis says the price of butter will be discussed at her meeting with the giant co-op. (Source: 1News) Characterising the meeting as "constructive and engaging," Willis said Hurrell was candid about the way butter was priced in New Zealand. ADVERTISEMENT Her summary of her meeting with Fonterra largely zeroed in on her drive to increase supermarket competition. The large proportion of what people pay for butter is dictated by global demand, which is something the government could not control. "Were that price to come down, you would expect that to be reflected in the prices that New Zealand shoppers pay," Willis said. Hurrell had told her that butter had once been the hardest product for Fonterra to sell globally, but the increasing demand was due to reporting on its health benefits. "It was once viewed as a bogeyman," she said. The meeting had reinforced Willis' interest in increasing supermarket competition to put downward pressure on the price of butter. "All roads lead back to supermarket competition. I continue to believe that is the most powerful lever that the government has on this issue. We will never be able to control global dairy prices. What we can influence is the amount of competition in New Zealand's grocery sector and we have a lot of work underway to address that." ADVERTISEMENT Fonterra had also observed the supermarket competition. Finance Minister Nicola Willis does not believe New Zealanders are getting a "raw deal" on butter. (Source: "Miles specifically conveyed that Fonterra operates in a number of markets around the world, most of which have a more competitive supermarket sector, and that it does feel different in New Zealand." She would leave it to supermarkets and Fonterra to argue who was charging what margin. "The sense that I got from my engagement with Miles is that it's a constant battle between them. Each party are probably going to point fingers at the other." Hurrell would not answer questions when RNZ approached him outside Parliament on Tuesday night, but a Fonterra spokesperson said the meeting was "constructive". Willis said she had encouraged Hurrell to front, in particular to explain what proportion of the margins go to Fonterra and what goes to supermarkets. ADVERTISEMENT Acknowledging that Fonterra's job was to get the best possible price for its shareholders, Willis also accepted New Zealanders saw the downsides of that when they were shopping. "I've been satisfied that I don't think consumers are getting a raw deal. I think that there is good work going on to ensure that there is pressure and competition from Fonterra to try and keep its prices low. But I get it. Butter is expensive right now. There's no getting away from that."
1News
19 hours ago
- 1News
Bank warns of multimillion-dollar 'subscription trap'
New Zealanders are losing millions of dollars a year to "subscription traps", one bank says. Westpac said it had helped to stop more than $25m in unwanted charges being processed on to the cards of unwitting customers. Westpac NZ head of customer care operations Peter Barnes said many overseas-based websites were selling goods and services that hooked customers into recurring subscription payments. The bank implemented a block in April 2024 and had stopped 20,000 customers from making these sorts of payments within the past three months. Barnes said the block was implemented after a spike in customer complaints and feedback on overseas subscriptions. Many were businesses based in Europe and the UK, he said. ADVERTISEMENT Barnes said it would only apply to businesses who misled customers and then made it extremely difficult to cancel recurring payments. Fine print "These types of businesses aren't necessarily acting fraudulently, because they do disclose the subscription details in their fine print, but typically they don't offer this information up front," Barnes said. "It's not normally until the following month or two when [the customer] sees the recurring fee from a credit card account that they actually twig that something's not quite right." The morning's headlines in 90 seconds, including Ozzy Osbourne dies, a worrying find on Rakiura Stewart Island, and new Coke coming. (Source: 1News) He said it was an unethical way of making money but was seen in everything from gift boxes, shoes, clothing and accessories to sportswear and digital content. "This is not just a case of someone signing up for a free trial and forgetting to cancel before the subscription kicks in. Typically, once someone has made a purchase through a merchant like this, they only realise they have signed up to a subscription when they see further charges on their credit card. ADVERTISEMENT "When they contact the merchant to dispute the transaction, it can often be difficult and time-consuming to cancel the subscription, and sometimes the merchant may be completely uncontactable. Customers may eventually resort to cancelling their credit card to stop the payments, which can be disruptive and inconvenient. "Blocking these types of payments is another way we can help protect customers, on top of initiatives like rolling out a confirmation of payee service and enhancing our fraud monitoring systems with biometric technology." He said a block would also stop customers' details being made available to unscrupulous third parties online. Westpac was working with other banks on the problem. "While this payment block has been working well so far, we encourage New Zealanders to be careful when transacting online, including reading the fine print when making purchases. "If something doesn't look or feel right, take a step back and check whether the payment you're making is legitimate."
