The Greens want to move salmon farms from water to land. The Tasmanian industry says it can't be done
It produced almost 75,000 tonnes of Atlantic salmon in the 2022-23 financial year, and those in support of the industry argue it's an important economic contributor to the state, while providing employment to regional communities.
Photo shows
Salmon farm location map 4
Those black, circular things floating in the water off the Tasmanian coastline? They are salmon farms. Here is how many there are — and who owns them.
The industry, made up of three foreign-owned companies — Tassal, Huon and Petuna — has recently found itself at the centre of several environmental incidents, and has played a key role in a last-minute
In February,
Rotting fish and
Not long after, video released of live salmon being placed into bins with dead fish resulted in
Tasmania's salmon industry operates mostly in the state's south in channels and bays.
(
ABC News: Luke Bowden
)
The industry has been criticised by conservation and environmental groups for years over its impact on the
To mitigate the impacts to marine areas, environmental groups such as Neighbours of Fish Farming (NOFF) have argued that commercially-farmed salmon could be moved to land-based operations.
They say land-based farming also minimises the spread of disease, reducing the need for antibiotics, and removes noise and light pollution for coastal communities.
In Iceland, grow-out tanks by land-based salmon company Laxey — each measuring 28m in diameter and 13m in height — can hold up to 5,000 cubic metres of seawater.
(
Laxey
)
It's a strategy the salmon industry strongly opposes, arguing the move to 100 per cent land-based farming would be economically, logistically and politically unrealistic.
The push to land-based salmon farming
In Tasmania, commercially grown salmon starts in freshwater land-based hatcheries, before being moved to saltwater open-pen farms on maturity.
Land-based farming uses Recirculating Aquaculture Systems (RAS), a controlled environment that reuses water and limits the movement of fish.
On Wednesday, Tasmanian Greens Senator Nick McKim announced a new policy to force salmon farms out of the state's coastal waters and in to land-based farms.
In his announcement, Senator McKim said "for too long, the salmon corporations have treated Tasmania's oceans like a dumping ground".
(
ABC News: Jake Grant
)
The Greens' proposal includes $50 million of Commonwealth funding for environmental remediation, independent monitoring of salmon farms for compliance with animal cruelty and environmental standards, and a "jobs transition package" for Macquarie Harbour workers.
Under the policy, the salmon industry would self-fund its transition to land-based farming.
"This is about transitioning the industry onshore, getting the industry out of Macquarie Harbour, to give the Maugean skate a fighting chance of survival,"
Mr McKim said.
The Greens have not put a timeline on the completion of the transition.
In April, Laxey completed its first salmon transfer to land-based grow-out tanks in Iceland.
(
Laxey
)
Photo shows
Large ship next to a fish farm pen in the ocean.
Foreign companies now own Tasmania's big three salmon farming operations. Here's a look at how industrial fish farms are run overseas — and the problems operators have encountered when there's opposition to their practices.
Tasmania's salmon industry is regulated by the state government.
Mr McKim said there were "plenty of levers that can be pulled" at a state level to instigate the transition.
"There's no doubt that the powers exist to transition the industry on shore and to force it to transition on shore," he said.
The Tasmanian government has not supported the Greens' policy.
"They clearly have a focus on shutting down Tasmanian industry. They are anti-everything,"
Minister Felix Ellis said.
Independent federal candidate for Franklin and Climate-200-backed anti-salmon campaigner, Peter George, has also flagged land-based aquaculture as an environmentally positive alternative.
Mr George took leave from his role as NOFF's president to challenge federal Fisheries Minister Julie Collins in the federal election.
In his campaign material, Peter George says "Labor and Liberal … are putting corporate interests and overseas profit before the people of Franklin".
(
ABC News: Ebony ten Broeke
)
Why the Tasmanian industry says it can't work
Luke Martin, outgoing chief executive of the industry's peak body Salmon Tasmania, dismissed the case for 100-per-cent land-based farming as "voodoo economics".
"It will never get to a point where you do the entire production period, the entire two-year life cycle of the fish, on land," Mr Martin said.
Mr Martin says he doesn't think land-based salmon farming would be economically viable.
(
ABC News: Luke Bowden
)
He said large amounts of water, energy and land would be required to transition the industry, requirements he deemed unfeasible.
Mr Martin also argued that the cost of moving the industry to land-based farms was significant and would drive up the price of the product, making it economically unviable.
"We're talking about giant artificial ponds, enormous tanks built into the Tasmanian landscape — which community would be lining up to put their hand up in Tasmania?" he said.
"
It is just not economically possible. I don't believe it's environmentally feasible and certainly the engineering considerations are very complex as well.
"
Thousands turned out to Hobart's parliament lawns to protest the environmental damage caused by marine fish farms.
(
ABC News: Jake Grant
)
However, he said the industry was investigating how it could expand the amount of time fish spend on land before being transferred to marine pens — with an eye to expanding operations.
"The future of the industry lies with a combination of partial on-land farming for the small fish, where the smolt [young fish] would spend around 12 months of their life,"
he said.
"And then secure leases in deeper water, into more open water areas like outer Storm Bay, potentially off the coast."
Mr Martin said if land-based farming did become feasible, he believed the industry would move closer to bigger mainland markets to minimise costs.
Has it worked elsewhere?
Other commercially grown finfish, such as barramundi, are farmed at land-based facilities in Queensland and the Northern Territory at far smaller volumes than Atlantic salmon.
Photo shows
Large ship next to a fish farm pen in the ocean.
Foreign companies now own Tasmania's big three salmon farming operations. Here's a look at how industrial fish farms are run overseas — and the problems operators have encountered when there's opposition to their practices.
However, land-based commercial Atlantic salmon farms do exist, and have been implemented at small scale in many countries — most notably in the US, Canada, Japan and Europe.
The scale of production at these land-based locations is far smaller than their ocean counterparts.
The largest example of land-based RAS aquaculture is Florida-based company, Atlantic Sapphire, which raises salmon in a "bluehouse", a climate-controlled indoor facility that minimises the risk of disease and environmental contamination.
But profitability remains a challenge.
In 2023, the company harvested just over 1,500 tonnes, a decrease of about 700 tonnes from the previous year.
Atlantic Sapphire is the largest global onshore aquaculture company in the world.
(
Supplied: Atlantic Sapphire
)
Canada is the world's fourth-largest producer of Atlantic salmon, with the majority of its industry farming in west coast waters off Vancouver Island in British Columbia.
It is attempting to transition part of its billion-dollar industry to land-based practices.
In June last year, the Canadian government promised to ban marine salmon farming in British Columbia by 2029, citing environmental concerns and the need to protect wild salmon populations.
The plan has left the region's peak-industry body, the British Columbia Salmon Farmers Association, concerned and doubtful it can be achieved without significant job losses.
Its executive director, Brian Kingzett, told the ABC the estimated cost to transition the industry was more than 2 billion Canadian dollars.
"We had a political decision, not based in science,"
Mr Kingzett said.
"Much like Tasmania, we're largely a remote island. Our salmon farms are in rural areas, we don't have the power grid or the land to support on-land aquaculture."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The Age
9 hours ago
- The Age
‘Magical combos': New bar trend brings surprising flavours to Sydney's drinks scene
Are Indian wine bars Sydney's unexpected hospitality trend for winter 2025? With new venues opening on the northern beaches and eastern suburbs, you wouldn't bet against it. Bazaar & Bar opened this week among the distilleries and craft breweries of Brookvale – the north side's answer to Marrickville – while down by the harbour at Rose Bay, Rasa House has started pouring lychee margaritas and aromatic white wines that can meet a curry head-on. Previous SlideNext Slide But why Indian, and why now? The owner of Bazaar & Bar, Kabir Arora, concedes his wine bar start-up hasn't grown out of a culture built on matching wine with food. 'Hard liquor,' Arora said, when asked about the drink of choice in India. 'But wine is slowly making its way in.' Arora is instead taking his lead from the growing number of winemakers in Australia with Indian heritage. He points to Rojer Rathod at Majama Wines in the Hunter Valley: 'His nero d'avola pairs well with our goat.' And he stocks the Sanskrit Pinot Gris made by Domaine Simha, a Tasmanian winery owned and operated by winemaker Navneet Singh.

Sydney Morning Herald
9 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Tarnished Tassal brand targets WA barramundi
Embattled global fish farmer Tassal's proposal for a mega barramundi sea cage operation north of Broome comes promising jobs and fulfilment of market demand. It would also bring up to 50 tonnes of dead fish in landfill a week, the 'smothering' of coral and potential spread of disease and pollution through a marine park. Canadian-owned Tassal Group, Australia's largest seafood producer, recently bailed out the previously loss-making enterprise, acquiring from administration a relatively small, 32-cage operation in the Kimberley's Cone Bay, a zone previously sanctioned for aquaculture as less sensitive than the rest of the region. Now the company proposes to expand across 50 kilometres of more sensitive areas in the Malaya Marine Park, part of the National Heritage-listed Buccaneer Archipelago, with 84 cages across seven sites, ultimately holding up to 17,500 tonnes of fish. Broome-based conservation group Environs Kimberley's submission to the WA environment watchdog regarding the proposal has now emerged, highlighting details of the proposal from Tassal, just as the company faces escalating controversy over the $1.8 billion salmon sea cage industry in Tasmania, where it operates alongside Huon and Petuna. Salmon farming in Tasmania has been blamed for antibiotics leaking into the food chain, algal blooms, endangered species impacts, mass fish escapes and finally an unprecedented kill of one million fish in April, resulting in erosion of consumer trust and revocation of RSPCA animal welfare certification. Escalating 'salmon wars' played a key role in the 2025 federal election and the GoodFish guide has told shoppers to reject Tasmanian farmed salmon. The WA sea cages proposed would be within the proposed general use zone of the marine park, which allows for aquaculture, but some would be close to sanctuary and cultural use zones. Tassal, promising 140 jobs from the operation, aims to achieve no more than 15 per cent fish mortality, equalling up to 2625 tonnes of dead fish per annum, or 50 tonnes a week. Tassal says it is exploring a number of 'mortality programs' for WA. One involves mincing the fish and stabilising it with formic acid for livestock feed, a common global practice, with processing done in Derby. The other option is landfill in Derby. Also, in the event of a 'mass mortality' all stock would be transferred to a licensed Derby landfill. The risks Tassal's documents identify the major risks as: Fish waste and uneaten feed settling on the sea-floor causing algal blooms and water deoxygenation around the sites. 'Smothering and/or shading' of the sea floor and the coral reefs fringing the archipelago's islands, models predicting losses of 1-16 per cent of coral reefs around some islands. Potential algal growth around the reefs, affecting coral and reducing marine life, possibly affecting the Malaya people's hunting practices Net damage from predators or weather events causing fish escapes, with possible 'significant impact on native barramundi' from swiftly spreading, generally fatal pests and diseases, or changes in their genetics. The greatest risks were 'generally from bacteria' (the cause of the Tasmanian fish kill) usually associated with hot temperatures or the rapid salinity changes common to the wet season. Vessel strike, noise and vibrations in a globally significant hotspot and refuge for sawfish, rays and sharks, critically endangered sea snakes and sea turtles The pens causing an artificial reef effect that could attract other fauna, and therefore predators, leading to the predators' entanglement. Tassal was unable to comprehensively survey the Buccaneer Archipelago area and so while it was unsure about whether the area's marine turtles nested near its sites, there was a possibility light pollution would disorient turtle hatchlings en route to the ocean. Tassal wrote of its rigorous testing and vaccination program in which imported hatchlings had to be disease free to a '95 per cent degree of confidence', and said it avoided 'where possible' managing outbreaks with chemicals, except in 'extreme cases'. It acknowledged a dugong hotspot was near the proposal area with little known about important feeding, breeding or movement areas. It noted the three of the proposed sea cage sites fell within a biologically important area for nursing, calving and resting for the largest population of humpback whales in the world. The whole area was also important habitat for Australian snubfin, Australian humpback and spotted bottlenose dolphins. Tassal also said in a statement to this masthead that the project was an exciting opportunity for the Kimberley and with it came a commitment to grow local jobs and invest in local suppliers and communities, while sustainably managing the environment. The elephant in the room Environs Kimberley is concerned Tassal's proposal fails to list climate change as a risk in a region recently hit by coral-bleaching marine heatwaves. They say warming oceans, severe weather and reduced ecosystem resilience will make it hard to avoid significant 'unplanned' impacts including fish kills, infrastructure damage, escapes and diseases. Executive director Martin Pritchard said Tassal's document glossed over the 220,000 barramundi killed at the existing Cone Bay operation in 2019, only noting the cause: an algal bloom caused by a combination of warm seas, warm air and pollution flushed by rain from rivers to the sea. In naming this cause it cited a report into the incident commissioned by and for the previous operator, which was not publicly released. Environs Kimberley voiced a 'strong concern' that the Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, as primary regulator, was 'an active promoter of sea cage fish farming' and did not investigate the 2019 fish kill, perceiving a conflict of interest, especially as WA Premier Roger Cook last year called the Tassal plan 'great news' and awarded the company a $5 million incentive. The department's Fisheries and Aquaculture executive director Nathan Harrison said after the 2019 Cone Bay fish kill, its testing confirmed the cause of death to be the algal bloom, so further investigation was not required. 'DPIRD continues to closely monitor and respond to environmental changes that affect fisheries and aquaculture, including marine heatwaves,' he said. WA Environmental Protection Authority chair Darren Walsh visited the region last month as part of the public environmental review. He said the proponent would be required to address all relevant issues raised during the public review. The EPA expected to publish those responses by the end of the year. Pritchard said the landfilling aspect was also concerning. 'Which facilities in Derby have the capacity and appropriate licencing to safely dispose of this quantity of dead and rotting fish, let alone huge quantities arising from a mass death event?' he said. He said the impacts and risks of intensive industry should not be spread across wide areas of a globally significant and unique marine park. He said Tassal downplayed the potential impacts but it was evident some level of pollution was expected and the risks were unacceptable, especially when heightened by climate change, and in the context of Tassal's track record in Tasmania. 'Because of its remoteness, high tides, fast currents, narrow channels and cyclones, if there is a major event like mass fish escape or mass disease and death event, it will be logistically very difficult to address,' he said. He said this proposal was one of several industrial projects under way or proposed in the Buccaneer Archipelago, representing the potential for significant, cumulative, long-term impacts. Environs Kimberley submitted to the watchdog that such industries should be on land, close to population centres, as with barramundi farming in the Northern Territory, so impacts could be contained and rapid support provided during incidents. A Tassal spokesperson said the company removed around 400 hectares from the proposal previously submitted by the past operators, recognising concerns of traditional owners and recreational fishers. 'If approved, we will grow the operations cautiously and sustainably, in line with market demands,' they said. 'We are proud and humbled to have secured the consent for the project via a voluntary Indigenous Land Use Agreement … we welcome the passion for the local environment from groups like Environs Kimberley, something we share, and hope they'll take up our offer to engage with us directly on this project.' They supplied a document outlining why barramundi was considered a climate-resilient aquaculture species. The Shire of Derby/West Kimberley acknowledged the public interest in the proposal and said it had confidence in the EPA process and was engaging with the regulator to better understand the project. Loading 'The shire would work with Tassal to assess and potentially accommodate waste disposal; however, if the volumes were beyond the capacity of local infrastructure, alternative arrangements would need to be found,' it stated. In December, before the Tasmanian fish kill, in giving consent to enter into the Indigenous Land Use Agreement, Mayala traditional owners said they felt Tassal would be able to manage any environmental issues. Mayala Inninalang Aboriginal Corporation was contacted for updated comment. The federal environment department is running its own public environment review parallel to the state process, with a public comment period yet to open.

Sydney Morning Herald
9 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
‘Magical combos': New bar trend brings surprising flavours to Sydney's drinks scene
Are Indian wine bars Sydney's unexpected hospitality trend for winter 2025? With new venues opening on the northern beaches and eastern suburbs, you wouldn't bet against it. Bazaar & Bar opened this week among the distilleries and craft breweries of Brookvale – the north side's answer to Marrickville – while down by the harbour at Rose Bay, Rasa House has started pouring lychee margaritas and aromatic white wines that can meet a curry head-on. Previous SlideNext Slide But why Indian, and why now? The owner of Bazaar & Bar, Kabir Arora, concedes his wine bar start-up hasn't grown out of a culture built on matching wine with food. 'Hard liquor,' Arora said, when asked about the drink of choice in India. 'But wine is slowly making its way in.' Arora is instead taking his lead from the growing number of winemakers in Australia with Indian heritage. He points to Rojer Rathod at Majama Wines in the Hunter Valley: 'His nero d'avola pairs well with our goat.' And he stocks the Sanskrit Pinot Gris made by Domaine Simha, a Tasmanian winery owned and operated by winemaker Navneet Singh.