The Battle of Bunker Hill rages again -- in Gloucester
Organizers chose
The spectators 'will get a very good look at what
Advertisement
Narrators using a sound system will describe the events in context for the audience as they unfold. A slightly compressed version of the reenactment will be staged Sunday from 8 a.m. to 2 p.m.
'We'll follow the script of what already happened historically,' said Dietzel, 37, of Bridgewater. 'We have people coming from all over the country, a few coming from Canada, and a few British coming from the UK' to portray the combatants.
Advertisement
Although Bunker Hill technically was a British victory, the Colonial troops inflicted massive casualties on the British, who were forced to mount three assaults on the Americans' hilltop fortifications before the rebels ran out of ammunition and retreated.
The British lost 1,054 killed and wounded in the battle, the first pitched conflict of the American Revolution. The Colonials suffered 450 casualties, but gained the morale-boosting confidence that they could stand and fight a disciplined army with superior numbers.
'Reenactments make history come alive in a way that you don't really get from the textbooks,' said Annie Harris, chief executive officer of the Essex National Heritage Area, one of the event's organizers.
'It was a more significant battle than many of us realize,' Harris said. 'You think about the Battle of Bunker Hill, and you see the obelisk [in Charlestown], and you don't really think much about it.'
The reenactment includes what Dietzel described as a series of battle vignettes interspersed throughout the day, beginning with the approach of several ships posing as troop-bearing British naval vessels toward Half Moon Beach in Gloucester beginning about 8 a.m. Saturday.
From 9 to 10 a.m., the rebels will build their redoubt, or hilltop fortification, with period hand tools. Spectators are encouraged to join the soldiers as they assemble their defenses, and to learn about their 18th-century backgrounds and motivation to take up arms against the British.
From 10 to 11 a.m., British reenactors will land on Half Moon Beach. From about 1 to 2 p.m., they are scheduled to make a flanking attack on Cressy Beach. British commanders ordered this flanking move as their marines made a frontal assault on the redoubt.
Advertisement
The coordinated attacks were unsuccessful, as was a following frontal assault. Only on the third assault, which will be staged about 4 p.m. Saturday, did the British break through and claim victory atop Breed's Hill, the Charlestown summit where the battle actually occurred.
'If we wanted to keep this exactly right, we'd have to burn a city,' which the British did to Charlestown, 'but we can't do that,' Dietzel said with a chuckle.
Dietzel said he feels honored to be able to portray Warren, a key Revolutionary figure whom he has researched extensively.
'I've been reading biographies, letters from the Massachusetts Historical Society, and attending lectures. I've been in the weeds with this man for quite some time,' Dietzel said.
The goal of the reenactment, which has been years in the making, is to convey the relevance of the battle to 21st-century Americans.
'We want to make sure we do justice to this event and help share a story that's important to us all,' Dietzel added. 'I told my third-grade teacher I wanted to be a Minute Man. It's been a passion of mine for as long as I can remember.'
Brian MacQuarrie can be reached at
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
7 hours ago
- New York Post
Nanny state, for real: Feds won't even trust parents with a baby pillow
Imagine a new parent, soothing her baby at home, grateful for a moment of peace while her infant reclines in a cozy, contoured lounger beside her: It's soft and portable, designed specifically for a baby's supervised awake time — a helping hand amid the chaos of early parenthood. Now imagine the federal government declaring this item to be too dangerous to exist. That's exactly what happened with the Podster, a baby lounger made by Leachco, a small family-owned business in Oklahoma. Advertisement Designed to cradle infants while they're awake and with an adult, the Podster is not a sleeper, not a car seat, not a crib. It's a contoured cushion, a glorified baby pillow, meant to keep infants comfortably propped up while under a parent's watchful eye. Since its release in 2009 Leachco has sold over 180,000 Podsters. When used as intended, it has a perfect safety record. Advertisement But after three infant deaths linked to serious misuse of the lounger were reported, the federal Consumer Product Safety Commission labeled the Podster a 'substantial product hazard' and demanded a full recall. In one case, the infant was left unsupervised in a crib with the Podster for over an hour. In another, it was used in an adult bed, surrounded by pillows and bedding. In every case, the lounger was not being used according to its clear safety instructions. Advertisement There was no suggestion the Podster failed or malfunctioned. But the CPSC argued it was 'reasonably foreseeable' that some parents might ignore the warnings — making the product itself defective. That reasoning reveals a deeper problem. The CPSC was created in 1972 to protect Americans from dangerous products — items with clear, physical risks, like a too-small toy that poses a choking hazard or a battery-operated mobile that could overheat and catch fire. Advertisement It sets safety standards and can recall or even ban items it deems inherently hazardous. But the agency has drifted into overreach, defining 'risk' in increasingly abstract and paternalistic ways. Picture applying the Podster standard more broadly. Should we ban grapes because they're a choking hazard? Should we make backyard pools illegal because children can drown, or outlaw cars because some people don't wear seat belts? Obviously not — but that's the logic at play when the CPSC targets products like the Podster or the Fisher-Price Rock 'n Play, a once-popular baby sleeper. The CPSC linked over 30 infant deaths to that product — all in situations where babies weren't restrained or were placed in unsafe sleep environments, despite manufacturer warnings. These are devastating tragedies, but they're not necessarily evidence of a defective product. They're examples of what happens when products are misused. Advertisement Instead of educating parents about safe practices, the CPSC has leaned on the idea that any possible misuse is enough to justify a recall. That sets an impossible standard, and one that disproportionately hurts small businesses. Complying with federal safety regulations comes at a high cost. Big companies might absorb it. But small firms like Leachco, run by a husband-and-wife team, often can't. Advertisement Even a 10% increase in regulation can shrink the number of firms and reduce small-business employment, analysts have found. And when smaller players are pushed out, competition suffers — leaving us fewer options, higher prices and less innovation. Regulatory overreach has another cost, too: the products that are never created. 'Trying to preemptively plan for every hypothetical worst-case scenario means that many best-case scenarios will never come about,' says policy analyst Adam Thierer. Advertisement In the quest to prevent all harm, we paralyze progress. And for what? The CPSC's own data shows that most injuries linked to nursery products don't stem from defects. They happen when caregivers misuse them. High chairs, for example, consistently top the injury charts. But kids get hurt because they're climbing, wiggling or not strapped in properly, not because the chairs themselves are dangerous. Worse, eliminating products like the Podster doesn't eliminate risk — it just shifts it. Advertisement Parents still need somewhere to put the baby. Banning safe loungers leads caregivers to improvise with regular pillows or folded blankets, introducing new hazards in the name of safety. A zero-risk world doesn't exist. The Podster is the poster child for bureaucratic overreach: A well-intentioned agency attacking a safe, helpful product because someone misused it. Congress should step in. Lawmakers can direct the CPSC to define what counts as a 'product defect,' and can require the agency to distinguish between genuine hazards and issues of misuse. Clear, objective standards will protect consumers without punishing responsible parents or businesses. Parents deserve safe products, but they also deserve the freedom to make their own choices — without a nanny-state government treating them like they can't be trusted with a baby pillow. Bethany Mandel writes and podcasts at The Mom Wars and is a homeschooling mother of six in greater Washington, DC.
Time Business News
10 hours ago
- Time Business News
How an English Language Course in Lahore Improves Your Listening Skills
Many English students and professionals in Lahore face problems with listening. They try to speak but fail to understand spoken English. This issue creates stress and confusion. Lack of good listening creates barriers in learning. An english language course in lahore by House of Learning helps them to handle this issue in simple ways. Many English learners do not listen to English daily. This gap reduces their understanding. They speak their regional language in daily life. Therefore, students and professionals hardly listen to English conversations. Their poor exposure to real listening creates big hurdles for them. Native speakers speak very fast. So, most learners fail to catch the words. This speed creates confusion and stress. Moreover, language learners skip many words while listening. This problem affects understanding deeply. Different accents confuse language learners easily. Some speak in British style while some use American words. Learners fail to recognise words in different accents. Therefore, listening becomes harder. This issue blocks smooth communication. Limited vocabulary creates listening issues. Students hear words but fail to understand their meaning. Moreover, unknown words break the flow of listening. Therefore, their understanding becomes weak. Poor vocabulary harms both listening and speaking. Most language learners never watch English movies or news. This lack of exposure weakens their listening skills. Listening improves when the ears catch regular sounds of English. Therefore, missing this habit affects their learning. It also lowers confidence during conversations. Many English learners translate English into their regional language while listening. This habit slows down their understanding. Translating breaks the flow of listening. Therefore, the brain focuses more on meaning than on sound. This process creates confusion and mistakes. Some learners do not focus while listening. Therefore, they easily get distracted. Noise or other sounds break their attention. Eventually, their listening fails to stay active. Poor focus creates gaps in learning. Many language learners do not understand correct pronunciation. Words sound different from their spelling. Therefore, students miss the words while listening. Mispronounced words create misunderstandings. This problem affects both listening and speaking. Some English students focus more on grammar rules while listening. This pressure blocks natural understanding. Therefore, the brain divides attention between grammar and listening. As a result, their understanding becomes slower and harder. Language learners often speak in one-to-one situations only. Group conversations never happen in their routine. Therefore, they fail to find different voices at the same time. This issue damages their listening skills in real conversations. English sounds are quite different from Urdu sounds. Therefore, language learners struggle to catch new sounds easily. Therefore, their brain takes time to adjust. This issue creates slow listening progress. It often frustrates them. Written English looks easy but spoken English sounds different. Many students and professionals understand books but fail to catch spoken words. Therefore, listening becomes difficult. This difference creates a gap in their learning. Many language students never talk to fluent English speakers. Therefore, their ears do not pick natural sounds. This gap harms their listening growth. Regular interaction boosts listening power easily, but lack of it delays progress. An English language course in Lahore offered by House of Learning improves listening step by step. Trainers offer daily listening exercises. Language students listen to slow and fast English. Therefore, the brain adjusts at different speeds. This practice makes listening easier. This spoken English course includes role plays and group talks. Students listen to others in real situations. Therefore, listening becomes active. Group discussions train ears to handle many voices. This practice improves real-life communication. This professional English language course in Lahore uses videos, podcasts, and audio lessons. So, students listen to different accents and voices. That's how their listening grows stronger. As audio content trains ears better than books. Trainers help students spot their listening mistakes. Students repeat words until they sound clear. Therefore, wrong patterns slowly disappear. That's how trainers guide them step by step. This support strengthens their listening quickly. Limited listening skills create big hurdles for English learners in Lahore. Many reasons block this skill, like: Poor practice, Stress, Fast speech, and Weak vocabulary. An English language course in Lahore by House of Learning solves these problems effectively. Regular practice, real conversations, role plays, and trainer support make listening better. Students start understanding easily and speak with more confidence. Their listening grows step by step with simple and regular effort! Click here and read more blogs TIME BUSINESS NEWS
Forbes
13 hours ago
- Forbes
This Fourth Of July, Let's Not Forget The Significance Of 1775
American colonists and British soldiers exchange fire at the Battle of Lexington, the first skirmish ... More int the US War of Independence. Next year will mark the 250th anniversary of the signing of the Declaration of Independence. It is a significant milestone for the nation. Still, the build-up to next year's celebration may already be overshadowing a year just as important in the history of the United States as 1776, namely 1775. That isn't to say that we're ignoring some noteworthy events, as last month's massive, and arguably underwhelming, military parade in Washington, D.C., was held to mark the 250th birthday of the United States Army, which was founded as the Continental Army in June 1775. It was just one of several such commemorations that have garnered regional attention, such as this past April's celebration marking the 250th anniversaries of the Battles of Lexington and Concord, followed by the capture of Fort Ticonderoga and the Battle of Bunker Hill. This fall will also mark the milestone anniversary of the Noble Train of Artillery, in which Colonel Henry Knox—namesake for Fort Knox—brought the captured cannons from Ticonderoga to Boston using boats, ox-drawn sledges, and simple pure determination. "We place too much attention on 1776 in the way we commemorate the American Revolution. At the end of the day, Americans won their independence because they won the war and triumphed at the peace negotiations that followed – not because of what they declared in 1776," acknowledges Dr. Benjamin Carp, professor of history at the City University of New York. For those in New England, these and other deeds aren't forgotten, but perhaps more attention could be paid on the national level, said Dr. Robert J. Allison, professor of history at Suffolk University in Boston, Massachusetts. "There is sometimes the joke that the revolution happened here in New England and then the Continental Congress went to Philadelphia to fill out the paperwork," Allison explained. Yet, the year 1775 has been getting significantly less attention than the recent performance by English rockers The 1975 at the Glastonbury festival! "Americans are already focused on 2026, America's semiquincentennial," added Dr. Joanne B. Freeman, professor of history and American studies at Yale University. "But the events of 1775 have much to tell us about 250 years ago this year. That year, British colonists were stunned to learn that their own army—British regulars—had fired on British subjects at Lexington and Concord, killing their own people." More Than A Single Day The significance of July 4, 1776, also can't be overstated, even as the Continental Congress voted in favor of declaring independence from Great Britain two days earlier. Yet, there is less emphasis on how it got there. "One thing about 1775 is that very few Americans were thinking in the concept of independence," said Matthew Skic, director of collections and exhibitions at the Museum of the American Revolution. "That changed rapidly between the summer of 1775 and 1776. One of the major events that happened is when King George III of the United Kingdom declared it an act of open rebellion." That called for the full might of the British Empire to suppress it, an action that resulted in many Americans seeing the king turn his back on the people. "Until that point, the fight was about restoring the rights and liberties as citizens in the British Empire," Skic continued. "America was trying to prove that its long list of grievances justified its bid for independence, and they wanted to undermine the British war effort and secure foreign aid," said Carp. "Beyond that, much of the American public was already convinced, and they needed to remain inspired enough to support the army in the field." What Happened In New England Didn't Stay In New England It is also important while New England, notably Boston, is often regarded as the birthplace of the Revolution, the events there helped unite the independence movement throughout the colonies. "We can see that in 1775, many Americans did not want to fight and hoped to live peacefully with their neighbors. But the blood spilled at Lexington and Concord put into motion events that would lead to armed conflict," said Dr. Franklin D. Rausch, professor of history at Lander University in South Carolina. "The establishment of the Provincial Congress, a challenge to the royal governor, here in South Carolina, would increasingly force people to choose sides," Rausch explained. And as armed camps grew, so did the need for weapons and ammunition. That was as true in the southern colonies as it was up north. "It was a struggle over such supplies that led to the bloodless seizure of Fort Charlotte by Whig forces in July 1775," suggested Raucsh. "And a similarly bloodless seizure of powder and destruction of lead destined for the Cherokee by King's Friends, led eventually to the first bloodletting in the south — the 1775 November Siege of Savages' Old Fields." Only a handful of people were killed, and the battle ended in a draw; yet, the Snow Campaign and the suppression of Loyalists soon followed. It would be the first great divide, even as the country had yet to come into existence. Like the bloody American Civil War eight decades later, it pitted neighbor against neighbor. "They would rise again in mass in 1780 with the British seizure of Charleston," said Raucsh. "Hardened and angered by years of suffering, many Loyalists would seek vengeance, making for a very bloody civil war in the backcountry. 1775 helped set the stage for the violence that was yet to come, while also reminding us that many Americans hoped to work peacefully and look to their families before the crisis drove them to arms." In addition, 1775 was also the year that American soldiers put literal books on the ground on foreign land, with the invasion of Canada. That and other campaigns could be described as best left forgotten, which could also explain why the year doesn't always get acknowledged as much as it should. Carp noted that the colonies almost "lost the war during the disastrous campaigns of New York and New Jersey later that year, not to mention the failure of the Canadian expedition earlier in the year." The Seeds Of International Recognition Although France wouldn't recognize the United States as an independent nation until February 6, 1778, the seeds of that recognition were already planted in 1775. "France was already being seen as a potential ally," said Skic. "There was already support in 1775 to send envoys to Spain and France, and that desire for international support was what helped prompt the eventual declaration of independence." Building To Next Year The goal for the rest of 2025 should be to commemorate the lead-up to the 250th anniversary, while not overlooking its significance every year. The American Revolution isn't something that should only be noted on major milestones or when Mel Gibson stars in a big-budget film about it. "We launched Revolution 250 to get excited about this," said Dr. Allison, noting the consortium of organizations that are working together to commemorate the anniversaries. "This is about getting young people interested, and those born after 2000 or 2010 will hopefully be around to see the tercentennial," he added. "But we should always be commemorating these events every year, not just these milestone years. It is important to get the story right and to get people excited about the story." That may be truer today than it was in 1876, a year that would go on to see a disputed election, or 1976, when the country was still divided over the recently concluded Vietnam War. "1776 deserves its prize place in our national narrative," said Freeman. "But when considering the Revolution and nationhood, don't forget the threats and violence and thinking and planning that led to that dire step. Crises of the past have much to say to us today."
