Nanny state, for real: Feds won't even trust parents with a baby pillow
Now imagine the federal government declaring this item to be too dangerous to exist.
That's exactly what happened with the Podster, a baby lounger made by Leachco, a small family-owned business in Oklahoma.
Advertisement
Designed to cradle infants while they're awake and with an adult, the Podster is not a sleeper, not a car seat, not a crib.
It's a contoured cushion, a glorified baby pillow, meant to keep infants comfortably propped up while under a parent's watchful eye.
Since its release in 2009 Leachco has sold over 180,000 Podsters.
When used as intended, it has a perfect safety record.
Advertisement
But after three infant deaths linked to serious misuse of the lounger were reported, the federal Consumer Product Safety Commission labeled the Podster a 'substantial product hazard' and demanded a full recall.
In one case, the infant was left unsupervised in a crib with the Podster for over an hour. In another, it was used in an adult bed, surrounded by pillows and bedding.
In every case, the lounger was not being used according to its clear safety instructions.
Advertisement
There was no suggestion the Podster failed or malfunctioned.
But the CPSC argued it was 'reasonably foreseeable' that some parents might ignore the warnings — making the product itself defective.
That reasoning reveals a deeper problem.
The CPSC was created in 1972 to protect Americans from dangerous products — items with clear, physical risks, like a too-small toy that poses a choking hazard or a battery-operated mobile that could overheat and catch fire.
Advertisement
It sets safety standards and can recall or even ban items it deems inherently hazardous.
But the agency has drifted into overreach, defining 'risk' in increasingly abstract and paternalistic ways.
Picture applying the Podster standard more broadly.
Should we ban grapes because they're a choking hazard?
Should we make backyard pools illegal because children can drown, or outlaw cars because some people don't wear seat belts?
Obviously not — but that's the logic at play when the CPSC targets products like the Podster or the Fisher-Price Rock 'n Play, a once-popular baby sleeper.
The CPSC linked over 30 infant deaths to that product — all in situations where babies weren't restrained or were placed in unsafe sleep environments, despite manufacturer warnings.
These are devastating tragedies, but they're not necessarily evidence of a defective product. They're examples of what happens when products are misused.
Advertisement
Instead of educating parents about safe practices, the CPSC has leaned on the idea that any possible misuse is enough to justify a recall.
That sets an impossible standard, and one that disproportionately hurts small businesses.
Complying with federal safety regulations comes at a high cost. Big companies might absorb it.
But small firms like Leachco, run by a husband-and-wife team, often can't.
Advertisement
Even a 10% increase in regulation can shrink the number of firms and reduce small-business employment, analysts have found.
And when smaller players are pushed out, competition suffers — leaving us fewer options, higher prices and less innovation.
Regulatory overreach has another cost, too: the products that are never created.
'Trying to preemptively plan for every hypothetical worst-case scenario means that many best-case scenarios will never come about,' says policy analyst Adam Thierer.
Advertisement
In the quest to prevent all harm, we paralyze progress.
And for what? The CPSC's own data shows that most injuries linked to nursery products don't stem from defects. They happen when caregivers misuse them.
High chairs, for example, consistently top the injury charts. But kids get hurt because they're climbing, wiggling or not strapped in properly, not because the chairs themselves are dangerous.
Worse, eliminating products like the Podster doesn't eliminate risk — it just shifts it.
Advertisement
Parents still need somewhere to put the baby.
Banning safe loungers leads caregivers to improvise with regular pillows or folded blankets, introducing new hazards in the name of safety.
A zero-risk world doesn't exist.
The Podster is the poster child for bureaucratic overreach: A well-intentioned agency attacking a safe, helpful product because someone misused it.
Congress should step in. Lawmakers can direct the CPSC to define what counts as a 'product defect,' and can require the agency to distinguish between genuine hazards and issues of misuse.
Clear, objective standards will protect consumers without punishing responsible parents or businesses.
Parents deserve safe products, but they also deserve the freedom to make their own choices — without a nanny-state government treating them like they can't be trusted with a baby pillow.
Bethany Mandel writes and podcasts at The Mom Wars and is a homeschooling mother of six in greater Washington, DC.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
‘What?' ‘I said: This restaurant is too loud!' ‘What?'
Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up When my sister lived in Paris, she would say, as she cautioned me to lower my voice, 'You can always tell the Americans: They're loud.' Advertisement We need to suffer a quiet moment in public every once in a while. We need to turn the volume down. We need to share space with others politely. Respect has resonance too. Christine Cluney West Newbury Advertisement The number one solution to noisy restaurants is to allow servers to turn down the music when requested. About three-quarters of the time I've found they will do so. The relief is immediate. People don't have to talk as loud and can once again hear one another. The other quarter of the time the server has said they're not allowed to adjust the volume. In that case, take action. Ask to speak to the manager, for a start. Then, if there's no relief, say you are leaving. I have walked out of restaurants where I can't hear myself think and no accommodation was made to my complaint. More people need to speak up to, ahem, make their voices heard. Donna Sullivan Brookfield Chris Berdik's generated nearly 170 comments from readers. Following is an edited sampling: Do the restaurant a favor and go on a quiet night. (Middleground) How many diners say to themselves before arriving, 'Boy, I hope this place is playing '90s rock music'? For me, 100+ customers in a restaurant are going to be loud on their own. (Sooner57) The article that needed to be written. (Graf_299) I've come to the conclusion that Americans are just deeply uncomfortable with quiet. (Are we afraid of our thoughts? Do we have no thoughts?) Fenway Park and the Garden are the same. I've given up on the Red Sox due to the incessant noise and clamor, even between innings. Used to be you could chat with your friend between innings, but not anymore. It's just another kind of social isolation. (visionsofneal) I recently asked my doc for a hearing test because I can never hear what people say in restaurants. I passed! (Lusmom) Advertisement About five years ago, I stepped through the door of one of my favorite restaurants and was assaulted by the new, much louder noise level that had become normal for the place since its remodel. I left. When I got home, I set up a spreadsheet and entered $75 as a deposit of what I estimated dinner with tip would have cost me that night. As of today, there's $2,775 in my Fun Fund account. In a year or so, I'm off to Hawaii. (White Middle Age Gay Guy)
San Francisco Chronicle
a day ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Photos of spectacular fireworks light up American skies on the Fourth of July
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Fourth of July is about all things American: parades, cookouts, cold beer and of course, fireworks. Those pyrotechnics remain at the center of Independence Day, a holiday 247 years in the making. Massive fireworks lit up the skyline of multiple American cities, marking festivities across the country. Despite widespread education efforts, thousands of Americans are badly injured by fireworks each year. Still, consumer sales of fireworks have rapidly grown over the past two decades. — This is a photo gallery curated by AP photo editors.
New York Post
2 days ago
- New York Post
Nanny state, for real: Feds won't even trust parents with a baby pillow
Imagine a new parent, soothing her baby at home, grateful for a moment of peace while her infant reclines in a cozy, contoured lounger beside her: It's soft and portable, designed specifically for a baby's supervised awake time — a helping hand amid the chaos of early parenthood. Now imagine the federal government declaring this item to be too dangerous to exist. That's exactly what happened with the Podster, a baby lounger made by Leachco, a small family-owned business in Oklahoma. Advertisement Designed to cradle infants while they're awake and with an adult, the Podster is not a sleeper, not a car seat, not a crib. It's a contoured cushion, a glorified baby pillow, meant to keep infants comfortably propped up while under a parent's watchful eye. Since its release in 2009 Leachco has sold over 180,000 Podsters. When used as intended, it has a perfect safety record. Advertisement But after three infant deaths linked to serious misuse of the lounger were reported, the federal Consumer Product Safety Commission labeled the Podster a 'substantial product hazard' and demanded a full recall. In one case, the infant was left unsupervised in a crib with the Podster for over an hour. In another, it was used in an adult bed, surrounded by pillows and bedding. In every case, the lounger was not being used according to its clear safety instructions. Advertisement There was no suggestion the Podster failed or malfunctioned. But the CPSC argued it was 'reasonably foreseeable' that some parents might ignore the warnings — making the product itself defective. That reasoning reveals a deeper problem. The CPSC was created in 1972 to protect Americans from dangerous products — items with clear, physical risks, like a too-small toy that poses a choking hazard or a battery-operated mobile that could overheat and catch fire. Advertisement It sets safety standards and can recall or even ban items it deems inherently hazardous. But the agency has drifted into overreach, defining 'risk' in increasingly abstract and paternalistic ways. Picture applying the Podster standard more broadly. Should we ban grapes because they're a choking hazard? Should we make backyard pools illegal because children can drown, or outlaw cars because some people don't wear seat belts? Obviously not — but that's the logic at play when the CPSC targets products like the Podster or the Fisher-Price Rock 'n Play, a once-popular baby sleeper. The CPSC linked over 30 infant deaths to that product — all in situations where babies weren't restrained or were placed in unsafe sleep environments, despite manufacturer warnings. These are devastating tragedies, but they're not necessarily evidence of a defective product. They're examples of what happens when products are misused. Advertisement Instead of educating parents about safe practices, the CPSC has leaned on the idea that any possible misuse is enough to justify a recall. That sets an impossible standard, and one that disproportionately hurts small businesses. Complying with federal safety regulations comes at a high cost. Big companies might absorb it. But small firms like Leachco, run by a husband-and-wife team, often can't. Advertisement Even a 10% increase in regulation can shrink the number of firms and reduce small-business employment, analysts have found. And when smaller players are pushed out, competition suffers — leaving us fewer options, higher prices and less innovation. Regulatory overreach has another cost, too: the products that are never created. 'Trying to preemptively plan for every hypothetical worst-case scenario means that many best-case scenarios will never come about,' says policy analyst Adam Thierer. Advertisement In the quest to prevent all harm, we paralyze progress. And for what? The CPSC's own data shows that most injuries linked to nursery products don't stem from defects. They happen when caregivers misuse them. High chairs, for example, consistently top the injury charts. But kids get hurt because they're climbing, wiggling or not strapped in properly, not because the chairs themselves are dangerous. Worse, eliminating products like the Podster doesn't eliminate risk — it just shifts it. Advertisement Parents still need somewhere to put the baby. Banning safe loungers leads caregivers to improvise with regular pillows or folded blankets, introducing new hazards in the name of safety. A zero-risk world doesn't exist. The Podster is the poster child for bureaucratic overreach: A well-intentioned agency attacking a safe, helpful product because someone misused it. Congress should step in. Lawmakers can direct the CPSC to define what counts as a 'product defect,' and can require the agency to distinguish between genuine hazards and issues of misuse. Clear, objective standards will protect consumers without punishing responsible parents or businesses. Parents deserve safe products, but they also deserve the freedom to make their own choices — without a nanny-state government treating them like they can't be trusted with a baby pillow. Bethany Mandel writes and podcasts at The Mom Wars and is a homeschooling mother of six in greater Washington, DC.
