&w=3840&q=100)
Jaishankar hopeful on trade deal with US, says outcome not guaranteed
In a conversation with Newsweek Chief Executive Officer Dev Pragad at the publication's headquarters at One World Trade Centre near the 9/11 Memorial in Manhattan, Jaishankar termed the negotiations on the bilateral trade agreement (BTA) as extremely complex, adding that an Indian delegation has been in Washington, DC for the past few days.
The External Affairs Minister said: 'There will have to be give and take, and just like the people in the US have views about people in India, people in India have views about the US too. We will have to find a meeting ground. I believe this is possible. I think we will have to watch this space for the next few days.'
Prefacing his remarks on the trade deal, Jaishankar reflected on the broader India–US ties. 'Relationships will never be free of issues, even differences. What matters is the ability to deal with issues and keep that trend going in the positive direction.'
Regarding the deal, he said: 'Yes, we are in the middle — hopefully more than the middle — of a very intricate trade negotiation. Obviously, my hope would be that we bring it to a successful conclusion. I cannot guarantee it because there is another party to that discussion.'
Jaishankar clarified that India and the US were not negotiating a free trade agreement (FTA) but a BTA. 'There is a reason why. If it is an FTA, it goes to the US Congress. If it's a BTA, it doesn't go to (US) Congress. The boundaries are a little tighter there,' he said.
He noted that the negotiators on both sides had been discussing the deal over several months. 'I can't vouch for which country has had how many rounds, but I suspect we would be among the countries which has done the most. Even as I speak, our delegation is in Washington and they have been there for the last few days,' he said.
'These are complicated negotiations. You are really looking at thousands of lines and doing very intricate trade-offs, both based on what are actually the market values of those lines and what could be the expected market values of those lines. So these are not simple, back-of-the-envelope calculations,' he added.
On disagreements between India and the US, Jaishankar said: 'Sure, it happens. It won't be for the first time,' and recalled tensions during the tenures of the past five US presidents, starting with Bill Clinton. 'In fact, at every one of these presidencies, I can think of something which at that time was a friction point,' he said, citing Washington's plans to sell F-16 aircraft to Pakistan.
When asked about US President Donald Trump's earlier claim that he used trade to stop a recent conflict between India and Pakistan — and whether that had affected trade negotiations — Jaishankar said: 'No, I don't think so. I think the trade people are doing what the trade people should be doing, which is negotiate with numbers and lines and products and do their trade-offs. I think they are very professional and very, very focused about it.'
Jaishankar is in the US to participate in the Quad Foreign Ministers' Meetings scheduled for Tuesday. From there, he will join Prime Minister Narendra Modi at the BRICS Summit in Rio de Janeiro.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
29 minutes ago
- First Post
'Illegal migrant': Can US strip Mamdani's citizenship as Trump, Republicans ramp up attack?
The Trump administration is considering stripping Zohran Mamdani, the Democratic candidate for New York City mayor, of his US citizenship over accusations that he concealed ties to 'terrorism' during his naturalization process, as the President and Republicans ramp up their attacks. read more The Trump administration has suggested it might strip Zohran Mamdani, the Democratic candidate for New York City mayor, of his US citizenship as part of a crackdown on foreign-born citizens accused of certain crimes, according to a report from The Guardian. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said the president is considering an investigation after Republican Congressman Andy Ogles called for Mamdani's citizenship to be revoked. Ogles claims Mamdani may have hidden his support for 'terrorism' during his naturalization process. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Mamdani, 33, was born in Uganda to Indian parents and became a US citizen in 2018. He has drawn national attention—and controversy—for his outspoken support for Palestinian rights. Trump threatens arrest Asked about Mamdani's call to stop undercover ICE agents from deporting immigrants, President Trump said on Tuesday, 'Well, then, we'll have to arrest him,' according to Axios. In response, Mamdani posted on social media, 'The President of the United States just threatened to have me arrested, stripped of my citizenship, put in a detention camp and deported. Not because I have broken any law but because I refuse to let ICE terrorize our city.' He added that Trump's threats are an attack on democracy and an attempt to silence those who speak out. My statement on Donald Trump's threat to deport me and his praise for Eric Adams, who the President "helped out" of legal accountability. — Zohran Kwame Mamdani (@ZohranKMamdani) July 1, 2025 Islamophobic attacks and political backdrop Mamdani has also faced Islamophobic attacks since winning last week's New York mayoral primary, defeating figures including former Governor Andrew Cuomo. The controversy comes as the Trump administration has directed government lawyers to prioritize efforts to denaturalize foreign-born citizens who committed certain crimes or lied during their citizenship process. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Ogles urged Attorney General Pam Bondi to investigate Mamdani, accusing him of possibly gaining citizenship through false statements or concealing support for terrorism. As evidence, he cited a rap song by Mamdani praising members of a group convicted of funding Hamas, as well as Mamdani's refusal to condemn the phrase 'globalize the intifada.' Ogles also posted on social media, calling Mamdani 'an antisemitic, socialist, communist who will destroy the great City of New York,' and saying he 'needs to be deported.' When asked about Ogles's claims, Leavitt said, 'I have not seen those claims, but surely if they are true, it's something that should be investigated.' The Justice Department confirmed it received Ogles's letter but declined further comment. Democrats push back Senator Chris Murphy, a Democrat from Connecticut, condemned the push to denaturalize Mamdani, calling it 'racist bullshit.' 'Trump will stop at nothing to protect billionaires and price gouging corporations, even racist bullshit like this,' Murphy wrote. 'Zohran won because he ran a campaign focused on putting power back in the hands of working people. And that's a threat to the Mar-a-Lago crowd.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Mamdani, who describes himself as a democratic socialist, has faced intense scrutiny of his social media posts and activism since his primary victory, where he promised left-leaning policies for New York City if elected. Trump's continued criticism Amid criticism from conservatives, Trump has labeled him 'a pure communist' and threatened to cut federal funds to New York if Mamdani becomes mayor and 'doesn't behave himself.' At a press event in Florida, Trump repeated his 'communist' accusation and hinted Mamdani might have obtained citizenship illegally. 'We don't need a communist in this country, but if we have one, I'm going to be watching over him very carefully,' Trump said. 'A lot of people are saying he's here illegally. We're going to look at everything.' Praise for Eric Adams Trump also praised current New York City Mayor Eric Adams, who is running for reelection as an independent after leaving the Democratic Party. Trump said Adams was 'a good person' and hinted he'd helped him, possibly referring to the Justice Department dropping a corruption case against Adams earlier this year. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD In his post, Mamdani said it was unsurprising that Trump praised Adams while threatening him.
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
31 minutes ago
- Business Standard
LIVE news updates: PM Modi embarks on 5-nation visit, says India committed to Brics
Latest news updates LIVE: Prime Minister Narendra Modi reaffirmed India's dedication to BRICS as a crucial platform for cooperation among emerging economies as he embarked on a week-long tour of five nations, including Brazil, where he will attend the group's summit. "Together, we strive for a more peaceful, equitable, just, democratic and balanced multipolar world order," he said in his departure statement. His itinerary includes visits to Ghana, Trinidad and Tobago, Argentina, Brazil, and Namibia, with Ghana being his first stop on July 2–3 at the invitation of President John Dramani Mahama. Former South Carolina Lieutenant Governor Andre Bauer is launching a Republican primary bid against Senator Lindsey Graham, criticizing the senator as insufficiently conservative for the state. Bauer, a wealthy real estate developer and staunch Trump supporter, positions himself as a genuine "America First" conservative. His run sets up a midterm clash with the four-term senator, whose ties with Trump have fluctuated but who currently has Trump's backing for reelection. A lawyer representing Elon Musk's X told an Indian court that an excessive number of government officials — "every Tom, Dick, and Harry" — had been empowered to issue content takedown orders, prompting a sharp response from the government's counsel. X has frequently clashed with Prime Minister Modi's administration over takedown demands. The statement came during a hearing on the platform's legal challenge to a government website it claims operates as a 'censorship portal.' Indian authorities maintain the site is only intended to facilitate compliance notifications for online platforms. Connect with us on WhatsApp
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
31 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Home payment plans in India: What CLP, PLP, flexi, and subvention mean
Buying a home is one of the biggest financial decisions most people make. But for many first-time buyers, figuring out how to pay for it can be confusing. From upfront down payments to staggered instalments linked to construction milestones, there are several options, each carrying its own set of risks. How payment plans work in real estate A real estate payment plan is an agreement between the buyer and the developer that lays out when and how payments will be made. Instead of paying the full amount at once, buyers can opt for structured schedules, often tied to project stages or timelines. These plans give homebuyers more flexibility. They help spread out the financial load and offer the chance to match payment schedules with project progress. Among the plans commonly used by Indian homebuyers are: • Down payment plan • Construction-linked plan (CLP) • Possession-linked plan (PLP) • Flexi plan • Subvention scheme Each model suits different financial situations and levels of risk tolerance. How CLP, PLP and subvention differ Explaining the most widely used model, Rahul Phondge, chief operating officer at ANAROCK Group, said, 'Construction Linked Plan (CLP) requires payments directly linked to the project's construction milestones. For a ₹2 crore apartment, buyers typically pay 10-15 per cent as a booking amount, followed by staged payments of 15-20 per cent at foundation, plinth, floor completion, and finishing stages. This spreads payments over 3-4 years based on actual construction progress.' In contrast, the Possession Linked Plan offers a different structure. 'A Possession-Linked Plan (PLP), on the other hand, might just be asking for 10-20 per cent, which is ₹20-40 lakh on commencement, with 80-90 per cent at other stages (usually handover). This is generally going to be much safer for end users to pay just then! Also avoid subvention,' said Aman Gupta, director at RPS Group. Why subvention plans can be risky Subvention schemes are often marketed as a low-stress way to buy a flat. The builder takes on the EMI burden during construction, while the buyer starts paying only after possession. But beneath the surface, the arrangement can expose buyers to financial shocks. Rahul Phondge explained, 'Subvention schemes involve third-party financing where builders absorb interest costs during construction, allowing buyers to defer payments until possession.' However, he added, 'The primary risks include substantial financial exposure when projects face delays, with buyers potentially becoming liable for interest payments and principal amounts on incomplete projects.' These schemes rely on a three-way contract between the buyer, builder, and bank. If the builder fails to honour the EMI promise, the responsibility quietly shifts to the buyer, regardless of whether the home is delivered or not. Gupta warned that in speculative markets like Gurgaon, subvention remains popular with investor-driven projects. 'If trader-heavy projects (often promoted), beware of the risks of PLP, if a weak builder has funding issues and delayed possession. If there are provisions for sale cheap or transfer, aggressive subvention emails, and unnaturally low deposits required to enter PLP, you are likely seeing trader-heavy methods. Always check if your builder has a prior record,' he said. Phondge added, 'These schemes attract investors seeking minimal initial commitments, inflating demand artificially and creating price volatility. When speculation-driven demand collapses, genuine homebuyers face delayed possessions, price corrections, and financing challenges.' Legal grey areas and regulatory caution Vikram Sobti, partner and head of dispute resolution practice at Chandhiok and Mahajan, said subvention plans occupy a regulatory grey area. 'They are not explicitly illegal, but they are neither fully regulated nor openly supported by financial authorities. The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) and the National Housing Bank (NHB) have issued cautionary guidelines discouraging banks from disbursing full loan amounts upfront to builders.' According to Sobti, Rera does not directly regulate subvention schemes either, though it does require that such arrangements be clearly disclosed. 'In practice, many subvention schemes are poorly explained to homebuyers. The tripartite agreement often contains fine print that buyers do not fully understand. In several cases, courts have criticised both banks and builders for misusing these schemes and shifting the burden to buyers unfairly.' The Supreme Court has recently restrained banks from taking recovery action in cases where builders failed to deliver homes. It has also directed the CBI to probe alleged builder-bank collusion where loans were disbursed in violation of rules. What can go wrong for buyers? Sobti said if a builder defaults on EMIs during the subvention period, buyers could face: • Damage to their credit score • Loan recovery notices from banks • Financial strain while the property remains incomplete 'In the worst-case scenario, the builder could go insolvent, leaving the buyer saddled with debt but no home. While Rera provides relief for delays and delivery issues, it doesn't cover banking liabilities,' he said. Red flags to watch for in payment plans Phondge pointed out several warning signs that buyers should stay away from. These include: • Booking amounts below 10 per cent • Extended payment holidays • Unusually flexible schedules not tied to construction 'These signs suggest a project is geared more towards traders than end users,' he said. 'Genuine buyer-focused projects have clear timelines, transparent milestone definitions, and simple terms in the agreement. The pricing usually reflects the real market rather than speculative bubbles.' How to handle pre-possession transfers During the construction stage, some builders allow the original buyer to transfer their booking to someone else before possession. This usually happens after the 'Agreement for Sale' has been signed. While not illegal, skipping certain steps can lead to serious problems. 'If the builder doesn't approve the transfer in writing, and a new agreement isn't registered in the name of the new buyer, Rera will still treat the original allottee as the legal owner,' said Sobti. 'Even if the new buyer has paid the full amount, they may not be eligible for possession or compensation in case of delays.' To stay protected, buyers must ensure that: • The builder formally approves the transfer • A new, registered agreement is signed in the buyer's name Without this, legal ownership stays with the original allottee, leaving the transferee vulnerable. 'Book now, pay later'—but at what cost? 'Book a home now, pay later,' they said. But for many homebuyers, 'later' became a painful reality, paying full EMIs without possession while battling stalled or delayed projects. What began as a marketing convenience ended in costly litigation and shattered trust. In the current Rera-regulated environment, buyers are better off choosing CLP or PLP schemes, where payment outflows align with construction progress or actual possession,' said Abhilash Pillai, partner at Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas.