&w=3840&q=100)
'Illegal migrant': Can US strip Mamdani's citizenship as Trump, Republicans ramp up attack?
The Trump administration has suggested it might strip Zohran Mamdani, the Democratic candidate for New York City mayor, of his US citizenship as part of a crackdown on foreign-born citizens accused of certain crimes, according to a report from The Guardian.
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said the president is considering an investigation after Republican Congressman Andy Ogles called for Mamdani's citizenship to be revoked. Ogles claims Mamdani may have hidden his support for 'terrorism' during his naturalization process.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Mamdani, 33, was born in Uganda to Indian parents and became a US citizen in 2018. He has drawn national attention—and controversy—for his outspoken support for Palestinian rights.
Trump threatens arrest
Asked about Mamdani's call to stop undercover ICE agents from deporting immigrants, President Trump said on Tuesday, 'Well, then, we'll have to arrest him,' according to Axios.
In response, Mamdani posted on social media, 'The President of the United States just threatened to have me arrested, stripped of my citizenship, put in a detention camp and deported. Not because I have broken any law but because I refuse to let ICE terrorize our city.'
He added that Trump's threats are an attack on democracy and an attempt to silence those who speak out.
My statement on Donald Trump's threat to deport me and his praise for Eric Adams, who the President "helped out" of legal accountability. https://t.co/m7pNcT2DFS pic.twitter.com/UcYakMx4lI — Zohran Kwame Mamdani (@ZohranKMamdani) July 1, 2025
Islamophobic attacks and political backdrop
Mamdani has also faced Islamophobic attacks since winning last week's New York mayoral primary, defeating figures including former Governor Andrew Cuomo.
The controversy comes as the Trump administration has directed government lawyers to prioritize efforts to denaturalize foreign-born citizens who committed certain crimes or lied during their citizenship process.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Ogles urged Attorney General Pam Bondi to investigate Mamdani, accusing him of possibly gaining citizenship through false statements or concealing support for terrorism. As evidence, he cited a rap song by Mamdani praising members of a group convicted of funding Hamas, as well as Mamdani's refusal to condemn the phrase 'globalize the intifada.'
Ogles also posted on social media, calling Mamdani 'an antisemitic, socialist, communist who will destroy the great City of New York,' and saying he 'needs to be deported.'
When asked about Ogles's claims, Leavitt said, 'I have not seen those claims, but surely if they are true, it's something that should be investigated.'
The Justice Department confirmed it received Ogles's letter but declined further comment.
Democrats push back
Senator Chris Murphy, a Democrat from Connecticut, condemned the push to denaturalize Mamdani, calling it 'racist bullshit.'
'Trump will stop at nothing to protect billionaires and price gouging corporations, even racist bullshit like this,' Murphy wrote. 'Zohran won because he ran a campaign focused on putting power back in the hands of working people. And that's a threat to the Mar-a-Lago crowd.'
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Mamdani, who describes himself as a democratic socialist, has faced intense scrutiny of his social media posts and activism since his primary victory, where he promised left-leaning policies for New York City if elected.
Trump's continued criticism
Amid criticism from conservatives, Trump has labeled him 'a pure communist' and threatened to cut federal funds to New York if Mamdani becomes mayor and 'doesn't behave himself.'
At a press event in Florida, Trump repeated his 'communist' accusation and hinted Mamdani might have obtained citizenship illegally.
'We don't need a communist in this country, but if we have one, I'm going to be watching over him very carefully,' Trump said. 'A lot of people are saying he's here illegally. We're going to look at everything.'
Praise for Eric Adams
Trump also praised current New York City Mayor Eric Adams, who is running for reelection as an independent after leaving the Democratic Party. Trump said Adams was 'a good person' and hinted he'd helped him, possibly referring to the Justice Department dropping a corruption case against Adams earlier this year.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
In his post, Mamdani said it was unsurprising that Trump praised Adams while threatening him.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
13 minutes ago
- Hans India
'Congress not concerned about country's pride': Jyotiraditya Scindia on Rahul's 'surrender' jibe
New Delhi: Union Minister for Communications and Development of the North Eastern Region, Jyotiraditya Scindia, launched a sharp attack on the Congress party on Wednesday in response to Rahul Gandhi's recent 'Narender Surrender' remark. Union Minister Scindia accused the Congress of undermining India's global standing and questioning the credibility of its armed forces. Speaking to IANS, he said, 'What else is left to say about a political party that has already been rejected by the people of the country? The dignity and respect of the nation should be paramount.' He alleged that the Congress has stooped to a level where it seeks to embarrass India on international platforms and cast doubt on the strength and professionalism of the Indian military. The minister's remarks came in the wake of Rahul Gandhi's criticism of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's foreign policy and national security approach. Rahul Gandhi had used the phrase 'Narender Surrender' in reference to the government's handling of border tensions with Pakistan—a phrase that has sparked political controversy in the past. Scindia also defended India's military actions, including the 2016 surgical strikes, the 2019 Balakot airstrikes, and the recent Operation Sindoor, which targeted terror infrastructure across the border. 'When there was a surgical strike or the Balakot operation, they asked for proof. When there is Operation Sindoor, they question how many (fighter) planes crashed,' he said. 'It has become clear that the people of India are not concerned about a party that is not concerned about the pride of India.' Operation Sindoor, a recent cross-border counter-terror operation, has been hailed by the government as a demonstration of India's strategic resolve. However, opposition leaders have raised questions about transparency and outcomes, prompting strong rebuttals from BJP leaders. Scindia also criticised Congress leaders for making statements abroad that, he claimed, tarnish India's image. 'Which patriot goes outside the country and brings it down?' he asked, without naming Gandhi directly. The BJP has intensified its counteroffensive against the Congress ahead of the upcoming state elections, framing national pride and security as central campaign themes.
Scroll.in
15 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
8 detained in Delhi as ‘illegal' migrants after opting for India in 2015 enclave exchange, released
Eight residents of West Bengal's Cooch Behar district, who were detained in Delhi on the suspicion of being 'illegal' Bangladesh migrants, were released on Tuesday. They were members of families who had relocated to India in the 2015 enclave exchange between India and Bangladesh. All eight were detained by the police on Monday from a brick kiln in Haryana during a drive against undocumented migrants, Deputy Commissioner of Police (Northwest Delhi) Bhisham Singh told The Indian Express. They were released on Tuesday, their family members told Scroll. The release came after the eight migrants produced their resident cards issued by the West Bengal government and other relevant documents, Singh added. Those who were detained were identified as Samsul Haque and his brother Rejaul Haque, Muhammad Rayhan Haque, Muhammad Rabiul Haque, and his wife Rashida Begum, the newspaper reported. Rabiul's three children were also detained. Their family members told The Indian Express that all eight are from Dashiar Chhara, a former Indian enclave in Bangladesh. They had moved to an apartment complex in Cooch Behar's Dinhata area made exclusively for enclave dwellers who had come to India after the exchange in 2015. Their release came the police in Cooch Behar district police contacted their counterparts in Delhi. Samirul Islam, chairperson of the West Bengal migrant welfare board, claimed that such detentions were happening daily to migrants from the state. He alleged that police in Bharatiya Janata Party-ruled states and in Delhi do not bother to inform the state government about such cases. 'We, on our own, have made verifications and sent them the requisite documents,' The Indian Express quoted Islam, also a Trinamool Congress MP, as having said. 'In this case, the district administration got in touch with the Delhi Police authorities.' He added that Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee had welcomed the families to India after the enclave and exclave exchange in 2015. 'Now they are being detained as illegal Bangladeshi citizens,' he was quoted as saying. 'And that too in the national capital.' The exchange of enclaves and exclaves took place on August 1, 2015. Under this agreement, 111 Indian enclaves covering 17,160 acres inside Bangladesh were transferred to Bangladesh, while 51 Bangladeshi enclaves occupying 7,110 acres in India became part of India. The residents of these enclaves were given the option of accepting citizenship of either country. At least 921 residents opted to move to the Indian side. The incident came as Indian authorities have been pursuing a policy to force individuals claimed to be undocumented migrants into Bangladesh. In June, four men from West Bengal, who were forced into Bangladesh on allegations of being undocumented migrants, were brought back. India has pushed back more than 2,000 persons into Bangladesh since the country launched ' Operation Sindoor ', a military operation in May against terrorist camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. The legality of the 'push back' policy has been debated in India and internationally. Experts have told Scroll that the policy violated India's obligations under international law and customary international law.
Time of India
16 minutes ago
- Time of India
Wisconsin Supreme Court's liberal majority strikes down 176-year-old abortion ban
The Wisconsin Supreme Court 's liberal majority struck down the state's 176-year-old abortion ban on Wednesday, ruling 4-3 that it was superseded by a newer state law that criminalizes abortions only after a fetus can survive outside the womb. State lawmakers adopted the ban in 1849, making it a felony when anyone other than the mother "intentionally destroys the life of an unborn child." It was in effect until 1973, when the U.S. Supreme Court's landmark Roe v. Wade decision legalizing abortion nationwide nullified it. Legislators never officially repealed the ban, however, and conservatives argued that the U.S. Supreme Court's 2022 decision to overturn Roe reactivated it. Wisconsin Attorney General Josh Kaul , a Democrat, filed a lawsuit that year arguing that the ban was trumped by abortion restrictions legislators enacted during the nearly half-century that Roe was in effect. Kaul specifically cited a 1985 law that essentially permits abortions until viability. Some babies can survive with medical help after 21 weeks of gestation. Sheboygan County District Attorney Joel Urmanski, a Republican, defended the ban in court, arguing that the 1849 ban could coexist with the newer abortion restrictions, just as different penalties for the same crime coexist. Live Events Dane County Circuit Judge Diane Schlipper ruled in 2023 that the 1849 ban outlaws feticide - which she defined as the killing of a fetus without the mother's consent - but not consensual abortions. Abortions have been available in the state since that ruling but the state Supreme Court decision gives providers and patients more certainty that abortions will remain legal in Wisconsin. Urmanski asked the state Supreme Court to overturn Schlipper's ruling without waiting for a decision from a lower appellate court. It was expected as soon as the justices took the case that they would overturn the ban. Liberals hold a 4-3 majority on the court and one of them, Janet Protasiewicz, openly stated on the campaign trail that she supports abortion rights . Democratic-backed Susan Crawford defeated conservative Brad Schimel for an open seat on the court in April, ensuring liberals will maintain their 4-3 edge until at least 2028. Crawford has not been sworn in yet and was not part of Wednesday's ruling. She'll play pivotal role, though, in a separate Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin lawsuit challenging the 1849 ban's constitutionality. The high court decided last year to take that case. It's still pending.
