Twelve of England's regional mayors back plan to create ‘national active travel network'
The scheme, which involves all non-London regional mayors other than one from Reform UK, is intended to fit into wider efforts to devolve transport planning, working with Active Travel England (ATE) to implement schemes they think would help their area.
It has the backing of Chris Whitty, the chief medical officer for England, who said the scheme has the potential to 'significantly improve' public health in the areas involved, covering 20 million people overall.
The 12 mayors, nine of them Labour and two Conservative, plus Luke Campbell, the Reform UK mayor of Hull and East Yorkshire, have signed a joint pledge to 'work together to improve our streets for everyone, for the benefit of the health, wellbeing and connectedness of our communities'.
The initial focus from this autumn will be on trips to and from school, with a pledge to create a combined 3,500 miles of routes safely linking schools to homes, town and city centres, and transport hubs.
It will be based around interventions such as safer road crossings and blocking motor traffic outside schools at drop-off and pick-up times.
The involvement of the two Conservative mayors, Ben Houchen of Tees Valley and Paul Bristow, who represents Cambridgeshire and Peterborough, underlines that the debate has moved on from the culture war-infused period under Rishi Sunak, whose government pushed back against safer walking and cycling in favour of a 'plan for drivers'.
Campbell was the last mayor to sign up. His Reform colleague Andrea Jenkyns, the mayor of Greater Lincolnshire, is the only mayor not involved outside London, which already has hundreds of so-called school streets and similar projects.
Chris Boardman, the former Olympic cyclist who heads ATE, said the focus on routes to schools followed focus group work which found that people are particularly amenable to messages about walking and cycling when it is about children being able to travel safely and independently.
He said countries including Finland had travel cultures in which primary school-age children routinely make their own trips, adding: 'If you start with asking people, do you want that for your kids, you'll have a very, very strong, powerful and politically popular – yes.
'So if there are mayors and leaders who are not standing next to that, then they have to be accountable for their choice.
'I want to see fear of missing out. If we get to a point where x per cent of kids in an area have the freedom to walk or ride to school, I think we'll see parents in neighbouring streets and communities thinking, hang on, why can't we have that?'
Whitty said: 'Increasing physical activity has health benefits across the life course. As part of this, we need to make walking and cycling more accessible, and safer, as well as access to green space easier and more equitable.
'This will help remove barriers to improving physical activity levels and could significantly improve the health of England's increasingly urban population.'
The 12 mayors to have signed the pledge are:
Tracy Brabin (Labour) of West Yorkshire.
Paul Bristow (Tory) of Cambridgeshire and Peterborough.
Andy Burnham (Labour) of Greater Manchester.
Luke Campbell (Reform UK) of Hull and East Yorkshire.
Oliver Coppard (Labour) of South Yorkshire.
Helen Godwin (Labour), the West of England mayor.
Ben Houchen (Tory) of Tees Valley.
Kim McGuinness (Labour), the North East mayor.
Richard Parker (Labour) of the West Midlands.
Steve Rotheram (Labour), the Liverpool City Region mayor.
David Skaith (Labour) of York and North Yorkshire.
Claire Ward (Labour), mayor of the East Midlands.
Sadiq Khan, the London mayor, signed the pledge in support.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
22 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Ministers are fretting about Britain's falling birthrate. Here's why it could be a good thing
Back in the early 1970s when he was lead singer with the Faces, few of his fans would have expected Rod Stewart to be still belting out Maggie May at Glastonbury more than half a century later. Long gone are the days when rock stars hoped to die before they got old. Instead, 80-year-old rock stars symbolise the fact that Britain and other developed economies have ageing populations. Women are having children later in life and having fewer of them. Politicians are starting to fret about the prospect of a decreasing number of people of working age supporting an ever-increasing number of pensioners. Just this week, the education secretary, Bridget Phillipson, said the falling birthrate had 'worrying repercussions' and that she hoped to be able to make it easier for women to have children. This might seem a curious concern given that the UK's population has risen from fewer than 60 million at the turn of the millennium to 67.2 million by 2022 and is expected to rise by another 5 million by 2032. Yet the fertility rate in England and Wales – the number of live births per woman – is currently 1.44, the lowest since records began in 1938 and well below the 2.1 level consistent with a stable population. If that trend continues and net migration is reduced, the number of people in the UK will eventually start to decline. So much is obvious. Less clear is what, if anything, policymakers should do to raise fertility rates. The answer may well be nothing. A falling population is not a disaster. It might even be a good thing. Hungary's prime minister, Viktor Orbán, would certainly disagree with that conclusion. So would France's president, Emmanuel Macron, and Italy's prime minister, Giorgia Meloni. Italy has a tax-free allowance – a 'baby bonus' – for women having children. Macron has a plan for France's demographic rearmament. In 2019, Hungary offered women a €30,000 (£26,000) interest-free loan that would be non-repayable in the event that they had three or more children. The chances of the UK matching that level of generosity given the strains on the public finances are infinitesimally small. Yet the evidence from countries that have already hit the panic button over declining populations is not encouraging. Fertility rates in Italy, France and Hungary remain well below 2.1 despite the fiscal inducements. And that's because the factors that are persuading women to delay having children – or not have children at all – are stronger than government tax breaks or interest-free loans. Make no mistake, these are welcome changes. Women are better educated than they have ever been. More of them go to university, so have the possibility of securing interesting and well-paid jobs. It is not surprising that for many of them career progression takes precedence over childbirth in their 20s. The days when households were financially dependent on one male breadwinner are over – and a good thing too. It is also tough for women who do want to start a family at a younger age. Rising house prices have resulted in home ownership rates among 25- to 34-year-olds declining from 59% to 39% since 2000. Rents have also increased sharply. Given all this, it is hard to see much future for pronatalist policies in the UK. The reality is that the demographic makeup of Britain will change over the coming decades as people live longer and fertility rates remain well below 2.1. If net migration is below the levels of recent years, the Office for Budget Responsibility thinks the population could be 1.2 million lower in 2072 than it was in 2022. Is this really so much of a problem? The economist David Miles – one of those responsible for putting together the OBR's economic and fiscal forecasts – says not. In a recent paper, he argues that the catastrophising about shrinking populations is 'largely bunkum'. In part, that's because the global population is expected to continue growing for some decades to come, putting added pressure on the environment and speeding up climate breakdown. It makes little sense to adopt policies designed to increase fertility rates when the UK is an overcrowded island in an overpopulated world. But it is also the case that the combination of an ageing and gently falling population could result in living standards rising. Older people tend to save more and that means the ratio of capital to worker will increase. There will, in other words, be fewer workers but they could well be more productive. Measured by gross domestic product, the economy would be getting smaller, but GDP per head – a much better measure of wellbeing – would be increasing. There would be less congestion on the roads, less pressure on public services and less competition for housing. Japan already has an ageing and shrinking population and seems to be coping just fine. To be sure, there will still need to be policy changes in Britain. If there are going to be fewer young people, it is bad for the economy as well as a waste of individual potential for them not to be working. To that extent, the motivation behind the government's botched welfare reforms makes sense. Childcare needs to be more affordable and changes to the pension age might also be required to extend the working lives of those able to do so. But it is not inevitable that a falling population would be bad for the economy. It would certainly be good for the planet. Larry Elliott is a Guardian columnist
The Independent
35 minutes ago
- The Independent
Has Kemi Badenoch finally shown the killer instinct to save her as Tory leader?
Ever since Kemi Badenoch became Tory leader, her many Conservative critics have claimed she has failed to make any impact. Any number of backbenchers have been only too willing, albeit usually under the cowardly cover of anonymity, to claim she is going nowhere. Principal among their complaints is that she never seems to get the better of her weekly parliamentary jousts with Keir Starmer. Time and again, she asks the wrong question, chooses the wrong topic, and lacks the wit to seize on any missteps by the Prime Minister, they moan. Why can't she give Starmer and co both barrels – just like showman Nigel Farage does on a regular basis? It is not a criticism likely to be made of her again anytime soon. Not after her comprehensive filleting of Starmer over his defeat by Labour welfare rebels. Initially, Starmer fended off Badenoch's barbs at him. It looked as though she would be repulsed yet again. You could imagine her Tory detractors already licking their lips, muttering, 'She can't even score an open goal.' But Badenoch wasn't finished. Starmer was merely the hors d'oeuvres. She took her knife to the person sitting behind Starmer, Rachel Reeves, asking him to guarantee she was safe in her job. Starmer the lawyer should have seen it coming a mile off. It's the oldest trick in the political book: he could have answered with a categorical yes. But he didn't. In political terms, he left Reeves drifting in the wind. The chancellor's emotional and distraught response signalled that Badenoch had scored a direct hit. A rare moment in such parliamentary exchanges, which, for the most part, have nothing to do with democracy or debate and are all about posturing, platitudes and pantomime politics. Knockout blows are about as common as someone scoring in the Eton Wall Game – about one per decade. Badenoch didn't just score, she smashed the ball through the back of the net. The most important consequence of today's events is how, indeed whether, Reeves can survive such a harrowing and humbling public ordeal. And whether Starmer can re-establish his and his administration's personal and political authority. That is all in the balance. But there can be no doubt that eight months after becoming opposition leader, Badenoch has arrived on the big stage. Her stock reply to complaints that she has not made her mark as a leader has been that it took heroine Margaret Thatcher years to do so. Thatcher became a formidable parliamentary performer, but it took her a long time. In her early years as opposition leader, she was frequently outwitted by Labour Prime Minister Harold Wilson. Thatcher's Tory critics said it showed she wasn't up to it. Just like Badenoch's Conservative critics. They won't be making the same criticism again anytime soon. In blasting open the fault line between Starmer and Reeves with a lethal precision, a skill most thought was not in her armoury, Badenoch has at long last given demoralised Conservatives reasons to be cheerful.
The Guardian
36 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Reform UK hires ex-Tory MP who was suspended for using racist language
Reform UK has hired a former Conservative MP who was suspended for using the N-word. Anne Marie Morris, who had the whip withdrawn by Theresa May in 2017 for using the term in a debate about Brexit, will lead Reform's social care policy. She is one of several ex-Tories who have defected to Nigel Farage's party. Morris had used the phrase '[N-word] in the woodpile' in an event at the East India Club, and apologised after the remarks came to light. She had the whip returned to her six months later – one day before a crucial Brexit vote for the then-government. At the time, Morris said: 'I would like to take this opportunity to apologise again for using such inappropriate and offensive language. It was a mistake and I regret it unreservedly.' She served for 14 years as an MP for Newton Abbot, and lost the Tory whip again in 2022 after rebelling to back a Labour move in parliament to cut VAT on energy bills. Other former Conservative MPs to have joined Reform include Lee Anderson, Ross Thomson, Andrea Jenkyns, Marco Longhi and Ann Widdecombe. There remains speculation that Suella Braverman, the former home secretary, could join the party, after her husband, Rael Braverman, became a member. After her defection, Morris said: 'The country is in a desperate position. I believe now it is Reform UK that offers the vision and leadership Britain so badly needs. I want to play my part in delivering that vision.' David Bull, the new chair of Reform, said he was delighted to welcome Morris. 'She brings a wealth of experience with her and will be a crucial part in developing the party's social care policy as we look to build our policy platform ahead of the next general election,' he said. 'Anne Marie is just one of many who realise that Reform UK is the only party that can stop this damaging Labour government in its tracks.' Reform's manifesto at the last election had a policy on social care of a royal commission and said a national plan was critical for a sustainable social care system. It said: 'The sector needs flexibility, tax incentives, VAT breaks and less waste. Simplify social care through a single funding stream, instead of the split between NHS and local authorities. More funding will be needed when a national plan is agreed.'
