Sussan Ley offers Albanese support to overhaul Australia's child care system after horrific sex abuse cases
The Education Minister has vowed to introduce new reforms allowing unannounced compliance checks at childcare centres without a warrant within the first sitting fortnight of Parliament when it returns on July 22.
The legislation push follows charges against Joshua Brown for dozens of child sex offences and would also give the Government power to strip funding from centres that fail to meet safety and quality standards.
In her step away from the previous stonewalling approach of former Liberal government, Ms Ley has written to Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to show her support for radical new laws to help protect children.
'I want to work constructively and collaboratively with the government. This subject is too horrible, too awful, too upsetting and it is making the community so angry and distressed,' she told 7NEWS.
'We're ready to start this today. Children need to be protected.
'Clearly there are loopholes in the system which allow predators to prey on children.' and it is just so horrific.
'This is above politics. I want to sit down with the government and work on something straight away.
'So that when they bring legislation into the parliament as they have said they will do, we are ready to pass it without no fuss.
'I've written to the prime minister to offer my full support and collaboration.'
New legislation will give the Government stronger powers to act against childcare providers that fail safety standards or commit fraud, such as banning them from opening new centres, and cutting off subsidy access among other measures.
Education Minister Jason Clare told 7NEWS on Sunday the Opposition was being briefed on reform efforts and has welcomed Ms Ley's offer of full cooperation.
'When Parliament returns this month, I will introduce laws to cut off funding to centres that aren't up to scratch,' he said.
'This is the big weapon that the Australian Government has to wield here. I welcome the Opposition's support for laws that strengthen child care regulation.'
Shadow Education Minister Jonathon Duniam is working closely with ministers to develop the legislation and ensure its swift passage when introduced to Parliament.
The scale of the government's election win on May 3, securing a 51-seat majority in the House of Representatives, means it no longer relies on Coalition support to govern and only needs the Greens' cooperation to pass legislation in the Senate.
Ms Ley said the party had reflected on its past positions, dubbed the 'Noalition', and was taking lessons from the devastating election result to better serve the public interest.
'The tone I want to set from the first is that we have listened to the Australian people. And that we do want to be collaborative where we can be, where we need to be and where it is in the national interest,' she said.
'My offer is all about respecting the safety of children and putting them front and centre.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Perth Now
43 minutes ago
- Perth Now
Details emerge about deadly crash in East Rockingham
Another driver has lost their life on the road — the sixth fatal crash to rock the State in just four days. The latest tragedy occurred at the intersection of Patterson and Ward roads in East Rockingham about 8.15am on Sunday. It is understood the driver of a white utility veered off the road and ploughed into a tree, leaving the vehicle a mangled wreck. The driver's injuries were so severe they died at the scene. It follows a horror run on the roads since Thursday, which started when a tow truck and motorcycle collided at the intersection of Forrest Highway and Raymond Road in Australind. The motorcyclist, a 70-year-old man, suffered critical injuries and died at the scene. And on Friday morning, a 40-year-old man was killed after his Toyota Camry sedan crashed into a Mack truck towing three trailers on Neaves Road near Mariginiup about 6am. A car is taken away from the scene of a serious crash on Patterson Road in East Rockingham this morning. Credit: Michael Wilson / The West Australian Just 30 minutes later, a 51-year-old male pedestrian died after being hit by a blue Jeep Wrangler on Phillips Road in Mundaring. Then about 10.20am, emergency services rushed to a single-vehicle crash in Serpentine. The male driver died at the scene. And on Friday afternoon, a female passenger, aged in her 60's, died after the white Hyundai Kona she was in struck a tree on Canning Highway near Latham Street in Alfred Cove. Already this year, 109 people have died in crashes — 16 more than the same time last year, and 26 more than the same time in 2023. Transport Minister Rita Saffioti on Sunday said road safety was a 'community-wide issue.' 'We need to all continue to work together to improve road safety,' she said. 'When you see these terrible accidents, deaths and serious injuries, the families of those affected, their lives will never be the same. 'We all need to be safer on our roads, we need to work together to improve road safety and make sure we don't lose people on our roads. The scene of a serious crash on Patterson Road in East Rockingham this morning. Credit: Simon Hydzik / 7NEWS 'It's a terrible circumstance and it affects people's lives forever.' Shadow Education Minister Liam Staltari said 'every death we see as a result of the road toll is a death too many.' 'It's very sad to see there has been a spate of deaths recently and I think we all just have to work together to bring that toll down,' he said. On Saturday, Road Safety Commissioner Adrian Warner urged drivers to be safe and make adjustments during wet weather conditions. He said car fatalities were entirely preventable 'if people make safer choices.' 'July: cold, wet, dark, fog in some places,' he said. 'These add to the risks on our roads and we need people to make adjustments. 'We need to be conscious about the risks on the roads. 'We need to be conscious about the choices we make when we get behind the wheel.' WA Police Commander Mike Peters, of the Road Policing Command, urged drivers to stay alert and remove any distractions. 'I also remind pedestrians and motorcyclists and also cyclists (about) their responsibility in relation to being distracted as well,' he said. 'Distraction comes in all forms: mobile phone use and all other sorts of distractions. 'Please remain vigilant when you're on the road network to understand there's lots of different people using it.'
The Advertiser
an hour ago
- The Advertiser
Australia has been invaded. And the invader is sure to come back with greater force
Australia was invaded last week. The invader did a lot of damage, similar to previous invasions over the past couple of decades. The invader took people's homes, damaged the power grid, wrecked roads and bridges, and destroyed crops. All the things that invaders do. And the invader will come again and again in greater force, destroying lives and property. The invader, of course, is the more violent weather caused by climate change. The same invader that killed at least 78 in Texas in the last week. This is the biggest national-security threat facing most countries. This is the national-security threat that the nations of the earth should be spending 3.5 or even 5 per cent of GDP to address. It provides the answer Australia should give to the preposterous US demand that we spend more on "defence" - a demand that really means wasting more money buying American weapons and adding to the $500 million already handed over to the Americans to bolster their shipyards to build submarines we will never get. And what rent is the US paying on Pine Gap, the North-West Cape and the Darwin base, if anything? When are we going to question whether it is worth remaining such a close ally of the US? What is the point of NATO increasing "defence" spending if NATO cannot use its undoubted force and ability to push the Russians out of Ukraine and arrest Putin to be tried for war crimes for which there is copious evidence? The passing last week of the One Big Beautiful Bill reinforces the fact that the US no longer shares with us common values. The bill slashes food, medical, and educational help from people who desperately need it to give money to the already wealthy who do not - in a way that runs counter to the Australian fair go. Just as the slashing of USAID is contrary to Australia values because it has killed innocent children. Maybe we could ignore that. But, more profoundly, in the medium to long term, the bill will likely damage the US and its position in the world so much economically that many American allies will question whether any alliance with them is worth continuing. It is a tragic irony that President Donald Trump whose political success has relied on the slogan "Make America Great Again" has with this bill and earlier actions attacked the two most important contributors to America's historic greatness: the rule of law and technological superiority. The rule of law provides the basis for economic strength. First, personal freedom (from arbitrary arrest and attack from government) nourishes individual economic activity. Secondly, the certainty that contracts will be impartially enforced; civil wrongs will be impartially addressed; and property rights respected underpins business confidence. Without the rule of law, the risks cause investors to shy away. Trump has undermined the world trading system and eroded the rule of law - bedrock Australian values - in America. Worse, the Supreme Court and the Congress have supinely allowed the erosion to go unchecked. Indeed, they have added to it. This is now not just a rogue President, but a nation that is losing any claim to holding the moral high ground. The second, more corrosive, effect on American greatness comes with the Big Beautiful Bill's attack on American technological progress. First, the bill makes it harder for Americans to get a college education by slashing student-loan funding and direct funding to universities. This is slashing the arteries of American industrial and technological superiority. Worse, the Bill removes tax incentives for electric vehicles and renewable electrification generally and provides more tax incentives for fossil vehicles and fossil industries generally. In short, it hands to China on an electrolysis plate, all of the wealth and technological advantage of the energy revolution. China already manufactures 80 per cent of the world's solar panels, 75 per cent of its batteries and 70 per cent of its EVs. The US is not even trying to catch up. Developing nations are not going to waste their money and time transitioning through coal and gas as demand for electrical power rises. They will go straight to the Chinese renewable industry because the US has vacated the field. READ MORE CRISPIN HULL: It also hands to China the massive industry of making devices more electrically efficient: think LED light globes, induction stoves and the like. Trump's mad, ideological obsession against renewable energy has driven him to a position where his other obsession - the rise of China - is lost. Hawks may well support an alliance with an immoral but strong nation, but surely they are misguided to so closely attach itself to a nation that sabotages its own economic and industrial strength? Trump has also squandered America's intelligence advantage, by surrounding himself with sycophants. Intelligence that tells a leader what he wants to hear is no intelligence at all. Who can forget the imagery of the sycophants who verbally told Putin that they agreed to his Ukraine invasion while their body language said it was mad. US intelligence officials concocted evidence to say the illegal bombing of Iran neutralised the threat, when all it did was make Iran more determined. And speaking of China and the rule of law, if the Chinese Communist Party wants to resume the civil war that ended in 1949, Australia should not get involved, even if the US does. We have wasted too much blood and treasure following the US into mad, bad and illegal wars: Vietnam, Afghanistan, and Iraq. None of them achieved anything but death and destruction and more violence. Taiwan is not a member of the UN. It does not even profess itself to be an independent nation. Yes, 20 million plus people are enjoying democratic rights which is terrific. But we should no more go to war with China to defend those rights than go to any of a score of African countries to do the same thing. Where is the end game in all this sabre rattling? It is like the lead-up to World War I. It will all be over by Christmas, they said, with more than four years of futile carnage before them. And when will American jurists, legislators, and American people generally realise they are being led by an ignorant fool of an emperor who has no clothes? Australia was invaded last week. The invader did a lot of damage, similar to previous invasions over the past couple of decades. The invader took people's homes, damaged the power grid, wrecked roads and bridges, and destroyed crops. All the things that invaders do. And the invader will come again and again in greater force, destroying lives and property. The invader, of course, is the more violent weather caused by climate change. The same invader that killed at least 78 in Texas in the last week. This is the biggest national-security threat facing most countries. This is the national-security threat that the nations of the earth should be spending 3.5 or even 5 per cent of GDP to address. It provides the answer Australia should give to the preposterous US demand that we spend more on "defence" - a demand that really means wasting more money buying American weapons and adding to the $500 million already handed over to the Americans to bolster their shipyards to build submarines we will never get. And what rent is the US paying on Pine Gap, the North-West Cape and the Darwin base, if anything? When are we going to question whether it is worth remaining such a close ally of the US? What is the point of NATO increasing "defence" spending if NATO cannot use its undoubted force and ability to push the Russians out of Ukraine and arrest Putin to be tried for war crimes for which there is copious evidence? The passing last week of the One Big Beautiful Bill reinforces the fact that the US no longer shares with us common values. The bill slashes food, medical, and educational help from people who desperately need it to give money to the already wealthy who do not - in a way that runs counter to the Australian fair go. Just as the slashing of USAID is contrary to Australia values because it has killed innocent children. Maybe we could ignore that. But, more profoundly, in the medium to long term, the bill will likely damage the US and its position in the world so much economically that many American allies will question whether any alliance with them is worth continuing. It is a tragic irony that President Donald Trump whose political success has relied on the slogan "Make America Great Again" has with this bill and earlier actions attacked the two most important contributors to America's historic greatness: the rule of law and technological superiority. The rule of law provides the basis for economic strength. First, personal freedom (from arbitrary arrest and attack from government) nourishes individual economic activity. Secondly, the certainty that contracts will be impartially enforced; civil wrongs will be impartially addressed; and property rights respected underpins business confidence. Without the rule of law, the risks cause investors to shy away. Trump has undermined the world trading system and eroded the rule of law - bedrock Australian values - in America. Worse, the Supreme Court and the Congress have supinely allowed the erosion to go unchecked. Indeed, they have added to it. This is now not just a rogue President, but a nation that is losing any claim to holding the moral high ground. The second, more corrosive, effect on American greatness comes with the Big Beautiful Bill's attack on American technological progress. First, the bill makes it harder for Americans to get a college education by slashing student-loan funding and direct funding to universities. This is slashing the arteries of American industrial and technological superiority. Worse, the Bill removes tax incentives for electric vehicles and renewable electrification generally and provides more tax incentives for fossil vehicles and fossil industries generally. In short, it hands to China on an electrolysis plate, all of the wealth and technological advantage of the energy revolution. China already manufactures 80 per cent of the world's solar panels, 75 per cent of its batteries and 70 per cent of its EVs. The US is not even trying to catch up. Developing nations are not going to waste their money and time transitioning through coal and gas as demand for electrical power rises. They will go straight to the Chinese renewable industry because the US has vacated the field. READ MORE CRISPIN HULL: It also hands to China the massive industry of making devices more electrically efficient: think LED light globes, induction stoves and the like. Trump's mad, ideological obsession against renewable energy has driven him to a position where his other obsession - the rise of China - is lost. Hawks may well support an alliance with an immoral but strong nation, but surely they are misguided to so closely attach itself to a nation that sabotages its own economic and industrial strength? Trump has also squandered America's intelligence advantage, by surrounding himself with sycophants. Intelligence that tells a leader what he wants to hear is no intelligence at all. Who can forget the imagery of the sycophants who verbally told Putin that they agreed to his Ukraine invasion while their body language said it was mad. US intelligence officials concocted evidence to say the illegal bombing of Iran neutralised the threat, when all it did was make Iran more determined. And speaking of China and the rule of law, if the Chinese Communist Party wants to resume the civil war that ended in 1949, Australia should not get involved, even if the US does. We have wasted too much blood and treasure following the US into mad, bad and illegal wars: Vietnam, Afghanistan, and Iraq. None of them achieved anything but death and destruction and more violence. Taiwan is not a member of the UN. It does not even profess itself to be an independent nation. Yes, 20 million plus people are enjoying democratic rights which is terrific. But we should no more go to war with China to defend those rights than go to any of a score of African countries to do the same thing. Where is the end game in all this sabre rattling? It is like the lead-up to World War I. It will all be over by Christmas, they said, with more than four years of futile carnage before them. And when will American jurists, legislators, and American people generally realise they are being led by an ignorant fool of an emperor who has no clothes? Australia was invaded last week. The invader did a lot of damage, similar to previous invasions over the past couple of decades. The invader took people's homes, damaged the power grid, wrecked roads and bridges, and destroyed crops. All the things that invaders do. And the invader will come again and again in greater force, destroying lives and property. The invader, of course, is the more violent weather caused by climate change. The same invader that killed at least 78 in Texas in the last week. This is the biggest national-security threat facing most countries. This is the national-security threat that the nations of the earth should be spending 3.5 or even 5 per cent of GDP to address. It provides the answer Australia should give to the preposterous US demand that we spend more on "defence" - a demand that really means wasting more money buying American weapons and adding to the $500 million already handed over to the Americans to bolster their shipyards to build submarines we will never get. And what rent is the US paying on Pine Gap, the North-West Cape and the Darwin base, if anything? When are we going to question whether it is worth remaining such a close ally of the US? What is the point of NATO increasing "defence" spending if NATO cannot use its undoubted force and ability to push the Russians out of Ukraine and arrest Putin to be tried for war crimes for which there is copious evidence? The passing last week of the One Big Beautiful Bill reinforces the fact that the US no longer shares with us common values. The bill slashes food, medical, and educational help from people who desperately need it to give money to the already wealthy who do not - in a way that runs counter to the Australian fair go. Just as the slashing of USAID is contrary to Australia values because it has killed innocent children. Maybe we could ignore that. But, more profoundly, in the medium to long term, the bill will likely damage the US and its position in the world so much economically that many American allies will question whether any alliance with them is worth continuing. It is a tragic irony that President Donald Trump whose political success has relied on the slogan "Make America Great Again" has with this bill and earlier actions attacked the two most important contributors to America's historic greatness: the rule of law and technological superiority. The rule of law provides the basis for economic strength. First, personal freedom (from arbitrary arrest and attack from government) nourishes individual economic activity. Secondly, the certainty that contracts will be impartially enforced; civil wrongs will be impartially addressed; and property rights respected underpins business confidence. Without the rule of law, the risks cause investors to shy away. Trump has undermined the world trading system and eroded the rule of law - bedrock Australian values - in America. Worse, the Supreme Court and the Congress have supinely allowed the erosion to go unchecked. Indeed, they have added to it. This is now not just a rogue President, but a nation that is losing any claim to holding the moral high ground. The second, more corrosive, effect on American greatness comes with the Big Beautiful Bill's attack on American technological progress. First, the bill makes it harder for Americans to get a college education by slashing student-loan funding and direct funding to universities. This is slashing the arteries of American industrial and technological superiority. Worse, the Bill removes tax incentives for electric vehicles and renewable electrification generally and provides more tax incentives for fossil vehicles and fossil industries generally. In short, it hands to China on an electrolysis plate, all of the wealth and technological advantage of the energy revolution. China already manufactures 80 per cent of the world's solar panels, 75 per cent of its batteries and 70 per cent of its EVs. The US is not even trying to catch up. Developing nations are not going to waste their money and time transitioning through coal and gas as demand for electrical power rises. They will go straight to the Chinese renewable industry because the US has vacated the field. READ MORE CRISPIN HULL: It also hands to China the massive industry of making devices more electrically efficient: think LED light globes, induction stoves and the like. Trump's mad, ideological obsession against renewable energy has driven him to a position where his other obsession - the rise of China - is lost. Hawks may well support an alliance with an immoral but strong nation, but surely they are misguided to so closely attach itself to a nation that sabotages its own economic and industrial strength? Trump has also squandered America's intelligence advantage, by surrounding himself with sycophants. Intelligence that tells a leader what he wants to hear is no intelligence at all. Who can forget the imagery of the sycophants who verbally told Putin that they agreed to his Ukraine invasion while their body language said it was mad. US intelligence officials concocted evidence to say the illegal bombing of Iran neutralised the threat, when all it did was make Iran more determined. And speaking of China and the rule of law, if the Chinese Communist Party wants to resume the civil war that ended in 1949, Australia should not get involved, even if the US does. We have wasted too much blood and treasure following the US into mad, bad and illegal wars: Vietnam, Afghanistan, and Iraq. None of them achieved anything but death and destruction and more violence. Taiwan is not a member of the UN. It does not even profess itself to be an independent nation. Yes, 20 million plus people are enjoying democratic rights which is terrific. But we should no more go to war with China to defend those rights than go to any of a score of African countries to do the same thing. Where is the end game in all this sabre rattling? It is like the lead-up to World War I. It will all be over by Christmas, they said, with more than four years of futile carnage before them. And when will American jurists, legislators, and American people generally realise they are being led by an ignorant fool of an emperor who has no clothes? Australia was invaded last week. The invader did a lot of damage, similar to previous invasions over the past couple of decades. The invader took people's homes, damaged the power grid, wrecked roads and bridges, and destroyed crops. All the things that invaders do. And the invader will come again and again in greater force, destroying lives and property. The invader, of course, is the more violent weather caused by climate change. The same invader that killed at least 78 in Texas in the last week. This is the biggest national-security threat facing most countries. This is the national-security threat that the nations of the earth should be spending 3.5 or even 5 per cent of GDP to address. It provides the answer Australia should give to the preposterous US demand that we spend more on "defence" - a demand that really means wasting more money buying American weapons and adding to the $500 million already handed over to the Americans to bolster their shipyards to build submarines we will never get. And what rent is the US paying on Pine Gap, the North-West Cape and the Darwin base, if anything? When are we going to question whether it is worth remaining such a close ally of the US? What is the point of NATO increasing "defence" spending if NATO cannot use its undoubted force and ability to push the Russians out of Ukraine and arrest Putin to be tried for war crimes for which there is copious evidence? The passing last week of the One Big Beautiful Bill reinforces the fact that the US no longer shares with us common values. The bill slashes food, medical, and educational help from people who desperately need it to give money to the already wealthy who do not - in a way that runs counter to the Australian fair go. Just as the slashing of USAID is contrary to Australia values because it has killed innocent children. Maybe we could ignore that. But, more profoundly, in the medium to long term, the bill will likely damage the US and its position in the world so much economically that many American allies will question whether any alliance with them is worth continuing. It is a tragic irony that President Donald Trump whose political success has relied on the slogan "Make America Great Again" has with this bill and earlier actions attacked the two most important contributors to America's historic greatness: the rule of law and technological superiority. The rule of law provides the basis for economic strength. First, personal freedom (from arbitrary arrest and attack from government) nourishes individual economic activity. Secondly, the certainty that contracts will be impartially enforced; civil wrongs will be impartially addressed; and property rights respected underpins business confidence. Without the rule of law, the risks cause investors to shy away. Trump has undermined the world trading system and eroded the rule of law - bedrock Australian values - in America. Worse, the Supreme Court and the Congress have supinely allowed the erosion to go unchecked. Indeed, they have added to it. This is now not just a rogue President, but a nation that is losing any claim to holding the moral high ground. The second, more corrosive, effect on American greatness comes with the Big Beautiful Bill's attack on American technological progress. First, the bill makes it harder for Americans to get a college education by slashing student-loan funding and direct funding to universities. This is slashing the arteries of American industrial and technological superiority. Worse, the Bill removes tax incentives for electric vehicles and renewable electrification generally and provides more tax incentives for fossil vehicles and fossil industries generally. In short, it hands to China on an electrolysis plate, all of the wealth and technological advantage of the energy revolution. China already manufactures 80 per cent of the world's solar panels, 75 per cent of its batteries and 70 per cent of its EVs. The US is not even trying to catch up. Developing nations are not going to waste their money and time transitioning through coal and gas as demand for electrical power rises. They will go straight to the Chinese renewable industry because the US has vacated the field. READ MORE CRISPIN HULL: It also hands to China the massive industry of making devices more electrically efficient: think LED light globes, induction stoves and the like. Trump's mad, ideological obsession against renewable energy has driven him to a position where his other obsession - the rise of China - is lost. Hawks may well support an alliance with an immoral but strong nation, but surely they are misguided to so closely attach itself to a nation that sabotages its own economic and industrial strength? Trump has also squandered America's intelligence advantage, by surrounding himself with sycophants. Intelligence that tells a leader what he wants to hear is no intelligence at all. Who can forget the imagery of the sycophants who verbally told Putin that they agreed to his Ukraine invasion while their body language said it was mad. US intelligence officials concocted evidence to say the illegal bombing of Iran neutralised the threat, when all it did was make Iran more determined. And speaking of China and the rule of law, if the Chinese Communist Party wants to resume the civil war that ended in 1949, Australia should not get involved, even if the US does. We have wasted too much blood and treasure following the US into mad, bad and illegal wars: Vietnam, Afghanistan, and Iraq. None of them achieved anything but death and destruction and more violence. Taiwan is not a member of the UN. It does not even profess itself to be an independent nation. Yes, 20 million plus people are enjoying democratic rights which is terrific. But we should no more go to war with China to defend those rights than go to any of a score of African countries to do the same thing. Where is the end game in all this sabre rattling? It is like the lead-up to World War I. It will all be over by Christmas, they said, with more than four years of futile carnage before them. And when will American jurists, legislators, and American people generally realise they are being led by an ignorant fool of an emperor who has no clothes?
The Advertiser
an hour ago
- The Advertiser
China wants AI in expanded trade deal with Australia
Strengthening ties between Chinese and Australian artificial intelligence researchers could be on the agenda when the prime minister visits China this week, as Beijing seeks to capitalise on trade tensions with the US. With President Donald Trump's tariffs straining relations with Australia's traditionally closest ally, China's top diplomat in Australia Xiao Qian has called for greater collaboration in fields like AI, healthcare and green energy under a revised free-trade deal between the two nations. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's visit to China on Saturday comes as the Sino-Australian relationship continues to build following a downturn in relations under former Liberal prime minister Scott Morrison. "China and Australia are natural partners with complementary economic strengths," Mr Xiao wrote in an opinion piece published in the Australian Financial Review on Monday. "Standing at a new historical starting point, now is the time to advance bilateral relations with steady progress." Trade volumes between the two nations have bounced back after China lifted sanctions on Australian exports. The ambassador believes Mr Albanese's visit marks an opportunity to broaden the terms of the 10-year-old free-trade agreement. "We are willing to review the agreement with a more open attitude and higher standard, further consolidate co-operation in traditional areas such as agriculture and mining, and actively explore new growth areas in emerging fields like artificial intelligence, healthcare, green energy, and the digital economy, elevating practical co-operation to new heights," Mr Xiao wrote. The promotion of AI ties, amid the Albanese government's agenda to boost productivity, follows similar provisions in recently signed trade deals between Australia and partners such as Singapore, the UK and the UAE. These clauses encourage sharing AI research and commercialisation opportunities between the countries, as well as promoting its responsible use. There are attractive opportunities to deepen research collaboration in the fundamental science of AI, even though there are challenges to expanding the use of Chinese AI programs in Australia, said UNSW Professor Toby Walsh. "It's going to be very hard for us to have too deep relationships within terms of AI, because you can touch upon things like data sovereignty and various other things that we value," the AI expert told AAP. "It's not like just sending them gold and they take it, and that's the end of the partnership. "Sharing technologies like AI could pose significant national security and other risks." Allowing Chinese tech companies access to the Australian market has been a sore spot in the bilateral relationship. In 2018, then-Liberal prime minister Malcolm Turnbull banned the Chinese tech giant Huawei from developing 5G infrastructure in Australia over concerns the Chinese government could force the company to hand over Australians' data or interfere with the network. The decision prompted strenuous protests from Beijing and was a factor behind a subsequent diplomatic fallout. Prof Walsh said there were still areas where collaboration could be beneficial without forfeiting Australian security. "It's about exchanging people, it's training, it's us going to work with them and them coming to work with us," he said. "So it's things that we've always done in terms of scientific exchange, supercharging our science, supercharging their science, and then building our own business off the back of that scientific knowledge. "China will be interested in partnering with us. "We have wonderful medical data, and we have a joined-up healthcare system. "There's huge value in those national data sets we have that no one else has." As the US drives a wedge through a fragmenting global order, Mr Xiao framed China as a like-minded partner for Australia - one that shares Australia's interests in pushing back against unilateralism and protectionism. China is willing to work with Australia to strengthen multilateral organisations like the United Nations and ASEAN, safeguard regional peace and the international rules-based order, and advocate for free trade, the ambassador said. Assistant Trade Minister Matt Thistlethwaite said the government was seeking to strengthen access to China - Australia's largest trading partner - in the best interests of Australians. Strengthening ties between Chinese and Australian artificial intelligence researchers could be on the agenda when the prime minister visits China this week, as Beijing seeks to capitalise on trade tensions with the US. With President Donald Trump's tariffs straining relations with Australia's traditionally closest ally, China's top diplomat in Australia Xiao Qian has called for greater collaboration in fields like AI, healthcare and green energy under a revised free-trade deal between the two nations. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's visit to China on Saturday comes as the Sino-Australian relationship continues to build following a downturn in relations under former Liberal prime minister Scott Morrison. "China and Australia are natural partners with complementary economic strengths," Mr Xiao wrote in an opinion piece published in the Australian Financial Review on Monday. "Standing at a new historical starting point, now is the time to advance bilateral relations with steady progress." Trade volumes between the two nations have bounced back after China lifted sanctions on Australian exports. The ambassador believes Mr Albanese's visit marks an opportunity to broaden the terms of the 10-year-old free-trade agreement. "We are willing to review the agreement with a more open attitude and higher standard, further consolidate co-operation in traditional areas such as agriculture and mining, and actively explore new growth areas in emerging fields like artificial intelligence, healthcare, green energy, and the digital economy, elevating practical co-operation to new heights," Mr Xiao wrote. The promotion of AI ties, amid the Albanese government's agenda to boost productivity, follows similar provisions in recently signed trade deals between Australia and partners such as Singapore, the UK and the UAE. These clauses encourage sharing AI research and commercialisation opportunities between the countries, as well as promoting its responsible use. There are attractive opportunities to deepen research collaboration in the fundamental science of AI, even though there are challenges to expanding the use of Chinese AI programs in Australia, said UNSW Professor Toby Walsh. "It's going to be very hard for us to have too deep relationships within terms of AI, because you can touch upon things like data sovereignty and various other things that we value," the AI expert told AAP. "It's not like just sending them gold and they take it, and that's the end of the partnership. "Sharing technologies like AI could pose significant national security and other risks." Allowing Chinese tech companies access to the Australian market has been a sore spot in the bilateral relationship. In 2018, then-Liberal prime minister Malcolm Turnbull banned the Chinese tech giant Huawei from developing 5G infrastructure in Australia over concerns the Chinese government could force the company to hand over Australians' data or interfere with the network. The decision prompted strenuous protests from Beijing and was a factor behind a subsequent diplomatic fallout. Prof Walsh said there were still areas where collaboration could be beneficial without forfeiting Australian security. "It's about exchanging people, it's training, it's us going to work with them and them coming to work with us," he said. "So it's things that we've always done in terms of scientific exchange, supercharging our science, supercharging their science, and then building our own business off the back of that scientific knowledge. "China will be interested in partnering with us. "We have wonderful medical data, and we have a joined-up healthcare system. "There's huge value in those national data sets we have that no one else has." As the US drives a wedge through a fragmenting global order, Mr Xiao framed China as a like-minded partner for Australia - one that shares Australia's interests in pushing back against unilateralism and protectionism. China is willing to work with Australia to strengthen multilateral organisations like the United Nations and ASEAN, safeguard regional peace and the international rules-based order, and advocate for free trade, the ambassador said. Assistant Trade Minister Matt Thistlethwaite said the government was seeking to strengthen access to China - Australia's largest trading partner - in the best interests of Australians. Strengthening ties between Chinese and Australian artificial intelligence researchers could be on the agenda when the prime minister visits China this week, as Beijing seeks to capitalise on trade tensions with the US. With President Donald Trump's tariffs straining relations with Australia's traditionally closest ally, China's top diplomat in Australia Xiao Qian has called for greater collaboration in fields like AI, healthcare and green energy under a revised free-trade deal between the two nations. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's visit to China on Saturday comes as the Sino-Australian relationship continues to build following a downturn in relations under former Liberal prime minister Scott Morrison. "China and Australia are natural partners with complementary economic strengths," Mr Xiao wrote in an opinion piece published in the Australian Financial Review on Monday. "Standing at a new historical starting point, now is the time to advance bilateral relations with steady progress." Trade volumes between the two nations have bounced back after China lifted sanctions on Australian exports. The ambassador believes Mr Albanese's visit marks an opportunity to broaden the terms of the 10-year-old free-trade agreement. "We are willing to review the agreement with a more open attitude and higher standard, further consolidate co-operation in traditional areas such as agriculture and mining, and actively explore new growth areas in emerging fields like artificial intelligence, healthcare, green energy, and the digital economy, elevating practical co-operation to new heights," Mr Xiao wrote. The promotion of AI ties, amid the Albanese government's agenda to boost productivity, follows similar provisions in recently signed trade deals between Australia and partners such as Singapore, the UK and the UAE. These clauses encourage sharing AI research and commercialisation opportunities between the countries, as well as promoting its responsible use. There are attractive opportunities to deepen research collaboration in the fundamental science of AI, even though there are challenges to expanding the use of Chinese AI programs in Australia, said UNSW Professor Toby Walsh. "It's going to be very hard for us to have too deep relationships within terms of AI, because you can touch upon things like data sovereignty and various other things that we value," the AI expert told AAP. "It's not like just sending them gold and they take it, and that's the end of the partnership. "Sharing technologies like AI could pose significant national security and other risks." Allowing Chinese tech companies access to the Australian market has been a sore spot in the bilateral relationship. In 2018, then-Liberal prime minister Malcolm Turnbull banned the Chinese tech giant Huawei from developing 5G infrastructure in Australia over concerns the Chinese government could force the company to hand over Australians' data or interfere with the network. The decision prompted strenuous protests from Beijing and was a factor behind a subsequent diplomatic fallout. Prof Walsh said there were still areas where collaboration could be beneficial without forfeiting Australian security. "It's about exchanging people, it's training, it's us going to work with them and them coming to work with us," he said. "So it's things that we've always done in terms of scientific exchange, supercharging our science, supercharging their science, and then building our own business off the back of that scientific knowledge. "China will be interested in partnering with us. "We have wonderful medical data, and we have a joined-up healthcare system. "There's huge value in those national data sets we have that no one else has." As the US drives a wedge through a fragmenting global order, Mr Xiao framed China as a like-minded partner for Australia - one that shares Australia's interests in pushing back against unilateralism and protectionism. China is willing to work with Australia to strengthen multilateral organisations like the United Nations and ASEAN, safeguard regional peace and the international rules-based order, and advocate for free trade, the ambassador said. Assistant Trade Minister Matt Thistlethwaite said the government was seeking to strengthen access to China - Australia's largest trading partner - in the best interests of Australians. Strengthening ties between Chinese and Australian artificial intelligence researchers could be on the agenda when the prime minister visits China this week, as Beijing seeks to capitalise on trade tensions with the US. With President Donald Trump's tariffs straining relations with Australia's traditionally closest ally, China's top diplomat in Australia Xiao Qian has called for greater collaboration in fields like AI, healthcare and green energy under a revised free-trade deal between the two nations. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's visit to China on Saturday comes as the Sino-Australian relationship continues to build following a downturn in relations under former Liberal prime minister Scott Morrison. "China and Australia are natural partners with complementary economic strengths," Mr Xiao wrote in an opinion piece published in the Australian Financial Review on Monday. "Standing at a new historical starting point, now is the time to advance bilateral relations with steady progress." Trade volumes between the two nations have bounced back after China lifted sanctions on Australian exports. The ambassador believes Mr Albanese's visit marks an opportunity to broaden the terms of the 10-year-old free-trade agreement. "We are willing to review the agreement with a more open attitude and higher standard, further consolidate co-operation in traditional areas such as agriculture and mining, and actively explore new growth areas in emerging fields like artificial intelligence, healthcare, green energy, and the digital economy, elevating practical co-operation to new heights," Mr Xiao wrote. The promotion of AI ties, amid the Albanese government's agenda to boost productivity, follows similar provisions in recently signed trade deals between Australia and partners such as Singapore, the UK and the UAE. These clauses encourage sharing AI research and commercialisation opportunities between the countries, as well as promoting its responsible use. There are attractive opportunities to deepen research collaboration in the fundamental science of AI, even though there are challenges to expanding the use of Chinese AI programs in Australia, said UNSW Professor Toby Walsh. "It's going to be very hard for us to have too deep relationships within terms of AI, because you can touch upon things like data sovereignty and various other things that we value," the AI expert told AAP. "It's not like just sending them gold and they take it, and that's the end of the partnership. "Sharing technologies like AI could pose significant national security and other risks." Allowing Chinese tech companies access to the Australian market has been a sore spot in the bilateral relationship. In 2018, then-Liberal prime minister Malcolm Turnbull banned the Chinese tech giant Huawei from developing 5G infrastructure in Australia over concerns the Chinese government could force the company to hand over Australians' data or interfere with the network. The decision prompted strenuous protests from Beijing and was a factor behind a subsequent diplomatic fallout. Prof Walsh said there were still areas where collaboration could be beneficial without forfeiting Australian security. "It's about exchanging people, it's training, it's us going to work with them and them coming to work with us," he said. "So it's things that we've always done in terms of scientific exchange, supercharging our science, supercharging their science, and then building our own business off the back of that scientific knowledge. "China will be interested in partnering with us. "We have wonderful medical data, and we have a joined-up healthcare system. "There's huge value in those national data sets we have that no one else has." As the US drives a wedge through a fragmenting global order, Mr Xiao framed China as a like-minded partner for Australia - one that shares Australia's interests in pushing back against unilateralism and protectionism. China is willing to work with Australia to strengthen multilateral organisations like the United Nations and ASEAN, safeguard regional peace and the international rules-based order, and advocate for free trade, the ambassador said. Assistant Trade Minister Matt Thistlethwaite said the government was seeking to strengthen access to China - Australia's largest trading partner - in the best interests of Australians.
