Use EPF as collection tool for national health insurance, says think tank
Published on: Tue, Jul 01, 2025
By: FMT Reporters Text Size: The funds would supplement existing allocations in the annual health budget, Galen Centre said in proposing a national insurance scheme via EPF contributions. PETALING JAYA: A health policy think tank has proposed the introduction of a national health and social insurance scheme funded through increased contributions to the EPF, without drawing from contributors' existing retirement savings. Azrul Khalib, CEO of Galen Centre for Health and Social Policy, said the scheme could be modelled after Singapore's Central Provident Fund in the early 1980s, where contributors allocated 8% to 10.5% of their income to the MediSave account. 'This proposal would not use people's existing retirement savings. Instead, it proposes an increase in the level of contributions by both worker and employer, which would then be earmarked for national health and social insurance. 'These funds would complement and not replace the existing annual allocation under the federal budget, potentially bringing in new and sustainable funding,' he said in a statement today. Azrul said the proposed scheme would provide access to both public and private healthcare, with no exclusions for pre-existing conditions, no costly deductibles, and only minimal co-payments where necessary. He added that the fund could be used to upgrade public hospital services and improve access to lifesaving medication and treatment currently out of reach for many Malaysians. Health minister Dzulkefly Ahmad previously proposed that EPF allow contributors to use funds in their Account 2 to pay for medical insurance premiums. EPF members are currently able to access their Account 2 funds to meet some of their education, healthcare, and housing needs. They are also allowed to make a partial withdrawal at the age of 50. Noting that only 18% of EPF members currently have sufficient savings, Azrul said diverting savings to pay insurance premiums risked making the situation worse. 'Implying that they won't notice the withdrawal as it is automatic and coming from the Sejahtera account is dangerous, encourages financial illiteracy, and is disconnected from the rakyat's everyday realities,' he said. * Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel and Telegram for breaking news alerts and key updates! * Do you have access to the Daily Express e-paper and online exclusive news? Check out subscription plans available.
Stay up-to-date by following Daily Express's Telegram channel. Daily Express Malaysia
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Focus Malaysia
4 hours ago
- Focus Malaysia
New electricity tariff rates: Will Malaysians continue to be burdened?
Letter to Editor PREVIOUSLY, the government claimed that the new electricity tariff rates to be implemented today (July 1) are fairer for fellow Malaysians, as well as progressive. They stated that these changes will not burden the business community, while domestic consumers will be able to pay lower rates. Despite this, public concern remains high. The Malaysia Data Centre Alliance (MDCA) and the EU-Malaysia Chamber of Commerce and Industry (EUMCCI) have expressed that this decision would increase operational costs and contradict ongoing efforts to position the country as a data hub—an initiative that is currently being implemented in Johor, Penang, Kedah, Negri Sembilan and Sarawak. According to media reports, both industry bodies have raised concerns over the government's method of calculating rates, labelling it as 'inaccurate' and 'unfair'. They argue that it could lead to double counting during periods of high demand, as different cloud providers often share overlapping customer bases. These high operational costs are expected to reduce Malaysia's attractiveness to foreign investors, who may opt to establish data centres or move their operations to other countries in the region. The new electricity tariff will result in a 100.2% increase for high voltage during off-peak hours, from 20.20 sen/kWh to 40.43 sen/kWh, and a 162.3% rise in the maximum demand charges during peak hours for medium voltage industries, from RM37 to RM97.06 per kWh per month. Naturally, industry stakeholders are reluctant to absorb these costs themselves and are likely to pass them on to the end consumer in the form of higher prices. At the same time, the public is questioning why they are being asked to shoulder an increase in electricity tariffs when Tenaga Nasional Bhd (TNB) reported a net profit of RM1.44 bil for the second quarter ending June 30, 2024—a significant rise from RM327.9 mil during the same period last year. With billions in profits, many are left wondering why there is still a need to raise electricity tariffs. In light of this, MCA once again calls on the government to delay the proposed tariff hike and engage in meaningful discussions with relevant stakeholders and elected representatives. This dialogue should aim to establish a more equitable mechanism. The issue should not be about raising tariffs arbitrarily to cover the country's revenue shortfall and losses following the abolition of the GST—a system that was transparent, efficient and fair. ‒ July 1, 2025 Datuk Ir Lawrence Low is the MCA vice president and the party's economic and SME affairs committee chairman. The views expressed are solely of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Focus Malaysia. Main image: The Star
The Sun
4 hours ago
- The Sun
'Happy July?' — Netizens react to SST hike as bills climb, wages stagnate
THE government's expansion of the Sales and Service Tax (SST) to more goods and services on July 1 may be part of a targeted fiscal strategy, but for many Malaysians online, the new month came with heavier bills and even heavier sighs. Across social media, netizens responded with a blend of sarcasm, satire and weary humour. ALSO READ: Govt open to factual criticisms on taxation system says PM Anwar One user called kapewithkate wrote on Threads: 'Welcome to July — SST is now 5–8%. Electricity tariffs have increased (your bills are really going to bling now).' Others joined in with mock suggestions. Annysaoi posted: 'Honestly, July 1st should've been declared a public holiday in honour of 'National Tax Day' — like bro, we pay taxes every day. Imagine future generations asking, 'Hey, why's today a holiday?' 'And we reply, 'Oh, it's to commemorate the day the tax system changed forever.' Iconic.' Echoing the frustrations of many Malaysians, user @nssyahiramzln voiced a pointed concern: 'The people aren't angry about paying taxes. We're angry because we're already paying so much — thousands are deducted monthly from our salaries through PCB (monthly tax deductions) — but we don't see any real results. 'Schools are still underfunded, government hospitals are overcrowded with hours-long waits. We pay taxes, yet if we want 'comfort' when we're sick, we still have to fork out extra for insurance? 'Roads in the city are full of potholes. SST goes up, everything goes up — but our salaries stay the same. So tell me, where is the people's money really going?' the user lamented. The SST expansion introduced a 5% to 10% tax on non-essential goods and widened its scope to include services such as private healthcare, financial services and leasing. However, the government has since made adjustments after public pushback. Imported apples and oranges, as well as beauty services like haircuts and facials, were exempted. The Prime Minister reiterated that adjustments in electricity tariffs and the expanded Sales and Service Tax (SST) scope aim to ensure wealthier individuals contribute fairly while shielding vulnerable groups from financial strain. 'Criticism is welcome, but it must be factual and constructive,' he stated.
Sinar Daily
5 hours ago
- Sinar Daily
Taxing fruits while fighting obesity feels like a bitter pill to swallow
AS Malaysia rolls out its revised Sales and Service Tax (SST) on imported fruits starting today, the irony is hard to miss. While the nation battles rising obesity rates and a diabetes crisis, the price of one of the easiest and healthiest solutions just went up. You really have to pause and wonder: what exactly are we doing? The Malaysian government officially implemented the revised five per cent SST on imported goods and yes, that includes imported fruits. However, apples and oranges were eventually excluded after public response, despite initially being on the list. They were described as 'the people's fruit,' which led the government to reconsider and grant an exemption. Meanwhile, local fruits like bananas, pineapples, rambutans, longan and jackfruit are exempted, a move that supposedly encourages people to support local agriculture and raise national revenue. As Malaysia enforces its revised SST on imported fruits today, the irony is clear—fruit prices are rising just as the nation faces growing obesity and diabetes crises. Photo: Edited via Canva Fair enough, on the surface. But dig a little deeper and it is hard not to be sceptical. Because the more urgent crisis Malaysia is facing is not a lack of love for local pineapples, it is obesity. A growing one. According to the World Obesity Atlas, nearly 20 per cent of Malaysians were already obese and projections show that number ballooning to 41 per cent by 2035. The Health Ministry has also highlighted that Malaysia has one of the highest diabetes rates in the world, with 3.6 million people diagnosed as of 2019, a number expected to double by this year. Alarmingly, many are walking around without even realising they have the disease: 40 per cent of adults and 84 per cent of young adults aged 18–29 do not even know they are diabetic. Data from the CIA World Factbook shows Malaysia ranks second in Southeast Asia for obesity, with 19.7 per cent of the population affected. Photo: Screenshot via Sea Asia Stats Instagram account When you factor in the infamous "Three Highs" - high blood sugar, high blood pressure and high cholesterol - the situation only grows bleeker. Over 500,000 Malaysians are now living with all four conditions. So why, of all things, are we making fruits more expensive? Fruits, after all, are the simplest, most accessible health solutions out there. Unlike fitness programmes, gym memberships or fancy diets, fruits are straightforward. You eat them, they are nutritious and they help. You do not need an app to track them or a trainer to tell you how to bite into a cherry. And I do not know anyone - really, anyone - who does not eat at least one fruit. Sure, some people are not into vegetables, but fruits? Everyone has a favourite. Now, we are making it less attractive to choose them, just as we are trying to convince people to take better care of their health. That is the contradiction that makes this new SST expansion so frustrating. It is like raising the price of bottled water during a heatwave and calling it a strategy to encourage people to use public fountains. Will this tax stop people from buying imported fruits? Probably not. Will people even realise what has been taxed and what has not? Doubtful. Malaysians are already overwhelmed with economic concerns. And let us be real, no one is memorising the government's updated tax catalogue before heading to the supermarket. If the goal was to redirect people toward local produce, there are better ways to do it. One could subsidise local fruits or launch awareness campaigns, alternatives that are more encouraging. Instead, we have just made a basic health necessity more expensive, hoping people will 'get the message'. As Malaysia enforces its revised SST on imported fruits today, the irony is clear—fruit prices are rising just as the nation faces growing obesity and diabetes crises. Photo: Edited via Canva But it is not just about pricing. Malaysia's battle with obesity goes deeper - into infrastructure, culture and lifestyle. This is a country where walking is not easy. It is hot, humid and not exactly pedestrian-friendly. Public transportation is not the most dependable and when people are tired, busy and stressed, grabbing a quick meal at the nearest 'mamak' becomes the default choice. 'Lepak' culture is a big part of who we are, but let us be honest, Roti Canai at 11pm while watching football is not exactly a nutritionist's dream. We are proud of our food heritage and rightfully so. But that pride should also come with some responsibility. If we want Malaysians to be healthier, we have to make healthy options easier and more appealing; not pricier. Fruits and vegetables should be the last things we make harder to access. They are neutral, universal and do not come with the socioeconomic stigma of gym memberships. They are just food, good food. So while we are all trying to eat better, live longer and manage this nationwide health concern, let us hope future policy decisions reflect a bit more thought on the actual barriers people face. Because this five per cent tax may seem small on paper, but in the broader fight against obesity, it is sending the wrong message entirely.
