Israel covered up Iranian hits on military sites
The data, provided to the British paper by Oregon State University researchers who track bomb damage using satellite radar, indicates that six Iranian missiles hit five military facilities in the north, south, and center of Israel, including a major air base, an intelligence gathering center, and a logistics base. The extent of the reported damage is unclear.
However, the hits were not publicly reported due to heavy military censorship, according to the report. When pressed on the issue, the Israel Defense Forces, declined to comment, only saying that 'all relevant units maintained functional continuity throughout the operation.'
Analysis cited by The Telegraph suggests that Israeli and US air defenses generally performed well, intercepting most of the incoming fire, although the share of missiles that penetrated through Israeli defenses rose to about 16% by the seventh day. The paper noted that this could have been linked with Israeli attempts to conserve ammunition, improved tactics by Iran, or the deployment of more advanced and harder-to-intercept weaponry.
The conflict began on June 13 when Israel launched airstrikes targeting Iran's nuclear infrastructure, top Iranian commanders, and military sites, triggering retaliation by Tehran. Israeli officials reported 29 deaths and over 3,200 injuries, while Iran estimated over 900 deaths and 4,700 injuries.
The US eventually joined the conflict by deploying heavy bombers against key Iranian nuclear sites. After a ceasefire was reached, both sides proclaimed victory.
The hostilities started after Iran declined a US demand to abandon its enrichment capabilities, which Washington believes could enable Tehran to create nuclear weapons. Iran has denied plans to create an atomic weapon, insisting that its nuclear program only serves peaceful purposes.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
2 hours ago
- Russia Today
Israel says Hamas' changes to Gaza ceasefire deal ‘unacceptable'
Israel has rejected Hamas' proposed changes to a Gaza ceasefire deal but agreed to continue indirect talks in Doha, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's office said on Saturday, as cited by Israeli media. A negotiating team is expected to travel to Qatar on Sunday for the next round of negotiations with the Palestinian militant group. US President Donald Trump announced a 'final proposal' for a 60-day Gaza ceasefire last week, saying he expected positive replies from both sides within hours. Hamas responded on Friday 'in a positive spirit,' saying it is 'fully prepared' to immediately begin a new round of talks to implement the ceasefire framework. The group, however, proposed amendments. A source involved in the mediation efforts said Hamas wants talks on a permanent truce to continue during the 60-day pause, full restoration of UN aid instead of the US- and Israel-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, and the withdrawal of Israeli troops to pre-March positions. 'The changes that Hamas is seeking to make to the Qatari proposal were delivered to us last night and are unacceptable to Israel,' Netanyahu's office said in a statement. It did not specify which demands were rejected. Nevertheless, Netanyahu has instructed his team to attend further talks in Qatar, the statement said. The prime minister is also expected to travel to Washington on Monday for a meeting with Trump on Gaza, Iran, and other regional matters. On Friday, Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One that he is 'optimistic' a deal can be reached. The current draft includes a provision that Trump's Middle East envoy, Steve Witkoff, is to travel to the region to finalize the agreement. West Jerusalem has repeatedly refused to accept any deal that leaves Hamas in control of Gaza. A previous hostage-truce deal reached in January included a three-phase process ending with a permanent ceasefire and full Israeli withdrawal, but it collapsed in March after Israel refused to begin talks on ending the war. Netanyahu reiterated his conditions last week: Hamas must surrender, disarm, and leave Gaza – terms the group continues to reject. The conflict began with Hamas' October 2023 assault on southern Israel, in which around 1,200 people were killed, mostly civilians, and 250 were taken hostage. Of those, 50 remain in Gaza, with fewer than half still alive. Israel's military response has killed at least 57,000 people in Gaza, mostly civilians, over the past 21 months, according to the Hamas-run Health Ministry. On Saturday, the families of the hostages held protests across Israel, urging the government to finalize a ceasefire. Videos on social media show crowds marching in Tel Aviv, Jerusalem, Haifa, and Be'er Sheva, calling for an end to the war and the return of the hostages. צעדת המחאה בירושלים צועדת בקינג ג'ורג'
Russia Today
4 hours ago
- Russia Today
Carlson teases interview with Iranian president
Conservative American journalist Tucker Carlson has announced that he will air an interview with Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, saying Americans deserve to hear directly from the leader of the country their military has recently fought. The interview comes on the heels of the 12-day war between Israel and Iran, as well as US airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities. In a short video on X, Carlson said the conversation, which was conducted remotely through a translator, will be released 'in a day or two.' He acknowledged that he will be criticized for the interview, saying: 'Why did we do it anyway? Well, we did it because we were just at war with Iran 10 days ago and maybe again.' He argued that Americans have 'the constitutional right and the God-given right to all the information they can gather about matters that affect them,' including hearing the views of adversaries. Carlson added that not everything Pezeshkian says can be trusted, but 'the point is you should be able to decide for yourself whether you believe it or not.' Regarding the contents of the interview, the former Fox News host said he avoided questions that were almost certain to yield evasions, such as whether the US strikes crippled Iran's nuclear program. 'There's no chance he's going to answer that question. Honestly, I didn't bother to ask it,' he said. Instead, he focused on broader questions like whether Iran is seeking war with the US and Israel. Carlson went on to say that he once again requested an interview with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, in an effort to hear from both sides of the conflict. The purpose of the Pezeshkian interview is 'not to get to the absolute truth,' but rather 'to add to the corpus of knowledge from which Americans can derive their own opinion,' he said. 'Learn everything you can, and then you decide.' The American journalist conducted a high-profile interview with Russian President Vladimir Putin last year, in which Putin explained the deep historical roots and national security concerns that led to the Ukraine conflict. Last month, he also interviewed US Senator Ted Cruz, pressing him on his hawkish stance on Iran, while suggesting that Cruz is calling for the overthrow of the Iranian government without having any knowledge of the country.
Russia Today
14 hours ago
- Russia Today
Another war, another trip, another ask: Netanyahu returns to Washington
Fresh off a bruising 12-day war with Iran, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is flying back to Washington. This will be his third visit to the US since Donald Trump returned to the White House – but arguably the most consequential. For Netanyahu, it's more than a diplomatic courtesy call: it's a chance to cash in on battlefield momentum, convert military theatrics into political capital, and solidify his standing with Israel's most crucial ally. According to Israeli media, Netanyahu's agenda goes beyond flag-waving and photo ops. He's expected to push forward on defense cooperation, intelligence sharing, and a new trade deal. But above all, he wants to translate Israel's perceived tactical success into long-term strategic advantage – ensuring that Washington remains firmly aligned with Israeli goals on regional security. Leaked reports suggest that the prime minister's diplomatic playbook includes more than bilateral handshakes. One of the most sensitive issues on the table is the future of the Golan Heights. Sources say Israel has quietly renewed contacts with Syria's new leadership under Abu Mohammad al-Julani – a former jihadist now vying for international legitimacy. Behind closed doors, officials are floating the idea of a partial agreement in which Syria might recognize Israel's control over the Golan, in exchange for security coordination and regional stabilization. But there's a catch: a real deal would demand Israeli concessions, and Netanyahu, still projecting strength, seems unwilling to budge. US officials are aware of these backchannel discussions and are said to be involved at key moments – though how far they're willing to go remains unclear. On paper, Israel's military operation dealt a heavy blow to Iran's infrastructure, damaging key parts of its nuclear program and military network. But at home, the narrative isn't so tidy. The Iranian regime didn't collapse – far from it. Instead, Iranian society rallied around its leadership, framing the conflict as a defense of national sovereignty. In Israel, critics argue that Netanyahu oversold the war's objectives and underdelivered on its results. The war left other wounds too. Dozens of Israeli hostages remain in Hamas custody – a painful, unresolved issue. Despite media efforts to frame the prime minister as a wartime leader, Netanyahu is facing sharp questions not just from his political opponents, but from restless members of his own coalition. According to Haaretz, the Trump administration is growing impatient. US officials are urging Israel to suspend active operations in Gaza and prioritize a deal to bring home the hostages. The message from Washington is blunt: finish the humanitarian business now; total victory can wait. The newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth reports that Netanyahu's tone has shifted. His previous rhetoric about 'total victory' has been quietly replaced by talk of 'humanitarian obligations' and 'pragmatic solutions.' That shift may signal a soft pivot toward a temporary truce. Meanwhile, Channel 12 notes that the Israel Defense Forces are pressing the government to define a clear path forward. Should Israel double down and seize full control of Gaza – or cut a deal with Hamas for a phased prisoner exchange? According to military sources, the army favors the second option, seeing it as more realistic and less likely to spiral into chaos. In the lead-up to the Washington summit, Israeli Strategic Affairs Minister Ron Dermer arrived in the US to test the waters and align messaging. Around the same time, the US approved a new $510 million defense contract with Israel, including over 7,000 sets of precision-guided JDAM munitions. The juxtaposition is striking: even as Washington pushes for de-escalation in Gaza, it continues to arm its closest Middle Eastern ally. The signal is mixed – and may reflect internal divisions within the Trump administration about how hard to press Israel toward restraint. At the heart of the current deadlock is the question of a ceasefire. Hamas has proposed an immediate and full halt to hostilities, along with the complete withdrawal of Israeli troops from Gaza. Israel has rejected the offer – unwilling to hand over military leverage without securing the return of its citizens. With roughly 50 hostages still held in Gaza, the pressure on Netanyahu is mounting. But the path to an agreement remains narrow and treacherous. Mistrust runs deep, and the window for compromise is closing fast. It's no secret that Trump sees himself as a dealmaker – especially in the Middle East. His declared 'victory' over Iran has set the stage for a new diplomatic push. If he can now broker a ceasefire in Gaza and bring Israeli hostages home, it would be a headline-grabbing foreign policy win ahead of his domestic battles. But Netanyahu isn't rushing to help Trump craft his legacy. The prime minister remains wary: despite public praise from the US president, he's received no guarantees on issues closer to home – such as immunity from prosecution in his two ongoing corruption trials. These criminal cases are more than a legal headache – they're a political time bomb. Trump's vocal support, including recent calls to drop the charges, may play well with Netanyahu's base, but they've stirred unease among Israeli institutions. Some officials see this transatlantic alliance as an attempt to shield the prime minister from accountability. Within Israel, any deal with Hamas – especially one that involves concessions – risks alienating Netanyahu's hardline supporters. For a leader trying to balance survival with statesmanship, the choices are narrowing. A rift is forming between Washington and West Jerusalem. Trump wants swift results – a diplomatic breakthrough that he can sell as evidence of his leadership. Netanyahu, by contrast, is playing a slower game: buying time, protecting his flank, and avoiding decisions that might weaken him politically. Whether they can bridge this gap will define the outcome of the upcoming talks. For Trump, success means a dramatic headline: 'I stopped the war.' For Netanyahu, it's about navigating the storm without sinking. In an ideal scenario – at least from West Jerusalem's point of view – Trump might back a new Israeli campaign against Iran. That would offer Netanyahu a cleaner battlefield, clearer objectives, and the chance to write a more triumphant chapter in his political story. But for now, both leaders are walking a tightrope – balancing war, diplomacy, and ambition – hoping not to fall before the next election.
