Another war, another trip, another ask: Netanyahu returns to Washington
According to Israeli media, Netanyahu's agenda goes beyond flag-waving and photo ops. He's expected to push forward on defense cooperation, intelligence sharing, and a new trade deal. But above all, he wants to translate Israel's perceived tactical success into long-term strategic advantage – ensuring that Washington remains firmly aligned with Israeli goals on regional security.
Leaked reports suggest that the prime minister's diplomatic playbook includes more than bilateral handshakes. One of the most sensitive issues on the table is the future of the Golan Heights. Sources say Israel has quietly renewed contacts with Syria's new leadership under Abu Mohammad al-Julani – a former jihadist now vying for international legitimacy. Behind closed doors, officials are floating the idea of a partial agreement in which Syria might recognize Israel's control over the Golan, in exchange for security coordination and regional stabilization.
But there's a catch: a real deal would demand Israeli concessions, and Netanyahu, still projecting strength, seems unwilling to budge. US officials are aware of these backchannel discussions and are said to be involved at key moments – though how far they're willing to go remains unclear.
On paper, Israel's military operation dealt a heavy blow to Iran's infrastructure, damaging key parts of its nuclear program and military network. But at home, the narrative isn't so tidy. The Iranian regime didn't collapse – far from it. Instead, Iranian society rallied around its leadership, framing the conflict as a defense of national sovereignty. In Israel, critics argue that Netanyahu oversold the war's objectives and underdelivered on its results.
The war left other wounds too. Dozens of Israeli hostages remain in Hamas custody – a painful, unresolved issue. Despite media efforts to frame the prime minister as a wartime leader, Netanyahu is facing sharp questions not just from his political opponents, but from restless members of his own coalition.
According to Haaretz, the Trump administration is growing impatient. US officials are urging Israel to suspend active operations in Gaza and prioritize a deal to bring home the hostages. The message from Washington is blunt: finish the humanitarian business now; total victory can wait.
The newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth reports that Netanyahu's tone has shifted. His previous rhetoric about 'total victory' has been quietly replaced by talk of 'humanitarian obligations' and 'pragmatic solutions.' That shift may signal a soft pivot toward a temporary truce.
Meanwhile, Channel 12 notes that the Israel Defense Forces are pressing the government to define a clear path forward. Should Israel double down and seize full control of Gaza – or cut a deal with Hamas for a phased prisoner exchange? According to military sources, the army favors the second option, seeing it as more realistic and less likely to spiral into chaos.
In the lead-up to the Washington summit, Israeli Strategic Affairs Minister Ron Dermer arrived in the US to test the waters and align messaging. Around the same time, the US approved a new $510 million defense contract with Israel, including over 7,000 sets of precision-guided JDAM munitions.
The juxtaposition is striking: even as Washington pushes for de-escalation in Gaza, it continues to arm its closest Middle Eastern ally. The signal is mixed – and may reflect internal divisions within the Trump administration about how hard to press Israel toward restraint.
At the heart of the current deadlock is the question of a ceasefire. Hamas has proposed an immediate and full halt to hostilities, along with the complete withdrawal of Israeli troops from Gaza. Israel has rejected the offer – unwilling to hand over military leverage without securing the return of its citizens.
With roughly 50 hostages still held in Gaza, the pressure on Netanyahu is mounting. But the path to an agreement remains narrow and treacherous. Mistrust runs deep, and the window for compromise is closing fast.
It's no secret that Trump sees himself as a dealmaker – especially in the Middle East. His declared 'victory' over Iran has set the stage for a new diplomatic push. If he can now broker a ceasefire in Gaza and bring Israeli hostages home, it would be a headline-grabbing foreign policy win ahead of his domestic battles.
But Netanyahu isn't rushing to help Trump craft his legacy. The prime minister remains wary: despite public praise from the US president, he's received no guarantees on issues closer to home – such as immunity from prosecution in his two ongoing corruption trials.
These criminal cases are more than a legal headache – they're a political time bomb. Trump's vocal support, including recent calls to drop the charges, may play well with Netanyahu's base, but they've stirred unease among Israeli institutions. Some officials see this transatlantic alliance as an attempt to shield the prime minister from accountability.
Within Israel, any deal with Hamas – especially one that involves concessions – risks alienating Netanyahu's hardline supporters. For a leader trying to balance survival with statesmanship, the choices are narrowing.
A rift is forming between Washington and West Jerusalem. Trump wants swift results – a diplomatic breakthrough that he can sell as evidence of his leadership. Netanyahu, by contrast, is playing a slower game: buying time, protecting his flank, and avoiding decisions that might weaken him politically.
Whether they can bridge this gap will define the outcome of the upcoming talks. For Trump, success means a dramatic headline: 'I stopped the war.' For Netanyahu, it's about navigating the storm without sinking.
In an ideal scenario – at least from West Jerusalem's point of view – Trump might back a new Israeli campaign against Iran. That would offer Netanyahu a cleaner battlefield, clearer objectives, and the chance to write a more triumphant chapter in his political story.
But for now, both leaders are walking a tightrope – balancing war, diplomacy, and ambition – hoping not to fall before the next election.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
3 hours ago
- Russia Today
Israel launches Operation Black Flag against Yemen (VIDEO)
Israel has launched an extensive bombing operation targeting key infrastructure in Yemen, with the IDF accusing the Houthi 'terrorist regime' of repurposing ports and power stations for military use. The bombing campaign against one of the world's poorest nations, dubbed Operation Black Flag, was announced early Monday by Defense Minister Israel Katz and the Israel Defense Forces (IDF). The strikes targeted infrastructure at the Yemeni ports of Hodeidah, Ras Isa, and Al-Salif, as well as a power station at Ras Katib. Loud explosions were reported in areas surrounding the targeted sites. 'These ports are used by the Houthi terrorist regime to transfer weapons from the Iranian regime, which are employed to carry out terrorist operations against the State of Israel and its allies,' the IDF claimed. The operation was described as a direct response to drone and missile attacks launched from Houthi-controlled territory toward Israel in recent weeks. According to the IDF, one of the targets struck at Ras Isa was the Galaxy Leader, a commercial vessel seized by Houthi forces in November 2023. The IDF claimed that the militants equipped the ship with a radar system to monitor maritime traffic in the Red Sea and facilitate attacks on commercial vessels. The Ras Kanatib power station was described by the IDF as a legitimate target, serving as a major electricity supply hub for Houthi military operations. 'This is another example of how the Houthi regime uses civilian infrastructure,' the IDF claimed. Katz reiterated that Israel views the Houthis as part of a broader network of Iranian-backed forces in the region. 'As I warned, Yemen will be treated like Tehran,' Katz said in a statement on X. 'Anyone who tries to harm Israel will be harmed, and anyone who raises a hand against Israel will have it cut off. The Houthis will continue to pay a heavy price for their actions.' Israel has accused the Houthi movement of serving as a 'central proxy of the Iranian regime' and receiving weapons and funding to support what it describes as a global campaign of terrorism. It further accused the Houthis of using the maritime domain to project force and disrupt international trade, and stated that Israel remains committed to striking any threats against its citizens 'wherever required.' The Houthis have attacked ships in the Red Sea since late 2023, citing solidarity with the Palestinians during the Gaza conflict. While US President Donald Trump brokered a deal in May to halt the attacks in exchange for a pause in Western airstrikes, the group warned that it would resume its operations if Washington supported Israeli strikes on Iran. The Houthis have since fired several drones and missiles at Israel following last month's ceasefire agreement between Israel and Iran. The latest Israeli retaliatory strikes mark the most extensive military action in Yemen since the series of strikes in May.
Russia Today
3 hours ago
- Russia Today
Musk explains why he changed his stance on Trump
US President Donald Trump's decision to increase the budget deficit instead of cutting costs has prompted Elon Musk to oppose Trump's policies, the tech tycoon has said. Musk made the comments in a thread on X when asked by a user what prompted him to go from 'loving' Trump 'as much as a straight man can' to opposing the president and attacking his policies. 'Increasing the deficit from an already insane $2 [trillion] under Biden to $2.5T. This will bankrupt the country,' Musk replied. Musk was a key supporter in Trump's return to the White House last November. Following the president's inauguration, the tech billionaire became a key figure in the newly created Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), which was established to cut federal spending and costs. The Trump-Musk honeymoon turned out to be short-lived, after the billionaire stepped down from his post last month. Since then, Musk has been critical of Trump's flagship legislation – the One Big, Beautiful Bill – which envisions massive increases in spending, cuts to social programs, and a sharp increase to the budget deficit limit. The two have been locked in a war of words, with the president accusing his former ally of receiving more government subsidies 'than any human being in history,' while openly considering the potential deportation of the South African-born entrepreneur. This week, the One Big, Beautiful Bill narrowly passed the Senate and House, and was signed into law by Trump on July 4. Musk, having pledged to launch his own political party if the bill passes, announced on Independence Day the creation of the America Party, representing the '80% in the middle.' Musk has said he wants to make his new party active by the midterm elections next year, suggesting that he will focus on a handful of seats to take advantage of 'the razor-thin legislative margins' and therefore have 'the deciding vote on contentious laws.'
Russia Today
6 hours ago
- Russia Today
Trump threatens BRICS partners with extra tariffs
US President Donald Trump has threatened to impose an additional 10% tariff on any country doing business with BRICS, with 'no exceptions,' accusing the economic bloc of adopting 'anti-American policies.' The warning came just hours after BRICS leaders concluded their summit in Rio de Janeiro. In their joint declaration, the bloc criticized unilateral tariff actions and condemned what they described as 'indiscriminate' trade measures, without mentioning the US directly. 'Any Country aligning themselves with the Anti-American policies of BRICS, will be charged an ADDITIONAL 10% Tariff. There will be no exceptions to this policy,' Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social on Sunday. The warning echoes Trump's even harsher remarks in February, when he threatened BRICS members with tariffs as high as 100%. At the time, he declared that BRICS was 'dead' if it established a common currency or otherwise challenged the US dollar's dominance in global trade. BRICS, originally formed by Brazil, Russia, India and China in 2006, has expanded to include South Africa, Egypt, Iran, Ethiopia, the United Arab Emirates and Indonesia. At the group's summit in the Russian city of Kazan last year, BRICS approved a new 'partner country' status in response to growing membership interest shown by more than 30 countries. Russian President Vladimir Putin said during Sunday's BRICS summit in Rio de Janeiro that the bloc's combined GDP has surpassed that of the G7 when measured by purchasing power parity. The group now represents nearly half the world's population and about 40% of global GDP. Since returning to office in January, Trump has launched a tariff campaign aimed at protecting US manufacturers. It culminated on April 2 with a set of measures on what he called 'Liberation Day', including a blanket 10% tariff and up to 70% on countries he accused of treating the US most 'unfairly.' Most of the tariffs were paused for 90 days to allow negotiations. The deadline has been further extended to August 1, as Trump is writing letters to US trade partners, with the first 'take it or leave it' deals set to be sent out on Monday. 'I am pleased to announce that the UNITED STATES TARIFF Letters, and/or Deals, with various Countries from around the World, will be delivered starting 12:00 P.M. (Eastern), Monday, July 7th,' he wrote in a separate post on Sunday. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told CNN that Trump would also send out letters to 100 smaller countries 'where we don't have very much trade,' many of which are 'already at the baseline 10%.' So far, the US has signed deals only with the UK, maintaining a 10% rate, and a minimum 20% tariff with Vietnam. Washington also reached a temporary deal with Beijing to limit the tariff at 30% – after hiking it to a whopping 145% in a series of tit-for-tat increases earlier this year.
