Department of Education directs schools to end diversity programs, threatens to pull funding
The directive comes on the heels of other efforts by the Trump administration to eliminate federal funding for Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) programs and initiatives across the country.
Educational institutions, including those related to pre-K, K-12 and higher education, that are not compliant with the DoE's directive risk losing federal support.
'For decades, schools have been operating on the pretext that selecting students for 'diversity' or similar euphemisms is not selecting them based on race. No longer. Students should be assessed according to merit, accomplishment, and character—not prejudged by the color of their skin,' Craig Trainor, acting assistant secretary for civil rights, wrote in a .
Hundreds in DC rally against Trump, Musk efforts to downsize federal government
The calls the United States' history of systemic and structural racism a 'false premise' and claims educational institutions have 'toxically indoctrinated students.'
'It will have a chilling effect on discussions of race, both in admissions materials and in the classroom,' Scott Michelman, Legal Director at the ACLU of the District of Columbia, said in an interview with .
Going forward, the DoE said the overturning race-based affirmative action programs in college admissions would apply more broadly to elementary, middle and high schools.
'By allowing this principle to guide vigorous enforcement efforts, the Trump Education Department will ensure that America's educational institutions will again embrace merit, equality of opportunity, and academic and professional excellence,' the DoE stated.
Federal law thus prohibits covered entities from using race in decisions pertaining to admissions, hiring, promotion, compensation, financial aid, scholarships, prizes, administrative support, discipline, housing, graduation ceremonies, and all other aspects of student, academic, and campus life.
Put simply, educational institutions may neither separate or segregate students based on race, nor distribute benefits or burdens based on race.
The Department of Education's 'Dear Colleague' letter
Target latest company to roll back DEI programs
Michelman said the letter suggests people shouldn't celebrate their diversity or teach about structural racism in the classroom.
'A diverse America … benefits everyone when we all have access to education,' he said.
Not only does the order have implications for higher education institutions and universities in the region, but will also impact K-12 schools in D.C., Maryland and Virginia that receive federal funds.
'The DMV has a proudly diverse community,' Michelman stated, which makes the directive especially relevant to parents, teachers and students in the region.
More than half (55%) of the students enrolled in the 117 public schools in D.C. during the 2023-2024 school year were Black according to . Twenty-two percent were Hispanic and 17% were white.
Traditional public schools and public charter schools received 18% of funding from the federal government, according to the DCPS FY 2023 budget, as noted by the .
Although a majority of DCPS' funding does not come from the federal government, losing federal financing would have potentially significant impacts.
In Maryland, the federal government provides 3.4% of the money used to fund .
Reaction: Trump's executive order on removing DEI policies and programs
As of Tuesday afternoon, it was not clear how the DoE's letter would impact classrooms in local school districts or whether parents, students or staff had received any further instruction from the DoE.
In a statement, a Fairfax County Public Schools spokesperson said the following:
Fairfax County Public Schools is reviewing this communication.Our school division remains committed to fostering a safe, supportive, welcoming and inclusive school environment for all students and staff and celebrating our diversity as a strength.
Fairfax County Public Schools
DC News Now reached out to multiple public school districts and divisions across the region but did not hear back in time for publication.
Institutions were ordered to comply within 14 days of receiving the directive. The final date to do that would be Feb. 28.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
a few seconds ago
- Politico
Musk-linked PAC spends big to promote newly enacted megabill
President Donald Trump pounds a gavel presented to him by House Speaker Mike Johnson after he signed his signature bill at the White House on July 4, 2025. | Evan Vucci/AP By Gregory Svirnovskiy 08/04/2025 05:55 AM EDT Building America's Future, a PAC that has been supported by Elon Musk, is shelling out more than a million dollars to promote recent White House wins, including a GOP domestic policy package the Tesla CEO and former Trump administration employee once called 'a disgusting abomination.' The 30-second ad, titled 'Independence,' is set to run nationally on Fox News and will congratulate President Donald Trump on the passage of Republicans' 'One Big, Beautiful Bill,' which extends his 2017 tax cuts alongside other GOP wins at the expense of nearly $1 trillion in coming Medicaid cuts. 'This Independence Day, President Trump and Congress made the working family tax cuts law,' the spot, which is to debut Monday, will say. 'Freeing Americans from taxes on their tips and overtime, doubling the child tax credit, and cutting taxes for seniors. Republicans know that our country is better off when working families keep more of what they earn. Now, they will.'
Newsweek
2 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Fewer Than 1,000 Trump Gold Cards Will Be Sold—Experts
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. While Trump administration officials have said that more than 70,000 people have expressed interest in the Trump "gold card" visa, some industry experts suggest the number of sales may be significantly lower. Latitude Managing Director Chris Willis told Newsweek, "In the end, less than 1,000 Trump Cards will be sold—far below the standards for a golden visa program." Newsweek has contacted the U.S. Commerce Department for comment. Why It Matters The gold card proposal, introduced in February, would grant U.S. residency to foreign nationals who invest $5 million in the United States. The fast-track pathway targets high-net-worth individuals looking for a route to American citizenship. Since returning to office on January 20, President Donald Trump has enacted sweeping changes to U.S. immigration policy and has moved to limit other immigration pathways, with his administration pausing the processing of some green card applications and ending the temporary legal status of certain migrant groups. A person in Shanghai, China, holds a smartphone displaying the website for registering interest in the new U.S. gold card visa on June 12. A person in Shanghai, China, holds a smartphone displaying the website for registering interest in the new U.S. gold card visa on June 12. Wang Gang/VCG via AP What To Know Since Trump announced the gold card visa program, it has drawn criticism, with experts calling it too expensive. "The key flaw with the Trump Card is that it's overpriced. The Trump administration is overestimating the value of American citizenship," said Latitude CEO Eric Major, who founded HSBC's Global Investor Immigration Services. Latitude, a global advisory firm, advises wealthy clients on dual passports and gold visas worldwide. "A required $5 million donation—not even an investment—is at least five times higher than comparable pathways in Europe," Major told Newsweek. "Without a proper legal basis, the Trump Card lacks legitimacy in the eyes of the market," he added. A key feature of the proposed visa is that recipients would be taxed solely on income they earn in the U.S., rather than on their worldwide income. The program faces several obstacles, Major said. To create such a pathway, the U.S. would need to significantly revise the Internal Revenue Code. This would include establishing a new classification of taxpayers that is separate from citizens, green card holders and those meeting the substantial presence test. These groups are currently taxed on worldwide income. Such changes cannot be made through executive order. It would require legislation passed by both chambers of Congress. According to the global investment migration firm Henley & Partners, interest in U.S. residency programs among wealthy individuals has increased, driven in part by renewed attention to established initiatives such as the EB-5 Immigrant Investor Program following the gold card announcement. The EB-5 program, created in 1990, requires applicants to pay fees ranging from $100,000 to $200,000 to the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, invest between $800,000 and $1 million, and create a minimum of 10 jobs for American workers. In June, the administration launched a website where foreign nationals can register their interest in the program. Registration is open to anyone. What People Are Saying Latitude CEO Eric Major told Newsweek: "The Trump Card, as currently presented, appears to have been launched for political branding. Even though they appear to have received close to 70,000 registrations, this reflects expressions of interest only. No formal applications have been processed, and the scheme still faces severe legal and legislative uncertainty, including whether Congress will approve the new visa category." Abigail Jackson, a White House spokesperson, previously told Newsweek: "President Trump is a businessman and innovator who is always looking for new ways to bring investment back to the United States and encourage legal immigration." David Lesperance, the managing partner at Lesperance & Associates, told Newsweek: "I doubt if the Trump Card will ever see the light of day." What Happens Next While individuals and businesses can register their interest in the visa on details about official application procedures and the vetting and approval processes have not been announced.
CNBC
3 minutes ago
- CNBC
Swiss tensions run high as clock ticks on U.S. tariff deadline
Tensions and fears are running high in Switzerland, as the deadline to strike a trade agreement with the U.S. looms just days away. Without a deal, Switzerland faces 39% duties on its goods imported into the U.S., after it was hit with one of the highest new tariff rates under U.S. President Donald Trump's latest trade policy shift last week. The higher duty surprised many, as widespread reports had previously suggested a trade agreement was near, and was just missing Trump's signature. Over the weekend, reports emerged that the higher tariffs followed a disagreeable Thursday phone call between Swiss President Karin Keller-Sutter and Trump — which Swiss officials rejected, according to Reuters. Guy Parmelin, Swiss federal council member and head of the Department of Economic Affairs, Education and Research, told local media that the government was open to tweaking its proposal to the U.S. — but that it may prove difficult to finalize by the Aug. 7 deadline, Reuters reported. Swiss leaders are set to meet Monday to discuss the latest developments. Elsewhere, U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer somewhat dashed hopes of a flurry of imminent trade agreements, telling CBS News that he was not expecting the latest tariffs to be negotiated lower in the coming days, and that "these tariff rates are pretty much set." Industry groups and business leaders have raised the alarm on potential fallout for businesses, which could include massive job losses. "It was far more than a surprise. We were all shocked," Jan Atteslander, head of the department international relations and member of the executive board at Economiesuisse, told CNBC's Carolin Roth and Ritika Gupta on "Europe Early Edition" on Monday. It would be difficult for Swiss businesses to offset the impact of a 39% tariff, Atteslander noted. "Such a high rate for many companies will just cut off trade, and we are convinced that a deal is still better for both sides than just cutting trade." He added that "there's no substitute for the United States" in terms of export markets, despite Switzerland prioritizing diversification and Swiss businesses finding success around the world. Key Swiss exports include chemical and pharmaceutical products, watches and jewelry, gold, chocolate and electronics. Switzerland's blue-chip SMI index was closed for a national holiday when the new U.S. tariff was announced Friday, but opened lower by around 1.2% at 8:30 a.m. in London on Monday. Shares of chemicals firm Sika fell 2.1%, while luxury groups Richemont and Roche traded around 1.5% lower. The broader Swiss All Share Index was down by 1.5% in early deals. Analysts at UBS said Friday that the direct impact on the overall Swiss equity market from the new duties would be "negative, but not destructive." They flagged the worst-hit firms would include watch and machinery manufacturers, some medtech businesses and smaller companies bthat are more reliant on exports. Fears have also emerged over the Swiss economic outlook in a no-deal scenario. GianLuigi Mandruzzato, senior economist at EFG Asset Management, told CNBC's "Europe Early Edition" on Monday that the risk of a Swiss recession had increased after the announcement, with U.S. export tariffs set to affect about 10% of the economy. The levies would also put deflationary pressure on the economy and therefore on the Swiss National Bank, which has already cut interest rates to zero to stave off weak inflation and the strength of the Swiss franc, Mandruzzato added. While business leaders are hoping for a Swiss-U.S. deal to be reached in time, there is currently a lot of uncertainty, according to Economiesuisse's Atteslander. While the Swiss government was working on a new offer, "it's totally open at the moment," he said. It remains "very hard to tell" whether the government will be able to negotiate a better deal that the current 39% rate before the deadline, Mandruzzato said, with potential bargaining tools including higher purchases of U.S. energy or more direct investment by Swiss companies into the U.S. "It seems that the trade negotiations with the U.S. eventually boils down to what Donald Trump prefers," Mandruzzato said, adding that it was also difficult to assess what the final negotiation points could be.
