Israel, Hamas set for Gaza ceasefire talks as Netanyahu due to meet Trump
Trump said a deal could be reached this week. Before departing for Washington on Sunday, Netanyahu said Israeli negotiators had been given clear instructions to achieve a ceasefire under conditions Israel has accepted.
An Israeli official described the atmosphere at the Gaza talks, mediated by Qatar and Egypt, as positive. Palestinian officials said initial meetings on Sunday ended inconclusively.
A second Israeli official said the issue of humanitarian aid had been discussed in Qatar, without providing details.
The truce talks have been revived after last month's 12-day Israeli air war against its arch-foe Iran, which backs Hamas.
The US-backed proposal for a 60-day ceasefire envisages a phased release of hostages, Israeli troop withdrawals from parts of Gaza and discussions on ending the war entirely.
Ending the war has been the main sticking point in past rounds of talks, with Hamas demanding a full end to the conflict in return for releasing all hostages, and Israel insisting it would fight until Hamas is dismantled.
Some of Netanyahu's hardline coalition partners oppose ending the fighting. However, with Israelis having become increasingly weary of the 21-month-old war, his government is expected to back a ceasefire.
The war was triggered on October 7 2023, when Hamas attacked southern Israel, killing about 1,200 people and taking 251 hostages. About 20 of the remaining 50 hostages in Gaza are believed to be alive.
Israel's retaliatory military campaign against Hamas has killed more than 57,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza's health authorities, led to a hunger crisis, displaced nearly all the population and left most of the territory in ruins.
Reuters
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The South African
33 minutes ago
- The South African
Will MAGA turn its back on Trump over 'Epstein Files' whitewash?
Donald Trump's MAGA base is up in arms after his administration effectively shut down conspiracy theories related to notorious sex offender Jeffrey Epstein that had become an obsession for the US president's diehard supporters. Trump's Justice Department and the FBI said in memo made public Sunday there is no evidence that the disgraced financier kept a 'client list' or was blackmailing powerful figures. They also dismissed the claim that Epstein was murdered in jail, confirming his death by suicide, and said they would not be releasing any more information on the probe. It marked the first time Trump's officials had publicly scotched the stories – pushed by numerous right-wing figures, notably including the FBI's top two officials, before Trump hired them. The backlash was swift and brutal from his 'Make America Great Again' movement – who have long held as an article of faith that 'Deep State' elites were protecting Epstein's most powerful associates in the Democratic Party and Hollywood. 'Next the DOJ will say 'Actually, Jeffrey Epstein never even existed,'' furious pro-Trump conspiracy theorist Alex Jones posted on X. 'This is over the top sickening.' Trump has managed to avoid much of the direct blame over the fiasco, with ire instead being directed at FBI director Kash Patel, his deputy Dan Bongino and Attorney-General Pam Bondi. Bongino and Patel spent years pushing conspiracy theories around the so-called 'Epstein list.' The controversy has clearly rattled Trump, who defended Bongino and Patel on social media as the 'greatest law enforcement professionals in the world,' without explaining why he had spoken out. Bongino reposted Trump's praise and was deluged with furious responses. But the lion's share of the fury has been reserved for Bondi, who assured Fox News in February she had the Epstein client list on her desk and would get to the truth – in remarks endorsed by the White House. Bondi was already on thin ice with MAGA after distributing binders labelled 'The Epstein Files' to influencers at the White House that turned out to contain largely already public information and no new revelations. 'President Trump should fire (Bondi) for lying to his base and creating a liability for his administration,' far right influencer Laura Loomer posted on X. 'She is an embarrassment and she doesn't do anything to help Trump.' White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt was pressed about the controversy and said that Bondi was actually talking about Epstein-related paperwork as a whole – sparking even more MAGA fury. 'This is what happens when the dog catches the car. Or, to put a finer point on it, when you and the people around you become the very 'Deep State' you have spent years attacking,' CNN analyst Chris Cillizza wrote on his Substack newsletter. Epstein died by suicide in a New York prison in 2019 after being charged with sex trafficking. Trump – who has denied visiting the US Virgin Islands home where prosecutors say Epstein sex trafficked underage girls – said ahead of his election he would have 'no problem' releasing files related to the case. It is one of a number of schisms that have opened in the MAGA movement in recent days, with supporters angry over Trump's announcement that weapons supply to Ukraine would resume. Trump's fiercely isolationist base was already upset at the president's bombing of Iran nuclear sites and his statements calling for an easing of immigration raids on farms. Beyond its insights into the power dynamics that animate Trump's supporters, the affair has raised concerns that MAGA disillusionment will damage Republican prospects in the next election cycle. The row comes with Trump under pressure from the launch of a new political party by his estranged former close aide Elon Musk, who had a bitter public split with the president over federal spending. When the Trump-Musk feud blew up last month, Musk alleged that Trump was named in the Epstein files. 'What's the time?' the world's richest man posted on his social media platform X on Monday, alongside an image of an Epstein countdown clock. 'Oh look, it's no-one-has-been-arrested-o'clock again!' Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news. © Agence France-Presse
Eyewitness News
42 minutes ago
- Eyewitness News
Ramaphosa maintains US 30% tariff hike inaccurate representation of trade between US and SA
JOHANNESBURG - As the United States (US) slaps South Africa with a 30% tariff hike, President Cyril Ramaphosa maintains that the figure isn't an accurate representation of trade between the two countries. Ramaphosa, in response to a letter from US President Donald Trump, said American goods enter the South African market under the 0% duty, which is against other countries that are charged 7.6%. Trump, in hiking up the import duties into his country, insists it's a move towards creating balance and fair trade. It's almost been 90 days since he halted his desired changes to the tariff rates as he negotiated deals with countries around the globe. Trump believes there's a major trade deficit disparity, with the relationship between the pair being far from reciprocal. Ramaphosa said available data shows otherwise. His spokesperson, Vincent Magwenya, said, 'This contested interpretation forms part of the issues under consideration by the negotiating teams from South Africa and the United States. Accordingly, South Africa maintains that the 30% reciprocal tariff is not an accurate representation of available trade data.' While the tariff rates don't just apply to South Africa, the country's also been trying to mend relations with the US, which hit an all-time low earlier this year. Ramaphosa said Pretoria would continue with its diplomatic efforts towards a more balanced trade relationship with America, while urging trade negotiation teams here at home to speed up efforts in responding to such developments. 'The President urges government trade negotiations teams and South African companies to accelerate their diversification efforts in order to promote better resilience in both global supply chains and the South African economy.' ALSO READ: Steenhuisen gravely concerned about impact of US tariff import on country's exports
Daily Maverick
an hour ago
- Daily Maverick
After the Bell: Thanks for the letter, Donald. We'll think about it
While South Africa must deal with the fallout from Donald Trump's latest round of tariffs, we might have some strengths to play with. When I finally knocked off last night, I did think that there would be more news to come. Sometimes you do indeed have a spidey sense, sometimes it's just rational to expect more from the day. And so it proved. It was obvious that when President Donald Trump said he was going to send letters to several countries telling them what their new tariffs would be, we would be included in the list. But earlier in the day, during the US breakfast TV cycle, his Treasury secretary, Scott Bessent, had said the letters would spell out that there would still be room for negotiation. To put it another way, Trump might still, as so often before, chicken out. And while he didn't really chicken out with our letter, in essence we are back to where we were before. No one knows what is going to happen, and Trump is trying to put as much pressure as possible on South Africa. Strangely, the letter to each of the countries that received one last night was the same. The only difference was the total tariff. Now, considering all of the heat that Trump and his allies have been putting on us, and how Elon Musk has been claiming he's the victim of discrimination (the richest man in the world … shame), you might think that we would be singled out for special treatment. But we weren't. Instead, the entire letter is about trade, and Trump's idea that the US is somehow suffering because its companies are trading with our companies. And this is something that is completely missed in much of the debate. South Africa doesn't trade with the US; American companies trade with South African ones. They do that because there is some benefit to it for both parties. Even the total 30% tariff shows that, for all of the screaming about 'white genocide', we are no different to places such as Japan or Indonesia. Modern Japan was almost wholly formed as a result of the way it was treated by the US after 1945. It is now an indispensable ally against China, and a Nato partner. And more than that, its chief negotiator actually put on a Maga cap during his talks with Trump, causing a small political storm in Japan. Despite all of that, despite the literal kowtowing to the US, and Trump personally, Japan was slapped with a tariff of 25%. Indonesia got 32%; Bangladesh and Serbia 35%. And no, I can't imagine two more different societies and economies than Serbia and Bangladesh. One has a population of about 171 million; the other under 7 million. Suddenly, our 30% looks like it is all about trade and not about politics. And that, in fact, all of Trump's antics around the Expropriation Act and everything else is not connected to our trading relationship. So, while we may now have to deal with the fallout after all of this, I do wonder if perhaps we have some strengths to play with. First, our economy, unlike some others, does not depend on the US. Sure, it's bad for some people to be locked out of the US – our winemakers and farmers will suffer big time. But we're not Canada or Mexico. They literally need the US. And we have some levers of our own. While Gwede Mantashe will be the first to tell you he and I disagree on many things, I thought people were wrong to laugh at him so quickly when he first said Africa should consider refusing to export its minerals to the US. Probably our biggest lever of the moment is platinum (prices have jumped dramatically in the past two months, mainly because of a scarcity of supply). If Trump doesn't get his platinum from us, he can go either to Russia (while sending more arms to Ukraine … good luck with that) or Canada (which is pretty keen on some levers of its own at the moment) or Zimbabwe. In other words, US companies might suddenly find that they have very few places to get their supplies if we refuse to sell the stuff to the US. Now, it might seem impossible to ban the export of platinum, and probably is. But it would be pretty easy to put a nice big export tax on it. Certainly, you could make the Americans pay for it. But actually all of that could just be performative. We won't need to go that far. What Trump really wants is to look like the boss, to make you wear a Maga cap and still kick you in the shins. He won't do that if you show that you can hit back. And it won't end there. This tariff argument is going to keep going.
