logo
Youth MP Wants To See Pasifika Voices In Politics Amplified

Youth MP Wants To See Pasifika Voices In Politics Amplified

Scoop12 hours ago
Māngere Youth MP Marques Tominiko has returned home from Parliament feeling proud of how he represented his people, but he also thinks that South Auckland remains under the radar.
"I feel like I represented my community to the best of my ability, and I just feel very proud at this moment," Tominiko said.
The 16-year-old admitted that it was intimidating to be surrounded by young people from bigger electorates, places with established political histories and strong connections.
But Tominiko stood firm, wearing his ie faitaga and ulafala through the halls of Parliament, making a distinct impression among the suits and Western attire.
After participating in debates and questioning ministers, Tominiko said the experience was powerful and frustrating, reflecting the promise and persistent gaps for Pasifika youth in politics.
"Something that I wanted to make sure of whilst I was at Parliament was that I didn't come as an individual," he says. "I came as the representative of not only my MP, the Honourable Lemauga Lydia Sosene, but also my Māngere community, the voices of Māngere youth, Pasifika as a whole, and South Auckland.
"Walking around, people would ask me where I'm from, and when I said South Auckland, Māngere, they'd ask, 'Where's that?' It shows we're still unknown and underrepresented."
Despite New Zealand having its most diverse Parliament to date, Tominiko said Pasifika priorities remained low on the agenda, and young people were increasingly frustrated by being excluded from decisions that directly affect them.
One issue that struck a nerve was the debate over race-based scholarships. Marques said some argued these should be scrapped in the name of "equality" but that ignored the reality for many Māori and Pasifika families.
"Yes, we have more Pasifika MPs, and even our Deputy Prime Minister is Pasifika, but we're still unseen and unheard. Our priorities aren't high on the list for this government.
"It's not about equality. It's about equity. Look at the stats: Māori and Pasifika are at the bottom for NCEA pass rates, retention and university entry. These scholarships exist to give us opportunities we're not given otherwise."
Manukau Ward Councillor Lotu Fuli agreed, supporting Tominiko's stance. "I believe in scholarships for Māori and Pasifika. The whole point of such scholarships is to address the inequities that exist to try to even up the playing field. If we get to a stage as a society where those inequities no longer exist, then the need for such scholarships will go."
Tasi Poumale, McAuley High School teacher and community leader, said ethnic scholarships could help break barriers and that visible role models are equally important. Poumale suggested that councils should prioritise civic education to encourage more young Pasifika people to vote, engage, and raise their voices.
"Our Pacific students need to see Pacific role models in those leadership spaces. Education is access to a lot of opportunities ... ethnic scholarships are equitable because not every family has the same resources.
"Council should be going into schools, especially year 11, 12, 13, running workshops ... If they go in and educate and encourage, then our rangatahi will have more exposure and opportunity to participate."
Tominiko also said that young people felt excluded because they lack genuine opportunities to challenge decision-makers.
Associate Education Minister Barbara Edmonds said Youth Parliament's handling of challenging issues showed the importance of allowing young people to speak truthfully, without fear of censorship.
She hoped for the growing number of Pasifika youth MPs this year, but said that the government must allow them to speak openly.
"The whole point of Youth Parliament is to give young people and rangatahi a chance to be heard. The issue of censoring their speeches so they don't criticise the government goes against the spirit of this. Youth MPs should feel safe to say what they think and not let anyone force them to think any other way.
"What was pleasing to see was so many young Pasifika Youth MPs come to Parliament. Their engagement and speeches were outstanding. It gives me so much hope for this next generation I think they could have done an even more important job if their speeches weren't vetted and they weren't told not to criticise."
For Tominiko, the experience reinforced his belief that Pasifika youth must become comfortable with discomfort to claim their rightful place, even when politics felt unsafe.
"Politics is not safe for Pasifika youth right now," he says. "But by getting into those spaces where we're not welcome, we can make them safe. Not just for ourselves, but for our people and our future."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Locals Prepare To Welcome Bike-Riding Teen For Māori Wards
Locals Prepare To Welcome Bike-Riding Teen For Māori Wards

Scoop

time16 minutes ago

  • Scoop

Locals Prepare To Welcome Bike-Riding Teen For Māori Wards

This Wednesday, Wellington locals will prepare to welcome 15 year old Jack Karetai-Barrett as he completes his 894km bike ride to raise awareness about Māori wards. His goal is to deliver a letter to Christopher Luxon explaining why Māori wards matter. The Whakatāne High School student walked almost 80 kilometres from Whakatāne to Mauao (Mt Maunganui) earlier in the year, and has now taken on the next challenge. Friendly locals have been 'host families' as he makes his way down the country in wintery conditions. Jack has been passionate about Māori wards for a number of years, after he attended the petition delivery as a child, calling on the government to treat Māori wards like every other ward, and remove the requirement for a referendum. This petition resulted in the then-government changing the legislation, which sparked immense support for Māori wards. New ward seats went from three across the country, to forty-nine - a 1500% increase showing that councils and communities were ready to embrace Māori representation. In 2024, the Coalition Government reversed this legislation which brought back referendums in retrospect, or requiring councils to scrap the seats themselves. ActionStation Director, Kassie Hartendorp says that it's heartening to see a young person use his skills, talents and bravery to turn a divisive issue into a positive event. 'It's promising to see that the younger generation have clarity on political issues of the day and are willing to forge a different path that brings us all together. Which is exactly what Māori wards can do for communities too.' She says that communities in 42 different council areas will be asked whether to keep their local Māori wards during local body elections this September and October. 'Māori wards have made a difference for entire communities - let's keep a good thing going, and make sure they continue into the future.' ActionStation is co-organising a welcome event for Jack as he arrives at Parliament to deliver his letter on Wednesday 9 July. PM Christopher Luxon has declined to receive Jack's letter or meet with him, however, Labour Leader Chris Hipkins has offered to receive it instead. All supporters are welcome to welcome Jack as he arrives at Parliament after his massive bike ride. Notes: For more information on the event details, please contact rangimarie@ The Protect Māori wards report by ActionStation can be found here: More info can be found on Māori wards here [ ] at the VoteLocal website, which includes the 42 regions holding a referendum.

The government departments that pushed back on cutting diversity, equity and inclusion requirements from the Public Service Act
The government departments that pushed back on cutting diversity, equity and inclusion requirements from the Public Service Act

NZ Herald

time2 hours ago

  • NZ Herald

The government departments that pushed back on cutting diversity, equity and inclusion requirements from the Public Service Act

'They should all know that they're there for the right reasons, which is on merit, and nobody should have to apologise for who they are when they do their job.' Other government agencies gave similar feedback. The Department of Conservation added it 'disagrees' with the proposed changes, because diversity and inclusion were 'important for living standards, inclusion [and] trust'. Numerous concerns were laid out by the Ministry for Pacific Peoples, which explained to Collins that diversity and inclusion had 'levelled [the] entry point' for Pasifika people in the public sector. The agency suggested moving diversity requirements out of the Public Service Act and to a Government Workforce Policy Statement (GWPS) risked a 'legal challenge' under both the Human Rights Act and Employment Relations Act, which it said 'require equal employment opportunities'. The Ministry of Defence suggested that removing the aforementioned provisions might mean agencies would not 'cast the net' as widely when appointing people to roles. Hernandez pointed to a moment when Collins was before the governance and administration select committee for scrutiny week and was unable to give an example of a non-merit-based appointment. He called it 'quite frankly, embarrassing'. 'The purpose of equity policies [is] actually to promote merit, or actually to promote groups that usually wouldn't get a look in,' Hernandez said. 'The public service works best when it looks like the communities it's designed to represent. I mean, we wouldn't want, for example, a Parliament of just 123 people from Dunedin.' Numerous Government departments gave feedback on proposals to change diversity and inclusion requirements. A separate briefing to Collins noted the proposals were consistent with the coalition agreement between the National Party and Act. The February briefing, also from the Public Service Commission to the minister, said it understood Collins was concerned there was 'not sufficient focus on merit' when chief executives were being appointed. The commission's paper noted that at the time, the minister wanted advice on removing diversity and inclusion requirements in those instances. The Public Service Commission told the minister that diversity policies are most suited to large groups of people, 'like the public service', where it said many societal groups can be reflected. Collins was then told that some departments were known as 'population agencies', where they relate directly to one or more groups in society. 'In these cases, knowledge of that community, relationships within that community and respect and trust of that community may be critical to the successful performance of the role. These attributes would be included in the position description for the role and therefore assessed as part of 'merit' or being most suited to the role,' the briefing read. The commission's paper went on to state that it would be possible to remove diversity requirements for public sector bosses while still considering relationships with specified communities when looking at population agencies. Collins earlier this year confirmed she was actively looking at cutting diversity requirements from legislation that guides government agencies and their workers. Her plans included proposing to remove requirements for public sector bosses to 'promote' diversity and inclusion . Such requirements have also faced scrutiny from New Zealand First leader Winston Peters, who labelled them 'woke' . When asked for a statement on the matter, the Ministry for the Environment pointed to an email sent from Environment Secretary James Palmer to Public Service Commissioner Sir Brian Roche in March. Palmer wrote that removing diversity and equity matters would not reduce much effort in terms of chief executive responsibilities. He noted such matters could be picked up in a workforce policy statement, but highlighted risks with the proposal. 'I think their removal from the Public Service Act risks sending a signal that we don't value diversity and pay equity, and the need for the public service to reflect the populations it serves. In other words, the downside of these proposals risk[s] outweighing the benefits in practical terms.' Te Puni Kokiri, which recommended diversity and inclusion remain an expectation for chief executives, said the paper's summary was an accurate representation of its feedback. The Ministry for Pacific Peoples said that as decisions on the amendments were under active consideration, it was unable to comment further. Azaria Howell is a multimedia reporter working from Parliament's press gallery. She joined NZME in 2022 and became a Newstalk ZB political reporter in late 2024, with a keen interest in public service agency reform and government spending.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store