
Rajnath at SCO meeting, Iran's trade ties with China, and a report that Xi may skip the BRICS summit in Brazil
Defence Minister Rajnath Singh attended the Defence Ministers' meeting of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) in China's Qingdao on Thursday (June 26), but refused to sign a draft statement that did not mention the Pahalgam terror attack. As a result, no joint declaration was made.
According to a Ministry of Defence press release, he also met his Chinese counterpart, Dong Jun. Singh spoke of 'the necessity of solving the complex issues through a structured roadmap of permanent engagement and de-escalation'. Notably, a permanent resolution has not been mentioned in recent statements.
Iranian Defence Minister Aziz Nasirzadeh was also in attendance, in his first foreign visit after the recent Iran-Israel conflict. He expressed gratitude over Beijing's stand, even as China has avoided directly engaging with the matter, as mentioned in last week's tracker.
The South China Morning Post reported that Chinese President Xi Jinping would not attend the BRICS summit in Rio de Janeiro in early July. This would mark his absence from the summit for the first time since he became President, the report said.
Finally, Taiwanese President Lai Ching-te said in a speech that Taiwan was 'of course a country', drawing a sharp response from China, which insists that the island is part of its territory.
Here is a closer look at these developments:
The SCO was established in 2001 to enhance regional cooperation on terrorism, and has 10 members (including Russia, Iran and Pakistan). The Defence Minister made references to Pakistan as part of India's diplomatic push following the Pahalgam attack. This was also his first visit to China in five years, after the 2020 standoff along the Line of Actual Control (LAC) began.
Singh said, 'Some countries use cross-border terrorism as an instrument of policy and provide shelter to terrorists. There should be no place for such double standards. SCO should not hesitate to criticise such nations'.
UPSHOT: In general, international cooperation over terrorism has often been hampered by countries taking positions based on their own strategic interests. The position in the SCO is complicated by the presence of both Pakistan, which is among the world's most active exporters of terrorism, and India, the primary target of the Pakistani terror infrastructure for decades.
China is Pakistan's strongest backer in international fora, and has long described their relationship as 'iron-clad'. This makes it difficult for India to garner diplomatic consensus against Pakistan-backed terrorist attacks.
There are other complexities too. India has a long-term strategic partnership with Russia, which also has deep ties with China, which have grown stronger after the Russian invasion of Ukraine and the targeting of Moscow by Western sanctions. Iran and the central Asian republics have their own relationships with China.
It remains to be seen whether the SCO leaders' summit in Tianjin, China, later this year sees a different diplomatic outcome.
At the SCO meeting, the Iranian Defence Minister thanked Beijing, saying, 'We hope China will continue to stand for justice, help maintain the current ceasefire and play a greater role in easing regional tensions.'
On Sunday, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio mentioned China amid reports of Iran potentially closing the Strait of Hormuz, an important choke point for global oil trade. 'I encourage the Chinese government in Beijing to call them about that, because they heavily depend on the Straits of Hormuz for their oil,' Rubio said.
UPSHOT: Questions have been raised in recent days over the limited Chinese involvement in the Middle East, which was mostly restricted to condemnations and statements calling for de-escalation. Iran has now called for a more proactive Chinese role at a forum that identifies security as a priority area.
Iran has a critical economic relationship with China, which buys about 90% of Iranian oil exports, totalling around 14% of China's oil purchases. It has evaded Western sanctions through so-called 'teapot refineries', which are smaller and privately owned, compared to state oil companies.
The South China Morning Post reported this week that President Xi would not attend the BRICS summit in Rio, 'marking his first-ever absence from the gathering of leading emerging economies'.
The Brazilian government had been informed of a scheduling conflict, and Premier Li Qiang could stand in for the President, the report claimed.
According to the report, Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva's invitation to Prime Minister Narendra Modi for a state dinner after the summit could have played a part in the decision by Xi, who would have been wary of being 'perceived as a supporting actor' at the gathering.
UPSHOT: Brazil, Russia, India, and China formed the grouping in 2009, with South Africa joining the next year. Today, it has six additional members — Iran, the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Ethiopia and Indonesia. The expansion of BRICS has been seen as countries of the Global South moving away from US-led groupings, and towards a multipolar world order.
However, both BRICS and the SCO include countries that have important trade relationships with China, and Beijing has often been described as the 'driving force' behind their expansions, in light of its own geopolitical rivalry with the US.
4. Is Taiwan a country? Depends on who you ask
Taiwanese President Lai Ching-te recently delivered the first two of his 10 planned speeches, called '10 Talks on the Country'. He drew upon history to argue that 'Taiwan has never belonged to the People's Republic of China' (official name for the mainland China government).
China reacted with its usual vehemence, with a Chinese Foreign Affairs Ministry spokesperson describing the speeches as 'Taiwan's independence manifesto'. The people of Taiwan had originally migrated from the Chinese mainland, the spokesperson countered.
'Taiwan has never been a country, and it is an integral part of China,' the spokesperson said, adding, 'Taiwan's future can only be decided by the more than 1.4 billion Chinese people, including our compatriots in Taiwan.'
UPSHOT: The Taiwan issue has been referenced by China as a 'red line' in terms of its core security concerns. It has accused the US of backing a 'separatist' movement on the island, and has frequently targeted the Taiwanese government.
Increasingly, surveys have recorded that the people of Taiwan identify themselves as Taiwanese rather than Chinese, and the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has reiterated this view. It has consecutively won three national elections since 2016, although it returned with a minority government in 2024.
In less than a month, several 'recall' polls will be held in Taiwan for a quarter of the total parliamentary seats, all held by the opposition Kuomintang party. The leaders of Kuomintang fought with Mao's communists during the Chinese Civil War (1927-49), and fled to Taiwan after the victory of the communists. However, within Taiwanese politics, the Kuomintang has been perceived as being closer to Beijing.
The DPP recently released a video calling on people to 'oppose the communists' in the recall, according to a Reuters report. Winning those seats would give the DPP greater control over Parliament.
Rishika Singh is a Senior sub-editor at the Explained Desk of The Indian Express. She enjoys writing on issues related to international relations, and in particular, likes to follow analyses of news from China. Additionally, she writes on developments related to politics and culture in India.
... Read More
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
29 minutes ago
- First Post
Lessons Israel-Iran war has for India's Operation Sindoor
India has to learn from Israel the contours of future war, where the enemy could be already well within the gates, wreaking havoc when it is given the signal read more It may be too early to learn lessons from the Israel-Iran war, but there are certainly some quick takeaways for India. Because Operation Sindoor is not over, and terrorism from Pakistan is unlikely to end as long as the army is in control there. Don't forget also that everyone is watching the war calibration carefully. Lessons will be learnt by all sides in this for their own purposes. And that's where we need to think and analyse and plan for the future. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Deep Intelligence The first aspect of the war is that Israel had access to precise intelligence on the ground in terms of a continuous feed. Fodrow, Natanz and others were static bases and needed no great intelligence capability. But the targeting of some 14 scientists is a different game altogether. Reports indicate that the majority were killed by explosive-laden drones, indicating a very high level of internal penetration into Iran. Israel has always had a formidable intelligence capability. But this was something else, and it's an open question what kind of deep assets it used when the 'go' command was given. For depend upon this. Such assets are not built overnight. That is worrying in terms of future wars. That means India has to not just up its technical intelligence for the future but also use technology to guard against such locally launched attacks – which could be on intel agencies, on high officials, and on personnel of sensitive installations. So far, the thrust of defence expenditure has been in securing the country's borders. Time to look inwards. Sindoor as Template The second aspect is rather the reverse. In many ways, the US operation, 'Midnight Hammer', was a textbook copy of 'Operation Sindoor'. Trump's announcement of having targeted 'only' nuclear sites, clear signs of talking to Iranians, and most of all, a series of moves to end the war quickly, something that the US is not known for. Those moves included allowing China to continue to buy oil – though sanctions remain – thus ensuring that outside powers did not take a hand. Iran was mollified by leaving open the possibility of sanctions relief. Then was his weighing heavily on Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu, to end his continuing strikes. Since the US could at any time stop its missile interception assistance for Israel, this arm-twisting was likely to have had a telling effect. The Standoff War Another takeaway from both operations is the 'stand-off' wars. Prior to US entry into Iran, Washington made sure that Israel had managed complete air superiority with bombing and missile raids. Even then it used a formidable array of aircraft that included the famed Stealth B-2's, practically invisible to radar, and fighter aircraft from its many bases in West Asia. And to make trebly sure, some 'two dozen' land-attack cruise missiles were fired from a submarine which was entirely undetected, at Isfahan. All attacks were at the extreme west of Iran, indicating that aircraft had no intention of doing a flyby and 'loitering' in the war zone. The blueprint of overwhelming force is used since even one aircraft lost would have been the political end for President Trump. No cities were hit, and US intel would have known full well that the major sites had been evacuated. But the lesson is that when there are no serious casualties, escalation is unlikely. This was also the case in Sindoor, where casualties were few. India did not have such a luxury of a package of aircraft (not to mention bases from where fighters could take off and provide protective cover), nor did it even enter Pakistan. But both provide a lesson in 'stand-off' wars. That means a line of technology development that includes, vitally, the ability of continuous satellite monitoring. India's own space programmes need to take note, and quickly. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Control of the Narrative Another issue to assess is control of the narrative. Even today, the imagery that is being discussed all over the internet is that of Iran. The damages to Israel were kept under wraps, with even the last missile strike by Iran, which mowed down three buildings at Beersheba, with casualties estimated at 4, which seems incredible given the clearly apparent destruction. But Israelis have long been used to violence and have safe rooms, standard procedures for quick evacuation and bunkers. What was hidden even more was the cost that Israel had to take on, with one estimate putting this at $3 billion in immediate costs, while tax authorities estimate costs at more than double the sum of claims stemming from the October 7 attack plus all 615 days since. And that's just claims for damages to property. Apart from this is the loss of man hours and its effect on gross domestic product. But the point is that none of this was apparent in an independent media, with the opposition swiftly putting aside rivalry in a show of national solidarity. It was only after a truce was declared that the Opposition lambasted Trump for interfering in the criminal charges against Netanyahu, which began in 2020 for fraud and breach of trust. Israel, like India, enjoyed widespread support after the first Hamas attack, which, however, rapidly deteriorated as its war entered its 629th day. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Even the recent meeting of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation saw a split – as did the G-7 meeting – over the question of the Iran war. In the end, the general consensus is that Iran can still make the bomb, perhaps in months. The takeaway of this lesson is probably that warmaking seldom wins friends and, in today's world, may not even deliver desired objectives. Far better to build up a narrative, as Defence Minister Rajnath Singh did recently when he refused to sign on to a joint statement of the Shanghai Organisation Cooperation while calling out the double standards on terrorism. But overall, here's the sum of it all. Internally, India has managed Kashmir without inordinate use of force; in fact, with 'one hand tied behind its back'. That, together with the manifold changes after the revocation of Article 370, had integrated Kashmir to the rest of India even more, not the other way around. That's something Tel Aviv should learn. But India has to, in turn, learn from Israel the contours of future war, where the enemy could be already well within the gates, wreaking havoc when it is given the signal. In this, both Pakistan and China are better placed than India. Time to reverse that, either with human assets – which are difficult for obvious reasons – and with technology. Future iterations of Operation Sindoor need to keep this clearly in the forefront. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The author is Director (R&A) at the Centre for Land Warfare Studies. She tweets @kartha_tara. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.

Hindustan Times
30 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Iran holds funeral for top brass, scientists killed in Israeli strikes
Mourners dressed in black lined streets in Iran's capital Tehran at a funeral on Saturday for top military commanders, nuclear scientists and some of the civilians killed during this month's war with Israel. People attend the funeral procession of Iranian military commanders, nuclear scientists and others killed in Israeli strikes in Tehran.(Reuters) At least 16 scientists and 10 senior commanders were among those mourned at the funeral, according to state media, including armed forces chief Major General Mohammad Bagheri, Revolutionary Guards commander General Hossein Salami, and Guards Aerospace Force chief General Amir Ali Hajizadeh. Their coffins were driven into Tehran's Azadi Square adorned with their pictures as well as rose petals and flowers, as crowds waved Iranian flags. State-run Press TV showed an image of ballistic missiles on display. State TV said the funeral, dubbed the "funeral procession of the Martyrs of Power", was held for a total of 60 people killed in the war, including four women and four children. Attending the funeral were President Masoud Pezeshkian and other senior figures including Ali Shamkhani, who was seriously wounded during the conflict and is an adviser to Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Bagheri, Salami and Hajizadeh were killed on June 13, the first day of the war. Israel, the only Middle Eastern country widely believed to have nuclear weapons, said its war against regional rival Iran aimed to prevent Tehran from developing its own nuclear weapons. Iran denies having a nuclear weapons program. The U.N. nuclear watchdog, which carries out inspections in Iran, has said it has "no credible indication" of an active, coordinated weapons programme in Iran. A senior Israeli military official said on Friday that Israel had killed more than 30 senior security officials and 11 senior nuclear scientists during the war. According to Iranian health ministry figures, 610 people were killed on the Iranian side in the 12-day war, 13 of them children and 49 women, before a ceasefire went into effect on Tuesday. More than 4,700 were injured. Activist news agency HRANA put the number of killed at 974, including 387 civilians. Israel's health ministry said 28 were killed in Israel and 3,238 injured.

Time of India
30 minutes ago
- Time of India
Iranians CHANT ‘Death To US & Israel' At Funeral For Commanders, Nuclear Scientists Killed In War
Iranians chanted 'Death To America' and 'Death To Israel' at 'historic' state funeral for military commanders and nuclear scientists. Social media footage showed Iranians donning black clothes, marching through streets of Tehran behind coffins of around 60 people with Iranian flags. Coffins draped in the Iranian flag, bearing portraits of deceased commanders, were flanked by crowds near Tehran's Enghelab Square. Watch for more details.