Most US adults say child care costs are a 'major problem,' a new AP-NORC poll finds
But they're divided over how to solve the problem and what role the government should have in that solution.
About three-quarters of U.S. adults see child care costs as a 'major problem,' but only about half say helping working families pay for child care should be a 'high priority' for the federal government, according to the June poll from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research.
The coronavirus pandemic was a tipping point, revealing the child care industry's vulnerabilities. The latest congressional package of tax cuts included tax credits and benefits for parents and businesses that assist employees with child care. Those changes have been praised by some, while others say millions of families at lower income levels wouldn't get the full credit and would be affected by cuts in Medicaid and food stamps.
The poll findings help explain the difficulty advocacy groups, elected officials and families navigate in trying to address the high costs of care: While most agree it's a problem, there isn't a simple fix. For instance, while government-funded child care is popular, that might not be everyone's first choice. Many U.S. adults also think it's better for children with two parents to be cared for full time by a parent.
'Everyone kind of agrees that it's a problem that we need to address,' said Sarah Rittling, executive director of the First Five Years Fund advocacy organization. 'By having this issue out there, it really is driving a lot of bipartisan conversations.'
Most Americans support initiatives to offer child care or additional time for working families to spend with babies. About two-thirds support providing free or low-cost day care for children too young to attend public school, and a similar share favor requiring employers to provide paid family leave for new parents.
Women are more likely than men to support the proposals, and Democrats are more likely than Republicans, but each is popular across the board.
Mary Banek, a nurse anesthetist of Midlothian, Texas, said she helps take care of her 1-year-old grandson so he doesn't need day care. When she had her kids, she left the workforce and got a license to start a day care from her home to watch 12 children, including her own, so she could generate income.
Banek said she's surprised at the high fees at day cares these days.
'I don't know what's happened and why it is so expensive,' Banek said, adding maybe there's a way to cap costs. She doesn't feel the government should foot the cost.
Many think parents should be caregivers
While many solutions focus on families with working parents, there isn't broad agreement this is the best arrangement for children. Just under half of U.S. adults, 45%, say children with two parents are better off when one parent doesn't have a job and raises the children. Only about 1 in 10 say children are better off when both parents work full time, and about 4 in 10 say it doesn't make a difference.
Vice President JD Vance has tried to push for ideas that would encourage Americans to have families but has opposed government spending on child care, saying children benefit from having a parent or family member at home as a caretaker.
About half of men say children with two parents are better off when one is the full-time caregiver, compared with about 4 in 10 women.
Stephen Yip-Wineman, 45, a high school teacher from Murrieta, California, who describes himself as a moderate, said he feels society doesn't see the value of parents choosing to be caretakers.
'A lot of people are pushed into the idea that everyone in their family is going to work and that's the way of being a productive member of society,' Yip-Wineman said. 'They think staying home and taking care of the kids is somehow not contributing.'
Yip-Wineman has two children ages 12 and 14, and their mother stays home, but he says his ideas of having a parent do the caretaking don't have to do with making the mother the primary caretaker.
'Having a parent raise the kids is not about pushing traditional Christian values and trying to keep women out of the workplace," he said. "It's about trying to be more personally engaged with each other.'
Are changes happening?
Many Democrats and Republicans have endorsed expansions to the child tax credit as a way to support families and lift children and young families out of poverty.
While campaigning as Donald Trump's running mate, Vance raised the possibility of increasing the child tax credit to $5,000, saying that would help more parents stay home with their children.
About 7 in 10 U.S. adults said they'd support increasing the child tax credit from $2,000 to $2,500 for parents who are U.S. citizens, a Washington Post/Ipsos poll from June found. Republicans and Democrats were similarly likely to support this: About 8 in 10 of each were in favor.
In the final bill, however, the child tax credit increased to $2,200.
Beyond expanding the child tax credit, the package also increased a benefit allowing most working parents to claim a higher percentage of their child care expenses and get more tax credits.
Organizations want increased funding for federal early-learning and care programs, including a child care program for low-income families and an early-education program called Head Start. Trump's Republican administration backed away from a proposal this year to eliminate funding for Head Start.
Other groups, including Child Care Aware of America, have pointed out the new law's cuts in Medicaid would result in a loss of health coverage for many child care workers.
___
The AP-NORC poll of 1,158 adults was conducted June 5-9, using a sample drawn from NORC's probability-based AmeriSpeak Panel, which is designed to be representative of the U.S. population. The margin of sampling error for adults overall is plus or minus 4 percentage points.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
an hour ago
- Los Angeles Times
Federal judge orders Trump administration to halt alleged indiscriminate immigration stops
A federal judge on Friday temporarily blocked the Trump administration from using racial profiling to carry out indiscriminate immigration arrests that advocates say have terrorized Angelenos, forced some immigrants into hiding and damaged the local sweeping ruling from U.S. District Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong, a Biden appointee, is a major setback for President Trump 's mass deportation plan. And it was widely hailed by immigrant rights groups and California Democrats frustrated by continuous show of force on the streets of Southern California. If followed, the ruling would stop immigration agents from roving around Home Depots and car washes stopping brown-skinned, Spanish-speaking day laborers to arrest on immigration charges, as they have been for the past month.
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
LA Mayor Karen Bass signs order to provide cash payments to immigrants affected by ICE raids
Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass signed an executive order Friday to bolster protocols and support immigrant neighborhoods, including offering cash assistance, in response to raids by the Trump administration targeting those living in the United States illegally. The order is intended to help protect the city's workforce and residents from the federal government during immigration enforcement operations. Advertisement It also demands that federal agencies provide records of the raids, who was detained and for what reason and the cost to taxpayers, which will be part of a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request. 'There is a need for me to have an executive directive to help our city understand how to protect itself from our federal government,' Bass said at a press conference. 'What we have seen here over the last, now six weeks of raids that pop up, and we never know exactly when and where they're going to happen. 'The directive will help city workers know how to address immigration officials should they approach a city department,' she added. Advertisement The order also requires city departments to create a plan for protocols and training on how to comply with Los Angeles' sanctuary city ordinance. 3 Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass signed an executive order to help out immigrant neighborhoods by offering strengthened protocols and cash assistance. AP In addition, Bass said a plan is being worked out to provide cash assistance to those affected by the enforcement operations, the Los Angeles Times reported. Cash cards with a 'couple hundred' dollars on them will be distributed by immigrants' rights groups in about a week, Bass said. Advertisement The money will not come from city coffers, but from philanthropic partners, she said. 'You're telling me that isn't a Babylon Bee headline?' a White House spokesperson told Fox News Digital, referring to the satirical news site. 'Recent immigration enforcement in California has resulted in successfully detaining countless violent criminals and liberating children from illegal labor exploitation. But instead of helping these children or putting American citizens first, Bass is doubling down on her defense of illegal aliens.' 3 The new legislation comes in response to the ICE raids by the Trump administration in California last month. / MEGA Advertisement 'Americans are sick of these pathetic stunts from Democrat politicians. That's why they elected President Trump,' the spokesperson added. 'They want someone who will put America First, and it's certainly not Karen, Gavin & Co.' Bass has condemned immigration operations targeting criminal illegal immigrants in the city. Los Angeles is one of several cities suing the Trump administration over the 'unlawful' raids. Immigration agents on Thursday raided a cannabis farm in nearby Ventura County to target illegal immigrants working there. Ten illegal immigrant minors, eight of them unaccompanied, were found at the farm, U.S. Customs and Border Protection Commissioner Rodney Scott said. 3 Bass told reporters, 'There is a need for me to have an executive directive to help our city understand how to protect itself from our federal government.' Getty Images The farm is now being investigated for potential child labor violations. Advertisement Earlier in the week, nearly 100 National Guard troops and immigration authorities targeted crime-ridden MacArthur Park in Los Angeles, prompting Bass to go to the park to demand a halt to the operation, which was rebuffed by U.S. Border Patrol Chief Gregory Bovino. 'I don't work for Karen Bass,' Bovino told Fox News at the time. 'Better get used to us now because this is going to be normal very soon. We will go anywhere, anytime we want in Los Angeles.' Fox News Digital has reached out to Bass' office.
CBS News
an hour ago
- CBS News
Colorado agency that administers Medicaid will make big changes under new federal law
Agency that administers Medicaid will make big changes under new federal law, state official says Agency that administers Medicaid will make big changes under new federal law, state official says Agency that administers Medicaid will make big changes under new federal law, state official says As executive director of the Colorado Department of Health Care Policy and Financing, Kim Bimestefer oversees the state's largest health insurance program. Kim Bimestefer, executive director of the Colorado Department of Health Care Policy and Financing CBS Medicaid covers 1.2 million Coloradans, or one in five residents. Verifying the eligibility of so many people each year is already a colossal task. Bimestefer says, under President Donald Trump's new tax and spending law, it will become far more challenging. "We've got to set up an entire industry in 18 months," Bimestefer said. Bimestefer says the state has sophisticated software that can automatically check things such as age, income, address and citizenship. But the new law creates new requirements, including 80 hours of work, school or community service each month for people between the ages 19 and 64 who aren't pregnant, disabled or have kids under age 14. There is no automated system for that or a master list to know who's in school and who's volunteering to verify eligibility. And Bimestefer notes the state now must do that verification twice a year. "We have to build the entirety of the infrastructure to capture and automate and to make sure that we don't have people impeded of getting through the eligibility process and therefore losing coverage," Bimestefer said. "Because the down-streaming impacts of people losing coverage are absolutely catastrophic." Bimestefer says up to 377,000 Coloradans could be impacted by the new eligibility requirements. It's estimated about 56% of them are already working, but Bimestefer says verifying that will be the challenge. Bimestefer worries thousands of Coloradans will lose coverage. "They'll move. They'll change their email address. They won't realize have to do it," Bimestefer explained. That will lead to more uninsured patients, Bimestefer says, and more uncompensated care, which will increase costs for everyone. "The north star is to have people covered but, again, this is going to be part of many difficult decisions that this state is going to have to step up and make," Bimestefer said. While most of the changes to Medicaid -- including the new eligibility requirements -- don't take effect for at least a year and a half. Bimestefer says she needs to start preparing now, which takes money. Bimestefer says lawmakers -- who decide what services are covered -- will have to make tough decisions soon. Gov. Jared Polis is expected to call them back to work next month. The new law provides $200 million to help with implementation, but the money will be shared among all states. The state of Kentucky alone spent about $270 million on a work requirement only before a court blocked it. "Are we going to lower provider reimbursements? Are we going to change benefits? All those are very difficult decisions," Bimestefer said. "But were going to have to move some of those levers in order to deal with the fiscal realities that the costs will continue to go up, and the revenues available will continued to be strained." Bimestefer says, not only will Colorado have to spend millions of dollars on new hires and new systems to implement the law, it will have to do so as it loses millions of dollars. Starting in 2027, the law limits federal matching funds that Colorado has used to increase provider reimbursements. The state budget is already expected to take a billion-dollar hit from other provisions in the law, so the legislature won't be able to backfill the lost revenue, which Bimestefer says could be as much as $2.5 billion. She says the money has helped double the number of providers that accept Medicaid over the last 5 years. If reimbursement drops, providers may limit how many Medicaid patients they see. The law provides $50 billion to help offset the loss of funds for rural hospitals, which see the most Medicaid patients. Bimestefer says the state should know in the next few months how much of that money Colorado will receive. The original bill included a provision that cut additional federal funding to states like Colorado that pay for health care for undocumented immigrants, but that was dropped from the final bill. Bimestefer says that doesn't mean the Cover All Coloradans program won't face cuts. It was expected to serve about 3,600 people this year at a cost of $27 million, but it serves nearly six times that -- 21,000 -- at a cost of more than $50 million.
