logo
Perfume brands fighting a ‘lost cause' against cheap dupes, say lawyers

Perfume brands fighting a ‘lost cause' against cheap dupes, say lawyers

The Guardian12-04-2025
One perfume smells suspiciously like a £355 bottle of Baccarat Rouge 540 eau de parfum. Another, which has notes of grapefruit, rose and Levantine spice, is reminiscent of a £215 bottle of Penhaligon's Halfeti. But unlike those luxury brands, these 'dupe scents' can cost as little as a fiver.
As many as half of UK consumers are now thought to have succumbed to the social media craze for cheap perfumes 'inspired by' well-known luxury fragrances. And lawyers now say perfume brands and beauty companies need greater legal protection from rivals who imitate their products.
Intellectual property lawyers and chartered trademark attorneys told the Observer that the law must catch up to better protect the original creators of perfumes. Some said they had been contacted by companies seeking advice on how to legally dupe a perfume, while others had received enquiries from luxury brands about how to take legal action against dupe scents.
'Everybody wants to smell good and to have an affordable slice of luxury. However, it comes at the expense of proper artists, because perfume creation is an art,' Mireille Dagger, legal director at Broadfield law firm, told the Observer. 'These companies are riding on the coattails of artists. It's very unfair. It's very hard to create a perfume brand and build it up. It requires expertise, artistic talent, time, energy and investment.'
'There have been no known cases in the UK of any perfume brands being able to trademark their scent – because under UK law, it's a requirement that a trademark be graphically representable,' Dagger said.
While perfume manufacturers can trademark their brand names, distinctive labels and unique bottle shapes, none of the lawyers the Observer spoke to believed it would be possible, in practice, to trademark the scent of an original fragrance. A company needs to be able to clearly, precisely and objectively describe what they are protecting with a trademark.
'When it comes to scent, you just can't do that, because scent is subjective. Different people smell different things. It's very hard to consistently reproduce that scent on paper,' added Dagger. 'You're not able to put it in writing.'
Equally, a scent cannot usually be patented, said Eloise Harding, a partner in Mishcon de Reya's intellectual property department, because this requires a particular perfume formulation to have an 'inventive step' during its creation. 'I don't think any kind of fragrance is likely to have a sufficient level of inventive step,' she said.
A brand owner might not even want to patent its perfume formulation, said Robert Lye, legal director at Gateley. 'The quid pro quo for patent protection is that the patented invention is made public, meaning that anyone would be able to copy the formulation once the patent has expired.' The maximum duration of a patent is 20 years, he added.
Some copycat perfume manufacturers are using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GCMS) to break down the complex chemical profiles of expensive perfumes so they can emulate these scents – potentially using cheaper, 'substandard' ingredients, Dagger said. The cheaper imitations are particularly popular on TikTok, where there are thousands of posts with the hashtag #perfumedupe.
With the once-inaccessible trade secrets about a perfume's formulation now able to be deduced using GCMS, 'there is no way, legally, for perfumers to protect their work,' said Dagger.
She would like to see 'dupe brands being forced to pay royalties to the original brands'. As for the law, 'something creative needs to happen – protection for the fragrance industry is lagging woefully behind beauty and fashion.'
The UK fragrance market was estimated to be worth £1.74bn in 2024, and is on track to surpass £2bn by 2029, according to market researchers Mintel.
In a recent survey of 1,435 fragrance buyers in the UK, 50% said they had bought a dupe perfume. A third of those surveyed said they would be prepared to buy a dupe fragrance again while 18% of those who had not yet bought one said they would be interested in doing so.
'It is almost a lost cause for perfume brands to defend themselves, if all they are saying is 'we came up with this fragrance first', because I don't think consumers really care about that,' said Dionne Officer, a Mintel research analyst.
Admirers of designer perfume brands no longer think they should have to pay through the nose to have access to luxury scents: 'Seeing dupe scents on social media, and knowing influencers are buying them, has made them more acceptable,' she added.
Younger consumers in particular are accustomed to seeing fast-fashion brands duplicating independent designers, and are unlikely to feel it is a taboo to openly wear a dupe scent or even give one as a gift.
'Maybe in older generations, it would have been looked down upon, to copy something,' said Officer. 'But younger consumers have grown up in a time of economic instability, where you're praised if you get a bargain – it's seen as quite cool, now.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Keir Starmer: My sister-in-law is lucky to be alive after firebomb
Keir Starmer: My sister-in-law is lucky to be alive after firebomb

Times

time27-06-2025

  • Times

Keir Starmer: My sister-in-law is lucky to be alive after firebomb

Sir Keir Starmer has revealed that his sister-in-law could have died in the fire-bombing of his old London home, describing how 'shaken up' the attack has left his family. The prime minister told his biographer that his wife's sister and her partner had been in bed at his former home in Tufnell Park when it was attacked just after 1.30am. He said had she not still been awake at the time the consequences could have been much worse, and the incident had had a deep impact on his family. 'She happened to still be awake,' Starmer said. 'So she heard the noise and got the fire brigade. But it could have been a different story.' The attack last month took place the night before Starmer held a press conference on migration, in which he made his infamous remark that Britain had become an 'island of strangers'. The prime minister told Tom Baldwin in a piece for The Observer that he now 'deeply regrets' the comment, saying he had 'no idea' that the phrase had an association with Enoch Powell. While he did not blame being preoccupied with the attack for making the comment, he said he should have chosen his words more carefully. 'I wouldn't have used those words if I had known they were — or even would be interpreted as — an echo of Powell,' he said. 'I had no idea — and my speechwriters didn't know, either. But that particular phrase — no, it wasn't right. I'll give you the honest truth: I deeply regret using it.' He added that he had very nearly cancelled the press conference altogether. 'I was really, really worried. I almost said, 'I won't do the bloody press conference.' Vic [his wife, Victoria] was really shaken up; as, in truth, was I. It was just a case of reading the words out and getting through it somehow so I could get back to them.' Elsewhere in the interview, Starmer described how he had personally gone to clear out the house belonging to his brother, Nick, who died at the end of last year. 'The previous day I had been taking calls on the future of European security and there I was, on my hands and knees with a brush, scrubbing out the back of the bog,' he said. 'That's quite a good leveller.' Asked why he didn't get cleaners in he replied: 'I didn't want anyone else there. He was my brother — I didn't want to let him down.' Beyond his 'island of strangers' speech, Starmer used the interview to admit to a series of missteps since taking power. • Starmer faces Labour backlash over 'divisive language' on immigration He said his gloomy speech in the Downing Street garden last summer, where he warned 'things will get worse before they get better', was a mistake. It 'squeezed the hope out', he said. 'We were so determined to show how bad it was that we forgot people wanted something to look forward to as well.' He also admitted that he should never have hired Baroness Gray of Tottenham as his chief of staff. 'Not everyone thought it was a good idea when I appointed her,' he said. 'It was my call, my judgment, my decision, and I got that wrong. Sue wasn't the right person for this job.' He also acknowledged that accepting expensive clothes for the election campaign and tickets to watch Arsenal and a Taylor Swift concert with his family had been a mistake, even if no rules were broken. Starmer said that what affected him was not that his own integrity had been questioned, but that sections of the media started calling his wife 'Lady Victoria Sponger' because she had received about £5,000 worth of clothes. • Keir Starmer and his family 'met Taylor Swift at London concert' 'Part of the problem is that I got emotionally involved,' he said. 'One thing I'm reasonably good at usually is staying calm. But when they dragged Vic into it through no fault of her own, that made me angry.' Starmer also spoke about his life in Downing Street, saying he tried to preserve 'normality' for his life and children. He added that they had been hesitant to have friends around initially. 'They were a bit reluctant to start with because it's sort of weird to say, 'Come over for a sleepover, but you'll need your passport; a man with a gun will check your bag and X-ray your teddy,' ' he said. He also revealed that he had deliberately gone out of his way to embrace President Zelensky of Ukraine when he arrived in Downing Street after having been scolded at the White House by President Trump. 'Normally, I would wait on the step to greet him,' he said. 'But I was really conscious that he'd left the White House on his own. That's why I walked towards him and gave him a sort of hug. 'It's also why I walked him out to the car at the end; I wanted him to know that you don't leave my house on your own.'

Bannockburn golf range plans to be shelved after ministers' refusal
Bannockburn golf range plans to be shelved after ministers' refusal

Daily Record

time24-06-2025

  • Daily Record

Bannockburn golf range plans to be shelved after ministers' refusal

The businesswoman behind the plans - which would have seen a driving range, clubhouse and community space - said she felt she had a "very good case". A disappointed Bannockburn businesswoman has completely shelved plans for a new golf driving range for the area. Lianne Muirhead's application for the driving range, clubhouse and multi-purpose community space 250 metres east of Bridge Cottages was initially rejected by Stirling Council's planning panel in January 2024 when all but one councillor backed planning officials' recommendation to refuse the bid. ‌ The plans had attracted 11 individual objections plus others from Historic Environment Scotland and the National Trust for Scotland. ‌ However, a total of 38 submissions of support had also been lodged. Council planners had backed objectors' concerns, saying the proposals failed to protect the cultural significance of the Bannockburn Battlefield, as well as failed to protect landscape features, character and setting of the battlefield. Most recently, the Scottish Government planning appeals reporter and then Scottish Ministers refused permission for the proposal, citing its impact on the battlefield - the same reason given for refusing a bid by a separate applicant for a trotting track on a neighbouring site. Lianne previously told the Observer that every aspect of the design had been carefully considered and environmental issues looked at sensitively plus it was hoped the project would create a community asset, whilst generating new employment to the area. Supporters had said the project would be a 'much needed replacement' for the loss of the former Brucefields driving range in Bannockburn, which closed in 2020, and would 'be a benefit to the area and the community' and bring jobs and consumers to the area. Following the Scottish Ministers' decision, however, Lianne told the Observer she would not be pursuing the plans any further. ‌ 'We are obviously very disappointed as you can imagine. We felt we had a very good case to provide a facility that would reinvest in our community and benefit those both living and working in Stirling. 'While we appreciate the significance of the battlefield, we hoped that the mitigations we had put in place to limit the view, allowed us to provide a community and economic benefit that would outweigh any detriment to the site of a possible battlefield. 'A lot of time, effort and money went into us putting in the very best application we could. ‌ 'Two golf facilities, along with a racetrack, have been removed from our area with no plans to have these facilities replaced anywhere. 'Scotland is the home of golf yet we are denying local children from being able to even take the game up never mind practice. Not to mention the health and wellbeing benefits of people being able to play the sport or just be outside in the fresh air. 'I believe we have a need for new houses but we need to provide infrastructure and facilities for people to use. We have the South Stirling Gateway already started and work commencing soon on Durieshill yet we are providing no new facilities for the community.' ‌ Lianne said she felt there had been a 'really disappointing start to the application process' having been denied meetings with the planning department and Historic Scotland to work through their concerns, and that she felt reports she had provided 'as and when required' hadn't been read fully by either the planning team or the local councillors. She added: 'When we had our appeal with the [Scotland Government's appeals] reporter it really did feel like they had listened and read the proposal fully. Disappointingly this has not gone our way either. 'A new application will not be submitted.' In their decision, Scottish Ministers stated: 'The Scottish Ministers agree with the reporter that the proposed development would be clearly visible to the observers directly beyond the [battlefield] interpretation panels and that the driving range building would be a prominent addition to the restricted and framed landscape view when observed from this viewpoint. 'The proposed development does not effectively integrate with its sensitive landscape context owing to its scale and position and therefore, does not accord with the relevant development plan policies regarding siting and design.'

Two ducks killed and sheep injured in dog attack in Aberfoyle
Two ducks killed and sheep injured in dog attack in Aberfoyle

Daily Record

time28-05-2025

  • Daily Record

Two ducks killed and sheep injured in dog attack in Aberfoyle

The incident took place when a dog got loose near an animal enclosure at a popular attraction in the village. An investigation is underway after two ducks were killed and a sheep suffered an injury in a dog attack at a popular tourist attraction in Aberfoyle. The incident took place early on Sunday afternoon when a dog reportedly leapt into an animal pen at the Scottish Wool Centre in the village and went on to inflict fatal injuries on a pair of ducks. ‌ A post released on various community Facebook pages by Lynne MacGregor-Dickson gave an account of the horrifying incident, confirming that 'display ducks' at the centre had been harmed in the attack while a sheep suffered a skin injury. ‌ It led to a call from Ms MacGregor-Dickson to locals and those in the area at the time of incident to get in touch with police over any CCTV, videos or dashcam footage they may have to assist with an investigation. But on Monday afternoon, Ms MacGregor-Dickson posted an update saying that police were 'preparing their case to move it forward'. She added: 'Thank you each and everyone of you who has commented on this post, shared it, personally messaged me and those that have given me a wee hug when you've seen me, they have all meant the world to me. 'The other wonderful news I have to share is, one of the ducks that had been left badly injured is responding very well to her treatment and is back with some duckie friends as she continues with her recovery. 'Thank you all so much once again with your support in this matter and if nothing else I think it has reminded many a person to make sure their dogs are kept on leads at all times while near livestock (which includes ducks and hens).' In a statement to the Observer, a Police Scotland spokesperson confirmed they were looking into the incident. The spokesperson said: 'Around 12.55pm on Sunday, 25 May, 2025, we received a report of two ducks killed and a sheep worrying incident in the area of Main Street, Aberfoyle. 'Enquiries are continuing and anyone with information that may assist should contact 101 quoting incident number 1640 of 25 May.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store