The Aussie design icon dreamed up in the outback 90 years ago – and still going strong today
The story of R.M.Williams began in the outback in 1932, when the world was a very different place.
So what enduring characteristics have helped the company continue to thrive more than 90 years later?
The origin story
The The very first R.M.Williams boots were crafted with a specific purpose in mind – to outlast all others.
A young Redinald Murray 'RM' Williams was camping in the South Australian bush when he observed the complaints of local stockmen, fed up with their boots wearing out after long days in the saddle.
Working alongside a local craftsman, Dollar Mick, RM found that the answer was to make a boot from a single piece of leather.
Together, they would make the very first R.M.Williams boot – starting off a remarkable Australian legacy.
Unique design, crafted by hand
Today, artisans continue to craft every boot by hand in RM's workshop in Adelaide, using the same method he pioneered.
It's safe to say this isn't the easiest or quickest way to go about things, but it still results in a pair of boots that are timeless, iconic, and most importantly, made to last.
After all, using a single piece of leather requires only one reinforced seam at the heel, eliminating points of weakness and maximising the material's inherent strength.
And with leather naturally conforming to the foot with wear, it also produces a smoother, more comfortable fit that improves with time.
R.M.Williams also employs the Goodyear welt process, which involves stitching a leather strip to the innersole of the boot, creating a lip of leather that the outersole can then be stitched to.
This doesn't just make the boots more durable than lower quality options that are glued together – it also means they can be easily resoled without damaging the structure.
The use of high-quality materials further contributes to their remarkable longevity, which makes them less of a one-off purchase, and more of a long-term investment.
It's a reflection of the effectiveness of this system that one in every 10 boot transactions R.M.Williams sees is for a repair service, with some customers wearing the same pair for more than 60 years.
From outback to city
In their ability to overcome the challenges of the outback, R.M.Williams boots became the stuff of local legend.
But news of their unrelenting quality quickly spread beyond Australia, gaining this very Aussie icon its current reputation as one of the world's best-loved boot brands.
Products like their iconic Chelsea Boot might have been designed to survive the punishing environment of the outback, but their comfort, style and versatility makes them ideally suited to city life too.
Grounded in the UK
More than 9,000 away from their home in Australia, R.M.Williams boots have proved a hit in the UK.
From long country walks to fancy parties, they're the perfect companion to life in Britain – and more than a match for our famously unpredictable climate! More Trending
The company now has four stores across the country, with the latest opening last year in Marlow, Buckinghamshire.
If you own a pair of R.M.Williams that you'd like repaired, simply drop them off at one of these stores, or phone their expert team for advice.
Once you've had yours patched up, they'll once again be a reliable companion for all your adventures…
Made to last: Browse the R.M.Williams men's range by clicking HERE.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
15 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Former banker gets result of court battle with ex-wife over £80m 'gift'
Judges have issued their ruling on a bitter divorce battle over £80m retired sheep-farming tycoon and ex-CFO of UBS Clive Standish gave his wife to avoid inheritance tax A retired banker who gave his wife nearly £80 million to avoid paying inheritance tax will not have to split the money equally with her following their divorce, the Supreme Court has ruled. Five justices unanimously agreed that because most of the money had been earned prior to the marriage, Clive Standish, 72, was entitled to keep the largest share. The retired sheep-farming tycoon and former CFO of UBS had transferred the multimillion-pound assets to his wife Anna Standish, 57, in 2017, to take advantage of the Australian's non-dom status and allow more money to benefit their two children. Mr Standish, who officially lives in the UK, was worried about paying around £32 million in inheritance tax if he died with the assets in his name, Lords Burrows and Stephens explained in their ruling today. They said: "In short, there was no matrimonialisation of the 2017 assets because, first, the transfer was to save tax, and, secondly, it was for the benefit of the children, not the wife. The 2017 assets were not, therefore, being treated by the husband and wife for any period of time as an asset that was shared between them." Mr Standish expected his wife to use the money to establish two offshore trusts, but Mrs Standish never did so, and she remained the sole owner of those assets when legal action began. In 2022, two years after their divorce, High Court judge Mr Justice Moor split the family's total wealth of £132 million by awarding Mr Standish £87 million and Mrs Standish £45 million. Mr Standish challenged this decision at the Court of Appeal, arguing that the majority of the money, including the £80 million of transferred assets, was earned before they began living together in Switzerland in 2004. Last year, Court of Appeal judges assessed that 75% of that £80 million had been earned prior to the marriage and so reduced Mrs Standish's share to £25 million. Lords Burrows and Stephens, sitting with Lord Reed, Lord Lloyd Jones and Lady Simler, said they "see no reason" to interfere with the Court of Appeal's assessment and dismissed Mrs Standish's Supreme Court appeal. In their ruling they noted: "The crucial point is that the 2017 assets are largely non-matrimonial property and only a relatively small element comprises matrimonial property. That point was lost in the approach taken by Moor J at first instance and the Court of Appeal was therefore entitled to intervene and to make its own assessment." Lord Faulks, for Mrs Standish, argued during the Supreme Court hearing that the assets had become shared property after the transfer and that she had contributed to that wealth by accepting them as a gift. Tim Bishop KC, said that the gift was not for the sole benefit of Mrs Standish but "primarily for the benefit of the children". Lords Burrows and Stephens said: "Here the source of the pre-marital assets within the 2017 assets was exclusively the husband. Those assets have been transferred to the wife. "But the problem for the wife is that there is nothing to show that, over time, the parties were treating the 2017 assets as shared between them. Rather the transfer was in pursuance of a scheme to negate inheritance tax and it was for the benefit exclusively of the children."
Metro
18 hours ago
- Metro
Banker avoids splitting £80,000,000 given to ex to avoid tax after divorce
A retired banker who gave his wife nearly £80 million to avoid paying inheritance tax will not have to split it equally after their divorce. Five Supreme Court justices unanimously agreed that because Clive Standish, 72, earned most of the money before their marriage, he was entitled to keep the largest share. Standish transferred the millions of pounds to his then-wife, Australian Anna Standish, in 2017, to take advantage of her non-dom status and allow more money to benefit their two children. He had been worried about paying around £32 million in inheritance tax if he died with the assets in his name, Lords Burrows and Stephens explained in their ruling on Wednesday. They said: 'In short, there was no matrimonialisation of the 2017 assets because, first, the transfer was to save tax, and, secondly, it was for the benefit of the children, not the wife. 'The 2017 assets were not, therefore, being treated by the husband and wife for any period as an asset that was shared between them.' Standish expected his wife to use the money to establish two offshore trusts, but she never did, remaining the sole owner of the money when legal action began. In 2022, two years after their divorce, High Court judge Justice Moor split the family's total wealth of £132 million by awarding Mr Standish £87 million and Mrs Standish £45 million. Standish challenged this decision at the Court of Appeal, arguing that the majority of the money, including the £80 million of transferred assets, was earned before they began living together in Switzerland in 2004. Last year, Court of Appeal judges assessed that 75% of that £80 million had been earned before the marriage and reduced Mrs Standish's share to £25 million. Lords Burrows and Stephens, sitting with Lord Reed, Lord Lloyd Jones and Lady Simler, said they saw 'no reason' to interfere with the Court of Appeal's assessment and dismissed Mrs Standish's Supreme Court appeal. In their ruling, they noted: 'The crucial point is that the 2017 assets are largely non-matrimonial property and only a relatively small element comprises matrimonial property. 'That point was lost in the approach taken by Moor J at first instance, and the Court of Appeal was therefore entitled to intervene and to make its own assessment.' Lord Faulks, for Mrs Standish, argued during the Supreme Court hearing that the assets had become shared property after the transfer and that she had contributed to that wealth by accepting them as a gift. More Trending Tim Bishop KC said that the gift was not for the sole benefit of Mrs Standish but 'primarily for the benefit of the children'. Lords Burrows and Stephens said: 'Here, the source of the pre-marital assets within the 2017 assets was exclusively the husband. Those assets have been transferred to the wife. 'But the problem for the wife is that there is nothing to show that, over time, the parties were treating the 2017 assets as shared between them. 'Rather, the transfer was in pursuance of a scheme to negate inheritance ta,x and it was for the benefit exclusively of the children.' Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Major bank could disappear from high street after £2,650,000,000 deal MORE: Full list of Santander bank branches closing this week MORE: Lloyds, Halifax and Bank of Scotland make major change to account fees for 'millions'
Scottish Sun
a day ago
- Scottish Sun
Sainsbury's sees sales boost thank to Marks & Spencer cyber attack
Grocery sales for the supermarket jumped by 5 per cent, SAINSBURY'S MARK UP Sainsbury's sees sales boost thank to Marks & Spencer cyber attack Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) SAINSBURY'S has seen a boost in sales, partly thanks to the cyber attack that disrupted rival Marks & Spencer earlier this year. The supermarket reported a 4.7 per cent rise in group sales for the 16 weeks to June 21, excluding fuel. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 1 Sainsbury's has seen a sales boost thanks to the cyber attack on Marks & Spencer Credit: Getty Grocery sales jumped by 5 per cent, while Argos saw a 4.4 per cent increase as shoppers bought fans and paddling pools during the warm weather. Sainsbury's said it had achieved its highest market share since 2016, growing share three years in a row. Boss Simon Roberts admitted that the M&S disruption had helped, saying: 'If a store is low on stock, customers will go somewhere nearby. 'We've had a little bit of benefit.' At yesterday's annual general meeting, M&S boss Stuart Machin said he expects online services to be fully restored within four weeks. Sainsbury's said strong first quarter performers included Taste the Difference fresh food, which saw sales surge 20 per cent as customers snapped up picnic and deli ranges in the sunny weather. Tu Clothing sales jumped 8 per cent, driven by a 13 per cent womenswear leap. Sainsbury's also confirmed it is on track to meet its £1billion profit target for the year, despite the impact of price cuts. Meanwhile, food price inflation rose 3.7 per cent in June, up from 2.8 per cent in May. Money News Today - Daily Episode RATE CUT HINT MILLIONS of borrowers could see their costs drop as interest rate cuts look more likely next month. Bank of England governor Andrew Bailey said the labour market is 'softening', with pay rises slowing down. Markets now predict a 75 per cent chance of rates being cut from 4.25 per cent to four per cent. Mr Bailey said: 'The path of interest rates will be gradually downwards.' PLUGS A HOLE SOUTHERN WATER's owner has pumped £1.2billion into the struggling utility to shore up its finances. Australian firm Macquaire, which used to own Thames Water, has already handed over £655million, with another £545million expected by December. Southern Water, which serves 4.7 million people in the South and South East, has built up nearly £9billion in debt. SQUEEZE ON CASH ISAS SAVERS are set to be dealt a blow as the Chancellor plans to slash the cash ISA allowance. Right now, you can save up to £20,000-a-year tax-free across four ISAs: cash, stocks and shares, lifetime, and innovative finance. The £20,000 limit will stay, but the amount allowed in cash ISAs is set to be reduced, according to The Financial Times. It is intended to encourage more money into stocks and shares ISAs, which potentially offer better returns and more support to the economy. Unlock even more award-winning articles as The Sun launches brand new membership programme - Sun Club.
