logo
Plea in Supreme Court challenges ECI revision of electoral roll in Bihar

Plea in Supreme Court challenges ECI revision of electoral roll in Bihar

The Association of Democratic Reforms (ADR), a non-governmental organisation (NGO), has approached the Supreme Court questioning the manner and timing of the Election Commission's decision to undertake a special intensive revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in poll-bound Bihar amid a political storm over the issue. The Association of Democratic Reforms (ADR) filed the petition in the Supreme Court through Advocate Prashant Bhushan
In its public interest litigation (PIL), ADR said SIR needs to be set aside, as insisting on people to prove their citizenship and that of their parents within short notice and without relying upon easily available identity documents such as Aadhaar card will potentially disenfranchise nearly 3 crore voters.
The petition filed through Advocate Prashant Bhushan on Friday said, 'The order dated June 24 issued by ECI has shifted the onus of being on the voters' list from the state to citizens. It has excluded identification documents such as Aadhaar or ration cards which further make marginalised communities and the poor more vulnerable to exclusion from voting.'
Terming that the timing and manner adopted by ECI was suspect, the petition alleged that SIT violates fundamental rights under Articles 14, 19 and 21, besides other provisions of the Constitution. It said, 'The SIR order if not set aside, can arbitrarily and without due process disenfranchise lakhs of voters from electing their representatives, thereby disrupting free and fair elections and democracy in the country, which are part of basic structure of the Constitution.'
While ECI has begun the exercise, Opposition parties have criticised the move raising similar apprehensions as raised in the petition.
The declaration as required under the SIR process is violative of Article 326, the petition said, as it requires a voter to provide documents to prove his/her citizenship and also citizenships of his/her mother or father, failing which his/her name would not be added to the draft electoral roll and can be deleted from the same.
Section 21(3) of the Representation of the People Act, 1950 (RPA) allows ECI to direct a special revision of electoral rolls 'for reasons to be recorded.' While deletion of names from electoral rolls can be on grounds of death, nonresidence, or disqualification mentioned under Section 16 of RPA,
'While SIR of Bihar or any other state of country is a positive step, the manner in which ECI has directed the conduct of SIR in a poll bound state like Bihar, has raised questions from all stakeholders, particularly the voters,' ADR stated.
Coupled with this, 'ECI has issued unreasonable and impractical timeline to conduct SIR in Bihar with close proximity to state elections which are due in November 2025,' that could disenfranchise lakhs of voters in the state who do not possess any of the 11 documents required under the SIR order and whose names do not figure in the 2003 electoral roll, it added.
A Special Summary Revision (SSR) was carried out between October 29, 2024 and January 6, 2025 to address issues of migration and ineligible voters due to death or other reasons. Pointing to this fact, the petition said, 'There is no reason for such a drastic exercise in a poll bound state in such a short period of time, violating the right to vote of lakhs of voters.'
The problem is aggravated due to Bihar being a state with high poverty and migration rates where persons, mostly belonging to the marginalised communities, may lack access to documents such as birth certificates or parental records. 'As per estimates, over 3 crore voters and more particularly from marginalized communities (such as SC, STs and migrant workers) could be excluded from voting due to the stringent requirements as mentioned in the SIR order. The current reports from Bihar, where SIR is already underway, show that lakhs of voters from villages and marginalized communities do not possess the documents sought from them,' the petition added.
ECI on Friday announced that over 68.6 million enumeration forms have been distributed in Bihar, covering over 87% of the 79 million enrolled electors as of June 24, under the SIR exercise. BLOs completed visits to nearly 15 million households by July 4. 'The first visit of BLOs to nearly 1.5 crore households...has been completed today and over 87% Enumeration Forms (i.e. 6,86,17,932) out of 7,89,69,844 (nearly 7.90 crore) electors in Bihar who are enrolled as on June 24, 2025, have been distributed during SIR exercise being conducted in the state,' ECI said in a press release.
Under the SIR exercise, the first in the state since 2003, voters have to give documents to prove their date and place of birth along with the forms being distributed in all districts – if their name doesn't figure in the 2003 rolls. There are a total of 11 documents an elector can provide.
The poll watchdog has said that the exercise will eventually be carried out nationwide
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mahua Moitra moves SC against ECI's special electoral roll revision in Bihar
Mahua Moitra moves SC against ECI's special electoral roll revision in Bihar

United News of India

timean hour ago

  • United News of India

Mahua Moitra moves SC against ECI's special electoral roll revision in Bihar

New Delhi/Kolkata , July 6 (UNI) Trinamool Congress MP Mahua Moitra has filed a petition in the Supreme Court challenging the Election Commission of India's (ECI) June 24 order, which mandates a Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of the electoral rolls in Bihar. The Krishnanagar MP has sought the quashing of the order, terming it "unconstitutional" and in "violation" of fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 14, 19(1)(a), 21, 325, and 326 of the Constitution of India, as well as provisions of the Representation of People Act, 1950 and the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960. 'Just filed writ petition in Supreme Court challenging ECI notification to conduct SIR in Bihar & seeking a stay on conducting the same in other states including Bengal,' Moitra posted on her X handle. The petition argues that the ECI's directive introduces "extraneous and legally unsanctioned" requirements for retaining or including names in the electoral rolls, including the production of documents proving citizenship — such as proof of citizenship of one or both parents. In the petition filed through Advocate Neha Rathi, the Trinamool Congress MP argued that these requirements are not envisaged by Article 326 of the Constitution or by any provision of the RP Act, and they create arbitrary hurdles for eligible voters. On June 24, the EC announced a Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar ahead of the Assembly elections scheduled later this year. As part of the process, voters are required to submit one of 11 approved documents, such as a birth certificate or passport, to verify their date and place of birth. Those born before July 1, 1987, need only provide their own documents. However, those born between July 1, 1987, and December 2, 2004, must also submit one parent's documents, while individuals born after December 2, 2004, must provide documents for both parents. According to the plea, the ECI order excludes commonly accepted identity proofs like Aadhaar and ration cards, disproportionately burdening voters — especially those in rural and marginalised communities. Current field reports from Bihar, the petition notes, suggest that lakhs of voters face imminent risk of disenfranchisement due to these stringent document requirements. 'This is the first time the Election Commission has initiated such an exercise, where voters already listed on the rolls and having voted in past elections are now being asked to revalidate their eligibility. She warns that the move may result in widespread disenfranchisement, undermining democratic principles and the conduct of free and fair elections,' Moitra argued in her petition. The petition also raises concerns about procedural inadequacies. It highlights that the order mandates the exclusion of names from the draft rolls if fresh enumeration forms are not submitted by July 25, 2025 — a deadline the petitioner calls arbitrary and unreasonable, especially for voters needing time to procure documents. The MP has additionally sought a direction to prevent the ECI from extending similar revision drives to other states. She claims the ECI has already issued instructions for the rollout of a similar exercise in West Bengal starting August 2025. Drawing parallels with the controversial National Register of Citizens (NRC), the plea underscores that the revision exercise appears to follow a similar structure and could disproportionately affect the economically and socially vulnerable populations. Interestingly enough, West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee on Thursday strongly criticised the new guidelines under the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) process, alleging they are intended to target West Bengal ahead of its 2026 Assembly elections, and indirectly accused the Election Commission of acting as an agent of the BJP. Criticising the Election Commission for taking the decision unilaterally, the chief minister had said, 'This is alarming for democracy. 'India became independent in 1947. Why are people born between 1987 and 2004 being targeted? I don't understand.' The West Bengal chief minister had claimed that the Election Commission could not take such steps without consulting political parties, underscoring that India is a democratic nation with a federal structure, and that no political party or elected government should be treated as subservient. 'Is this being done so that the younger generation cannot vote? How will the poor obtain their parents' documents? Is this NRC in disguise? Are they trying to implement NRC through this? Let them clearly state their intention. Is this what's happening in our country?' Mamata had questioned. UNI XC SSP

TMC MP Mahua Moitra moves Supreme Court against EC's revision of electoral rolls in Bihar
TMC MP Mahua Moitra moves Supreme Court against EC's revision of electoral rolls in Bihar

The Hindu

timean hour ago

  • The Hindu

TMC MP Mahua Moitra moves Supreme Court against EC's revision of electoral rolls in Bihar

Trinamool Congress leader and Member of Parliament Mahua Moitra has moved the Supreme Court challenging an order of the Election Commission of India for special intensive revision of electoral rolls in Bihar. In her plea, Ms. Moitra said she seeks setting aside of the order dated June 24 under which Special Intensive Revision (SIR) is being conducted in alleged violation of various provisions of the Constitution. "The present writ petition has been filed in public interest under Article 32 of the Constitution seeking setting aside of order dated 24.06.2025 issued by Election Commission of India under which SIR of electoral rolls in Bihar is being conducted in violation of Articles 14, 19(1)(a), 21, 325, 328 of the Constitution and provisions of Representation of People (RP) Act, 1950 and Registration of Electors (RER) Rules, 1960 which, if not set aside, can lead to large-scale disenfranchisement of eligible voters in the country thereby undermining democracy and free and fair elections," it submitted. Ms. Moitra further sought a direction from the apex court to restrain the Election Commission of India from issuing similar orders for SIR of electoral rolls in other states of the country. "It is submitted that it is for the very first time in the country that such an exercise is being conducted by ECI, where electors whose names are already there in electoral rolls and who have already voted multiple times in are being asked to prove their eligibility," the plea filed through advocate Neha Rathi said. The plea said "the impugned SIR order requires the inclusion or retention of a voter's name in the electoral roll upon production of citizenship documents, including proof of citizenship of either or both parents, failing which the voter is at risk of requirement is ultra vires Article 326 and introduces extraneous qualifications not contemplated by the Constitution of the RP Act 1950.' A similar plea has also been filed by NGO Association of Democratic Reforms challenging the poll panel's direction for SIR of electoral rolls in Bihar. The ECI on June 24 issued instructions to carry out an SIR in Bihar, apparently to weed out ineligible names and ensure only eligible citizens are included in the electoral roll. Bihar goes to polls later this year. The NGO has also sought setting aside of the order and communication, arguing that it violates Articles 14, 19, 21, 325, and 326 of the Constitution, as well as provisions of the Representation of People's Act, 1950, and Rule 21A of the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960. The NGO's plea filed through advocate Prashant Bhushan said the EC order "can arbitrarily and without due process" disenfranchise lakhs of voters and disrupt free and fair elections. "That the documentation requirements of the directive, lack of due process as well as the unreasonably short timeline for the said Special Intensive Revision of Electoral Roll in Bihar further make this exercise bound to result in removal of names of lakhs of genuine voters from electoral rolls leading to their disenfranchisement," the plea said. The last such revision in Bihar was conducted in 2003. According to the EC, the exercise was necessitated by rapid urbanisation, frequent migration, young citizens becoming eligible to vote, non-reporting of deaths, and inclusion of the names of foreign illegal immigrants. It said with the exercise, it wants to ensure the integrity and preparation of error-free electoral rolls. The SIR is being conducted by booth officers, who are conducting a house-to-house survey for verification. The EC said it will scrupulously adhere to the constitutional and legal provisions as laid down in Article 326 of the Constitution and Section 16 of the Representation of the People Act, 1950, in carrying out the revision. Several other civil society organisations like PUCL and activists like Yogendra Yadav have approached the top court against the ECI's direction.

"My Father's Dream Has Come True": Chief Justice BR Gavai Gets Emotional
"My Father's Dream Has Come True": Chief Justice BR Gavai Gets Emotional

NDTV

timean hour ago

  • NDTV

"My Father's Dream Has Come True": Chief Justice BR Gavai Gets Emotional

Chief Justice of India Bhushan Ramkrishna Gavai on Saturday recalled his father's dream of seeing him become a judge, saying that dream has now come true. "I am happy that my father's dream has come true," said an overwhelmed CJI Gavai, holding back tears, as he addressed members of the Advocates Association of Western India (AAWI), which hosted a grand felicitation in his honour. CJI Gavai while speaking about his father, gets emotional. #CJIBRGavai — Live Law (@LiveLawIndia) July 5, 2025 Taking to the stage, CJI Gavai said, "I am today standing before you not just as the Chief Justice of India but also as a member of AAWI. I remember joining the profession in 1983 under Advocate Raja Bhau Bhosale. My colleagues and I would often gather in Rooms 18 and 36, eating lunch together in a group of ten. Those memories remain etched in my heart." CJI Gavai also paid tribute to the legacy of judges who shaped the discourse on social and economic justice in the country. Referring to landmark judgments and contributions of Justices PB Sawant, PN Bhagwati, and former CJI YV Chandrachud, he said, "The pragmatic interpretation of our Constitution about social and economic justice... I would say J Sawant has a great contribution to it, especially his contribution in Indra Sawhney judgment." The event, held as part of AAWI's 161st anniversary celebrations, was marked by cultural performances by advocates and their children. CJI Gavai was felicitated by AAWI President and senior members of the legal community. Government pleaders Neha Bhide (Appellate Side), Poornima Kantharia (Original Side), and Public Prosecutor Hiten Venegavkar also joined in honouring the Chief Justice. A week earlier, at an event hosted by the Nagpur District Court Bar Association, the Chief Justice had offered rare insights into the sacrifices and legacy that shaped his life. He recalled how his father's unfulfilled ambition to become a lawyer had defined his own path. "I wanted to be an architect," he said. "But my father had different dreams. He wanted to be a lawyer but couldn't because of his role in the freedom movement." Choked with emotion, CJI Gavai remembered the struggles of his parents, particularly his father's commitment to Dr BR Ambedkar's ideology. "My father gave himself to the service of Ambedkar. He wanted to be an advocate himself, but couldn't fulfill that wish as he was arrested for being part of the freedom movement." "All responsibility fell on my mother and aunt," he said. "Later, when my name was recommended for the post of a judge in the high court, my father said if you remain a lawyer, you will only go after money, but if you become a judge then you will walk on the path laid down by Ambedkar and do good for society." His father died in 2015 and did not witness his son becoming the 52nd Chief Justice of India. CJI Gavai added, "We lost him in 2015, but I am glad my mother is there."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store