UK court awards £700 mn to HP in late tycoon's fraud case
Lynch, once dubbed the "British Bill Gates", founded software firm Autonomy in the 1990s. Its $11 billion sale to Hewlett Packard in 2011 also saw him face fraud charges in the United States.
HP accused Autonomy of artificially inflating its revenues and growth before the sale and had demanded $5 billion in compensation.
"We are pleased that this decision brings us a step closer to the resolution of this dispute," said a spokesperson for Hewlett Packard.
"We look forward to the further hearing at which the final amount of HPE's damages will be determined," they added.
The further hearing, dealing with matters including interest, currency conversion and whether Lynch's estate can appeal the decision, is scheduled for November.
The British court had not yet awarded damages when Lynch was killed along with his 18-year-old daughter Hannah, four friends and the yacht's cook in the sinking of his British-flagged vessel Bayesian in a storm in August 2024.
Lynch, 59, his family and guests were on board celebrating his acquittal in the massive US fraud case.
The 56-metre (185-foot) yacht was struck by a mini-tornado before dawn as it was anchored off Porticello, near Palermo.
Hewlett Packard had recorded nearly $9 billion in write-downs, including more than $5 billion it claimed resulted from accounting manipulations by Autonomy's directors before the sale.
But justice Robert Hildyard in the British case wrote in his ruling that "HP's claim was always substantially exaggerated".
The initial compensation award had been expected in September 2024, and before his sudden death Lynch had prepared a written reaction to the judgement.
The ruling "exposes HP's failure and makes clear that the immense damage to Autonomy was down to HP's own errors and actions", he wrote, adding that the company would consider appealing the decision.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
France 24
4 hours ago
- France 24
US migrant raids spark boom for private detention providers
Migrants captured by Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents need to be temporarily housed in places like the facility being readied in California City, prior to deportation. "When you talk to the majority of residents here, they have a favorable perspective on it," said Marquette Hawkins, mayor of the hardscrabble settlement of 15,000 people, 100 miles (160 kilometres) north of Los Angeles. "They look at the economic impact, right?" California City is to be home to a sprawling detention center that will be operated by CoreCivic, one of the largest companies in the private detention sector. The company, which declined AFP requests for an interview, says the facility would generate around 500 jobs, and funnel $2 million in tax revenue to the city. "Many of our residents have already been hired out there to work in that facility," Hawkins told AFP. "Any revenue source that is going to assist the town in rebuilding itself, rebranding itself, is going to be seen as a plus," he said. Boom Trump's ramped-up immigration arrests, like those that provoked protests in Los Angeles, saw a record 60,000 people in detention in June, according to ICE figures. Those same figures show the vast majority have no conviction, despite the president's election campaign promises to go after hardened criminals. More than 80 percent of detainees are in facilities run by the private sector, according to the TRAC project at Syracuse University. And with Washington's directive to triple the number of daily arrests -- and $45 billion earmarked for new detention centers -- the sector is looking at an unprecedented boom. "Never in our 42-year company history have we had so much activity and demand for our services as we are seeing right now," Damon Hininger, executive director of CoreCivic, said in a May call with investors. When Trump took office in January, some 107 centers were operating. The number now hovers around 200. For Democratic politicians, this proliferation is intentional. "Private prison companies are profiting from human suffering, and Republicans are allowing them to get away with it," Congresswoman Norma Torres told reporters outside a detention center in the southern California city of Adelanto. At the start of the year, there were three people detained there; there are now hundreds, each one of them attracting a daily stipend of taxpayer cash for the operator. Torres was refused permission to visit the facility, run by the privately owned GEO Group, because she had not given seven days' notice, she said. "Denying members of Congress access to private detention facilities like Adelanto isn't just disrespectful, it is dangerous, it is illegal, and it is a desperate attempt to hide the abuse happening behind these walls," she said. "We've heard the horrifying stories of detainees being violently arrested, denied basic medical care, isolated for days, and left injured without treatment," she added. Kristen Hunsberger, a staff attorney at the Law Center for Immigrant Advocates, said one client complained of having to wait "six or seven hours to get clean water." It is "not sanitary and certainly not... in compliance with just basic human rights." Hunsberger, who spends hours on the road going from one center to another to locate her clients, says many have been denied access to legal counsel, a constitutional right in the United States. Both GEO and ICE have denied allegations of mistreatment at the detention centers. "Claims there is overcrowding or subprime conditions in ICE facilities are categorically FALSE," said Tricia McLaughlin, the assistant secretary at the Department of Homeland Security. "All detainees are provided with proper meals, medical treatment and have opportunities to communicate with their family members and lawyers." 'Strategy' But some relatives of detainees tell a different story. Alejandra Morales, an American citizen, said her undocumented husband was detained incommunicado for five days in Los Angeles before being transferred to Adelanto. In the Los Angeles facility, "they don't even let them brush their teeth, they don't let them bathe, nothing. They have them all sleeping on the floor, in a cell, all together," she said. Hunsberger said that for detainees and their relatives, the treatment appears to be deliberate. "They're starting to feel that this is a strategy to wear people down, to have them in these inhumane conditions, and then pressure them to sign something where they could then agree to being deported," she said.
Sustainability Times
20 hours ago
- Sustainability Times
'This Isn't Investment, It's Invasion': Locals Revolt as Dubai Takes 1 Billion ft³ of U.S. Land to Pump the ‘New Oil'
IN A NUTSHELL 🌍 Adnoc and ExxonMobil have partnered in the Baytown Project to revolutionize low-carbon energy production. and have partnered in the to revolutionize low-carbon energy production. ⚡ The project aims to create the world's largest low-emission hydrogen plant, producing up to 1 billion cubic feet of blue hydrogen daily. daily. 💼 Despite its promise, the project's success depends on political support and government subsidies for blue hydrogen in the U.S. in the U.S. 🔋 If successful, the Baytown Project will contribute to solving the global energy crisis and offer significant local economic benefits. As the world grapples with an unprecedented energy crisis, a groundbreaking partnership has emerged between the Abu Dhabi state oil company, Adnoc, and the American giant ExxonMobil. This billion-dollar collaboration aims to revolutionize the energy landscape by focusing on low-carbon solutions. The partnership's potential impact extends beyond the energy sector, influencing global geopolitics as countries seek alternatives to traditional oil. With a strong commitment to innovation and environmental sustainability, this venture could redefine the future of energy and reshape international alliances in the process. The Baytown Project: A New Era of Energy Production The visionary joint venture between Adnoc and ExxonMobil is known as the Baytown Project. This ambitious initiative aims to establish what could be the largest low-emission hydrogen plant in the world. The project is designed to produce up to 1 billion cubic feet per day of blue hydrogen, a form of hydrogen derived from natural gas with integrated CO₂ capture. This process is critical as it significantly reduces carbon emissions compared to traditional hydrogen production methods. The production of blue hydrogen involves extracting hydrogen not as a liquid but through a refined, technologically advanced process. This clean energy source is poised to power refineries in Europe and energy plants in Japan and Korea. A key goal of the Baytown Project is to capture up to 98% of carbon emissions during production, paving the way for the annual generation of 1 million tons of low-carbon ammonia. This development is significant because ammonia is emerging as a crucial component in the global energy transition. Challenges and Risks: The Political Landscape The Baytown Project, though promising, faces political and economic uncertainties. The United Arab Emirates has invested heavily, securing a 35% stake in the project, centered in the heart of Texas. However, the project's future hinges on the availability of government subsidies for blue hydrogen production in the United States. Despite the absence of clear tax incentives, Adnoc has committed to the project, demonstrating strong confidence in its potential. ExxonMobil, on the other hand, has expressed concerns, even threatening to withdraw by early 2024 if blue hydrogen remains ineligible for tax credits under preliminary US Treasury guidelines. The evolving political climate, particularly after upcoming American elections, could alter this scenario. The project's success depends on navigating these complex political dynamics to secure essential support and funding. Implications for the Global Energy Crisis Despite uncertainties, the Baytown Project represents a pivotal moment in addressing the global energy crisis. Beyond a commercial alliance, the agreement marks a significant step in the internationalization of transitional energies. Adnoc's commitment to achieving zero emissions by 2045 underscores the strategic value of this partnership for the United States. Meanwhile, ExxonMobil solidifies its position as a leader in carbon capture technologies and the development of cleaner, sustainable fuels. The project also promises substantial local benefits, including job creation, economic development, and community support in Texas. If successful, operations are set to begin in 2029, potentially positioning this partnership as the most influential in the world. It could even surpass recent high-profile alliances, such as the one between China and Russia, touted as the most significant of the century. Looking Ahead: A Transformative Partnership The collaboration between Adnoc and ExxonMobil signifies not just a business venture but a transformative step towards sustainable energy solutions. With the potential to redefine low-carbon energy production, this project could lead the way in transitioning to cleaner fuel sources. However, its success will depend on political support, technological advancements, and global cooperation. As the world watches the unfolding of this ambitious initiative, one must ask: Will the Baytown Project become a beacon of innovation and collaboration, leading the charge in solving our energy challenges, or will it succumb to the political and economic hurdles that often accompany such groundbreaking endeavors? This article is based on verified sources and supported by editorial technologies. Did you like it? 4.7/5 (23)
France 24
a day ago
- France 24
Trump, EU chief to meet Sunday in push for trade deal
In a drive to slash his country's trade deficits, Trump has vowed to hit dozens of countries with punitive tariff hikes if they do not hammer out a pact with Washington by August 1. The EU -- which is facing an across-the-board levy of 30-percent -- has been pushing hard for a deal with Trump's administration, while also planning retaliation should talks fall short. Von der Leyen first announced the meeting, writing on X: "Following a good call with POTUS, we have agreed to meet in Scotland on Sunday to discuss transatlantic trade relations, and how we can keep them strong." Arriving on UK soil late Friday, Trump confirmed he would meet the head of the European Commission, which has been negotiating with Washington on behalf of the 27-nation bloc. "I'll be meeting with the EU on Sunday, and we'll be working on a deal," he told reporters as he touched down at Prestwick Airport near Glasgow. "Ursula will be here -- a highly respected woman. So we look forward to that," Trump said. "We'll see if we make a deal," added the president -- who reiterated earlier comments saying the chance of a deal was "50-50", with sticking points remaining on "maybe 20 different things." "But we're meeting ... with the European Union. And that would be, actually, the biggest deal of them all, if we make it," he said. The high-level meeting follows months of negotiations between top EU and US trade officials, and days of signals suggesting the sides were moving towards an agreement. According to multiple European diplomats, the agreement under consideration would involve a baseline 15-percent US levy on EU goods -- the same level secured by Japan this week -- and potential carve-outs for critical sectors. Von der Leyen's spokesperson Paula Pinho said "intensive negotiations" had been taking place at technical and political level in the run up to Sunday's meeting. "Leaders will now take stock and consider the scope for a balanced outcome that provides stability and predictability for businesses and consumers on both sides of the Atlantic," she said. 'In Trump's hands' Hit by multiple waves of tariffs since Trump reclaimed the White House, the EU is currently subject to a 25-percent levy on cars, 50 percent on steel and aluminium, and an across-the-board tariff of 10 percent, which Washington threatens to hike to 30 percent in a no-deal scenario. The EU wants to avoid sweeping tariffs inflicting further harm on the European economy -- already suffering from sluggish growth -- and damaging a trading relationship worth an annual 1.6 trillion euros ($1.9 trillion) in goods and services. EU member states gave the European Commission a mandate to pursue a deal to avoid hefty US tariffs, with retaliation held out as a last resort if talks fail. Seeking to keep up the pressure in the final stretch of talks, EU states on Thursday backed a package of retaliation on $109 billion (93 billion euros) of US goods including aircraft and cars -- to kick in in stages from August 7 if there is no deal. Most states prefer a deal to no deal -- even with undesirable levies of 15 percent -- but exemptions are key, with aircraft, steel, lumber, pharmaceutical products and agricultural goods under discussion, diplomats said. Concerning steel, diplomats say a compromise could allow a certain quota to enter the United States, with amounts beyond that taxed at 50 percent. Since launching its tariffs campaign, Trump's administration has so far unveiled just five agreements, including with Britain, Japan and the Philippines. While EU hopes have been rising for a deal, the approaching August 1 deadline also comes with a sense of deja-vu: earlier this month, EU officials also believed they were on the cusp of a deal, before Trump hiked his tariff threat to 30-percent.
