AICTE urges technical institutions to promote, research Basavanna's teachings
In a communication from the Department of Higher Education under the Ministry of Education, Government of India, the AICTE urged the academic world to highlight Basaveshwara's teachings for modern India. At a time when India is seeking new models of inclusive development, social justice and decentralized governance, poet-saint Basaveshwara's radical ideas are being revived and researched by the country's top educational bodies.
The AICTE letter calls for workshops, seminars and research projects on Basaveshwara's philosophy, exploration of his 'Lok Sansad' concept of participative local governance, studies on his fight for social equity, gender equality, and eradication of caste-based discrimination and superstitions, and 'Vachanas', which are poetic verses filled with wisdom and rebellion.
They spoke out against injustice, patriarchy, blind rituals, and social inequality. Basava himself stood for meritocracy, dignity of labour, rationality, and an egalitarian society.
The Indian government now wants engineering students, faculty and research scholars to draw inspiration from this reformer to craft cutting-edge research on governance and social transformation. As India deals with growing social divides and challenges in governance, it is turning to its roots for solutions, and the message is clear: Basaveshwara is not just history, but he has his place in the future.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
18 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Who is Gita Gopinath, Indian-origin economist who quit top IMF post to rejoin Harvard?
Indian-American economist Gita Gopinath, who is serving as the first deputy managing director at the International Monetary Fund (IMF), announced that she is stepping down from her position and returning to her academic career. In a social media post, Gopinath said that she is rejoining Harvard University as an economics professor. 'After nearly 7 amazing years at the IMF, I have decided to return to my academic roots,' Gopinath, the first female chief economist in IMF history, said in a post on X. The Indian-origin economist will step down from her position at IMF in August, and rejoin the Harvard Economics Department on September 1 as the inaugural Gregory and Ania Coffey Professor of Economics. Gita Gopinath is an Indian-American economist, currently serving as the the first deputy managing director at the International Monetary Fund (IMF) since January 21, 2022. Gopinath was born in Kolkata in 1971. She holds an economics degree from the Delhi School of Economics and also from Delhi University. She then moved to the United States to pursue her MA degree from the University of Washington. She later earned her PhD from Princeton University. Gopinath joined the IMF in January 2019 as chief economist and was promoted to the post of first deputy managing director in January 2022. Prior to joining the IMF, Gopinath was the John Zwaanstra Professor of International Studies and of Economics at Harvard University's economics department from 2005 to 2022. Before joining Harvard, she was an assistant professor of economics at the University of Chicago's Booth School of Business from 2001 to 2005. IMF Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva described Gopinath as an 'outstanding colleague—an exceptional intellectual leader, dedicated to the mission and members of the Fund, and a fabulous manager, always showing genuine care for the professional standing and wellbeing of our staff.' Gopinath also co-authored the 'Pandemic Plan' on how to end the COVID-19 crisis, a contribution which has widely been hailed as filling an important global gap by setting targets to vaccinate the world at feasible cost, Georgieva said. (With inputs from PTI)
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
18 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Women's labour participation in India far from matching G20 peers: Poll
Indian women's participation in the workforce will take at least two decades to catch up with G20 peers, according to a Reuters poll of economists and policy experts, many of whom said they believed poorly-paid self-employment is inflating an already-low rate. Overall job creation is falling short of the needs of India's mostly young, rapidly-growing working-age population. Women, who make up half of that pool, are largely absent from the workforce and most women with jobs are not formally employed on payrolls. The official female labour force participation rate (FLFPR) rose to 31.7% from 27.8% in the latest 2023-24 Periodic Labour Force Survey (PLFS), but is well short of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's 2047 development goal to raise it to 70%, putting it more in line with advanced economies. India is at the bottom of the G20 table, behind Saudi Arabia and Turkey, and lower than even neighbouring Bangladesh and Bhutan, according to World Bank data. The G20 average is around 50%. A majority, 80%, of top independent economists and policy experts surveyed over the past month, 32 of 40, said it would take at least 20 to 30 years for India to reach a rate comparable to other G20 economies, including 18 who said it would take more than three decades. The remaining eight said it would take 10-20 years. "The kind of work women are involved in is not really what we call good jobs or good quality work. It's really just bottom of the ladder, survivalist kind. It's good they're participating but it's not the kind of transformational participation you might imagine," said Ashwini Deshpande, a professor and head of the department of economics at Ashoka University. "The job crisis is much more acute than in countries with similar levels of when jobs are scarce, men get the first priority everywhere," added Deshpande. Only 15.9% of working women are in regular wage or salaried jobs, the kind that come with contracts, steady pay or benefits. While officials have noted the recent rise in female labour force participation as a sign of progress, the latest PLFS survey showed 73.5% of rural working women and over 40% with jobs in urban areas are self-employed. Asked what they make of the official data over 70% of economists surveyed, 32 of 43, said it masked the real picture. " should see household earnings also go up when women are participating and that has not happened, which is a very big marker that this is potentially not the best kind of employment. It's potentially distress-driven," said Rosa Abraham, assistant professor at Azim Premji University. Asked if the recent rise in FLFPR signals real progress, she said: "That level of shift is still nowhere near what you would expect at this level of economic development that we are in and there's still a long way to go." Over 70% of experts said the Indian government's overall unemployment data was inaccurate and masked the severity of joblessness and underemployment. Even when jobs are available, safety concerns and unpaid care work prevent many women from applying. They spend nearly five hours daily on household duties, over three times as much as men, according to the 2025 Time Use Survey. "For women the productive and reproductive age coincide. Hence childcare and lack of suitable facilities serve as a constraint," said Sangeeta Shroff, former professor at the Gokhale Institute of Politics and Economics. "To address such issues, it will require aggressive policy intervention which will require considerable time and resources." Asked what the government should prioritise, respondents highlighted expanding childcare, safer workplaces and stronger anti-discrimination measures. Bina Agarwal, professor of development economics and environment at the University of Manchester, said young women need safe hostels in cities and small towns, safe transport to work and enforcement of workplace sexual harassment laws. "These are among many ideas feminist economists in India have been advocating for years. Is anyone listening?" she asked. (Reporting by Devayani Sathyan and Veronica Khongwir; Polling by Pranoy Krishna, Rahul Trivedi and Susobhan Sarkar; Editing by Hari Kishan, Ross Finley, Alexandra Hudson) (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Deccan Herald
18 minutes ago
- Deccan Herald
India's millions of jobseekers are short on skills
By Mihir SharmaIndia's destiny for centuries to come will be determined by the young people joining its workforce today. A few years ago — in 2019, by some calculations — the country entered the most favorable stage of its demographic transition. There are more working-age people than those over 65 or under 16. This will be true for another three or so decades; if India doesn't grow rich in that period, then the chances are it will stay poor a great responsibility for this generation — and one it can only fulfill if it the right jobs are available, allowing them to increase their productivity and grow incomes. But those don't seem to exist. India's growth numbers may appear comfortable, but that isn't being accompanied by an expansion of employment. There are no reliable statistics on joblessness rates — and these are deceptive in poorer countries anyway. But scenes like those in 2022, when 12.5 million candidates applied for 35,000 junior positions in Indian Railways and then rioted over the selection process illustrate the scale of the Minister Narendra Modi's government knows that this is a problem. Which is why this month his cabinet agreed to begin a new 'employment-linked incentive' program for companies. Federal finances will pay a month's worth of social security, and give employers 3,000 rupees (about $35) every month for every new employee they hire. This subsidy will last for two years — or four, if the company in question is in the manufacturing sector, which is a state favorite. These aren't big numbers, but the government nevertheless insists the handouts will create millions of new jobs..A looming dairy drought will stunt the world's growth.I'm a bit more skeptical. It may result in some jobs that wouldn't otherwise exist, but this sort of program assumes the main constraint that potential hirers have to deal with is their wage bill. That doesn't seem to be the case. More often than not, what employers complain about is that there are too few people to an odd thing to hear in the world's most-populous country. What that statement actually means is that companies can't find enough reliable, skilled workers to fill entry- or middle-level positions. This is particularly true in the manufacturing sector that the government is so determined to support. The problem isn't that Indian workers are $35 a month too expensive; the problem is that there are too few of them with the talents that employers want. That's what Modi needs to major problem is the educational system. Primary schooling is particularly bad. It may already be too late for the generation currently entering the workforce, but fixing schools should be a priority anyway. The most reliable school survey has found that only one of every four third-graders can do simple tasks, like subtraction, that they should have learned in second grade. The gap between curriculum and achievement widens as they head into high school. If a large part of the workforce struggles with basic numeracy, then it might be too much to expect them to be hired for skilled manufacturing formal education isn't working well, then India's network of vocational and technical schools should have picked up the slack. Unfortunately, those are even worse. The skills they teach are out of touch with the private sector's needs. Most don't even have active placement cells to connect their graduates with possible employers. According to the government's official think tank, less than 0.1% of the hundreds of thousands trained in Industrial Training Institutes were recorded as being placed in a company. But Indians have learned to live with public-sector dysfunction. Why don't they acquire the skills that would get them a private-sector job without the government's help?Partly because they don't see how it would make economic sense. The compressed wage structure means that the returns to education and skilling are far too low. That's really clear if you read the large-scale wage survey that the labor bureau conducts every few years. In the last iteration, it found that a skilled machinist in the automotive sector makes barely 20-25% more than an unskilled manual laborer in the same factory. That's not really enough of an incentive for most people to spend their time and money on vocational young Indians might be more willing to take a few risks if the jobs they got later felt a bit more secure. They certainly try exceptionally hard for the few government or public-sector positions that are available. But those come with more job security, as well as health and other benefits. India's minimal social safety net means that private-sector employment doesn't pay enough to make up for how insecure they a lot else the government can and should be doing if it wants more people to be hired. It needs to provide the sort of safety net that encourages them to take the risk of investing in their own human capital. It needs to fix schooling, and make sure the next generation of workers are literate and numerate enough to learn quickly on the job. And it must find new ways of getting skills to the workforce — perhaps using digital methods. Giving companies a dollar or so a day is simply not enough to create the scale of employment that India needs to grow.
