Arrest threat over inquiry no-shows
The five senior ministerial staffers failed to appear before a NSW parliamentary inquiry this morning, prompting the chair of the committee to flag 'further action' in what is fast becoming a major constitutional standoff over executive accountability.
The Legislative Council inquiry, chaired by independent MLC Rod Roberts, commenced at 10.45am on Friday but was forced to adjourn for 30 minutes after none of the five summoned witnesses, senior advisers to Premier Chris Minns and Police Minister Yasmin Catley, arrived. Hon Rod Roberts formally acknowledged the no-show and delivered a lengthy statement criticising the government's ongoing resistance to the inquiry. NewsWire/ Gaye Gerard Credit: News Corp Australia
The hearing was ultimately abandoned without a vote, after Chair Roberts formally acknowledged the no-show and delivered a lengthy statement criticising the government's ongoing resistance to the inquiry.
'I am disappointed in the government's continued efforts to hinder and frustrate the work of this committee, and ultimately, the role of the Legislative Council to scrutinise the actions of government,' Mr Roberts said.
'The committee will now consider further action in relation to these witnesses under section 7 through 9 of the Parliamentary Evidence Act 1901.'
Those summoned included Mr Minns' chief of staff, James Cullen; two senior advisers from the Premier's office, Edward Ovadia and Sarah Michael; and two staffers from Minister Catley's office, Dr Tilly South and Ross Neilson.
Their appearance was meant to shed light on who in government knew what, and when, regarding the discovery of an explosives-laden caravan in Sydney's northwest in January. James Cullen, Chief of Staff for Premier Chris Minns, is one of five who were summoned. Picture by Max Mason-Hubers Credit: News Corp Australia
The Premier had previously described the incident as a potential 'mass casualty event'. Although the Australian Federal Police later determined it was part of a criminal conspiracy.
The circumstances surrounding the government's response, and whether MPs passed sweeping anti-hate laws in February based on incomplete information, remain under intense scrutiny.
A letter sent to the committee chair on Thursday and signed by the five staffers outlined their refusal to appear. They argued that attending would breach 'the principles of ministerial accountability and comity between the Houses of Parliament,' particularly while a separate privileges inquiry by the Legislative Assembly is ongoing.
The group also took aim at Mr Roberts' earlier media comments, writing:
'Given your comments on breakfast radio yesterday as to the motivation for issuing the summonses, – which make it clear we are 'proxies' because our respective Ministers cannot be compelled as witnesses to the Select Committee – we also consider that they have not
been properly issued,' the letter read.
'In light of the above, we invite you not to press for our attendance at the hearing tomorrow.' NSW Premier Chris Minns had previously described the incident as a potential 'mass casualty event'. Although the Australian Federal Police later determined it was part of a criminal conspiracy. Photo: NewsWire/ Gaye Gerard Credit: News Corp Australia
Mr Roberts rejected those arguments in his closing statement, asserting the inquiry is properly constituted and that ministerial staff are not exempt from appearing.
'The inquiry seeks to examine the actions of the executive, not members of the Legislative Assembly,' he said.
'The committee is not seeking to sanction ministerial staff for their actions, only to shed lights on the events in the lead-up to the passage of the hate speech and protest laws through parliament.
'The power of committees to summon witnesses and compel them to attend and give evidence is in black and white in the Parliamentary Evidence Act. It is not in doubt.'
Local Government Minister Ron Hoenig has previously condemned the inquiry as 'an incursion upon the privilege' of the Legislative Assembly.
'It expressly seeks to scrutinise the discourse of the House, the conduct of its members, be it backbencher or a member of the executive government, while undertaking the primary function entrusted upon them by their constituents which is to legislate,' Mr Hoenig said during Question Time in May.
He argued the Legislative Council had overstepped its bounds by summoning ministerial staff and attempting to examine lower house proceedings. Mr Roberts rejected the witnesses arguments, asserting the inquiry is properly constituted and that ministerial staff are not exempt from appearing. NewsWire / Nikki Short Credit: News Corp Australia
Despite the controversy, the Legislative Assembly passed a motion 47 to 27 to refer the inquiry's terms to the Standing Committee on Parliamentary Privilege and Ethics.
In response, Mr Roberts amended the inquiry's terms to narrow its focus to the passage of relevant bills through the upper house. Mr Hoenig, however, insisted the changes 'did not go far enough'.
Opposition MP Alister Henskens said the amendments were sufficient to avoid breaching privilege and labelled the referral motion 'a transparent attempt to frustrate and delay the upper house inquiry'.
Greens MP Jenny Leong said it was 'critical' that the Legislative Council was not prevented from doing its work, warning that any 'unreasonable delay' would raise concerns about the Premier and executive trying to 'subvert' the inquiry.
Speaker Greg Piper defended the committee's progression, saying the changes were not intended to obstruct but instead 'an opportunity to actually examine the issue, the rights and privilege, the exclusive cognisance of the Legislative Assembly'.
The committee has previously heard from senior police officials, including NSW Police Commissioner Karen Webb and Deputy Commissioner David Hudson.
With Friday's hearing abandoned and potential legal action looming, the inquiry is now at a crossroads.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Perth Now
3 hours ago
- Perth Now
What you need to do about your Qantas password
Millions of Aussies have been impacted by the shock cyber hack on Qantas, which extracted sensitive customer data including names, emails, phone numbers, birth dates and frequent flyer numbers. But what happens now? Do you need to change your password? Qantas CEO Vanessa Hudson, in an email that started landing in the inboxes of impacted customers on Wednesday, says no. 'I want to reassure our Qantas frequent flyers that there's no requirement to reset your password or pin,' she writes. 'If you're having trouble accessing your account, reset your password or call the Qantas Frequent Flyer Service Centre.' Passwords, PIN numbers and log in details are still safe, Qantas says, because these were not accessed or compromised in the hack. The company also says the information extracted by the criminals is not enough to gain access to frequent flyer accounts. Further, all frequent flyer account by default have multi-factor authentication or two-factor authentication already enabled. Qantas CEO Vanessa Hudson has sent an email to customers apologising for the data breach and offering advice on what to do next. NewsWire / Luis Enrique Ascui Credit: News Corp Australia A one-time password code sent to a registered mobile number of email is an example of this. All the same, you're free to update your password and login details any time you'd like. The hack happened at Qantas' Manila call centre. The criminals used a 'vishing' ploy, or voice phishing, to trick a call centre operator into helping them access to confidential information. The company has stressed there was no impact to its operations or the safety of the airline. 'We are continuing to investigate the proportion of the data that has been stolen, though we expect it will be significant,' Qantas said in a statement. 'An initial review has confirmed the data includes some customers' names, email addresses, phone numbers, birth dates and frequent flyer numbers. 'Importantly, credit card details, personal financial information and passport details are not held in this system. 'No frequent flyer accounts were compromised nor have passwords, PIN numbers or log in details been accessed.' Ms Hudson said the company was now working with the National Cyber Security Coordinator, the Australian Cyber Security Centre and independent specialised cyber security experts. So what now? You don't need to change your password or PIN numbers, but is there anything else you need to do? Yes. Be alert over the next few days and weeks. Qantas recommends customers: – Remain alert for unusual communications claiming to be from Qantas – Be cautious of emails or call asking for personal information or passwords 'Remember, Qantas will never contact you requesting passwords, booking reference details or sensitive login information,' the company said. About six million Qantas customers have been impacted by the hack. NewsWire / Ben Clark Credit: News Corp Australia Software security company Norton, meanwhile, says the most crucial thing you can do to help protect your personal information is to practice 'safe password use'. 'Never reuse the same password on multiple websites,' the company says. 'Even if it's just two or three sites, it's still not a good idea. Once a cybercriminal obtains a cache of user credentials, they will then attempt to try them on other, well known websites, especially ones that are e-commerce, financial and medical related. Second, the company says you should always deploy 'strong passwords'. 'A password should be a random string of letters, numbers and special characters and must contain no less than eight characters (the more the better). 'But they don't really have to be 100 per cent random, it can still be memorable to you.' Further, the company recommends changing your password if you are the victim of a data breach.
The Advertiser
4 hours ago
- The Advertiser
Protest laws questioned after 'indefensible' injuries
Pro-democracy groups say controversial laws granting police powers to move protesters on from places of worship have emboldened the force to "act with impunity". Days after the violent arrest of one-time federal Greens candidate Hannah Thomas, advocates have written an open letter to NSW Premier Chris Minns with concerns about a "criminalisation and police powers creep". Ms Thomas, who was among five people arrested in Sydney on Friday outside an Australian firm reportedly linked to the manufacture of components for Israeli Defence Force fighter jets, was hospitalised and could suffer permanent vision loss. The arrests will be investigated by police officers from another command, with internal review by professional standards and external oversight from police watchdog the Law Enforcement Conduct Commission. Australian Democracy Network protest rights campaigner Anastasia Radievska said the incident showed the 'places of worship' laws had given police extra impetus to violently shut down protests. The laws were introduced by the state Labor government after a spate of anti-Semitic attacks across the country, with the stated intention of protecting people being targeted by disruptive protesters when entering or leaving a place of worship. "The passage of the places of worship anti-protest legislation has emboldened the NSW Police to act with impunity in shutting down protests when they're merely occurring near a place of worship," Ms Radievska said. "The place of worship move-on powers are not fit for purpose, and they must be immediately repealed before more protesters are subject to reckless police action … participating in protest cannot be an invitation to assault and serious injury from police." Friday's protest in Belmore was opposite a mosque but it was not the target of demonstrators. Police have denied the laws were relied upon in the arrest. Doctor Mitch Hickson said Ms Thomas' injuries were "medically significant" and "ethically indefensible". "Facial trauma of the kind she has experienced - requiring surgery and with the potential for permanent vision loss - should never be the outcome of lawful protest activity and reveals a disproportionate and excessive use of force by the police," he said. ""A democracy cannot function where lawful protest is met with force, where questions are answered with violence, and where power is exercised without accountability." The open letter calls for an independent investigation into the policing of the Belmore protest and urgent amendments to the places of worship protest laws. Signatories include Amnesty International Australia, Australian Lawyers for Human Rights and the Jewish Council of Australia. Pro-democracy groups say controversial laws granting police powers to move protesters on from places of worship have emboldened the force to "act with impunity". Days after the violent arrest of one-time federal Greens candidate Hannah Thomas, advocates have written an open letter to NSW Premier Chris Minns with concerns about a "criminalisation and police powers creep". Ms Thomas, who was among five people arrested in Sydney on Friday outside an Australian firm reportedly linked to the manufacture of components for Israeli Defence Force fighter jets, was hospitalised and could suffer permanent vision loss. The arrests will be investigated by police officers from another command, with internal review by professional standards and external oversight from police watchdog the Law Enforcement Conduct Commission. Australian Democracy Network protest rights campaigner Anastasia Radievska said the incident showed the 'places of worship' laws had given police extra impetus to violently shut down protests. The laws were introduced by the state Labor government after a spate of anti-Semitic attacks across the country, with the stated intention of protecting people being targeted by disruptive protesters when entering or leaving a place of worship. "The passage of the places of worship anti-protest legislation has emboldened the NSW Police to act with impunity in shutting down protests when they're merely occurring near a place of worship," Ms Radievska said. "The place of worship move-on powers are not fit for purpose, and they must be immediately repealed before more protesters are subject to reckless police action … participating in protest cannot be an invitation to assault and serious injury from police." Friday's protest in Belmore was opposite a mosque but it was not the target of demonstrators. Police have denied the laws were relied upon in the arrest. Doctor Mitch Hickson said Ms Thomas' injuries were "medically significant" and "ethically indefensible". "Facial trauma of the kind she has experienced - requiring surgery and with the potential for permanent vision loss - should never be the outcome of lawful protest activity and reveals a disproportionate and excessive use of force by the police," he said. ""A democracy cannot function where lawful protest is met with force, where questions are answered with violence, and where power is exercised without accountability." The open letter calls for an independent investigation into the policing of the Belmore protest and urgent amendments to the places of worship protest laws. Signatories include Amnesty International Australia, Australian Lawyers for Human Rights and the Jewish Council of Australia. Pro-democracy groups say controversial laws granting police powers to move protesters on from places of worship have emboldened the force to "act with impunity". Days after the violent arrest of one-time federal Greens candidate Hannah Thomas, advocates have written an open letter to NSW Premier Chris Minns with concerns about a "criminalisation and police powers creep". Ms Thomas, who was among five people arrested in Sydney on Friday outside an Australian firm reportedly linked to the manufacture of components for Israeli Defence Force fighter jets, was hospitalised and could suffer permanent vision loss. The arrests will be investigated by police officers from another command, with internal review by professional standards and external oversight from police watchdog the Law Enforcement Conduct Commission. Australian Democracy Network protest rights campaigner Anastasia Radievska said the incident showed the 'places of worship' laws had given police extra impetus to violently shut down protests. The laws were introduced by the state Labor government after a spate of anti-Semitic attacks across the country, with the stated intention of protecting people being targeted by disruptive protesters when entering or leaving a place of worship. "The passage of the places of worship anti-protest legislation has emboldened the NSW Police to act with impunity in shutting down protests when they're merely occurring near a place of worship," Ms Radievska said. "The place of worship move-on powers are not fit for purpose, and they must be immediately repealed before more protesters are subject to reckless police action … participating in protest cannot be an invitation to assault and serious injury from police." Friday's protest in Belmore was opposite a mosque but it was not the target of demonstrators. Police have denied the laws were relied upon in the arrest. Doctor Mitch Hickson said Ms Thomas' injuries were "medically significant" and "ethically indefensible". "Facial trauma of the kind she has experienced - requiring surgery and with the potential for permanent vision loss - should never be the outcome of lawful protest activity and reveals a disproportionate and excessive use of force by the police," he said. ""A democracy cannot function where lawful protest is met with force, where questions are answered with violence, and where power is exercised without accountability." The open letter calls for an independent investigation into the policing of the Belmore protest and urgent amendments to the places of worship protest laws. Signatories include Amnesty International Australia, Australian Lawyers for Human Rights and the Jewish Council of Australia. Pro-democracy groups say controversial laws granting police powers to move protesters on from places of worship have emboldened the force to "act with impunity". Days after the violent arrest of one-time federal Greens candidate Hannah Thomas, advocates have written an open letter to NSW Premier Chris Minns with concerns about a "criminalisation and police powers creep". Ms Thomas, who was among five people arrested in Sydney on Friday outside an Australian firm reportedly linked to the manufacture of components for Israeli Defence Force fighter jets, was hospitalised and could suffer permanent vision loss. The arrests will be investigated by police officers from another command, with internal review by professional standards and external oversight from police watchdog the Law Enforcement Conduct Commission. Australian Democracy Network protest rights campaigner Anastasia Radievska said the incident showed the 'places of worship' laws had given police extra impetus to violently shut down protests. The laws were introduced by the state Labor government after a spate of anti-Semitic attacks across the country, with the stated intention of protecting people being targeted by disruptive protesters when entering or leaving a place of worship. "The passage of the places of worship anti-protest legislation has emboldened the NSW Police to act with impunity in shutting down protests when they're merely occurring near a place of worship," Ms Radievska said. "The place of worship move-on powers are not fit for purpose, and they must be immediately repealed before more protesters are subject to reckless police action … participating in protest cannot be an invitation to assault and serious injury from police." Friday's protest in Belmore was opposite a mosque but it was not the target of demonstrators. Police have denied the laws were relied upon in the arrest. Doctor Mitch Hickson said Ms Thomas' injuries were "medically significant" and "ethically indefensible". "Facial trauma of the kind she has experienced - requiring surgery and with the potential for permanent vision loss - should never be the outcome of lawful protest activity and reveals a disproportionate and excessive use of force by the police," he said. ""A democracy cannot function where lawful protest is met with force, where questions are answered with violence, and where power is exercised without accountability." The open letter calls for an independent investigation into the policing of the Belmore protest and urgent amendments to the places of worship protest laws. Signatories include Amnesty International Australia, Australian Lawyers for Human Rights and the Jewish Council of Australia.
Perth Now
5 hours ago
- Perth Now
Labor's big call despite Trump risk
The Albanese government is 'determined' to enforce rules compelling tech firms to pay Australian media for content consumed on their platforms despite concerns of backlash from the White House. Canada this week axed a digital services tax that would have slugged the likes of Meta and Google with billions in duties, clearing the way to restart trade talks with the US. Australia's media bargaining code affects US tech titans more because they own most major digital platforms – a similarity with Canada's case. Against a backdrop of US tariffs slapped on Australian products, Foreign Minister Penny Wong said on Thursday (AEST) Labor had no intention of changing the code. Foreign Minister Penny Wong (left) met with US State Secretary Marco Rubio in Washington this week. NewsWire Handout Credit: NewsWire 'We're determined to continue with this policy framework,' she told Sky News from Washington. 'This is not a revenue-raising exercise. 'It really does go to enabling content for consumers and ensuring that journalists and content creators have appropriate remuneration, and that is an important thing for any democracy but also paying the fair share of tax.' Pressed on the challenge of taxing multinationals, Senator Wong vowed to 'take an approach on taxation that we believe is in our national interests'. 'Obviously, there are always people with different views,' she said. 'We believe in a reasonable tax system, and that's what we'll continue to implement.' Senator Wong was in Washington this week for a summit with her Quad counterparts. She had a one-on-one with US State Secretary Marco Rubio, with both spruiking the strength of the Australia-US relationship. But Senator Wong was hard-pressed to name any tangible outcomes from the talks. More to come
