logo
H-1B visas usage now led by banks and telecoms rather than Silicon Valley companies

H-1B visas usage now led by banks and telecoms rather than Silicon Valley companies

Time of India4 days ago
H-1B visas: The H-1B visa shift is rewriting the rules of America's work‑visa landscape as non‑tech giants like banks and telecom firms now lead sponsorship, overtaking Silicon Valley . New data reveals that nearly half of the 85,000 annual H-1B visas are being granted via staffing and outsourcing agencies, reshaping the program's original intent.
While fintech and telecom companies increasingly rely on foreign talent, concerns are mounting over the impact on American workers, potential wage suppression, and lottery loopholes.
As the H-1B landscape evolves, the shift raises questions about fairness, program transparency, and whether reforms are needed to protect U.S. labor. Stay tuned as the system adapts to a broader corporate footprint—and intensifying scrutiny.
What is H-1B visa?
The H-1B visa is a non-immigrant visa issued by the United States that allows U.S. companies to employ foreign workers in specialty occupations that require theoretical or technical expertise. These fields typically include IT, engineering, finance, medicine, and academia.
Key points about the H-1B visa:
Eligibility: The job must require at least a bachelor's degree or equivalent, and the applicant must have the necessary qualifications.
Employer-sponsored: A U.S. employer must petition on behalf of the foreign worker.
Validity: Initially granted for three years, and can be extended up to six years (or more under certain conditions).
Annual cap: There is an annual limit of 65,000 visas, with an additional 20,000 reserved for individuals with a U.S. master's degree or higher.
Path to green card: It can serve as a stepping stone to permanent residency (green card) in the U.S.
From Silicon Valley to Wall Street: How outsourcing firms are redefining the H-1B program
America's H-1B visa program has long been a key component of Silicon Valley's innovation-driven strategy, drawing in top-tier international talent in science and engineering. However, according to fresh data that Bloomberg News was able to obtain, a broader range of industries, such as banks and telecom firms, are among the biggest users of the program.
This is frequently the case through outsourcing and staffing firms that obtain almost half of the 85,000 new H-1B visas that are granted each year. By serving as visa intermediaries, these businesses are changing the goal of the H-1B visa program and, in the process, posing concerns about how it will affect American workers' earnings.
Bloomberg's analysis, which included new H-1B employment from May 2020 to May 2024, found that Citigroup Inc. outpaced tech titans like Nvidia, Oracle, and Qualcomm by adding 3,000 H-1B workers. However, around two-thirds of Citi's H-1B employees were IT contractors hired through staffing and outsourcing firms, unlike the highly qualified researchers and engineers in software companies.
These employees, sometimes said to be paid much less than direct hiring, are part of an increasing trend in which non-tech enterprises use the visa program to obtain cheaper labor. In an interview with Bloomberg, a senior economist at the W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, Susan Houseman stated, "This is just the beginning."
"The offshoring of service jobs has not received enough attention in the national debate about the United States' reliance on imported goods—not because it doesn't occur or isn't significant, but rather because we don't have good data on it."
Frauds in H-1B visas
Congress created the H-1B visa in 1990 to increase American competitiveness in developing technology sectors. However, it has now grown so popular that there are yearly lottery draws for the few visas that are still available. This system has been abused by outsourcing and staffing companies acting as intermediaries for visas. These companies let businesses outsource back-office tasks or supply lower-level IT personnel.
According to Bloomberg's data, which was acquired through a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit against the Department of Homeland Security, these visa intermediaries are frequently used by large U.S. corporations such as Capital One Financial Corp., Verizon Communications Inc., AT&T Inc., and Walmart Inc. To improve their chances, some intermediaries used a tactic known as "multiple registration" to influence the visa lottery until recently.
This involved submitting many applications for the same worker. In a 2023 report, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) declared this technique fraudulent and changed the rules to stop it last year.
According to Bloomberg's investigation, USCIS also highlighted thirteen staffing companies that had used such tactics, and at least six of them sent personnel to Capital One. The largest percentage of the top 10 corporations examined, more than half of Capital One's 905 H-1B contract employees across the four years, were associated with multiple registrations. 361 of the 429 staffing companies that Capital One used had multiple registrations.
A Capital One representative responded to Bloomberg by saying that the business would "take appropriate action" if there were any government charges of visa fraud by its contractors but that it was unaware of such complaints. AT&T, Walmart, and USAA declined to comment, although Verizon and Capital One stressed that they demand suppliers to do the same.
The impact on salaries of the change in H-1B visas
There are also notable income gaps, according to the data. Even for comparable responsibilities, H-1B contractors are frequently paid far less than direct hiring. Even after adjusting for age and education, more than 75% of the approximately 5,300 H-1B "software developers" employed between 2020 and 2024 were contractors, earning about $48,000 less on average than direct recruits, according to Bloomberg's research of the top 10 end clients.
The Department of Labor's minimum wage was paid to one out of every three contractors. Information Services Group Inc. Chief AI Officer Steve Hall told Bloomberg that contractors doing less technical tasks, such as communicating with overseas teams and U.S. clients, account for a portion of the salary disparity. Critics counter that using visa intermediaries distorts the original aim of the H-1B program.
Labor proponents argue that it undercuts American workers, tilts the labor market in favor of employers, and leaves a vulnerable workforce with fewer protections. The absence of thorough statistics on offshored employment and pre-existing H-1B contractors makes evaluating the program's overall impact more difficult.
Houseman pointed out that although outsourcing service jobs is poorly understood, it has important ramifications for the American labor market. The H-1B program's influence on the workforce is still up for question, as businesses from various industries increasingly use visa middlemen.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

America 'accuses' one of China's largest technology company: You plotted to steal our trade secrets and ...
America 'accuses' one of China's largest technology company: You plotted to steal our trade secrets and ...

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

America 'accuses' one of China's largest technology company: You plotted to steal our trade secrets and ...

Representative AI image A U.S. federal judge has reportedly ruled that Huawei Technologies , China's leading telecommunications equipment manufacturer, must face a sweeping 16-count indictment accusing the company of stealing trade secrets, racketeering, wire and bank fraud, and violating U.S. sanctions . U.S. District Judge Ann Donnelly rejected Huawei's motion to dismiss the charges, calling the company's arguments premature in a 52-page ruling, according to court documents. According to a report by news agency AP, the U.S. Justice Department (DoJ) alleges that Huawei and its subsidiaries engaged in a concerted effort to steal American trade secrets, installed surveillance equipment that aided Iran in monitoring protesters during 2009 anti-government demonstrations, and conducted business in North Korea despite U.S. sanctions. The 2019 indictment also charged Huawei with using a Hong Kong shell company, Skycom, to sell equipment to Iran in violation of sanctions, and accused its chief financial officer, Meng Wanzhou , of misleading HSBC about Huawei's Iranian dealings. Arrest of Huawei founder's daughter in Canada Meng, the daughter of Huawei's founder, was arrested in Canada in 2018 on a U.S. extradition request but was released in 2021 as part of a prisoner swap that freed two Canadians detained by China. Huawei did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the ruling. The case, which intensified during former President Donald Trump's administration, saw the U.S. raise national security concerns and urge Western allies to exclude Huawei from their high-speed wireless networks. Chinese officials have countered, accusing the U.S. of 'economic bullying' and using national security as a pretext to suppress Chinese companies. Huawei's legal team argued the allegations were vague and some charges improperly applied U.S. law extraterritorially. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like An engineer reveals: One simple trick to get internet without a subscription Techno Mag Learn More Undo Facing U.S. sanctions that have restricted access to American processor chips and technology, Huawei, the world's largest network gear maker, has pivoted to developing its own chips and focusing on the Chinese market. The company has also expanded into network technology for hospitals, factories, and other industrial sectors less affected by U.S. restrictions. The ruling sets the stage for a high-profile legal battle as Huawei confronts the serious allegations in the U.S. federal court.

When Steve Jobs visited Moscow as he was 'looking for something to do', making a trip that made it to FBI files
When Steve Jobs visited Moscow as he was 'looking for something to do', making a trip that made it to FBI files

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

When Steve Jobs visited Moscow as he was 'looking for something to do', making a trip that made it to FBI files

Apple founder Steve Jobs reportedly made a trip to Moscow. When? In 1985, when Moscow was part of Soviet Union and shortly after reformist leader Mikhail Gorbachev's rise to power. According to a report in Cult of Mac, in a trip to the Soviet Union in 1985, Apple co-founder Steve Jobs aimed to bring Macintosh computers to Russia. The two-day visit saw Jobs lecturing computer science students, attending a Fourth of July party at the American embassy, and discussing the possibility of establishing a Mac factory in Russia. The trip came at a tumultuous time for Steve Jobs, who had been sidelined at Apple after a power struggle with CEO John Sculley. Seeking purpose, Jobs embarked on an overseas journey that included stops in Paris, Italy, and Moscow. In Paris, he met future U.S. President George H.W. Bush, discussing how Macs could spark a 'revolution from below' in the Soviet Union, where the less-powerful Apple II had recently launched. However, Jobs' visit wasn't without controversy. According to Walter Isaacson's 2011 biography, Jobs nearly clashed with the KGB by praising exiled Bolshevik leader Leon Trotsky, deemed an 'enemy of the people' by the Soviet regime. Cult of Mac cites Isaacson, noting that a KGB agent warned Jobs against discussing Trotsky, saying, 'Our historians have studied the situation, and we don't believe he's a great man anymore.' Undeterred, Jobs reportedly began a speech to Moscow computer students by lauding Trotsky, though a partial transcript of the speech omits this detail. Intriguingly, Jobs suspected the attorney organizing his trip might have ties to the CIA or KGB, a detail noted in his FBI file, which also mentioned his meeting with a Russian Academy of Sciences professor to explore marketing Apple products. Despite these, the trip reportedly yielded no Russian Apple division, aligning with what Cult of Mac describes as 'busy work' to keep Jobs away from Apple's management. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Glicemia acima de 130? Insira essa receita no seu café da manhã G!Saú Undo A surprising outcome emerged, however. Apple VP Al Eisenstat, staying at the same Moscow hotel, received a floppy disk from a nervous programmer containing advanced handwriting-recognition software. The report adds that members of the Apple Newton team later confirmed this code became the foundation for the Newton MessagePad's handwriting recognition feature. Though Jobs' Soviet venture didn't revolutionize Russia's tech landscape, it remains a fascinating chapter in his storied career, blending ambition, intrigue and unexpected technological gains. AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now

At WTO, India Proposes Retaliatory Duties Against US Aver Auto Tariffs
At WTO, India Proposes Retaliatory Duties Against US Aver Auto Tariffs

NDTV

timean hour ago

  • NDTV

At WTO, India Proposes Retaliatory Duties Against US Aver Auto Tariffs

New Delhi: India on Friday proposed imposing retaliatory duties under the WTO (World Trade Organisation) norms against the US over American tariffs imports on the country's auto parts in the name of safeguard measures. "The proposed suspension of concessions or other obligations would take the form of an increase in tariffs on selected products originating in the United States," according to a notification of the WTO being circulated at the request of India. India has notified the WTO's Council for Trade in Goods of its proposed suspension of concessions and other obligations under certain WTO provisions. "This notification is made in connection with safeguard measures extended by the United States of America on imports of automobile parts from India," it said. On March 26 this year, the US adopted a safeguard measure in the form of a tariff increase of 25 per cent ad valorem on imports of passenger vehicles and light trucks, and on certain automobile parts from India. These measures apply from May 3, 2025 as regards automobile parts, and for an unlimited duration. The measures have not been notified by the United States to the WTO, but are, in essence, safeguard measures. India has maintained that the measures taken by the United States are not consistent with the GATT (General Agreement on Trade and Tariff) 1994 and the agreement on Safeguards. As consultations sought by India on these tariffs have not taken place, "India reserves the right to suspend concessions or other obligations", the WTO notification added. The safeguard measures would affect USD 2,895 million imports annually into the United States of the relevant products originating in India, on which the duty collection would be USD 723.75 million. "Accordingly, India's proposed suspension of concessions would result in an equivalent amount of duty collected from products originating in the United States," it said. To ensure the effective exercise of its right to suspend substantially equivalent concessions or other obligations, the multinational body said, India has reserved its right to adjust the products as well as the tariff rates. "India reserves the right to withdraw, modify, supplement or replace this notification,and/or make a further notification or notifications as and when required," it added. The development is important as India and the US are actively negotiating an interim trade agreement to boost trade ties. India has last month taken similar measures against the US tariffs on steel and aluminium. Commenting on India's decision to reserve rights, think tank Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI) said India's WTO notification is a legal and strategic step, signalling its readiness to retaliate against the US safeguard duties on automobiles and parts. By invoking a provision of the WTO's Safeguards Agreement, India is asserting its rights under international trade rules. "The proposed retaliation -- tariff hikes on US goods worth over USD 700 million -- is proportionate to the injury caused. However, whether India will follow through remains uncertain," GTRI Founder Ajay Srivastava said. He added that in a similar case involving US steel tariffs, India held back. Given the sensitive timing of the India-US trade deal and broader geopolitical considerations, this may be more of a warning shot than a guaranteed action, he said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store