logo
How long will you wait for Social Security help? Why it's anybody's guess.

How long will you wait for Social Security help? Why it's anybody's guess.

Yahoo2 days ago
Members of Congress and advocates say the Social Security Administration is providing the public with misleading information about how long it will take to resolve their problems.
Over the last several weeks, the agency has stopped making public 34 real-time performance metrics about things like how long they will have to wait to reach a live person on the phone, and how long applications for new senior benefits or social security benefits take to be approved. The metrics have been used for years to show how time-consuming it can be to reach a live person at certain locations or through the national 1-800 number, and as an accountability measure for the agency.
Instead the webpage now emphasizes how quickly problems can be resolved online, and says the "average speed of answer," which excludes callback wait time, is 19.2 minutes.
USA TODAY reporters called Social Security's 1-800 line multiple times over several days and found the wait times to be consistently over an hour. Multiple times they did not reach a live person before the line disconnected with no warning.
Social Security Commissioner Frank Bisignano told members of Congress June 25 that three out of four people who call that 1-800 number use a call-back feature so they are not waiting on the phone. He said he took the wait time metric off the website because he thought it kept people from calling.
"If you show that you got an hour and a half wait time, well people are going to be discouraged and not call," he said.
When California Rep. Judy Chu asked him to reinstate the metrics so members of Congress and the public can have an accurate barometer of the agency's performance, Bisignano avoided answering the question until Chu's time to ask questions expired.
"How can you know how the Social Security Administration is doing with regard to answering calls or processing benefit applications unless you have these metrics? You have to compare them over time so it is shocking that they would just remove that data if they are so confident about all of these metrics that he was talking about," Chu told USA TODAY after the hearing.
Social Security staffing was already at a ten-year low when President Donald Trump took office in January. Meanwhile, the number of new applicants has skyrocketed as Baby Boomers retire.
That meant wait times to reach employees by phone, email or in person were already high when the Trump administration began to slash staff amidst efforts to downsize government.
In February, the agency announced plans to cut 7,000 of the agency's 57,000 employees ‒ more than 10% of staff ‒ in response to President Trump's executive orders. At least 3,000 employees have already accepted buyout agreements.
Average wait times to reach a live person by crept up to 90 minutes by early May. A May 22 screenshot of the Social Security website's live metrics, preserved by the Internet Archive, shows that call wait time was 1 hour and 46 minutes, and call back wait time was 1 hour and 44 minutes. It also showed the number of people on hold and current number waiting for a call back.
Along with the 1-800 wait time information, the Social Security metrics page also included processing time for retirement, survivor, and Medicare benefits. For disability benefit applicants, which can take more than a year to get a decision, there was information about processing time, reconsideration time, and appeals adjudication time.
The average speed of answer was shown as 20.3 minutes, based on an average of monthly data from the last year. That speed is similar to data the agency previously made public. Then, on June 6 the comprehensive dashboard showing live metrics was removed from the Social Security Administration's website, showing as 'under maintenance' until June 16.
When the dashboard page went back up on June 16, it no longer included the live call wait time data or information on the number of people on hold or waiting for a call back, instead just listing the average speed of answer excluding call-back wait time as 19.2 minutes over the last year.
"We are updating our performance metrics to reflect the real-life experiences of the people we serve and highlight the fastest ways our customers can get service," Social Security spokesperson Stephen McGraw said in a statement to USA TODAY. "It is critical that the agency measures what matters most to improve customer service while providing all Americans the information they need to select the service channel that works best for them."
Concerned that the information now available on the website didn't match what her staff was hearing from constituents, Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren's staff began conducting its own test of the 1-800 number, making hourly phone calls from June 12 through June 20.
Warren leads Senate Democrat's Social Security War Room, which seeks to draw attention to changes the Trump administration is making to Social Security.
In a letter Warren sent to Bisignano late on June 25, she called the results of her office survey "deeply troubling." Compared to the number available online, wait times averaged nearly an hour and 45 minutes and often exceeded three hours.
Data from the office survey showed that in 50 calls, more than 50% were never answered by a human. The majority ended when the caller was placed on hold and then the call dropped.
Of calls that were answered, 32% had wait times exceeding two hours. The average wait time was 102 minutes.
"These delays are unacceptable ‒ and made even worse by your misleading claims that service has actually improved under your watch," she wrote in her letter, shared first with USA TODAY. "Service disruptions and barriers make it harder for beneficiaries to receive their Social Security benefits ‒ payments which are the primary source of income for more than half of America's seniors."
More: Social security employees warn of delays: What the new priorities means for your benefits
Warren accused Bisignano of lying about improving wait times at the agency in a separate statement to USA TODAY.
"Donald Trump and DOGE (the Department of Government Efficiency) took a chainsaw to Social Security, leaving Americans waiting hours just to get help ‒ and that's if their call is answered at all. Instead of owning that failure, Commissioner Bisignano and his team are trying to cover it up," she said.
Taking data offline makes it harder for Congress and Americans to know what the agency is doing, said Nancy Altman, president of Social Security Works, an advocacy group that wants to expand the agency.
The information that is now on the website is an "apples to oranges" comparison to what was previously available, she said. Along with the call wait time, there is less detail on how long it will take for new applications to be processed and for disability claims to be appealed, and less about how wait times vary geographically, she said.
There is "zero" evidence that wait times have suddenly gone down, she said. "It would defy logic for it to get easier given how they've hollowed out the agency, every part of the agency."
Altman said the agency's lack of transparency about wait times raises questions about other information they are making public.
And, if the website says the average hold is 19.2 minutes, but they are on the phone for much longer, it is hard for Americans to tell how widespread the problem is, Altman said.
"The American people are getting frustrated, but they don't know if it is just happening to them," she said.
More: Social Security wait times were already long under Biden. They're even longer under Trump.
Jen Burdick, supervising attorney at Community Legal Services of Philadelphia, said they haven't seen a reduction in call times.
"Social Security attorneys and paralegals from our office call SSA dozens of times every day. We are uniformly finding that we can't get placed into the queue, either because of system outages, phone disconnects, or AI chatbot issues. When we do get put into the queue, wait times seem to be up from last year ‒ sometimes more than an hour. More importantly, we're having a hard time resolving issues because of SSA training issues when we do reach staff," she told USA TODAY.
We want to hear from people affected by or who have knowledge of the Trump administration's efforts to reshape the government, including actions by DOGE.
Know something others should? Reach out at swire@usatoday.com or Signal at sarahdwire.71
This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: How long will you wait for Social Security help? Anybody's guess.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump says Musk is ‘off the rails' with his third-party effort
Trump says Musk is ‘off the rails' with his third-party effort

Boston Globe

time33 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

Trump says Musk is ‘off the rails' with his third-party effort

Advertisement Their close bond crumbled in a public spectacle last month, as Trump pushed his sprawling domestic policy bill through Congress. Musk panned the legislation, which is projected to add trillions to the federal debt, as a 'disgusting abomination.' He has said he would support primary challengers against any Republican who voted for the legislation, which passed with almost unanimous Republican support, but he has given few details about his new political party. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up 'Backing a candidate for president is not out of the question, but the focus for the next 12 months is on the House and the Senate,' Musk wrote on his social platform X on Sunday. Trump has also threatened to cut billions of dollars in federal contracts and tax subsidies for Musk's companies. Advertisement Trump said Sunday night that Musk had opposed the legislation because it eliminated the electric vehicle mandate, which would have been a boon for Tesla, one of Musk's companies. 'I have campaigned on this for two years and, quite honestly, when Elon gave me his total and unquestioned Endorsement, I asked him whether or not he knew that I was going to terminate the EV Mandate -- It was in every speech I made, and in every conversation I had,' Trump wrote in his post. 'He said he had no problems with that -- I was very surprised!' Musk did previously support ending the electric vehicle tax credits, but has done an about-face more recently, as Tesla's sales have dropped this year. Trump also said that Musk was furious that the president had pulled the nomination of Jared Isaacman, who has twice launched into orbit in a SpaceX vehicle and is a close friend of Musk, to run NASA. Trump withdrew the nomination after a White House official highlighted for Trump that Isaacman had previously donated to prominent Democrats. Isaacman met with Trump during the transition and disclosed the donations before he was nominated. But as Trump's relationship with Musk was fracturing, a White House official resurfaced the donations, according to two people with knowledge of the matter. Trump, who also has not walled off his or his family's business interests from the government, offered another reason Sunday for pulling Isaacman's nomination. 'I also thought it inappropriate that a very close friend of Elon, who was in the Space Business, run NASA, when NASA is such a big part of Elon's corporate life,' Trump wrote. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Sunday that the goals of Musk's past government cost-cutting effort, through the Department of Government Efficiency, were popular. But the billionaire himself, Bessent said, was not. Advertisement 'I believe that the boards of directors at his various companies wanted him to come back and run those companies, which he is better at than anyone,' he said on CNN on Sunday. 'So I imagine that those board of directors did not like this announcement yesterday and will be encouraging him to focus on his business activities, not his political activities.' This article originally appeared in

Canadian mother reportedly detained in the U.S. as Trump-voting husband feels 'totally blindsided'
Canadian mother reportedly detained in the U.S. as Trump-voting husband feels 'totally blindsided'

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Canadian mother reportedly detained in the U.S. as Trump-voting husband feels 'totally blindsided'

A Canadian woman has been detained in the U.S. during her green card interview for being in the U.S. illegally, California-based KGTV reported Thursday. Cynthia Olivera's green card interview was on June 13 in California. As she went into the interview room, her husband, Francisco Olivera waited outside. 'We feel totally blindsided. I want my vote back,' Francisco told KGTV after Cynthia was detained. Francisco is a U.S. citizen and self-identified Trump voter. The U.S. president's promises to deport dangerous criminals appealed to the couple but they didn't think Cynthia's lack of legal U.S. status would be a problem — no criminal charges were found under Cynthia's name by KGTV. 'The U.S. is my country,' Cynthia told KGTV from an immigration detention centre in El Paso, Texas. 'That's where I met my husband. That's where I went to high school, junior high, elementary. That's where I had my kids,' she continued. The 45-year-old was born in Canada and taken to the U.S. by her parents when she was 10 years old. In 1999, when Cynthia was 19 years old, U.S. border officials determined she was living in the country without a legal status and an order was obtained to deport her. After being removed, Cynthia returned within a few months to the U.S. by driving to San Diego from Mexico, The Guardian reports. 'They didn't ask me for my citizenship – they didn't do nothing. They just waved me in,' Cynthia told KGTV. For the next 25 years, Cynthia is reported to have worked in Los Angeles where she paid her taxes and provided for her family. She has three children who were born in the U.S. As she navigated the onerous task of obtaining a green card, she was granted a permit by the Biden administration in 2024 that allowed her to work legally in the U.S. Meanwhile, the Trump administration in an emailed statement referred to Cynthia as an 'illegal alien from Canada,' The Guardian reports. In a statement to Newsweek, the spokesperson said Cynthia was 'previously deported and chose to ignore our law and again illegally entered the country.' The statement further noted that 're-entering the U.S. without permission after being deported is a felony, and it said Olivera would remain in Ice's custody pending removal to Canada,' Newsweek reports. Cynthia reportedly told officials that the couple can pay for her to fly to Canada, where she would live with a cousin in Mississauga, Ontario. 'Despite offering to pay for her own flight back to Canada and waive her rights to a bond hearing, she remains locked up at an ICE detention facility in El Paso, Texas,' reads a petition on The Canadian government told KGTV that it is aware of Cynthia's case but cannot intervene because 'every country or territory decides who can enter or exit through its borders,' Guardian reports. U.K. singer arrested in U.S. after being denied entry into Canada. She overstayed her visa by 26 years Canadian man detained by ICE dies in custody in Miami Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store