Satellite Photos Show British Aircraft Carrier Heading Toward Pacific
The British High Commission in Singapore also announced that the United Kingdom carrier strike group, led by the Prince of Wales, is scheduled to make a port call in the South China Sea country next month to mark 60 years of diplomatic relations between the two countries.
Newsweek has contacted the Chinese Defense Ministry for comment by email.
The Prince of Wales has been conducting Operation Highmast-an eight-month mission set to take it to Singapore, Australia, Japan and India-since departing from its home port in southern England on April 22, forming a naval task group with several NATO naval vessels.
The aircraft carrier's deployment comes as the United States-a major ally of the U.K.-and China-which has the world's largest navy by hull count-jostle for naval dominance in the western Pacific Ocean, where both countries have recently deployed their aircraft carriers.
Open-source intelligence researcher @MT_Anderson wrote on X, formerly Twitter, that a group of nine warships appeared to be transiting the Suez Canal southward on Saturday, sailing from the Mediterranean Sea toward the Red Sea, as shown in a satellite image.
Based on its silhouette, the researcher identified one of the warships as the Prince of Wales, positioned as the second ship in the single-line formation. Prior to their transit in the Suez Canal, the aircraft carrier and its escorting warships made a stopover at Greece's Souda Bay.
The presence of the Prince of Wales near the Red Sea comes after the U.S. aircraft carrier USS Harry S. Trumanleft the region. The American warship had been engaged in conflict with Yemen's Houthis until both sides reached a ceasefire agreement earlier this month.
Meanwhile, @MT_Anderson said two American destroyers were likely part of the formation. According to the specialist outlet The Maritime Executive, their presence would make it difficult for the Houthis to target non-U.S. ships within the U.K. carrier strike group.
Regarding the Prince of Wales' planned visit to Singapore, the British High Commission told Newsweek that it was unable to share much information at the moment. It remains unclear exactly when the British carrier strike group will arrive in the Southeast Asian country.
The Royal Navy said in a statement issued on April 29: "The 2025 mission, known as Operation Highmast and commanded by Commodore James Blackmore and his staff from aboard HMS Prince of Wales, occurs with a changed world order and even more volatile geo-political situation."
U.K. Defense Secretary John Healey said in a statement issued on April 22: "As one of only a few nations capable of leading a deployment of this scale, the Royal Navy is once again demonstrating that U.K. defense is strong, modern, and ready to meet the threats of today and tomorrow."
It remains to be seen whether the Prince of Wales will operate in or near contested areas in the western Pacific Ocean-the South China Sea and the Taiwan Strait-during its mission.
Related Articles
Donald Trump Attacks UK's 'Unsightly Windmills'Map Shows Countries Condemning Israel Over Gaza OffensiveThe EU Needs a Navy. Can the UK Supply It? | OpinionEurope Squeezes Putin as Trump Pins Ukraine Hopes on More Talks
2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gizmodo
5 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
Court Rules Mike Lindell Doesn't Have to Pay $5 Million in Hacked Voting Machine Bet
Mike Lindell, the founder and CEO of MyPillow, could be considered a loser in many ways, but not in a way that will cost him $5 million. The New York Times reports that a federal appeals court ruled on Wednesday that Lindell will not have to pay out the prize money for his 'Prove Mike Wrong' challenge, which offered up a $5 million reward to anyone who could sufficiently debunk his baseless claim that the 2020 election was stolen from Donald Trump. Lindell offered up the prize money in 2021 during his 'Cyber Symposium' event that he held in South Dakota, in which he laid out his 'evidence' to prove that China hacked US voting machines and changed votes. Lindell invited cybersecurity experts to the event and offered up the prize money to anyone in attendance who could prove his findings to be inaccurate—a challenge that software engineer Robert Zeidman took on. If you assume that proving Lindell's findings are false would be easy, you're not wrong. Lindell's argument primarily hung on the idea that data from voting machines could be seen moving across Chinese servers. According to Zeidman's account, he determined that Lindell's files of 'proof' that votes were being manipulated by China were, in fact, a collection of nonsense data. Zeidman told Politico that the supposed 'evidence' contained no voting machine packet capture data that would have shown the votes being transferred to Chinese servers. So he wrote up his report, submitted it, and sat back and waited for his $5 million payday. The hard part, it turns out, is getting conspiracy theorists to admit they are wrong. Zeidman said he never heard from Lindell and had to file an arbitration lawsuit to have a court adjudicate whether he actually debunked the MyPillow guy's findings. In 2023, a private arbitration panel ruled in Zeidman's favor, determining that he proved 'unequivocally' that Lindell's data did not reflect 2020 election data. Lindell was given 30 days to pay up. Now it looks like that payday will probably never come. Lindell appealed the ruling and got a decision in his favor, thanks to the fact that he provided extremely broad rules that apparently gave him lots of outs. 'From the four corners of the Challenge contract as defined by the Official Rules, there is no way to read 'information related to the November 2020 election' as meaning only information that is packet capture data,' the court ruled. 'It's a great day for our country,' Lindell told the Times, as if the entire United States was holding its breath, hoping that Mr. MyPillow wouldn't have to give up any of his money. While Lindell seems to have wriggled out of this case for now, he'll still have plenty more lawyer fees in front of him. Earlier this year, a court ruled that he must pay $2.3 million to a former employee of Dominion Voting Systems after Lindell called the worker a 'traitor to the United States.' Lindell plans to appeal that one, too.
Associated Press
6 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Trump signs bill to cancel $9 billion in foreign aid, public broadcasting funding
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump signed a bill Thursday canceling about $9 billion that had been approved for public broadcasting and foreign aid as Republicans look to lock in cuts to programs targeted by the White House's Department of Government Efficiency. The bulk of the spending being clawed back is for foreign assistance programs. About $1.1 billion was destined for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which finances NPR and PBS, though most of that money is distributed to more than 1,500 local public radio and television stations around the country. The White House had billed the legislation as a test case for Congress and said more such rescission packages would be on the way. Some Republicans were uncomfortable with the cuts, yet supported them anyway, wary of crossing Trump or upsetting his agenda. Democrats unanimously rejected the cuts but were powerless to stop them. The White House says the public media system is politically biased and an unnecessary expense. Conservatives particularly directed their ire at NPR and PBS. Lawmakers with large rural constituencies voiced grave concern about what the cuts to public broadcasting could mean for some local public stations in their state. Some stations will have to close, they warned. Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, said the stations are 'not just your news — it is your tsunami alert, it is your landslide alert, it is your volcano alert.' On the foreign aid cuts, the White House argued that they would incentivize other nations to step up and do more to respond to humanitarian crises and that the rescissions best served the American taxpayer. Democrats argued that the Republican administration's animus toward foreign aid programs would hurt America's standing in the world and create a vacuum for China to fill. They also expressed concerns that the cuts would have deadly consequences for many of the world's most impoverished people. 'With these cuts, we will cause death, spread disease and deepen starvation across the planet,' said Sen. Brian Schatz, D-Hawaii.
Newsweek
6 minutes ago
- Newsweek
California Proposes Major Drinking Water Change: What to Know
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A bill introduced in California by state senators Anna Caballero and Alexandra Macedo, a Democrat and Republican, respectively, would give water agencies immunity from civil lawsuits regarding chromium-6 contamination in their supply if they are actively working on plans to address the issue. Caballero argued California Senate Bill 466 is needed so water agencies can concentrate on removing the potentially cancer-causing contaminant from their supply, rather than spending their limited resources on legal cases. Newsweek contacted state Senators Caballero and Macedo for comment on Thursday via telephone and voicemail message outside of regular office hours. Why It Matters Chromium-6 is a known carcinogen, meaning it can cause cancer in humans when inhaled or ingested in certain amounts. During the 1990s, a case against Pacific Gas and Electric over contamination of its water in Hinkley, California, with chromium-6 resulted in a $333 million settlement and formed the basis of the 2000 movie Erin Brockovich. According to the Los Banos Enterprise, a newspaper serving the town of 50,000 in central California, water testing has uncovered chromium-6 levels in the settlement above the legal California limit of 10 parts per billion. What To Know Senate Bill 466 would protect water suppliers from civil lawsuits over chromium-6 in California, provided they are either implementing a state-approved compliance plan to reduce chromium-6 levels from their water or are waiting to see if a proposed plan is approved. However, the powers of state regulators are not impacted. The legislation has been endorsed by the City of Los Banos and passed by the California Senate, and is currently making its way through the California State Assembly. Stock photograph showing water running from a tap. Stock photograph showing water running from a tap. show999/GETTY According to the Los Banos Enterprise, city officials estimate reducing chromium-6 levels in water supplied to the town to the state-regulated level will cost around $65 million, around half its annual budget. Los Banos is expected to submit a compliance plan later in 2025 to the State Water Resources Control Board. If Senate Bill 466 is passed, this would protect water suppliers to the city from civil lawsuits while they work to reduce chromium-6 levels. In 2019, the Environmental Working Group concluded that chromium-6 is in the drinking water consumed by more than 200 million Americans. What People Are Saying Addressing The Fresno Bee, state Senator Caballero said: "The goal of SB 466 is not to block accountability, but to make sure resources go toward fixing the problem — not fighting premature lawsuits while a water system is actively working under state oversight to meet the standard. "This bill strikes the balance between protecting public health and giving water providers the time and tools they need to deliver safe water without diverting funds to litigation when they are already doing everything required by the state to comply." Speaking to non-profit news website CalMatters, Los Banos Mayor Michael Amabile said: "I really don't want to go down as the mayor that quadruples water rates, so I need the help from the state." In a report, California state Senate Judiciary Committee staff wrote: "Immunity from liability tends to strip incentives to act with reasonable care by taking away the consequence of having to pay for any damages caused by doing otherwise." In an opinion piece for the publication The Fresno Bee writer Tad Weber said: "A water department as large as Los Banos cannot be brought into legal jeopardy over an inability to pay for a new treatment system that must go online in mere years. Cleaning out chromium-6 will take some time — and money. "Caballero's bill seeks to be a buffer while still ensuring the state does not lose any enforcement capability. As strange as it is for a senior Democrat in the Legislature to argue for protecting water agencies with contaminated supplies, in this case it makes sense." What Happens Next The California State Assembly is expected to vote on Senate Bill 466 in August.
