ICC plenary: No bias found in 2 judges Duterte sought to disqualify
In the full decision published on July 3, the plenary said that Judge Reine Adélaïde Sophie Alapini-Gansou and Judge María del Socorro Flores Liera acted in accordance with their duties at all times.
'Accordingly, the plenary of judges, acting unanimously, considers that the Rome Statute recognises that Judges Alapini-Gansou and Flores may exercise the functions assigned to them,' it said.
It said that it found that 'no appearance of bias or lack of impartiality arise from the ordinary exercise by the judges of legal functions assigned to them under the Statute in respect of two separate legal decisions.'
The plenary rejected Duterte camp's disqualification request in June.
The full copy of the decision was published on the ICC website on July 3.
Duterte previously requested that Alapini-Sansou and Flores be disqualified from adjudicating on the issue of jurisdiction, saying this will ensure the autonomy and irreproachability of the judges as well as the efficient conduct of the proceedings
Duterte is currently under the custody of the ICC in The Hague, Netherlands.
The confirmation of charges will take place on September 23, 2025.
In an interview on Super Radyo dzBB, CenterLaw Executive Director and ICC accredited counsel Gilbert Andres said that the ICC will also release the filing of the document containing charges (DCC) today.
He said this is similar to the 'information' filed when charging individuals before Philippine courts.
'Dito po natin malalaman kung 'yung crimes of humanity laban kay Mr. Duterte ay does it include murder lang o meron ba 'yung tinatawag na imprisonment? 'Yung mga arbitrary detentions,' he said.
(This is where we will find out whether the crimes against humanity against Mr. Duterte include only murder or if they also involve what we call imprisonment? The arbitrary detentions.) —AOL, GMA Integrated News
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
GMA Network
a day ago
- GMA Network
ICC plenary: No bias found in 2 judges Duterte sought to disqualify
The International Criminal Court plenary of judges found that no bias arises in respect of the two judges that the camp of former President Rodrigo Duterte sought to disqualify from his crimes against humanity case. In the full decision published on July 3, the plenary said that Judge Reine Adélaïde Sophie Alapini-Gansou and Judge María del Socorro Flores Liera acted in accordance with their duties at all times. 'Accordingly, the plenary of judges, acting unanimously, considers that the Rome Statute recognises that Judges Alapini-Gansou and Flores may exercise the functions assigned to them,' it said. It said that it found that 'no appearance of bias or lack of impartiality arise from the ordinary exercise by the judges of legal functions assigned to them under the Statute in respect of two separate legal decisions.' The plenary rejected Duterte camp's disqualification request in June. The full copy of the decision was published on the ICC website on July 3. Duterte previously requested that Alapini-Sansou and Flores be disqualified from adjudicating on the issue of jurisdiction, saying this will ensure the autonomy and irreproachability of the judges as well as the efficient conduct of the proceedings Duterte is currently under the custody of the ICC in The Hague, Netherlands. The confirmation of charges will take place on September 23, 2025. In an interview on Super Radyo dzBB, CenterLaw Executive Director and ICC accredited counsel Gilbert Andres said that the ICC will also release the filing of the document containing charges (DCC) today. He said this is similar to the 'information' filed when charging individuals before Philippine courts. 'Dito po natin malalaman kung 'yung crimes of humanity laban kay Mr. Duterte ay does it include murder lang o meron ba 'yung tinatawag na imprisonment? 'Yung mga arbitrary detentions,' he said. (This is where we will find out whether the crimes against humanity against Mr. Duterte include only murder or if they also involve what we call imprisonment? The arbitrary detentions.) —AOL, GMA Integrated News
GMA Network
2 days ago
- GMA Network
Group calls for good governance, transparency amid VP Sara impeachment issue
Several senator-judges vote in favor of returning the Articles of Impeachment against Vice President Sara Duterte to the House of Representatives, after the Senate convened as an impeachment court earlier in the day, on June 10, 2025. Joseph B. Vidal/OSP An anti-corruption group on Thursday called for transparency and good governance in public service amid the issue of Vice President Sara Duterte's impeachment. In a press release, Democracy Watch Philippines (DemWatch) said it has convened student leaders from 16 universities and various youth-led non-government organizations in Metro Manila to promote good governance as well as to urge the youth to partake in civic engagement and political participation. 'Transparency isn't just a buzzword—it's the frontline of accountability. If we don't know what our leaders are doing, how can we hold them responsible? If public service is cloaked in secrecy, can we still call it democratic?' DemWatch convenor Lloyd Ian Zaragoza said in a press release. 'We must understand who these politicians are and what they are scared of. It's actually the voters. It's us, the people, who hold the power to elect and are empowered to hold them accountable,' he added. The House of Representatives impeached Duterte on February 5 with more than 200 congressmen endorsing the verified complaint against her, which has been transmitted to the Senate for her impeachment trial. The Senate sitting as an impeachment court however voted last June 10 to return to the House of Representatives the Articles of Impeachment against Duterte without dismissing or terminating the case. Duterte entered a 'not guilty' plea in the verified impeachment complaint filed against her, which she called merely a 'scrap of paper.' Zaragoza, meanwhile, pointed out that the issues surrounding the impeachment case were supposedly muddled by misinformation. He cited the importance of empowering the youth as the next generation of voters to raise awareness on relevant social issues and put public pressure on leaders to serve honestly. 'You are not a silent generation. You are asking the hard questions. You are calling out injustice. You are not here to inherit a broken system—you are here to help fix it,' said Zaragoza. — BM, GMA Integrated News
GMA Network
3 days ago
- GMA Network
Tongol: Certifications asked from House not ‘traps' in impeachment process
Senate impeachment court spokesperson Atty. Regie Tongol on Wednesday denied that the certifications being required from the House of Representatives are 'traps or measures to impede' the impeachment trial of Vice President Sara Duterte. This, as House prosecutor and Akbayan Rep. Chel Diokno said Tuesday that the Senate impeachment court's order for the House under the 20th Congress to submit a certification of its willingness to pursue Duterte's impeachment may impair the prosecution's case. Tongol maintained that such certifications are 'all part of the effort to guarantee procedural legitimacy and to uphold constitutional standards.' 'This certification procedure should not be seen as traps or measures to impede, but these certification processes help prevent any legal impediment or challenges or technicalities that could undermine the impeachment process once it starts rolling and to uphold the proceeding's integrity,' Tongol said at a press conference. Senate impeachment court spokesperson Atty. Regie Tongol says that specific certifications being required from the House of Representatives 'should not be seen as traps or measures to impede' the impeachment process. @gmanews — Giselle Ombay (@giselleombay_) July 2, 2025 'So, the disrespect for or attempts to undermine the impeachment court processes threaten the independence and credibility of the court and jeopardizes public trust in the process itself,' he added. The House already submitted the first required certification that the complaint complied with the one-year ban on subsequent impeachment complaints and that it followed the Constitution. The House under the 20th Congress has yet to submit the second certification concerning its willingness to prosecute. The House of Representatives impeached Duterte on February 5, with over 200 lawmakers endorsing the complaint. The Vice President was accused of betrayal of public trust, culpable violation of the constitution, graft and corruption, and other high crimes. The Senate impeachment court convened on June 10, with the trial proper expected to begin in the 20th Congress. —AOL, GMA Integrated News
