&w=3840&q=100)
Has Nimisha Priya been pardoned in Yemen? How Grand Mufti's big claim has been refuted
Has Nimisha Priya's death sentence been overturned? The 38-year-old nurse from Kerala is on the death row in Yemen for killing her business partner. More than two weeks after Nimisha Priya's execution was deferred, the 'Grand Mufti of India', Kanthapuram AP Abubakar Musliyar, has claimed that the punishment was completely overturned. However, the Indian government and the victim's family have refuted the claim.
What's the latest in the case? And is there any truth to the Grand Mufti's claim? We explain.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Is Nimisha Priya saved from the gallows? Grand Mufti says…
On Monday (July 28), the office of the 'Grand Mufti of India', Kanthapuram AP Abubakar Musliyar, reportedly claimed that Nimisha Priya's death sentence had been officially cancelled. It, however, added that it had yet to receive official written communication from authorities in Yemen.
Nimisha Priya was scheduled to be executed on July 16 for killing her business partner, Talal Abdo Mehdi, a Yemeni national, in 2017. However, her sentencing was deferred, and no further date was set. Then came the big claim.
'The death sentence of Nimisha Priya, which was previously suspended, has been overturned. A high-level meeting held in Sanaa decided to completely cancel the death sentence that was temporarily suspended earlier,' according to a statement issued by the Grand Mufti's office and quoted by the news agency ANI.
The office of Kanthapuram AP Aboobacker Musliyar, who holds the ceremonial title of 'Grand Mufti of India', reportedly claimed that Nimisha Priya's death sentence was revoked. Image courtesy: Markaz Knowledge City
According to reports, the decision to overturn the nurse's death sentence was taken at a meeting in the Yemeni capital. Senior Yemeni scholars, appointed by Sheikh Umar Hafeel Thangal at the request of the Indian Grand Mufti, mediated with the rulers of Northern Yemen and international diplomats, it was earlier reported. The meeting was concluded with the complete cancellation of the death sentence.
According to Musliyar's office, while some key decisions regarding the case have been made, further deliberations were expected. The pending matters, which included a resolution with the family of the murdered Yemeni national Talal Abdo Mehdi, will be finalised through continued discussions, media reports claimed.
Who is the 'Grand Mufti of India'?
A mufti is a Muslim scholar, an Islamic law expert, qualified to give legal opinions on matters of Sharia. Grand Mufti is the highest-ranking cleric in the country.
Musliyar, whose official name is Sheikh Abubakr Ahmad, is a revered figure in the Sunni Muslim sect and has a following not only in India but also in South Asia. The 94-year-old cleric is based in Kerala, the state Nimisha Priya hails.
He is widely known as the 'Grand Mufti of India', though it is not an official title. He is the 10th person to hold the title. A leader in Islamic education, social welfare, and public discourse, he rose to prominence over the years.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Sheikh Abubakr Ahmad was conferred the 'Grand Mufti of India' title in February 2019 at the Gareeb Nawaz Peace Conference held at New Delhi's Ramlila Maidan, organised by the All India Tanzeem Ulama-e-Islam, a national body of Sunni clerics. He is the general secretary of All India Sunni Jamiyyathul Ulama and the Samastha Kerala Jem-iyyathul Ulama, two of India's most influential Sunni Muslim organisations. He is also chairman of the Markaz Knowledge City project, a private integrated township in his hometown, Kozhikode, which runs educational institutions, charitable organisations, social service centres, and a cultural centre.
Musliyar is a regular at global interfaith gatherings and represented Indian Muslim scholars at international forums, including sessions at the United Nations and events organised by Unesco, reports The Hindu.
In the past, he has grabbed headlines for his views on the Babri Masjid verdict and the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA). In 2019, he appealed to the Muslim community to accept the verdict in the Ram Janmabhoomi issue. Musliyar met Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Home Minister Amit Shah in March 2020 and urged them to amend the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA).
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
What is his role in the Nimish Priya case?
After Yemeni authorities set July 16 as the date for Nimisha Priya's execution, there was hectic activity going on to delay the sentencing. Politicians in Kerala requested the government to step in, but India does not have a formal diplomatic relationship with the Houthis, the rebel group that controls parts of Yemen, including Sana'a, where Nimisha Priya is lodged in jail.
Amid the hectic parlays, Kerala Congress MLA Chandy Oommen reportedly approached the Grand Mufti, requesting him to secure mercy under Islamic law. The cleric reached out to prominent Yemeni Sufi scholar Sheikh Habib Umar bin Hafiz to explore the possibility of obtaining a pardon from the victim's family under the Islamic concept of diyah, also known as blood money, according to a report in The Hindu.
The Grand Mufti appealed to religious leaders in Yemen to pardon the nurse in exchange for financial compensation. A coordinated effort involving Yemeni tribal leaders, judicial authorities, and religious scholars led to Nimisha Priya's execution being temporarily deferred, the report says.
However, a report by The Indian Express pointed to the role of the Indian government in deferring the execution. According to social worker Samuel Jerome Baskaran, who has been leading the negotiations in the case, the decision to postpone the death sentence was taken by the Yemeni government after Abdul Malik Al Nehaya, ruler of the Al Wasab region, met the President of Yemen on July 11. A day later, he agreed to defer to sentencing. 'The Indian government also got involved in this mission,' he had said.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
What is the Indian government saying about the case now?
The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) has refuted reports that Nimisha Priya's execution has been revoked. 'Information being shared by certain individuals on the Nimisha Priya case is inaccurate,' MEA sources said today.
Nimisha Priya, a nurse from Kerala, was convicted of killing her business partner and Yemeni national Talal Abdo Mehdi in 2017 and was sentenced to death in 2018.
What is the victim's family saying?
The family of the Yemeni businessman called the Grand Mufti's claim baseless. In a rebuttal to a statement made by the office of Musaliyar, Mehdi's brother, Abdul Fattah Mehdi, denied that a pardon had been granted to Nimisha Priya.
'Certain preachers who claim to speak in the name of religion step forward to create a false sense of heroism for themselves — at our expense,' Abdul Fattah said, according to CNN-News18. 'Talal's blood will not become merchandise in a negotiation bazaar.'
Questioning the claims made by the cleric, he said, 'Who authorised them, when, and on what basis?' He emphasised that under Yemeni law, a death sentence can only be reversed if the victim's family accepts blood money — a decision his family has not yet made. 'If any decision is to be made, we are the ones who will make it,' he said.
What can we expect next in the Nimisha Priya case?
Efforts are ongoing to save the nurse from the gallows. However, when the Houthi Supreme Political Council rejected Nimisha Priya's appeal in November 2023, it left a very small window under the Sharia law – only the victim's family can now forgive her if they were paid blood money.
Diplomatic efforts by the Indian government are underway. Indian officials are regularly in touch with jail authorities in Sana'a and the prosecutor's office in Yemen, according to reports.
For now, Nimisha Priya's fate hangs in balance.
With inputs from agencies
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
20 minutes ago
- Indian Express
India in trade talks with EU, other countries, minister tells Lok Sabha
India is actively pursuing trade negotiations with the European Union (EU), US, Australia, Sri Lanka, Peru, Chile and New Zealand, Minister of State for Agriculture and Farmers Welfare Ram Nath Thakur informed Lok Sabha on Tuesday. In a written reply to a question asked by CPI (M) member R Sachithanantham, Thakur said that with these trade discussions, India will focus to expand its global trade footprint and enhance competitiveness of Indian exports. 'At present, negotiations are ongoing on the India–European Union Free Trade Agreement, India–Australia Comprehensive Economic Cooperation Agreement, India–Sri Lanka Economic and Technology Cooperation Agreement, India–Peru Free Trade Agreement, India-Chile Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement, India–New Zealand Free Trade Agreement, India–USA Bilateral Trade Agreement and a similar approach has been followed while dealing with the United Kingdom to safeguard the interests of farmers and secure market access for our agri-products,' Thakur said. He said, 'In order to protect the interests of the farmers and domestic industry, including MSMEs, FTAs provide for maintaining sensitive, negative or exclusion lists of items on which limited or no tariff concessions are granted.' 'In addition, in case of surge in imports and injury to the domestic industry, a country is allowed to take recourse to trade remedial measures such as anti-dumping and safeguards on imports within the period as mutually agreed to by the parties under the FTAs. Likewise Rules of Origin, including product-specific rules are developed with stakeholder consultations,' he said.


Time of India
29 minutes ago
- Time of India
No sign of government re-strategising for Pakistan-China front, says Congress in Parliament
NEW DELHI: The opposition in Rajya Sabha Tuesday demanded that home minister Amit Shah take responsibility for security lapses that led to Pahalgam massacre, while PM Modi come clean on why India agreed to the ceasefire on May 10, when Pakistan was on its knees, and US President Donald Trump's role in it. Leader of opposition Mallikarjun Kharge said J&K LG Manoj Sinha had admitted that the Pahalgam terror attack was "undoubtedly" an intelligence and security failure. "The home minister should take responsibility, not the LG. Accountability must be fixed," he said, while also demanding a security review committee to examine lapses like what was done after the 1999 Kargil conflict. Former home minister P Chidambaram, in turn, said while no one was disputing the damage to terror hubs and airbases in Pakistan during Indian strikes, the govt has shown no signs of "re-strategising" for the "well-fused" Pakistan-China front now. Indian military, including chief of defence staff, showed "exemplary leadership" and candidness by admitting losses, tactical mistakes and re-strategising after the initial strikes on May 7. "But the govt has not yet admitted intelligence and security lapses. The political leadership has been thoroughly disappointing. They should admit their mistakes. Where is the plan to fight a fused China-Pakistan front?" Chidambaram said. He also questioned why India had abstained and not voted against the $1 billion assistance to Pakistan by IMF during Operation Sindoor, as well as similar aid by the Asian Development Bank and World Bank. Earlier, the govt had claimed India abstained from IMF vote since system doesn't allow a formal 'no' vote. Stressing the overall diplomatic failure, with no country "naming and shaming Pakistan", Chidambaram also asked why no all-party delegations were sent to Nepal, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Myanmar and others in the immediate neighbourhood. Both Kharge and Chidambaram also slammed the PM for not publicly rebutting Trump's repeated claims - almost 30 times by now - that he helped broker ceasefire between India and Pakistan by leveraging trade deals. "The ceasefire was not announced by our PM or defence minister, it first came from the US president," Kharge said. Trump claimed that five fighter jets were shot down but Modi, who earlier even went all the way to the US to hold a political rally with the slogan "Phir Ek Baar Trump Sarkar", is yet to publicly contradict anything. "The PM should openly condemn this by saying India does not accept third-party mediation. If no Indian fighter jet has been downed, PM Modi should tell the country," Kharge said. Noting that BJP-led govt has set up "factories of lies", Kharge said Shah had claimed that Modi govt had crippled terrorist ecosystem while visiting J&K on April 7-8. "If it was crippled, how was Pahalgam attack carried out? You keep saying so many things that are so far from the truth. Just three days before the Pahalgam attack, PM Modi cancelled his scheduled visit to J&K," Kharge said. "It is an issue I have raised before as well and I have got no answers. Did the Centre suspect an attack was about to be carried out? If so, why were the tourists and pilgrims not stopped from going?" he said.


India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Donald Trump says US-India trade deal not finalised yet, hints at 20-25% tariff
US President Donald Trump on Monday said a trade agreement with India has not yet finished, just two days before the August 1 deadline to impose reciprocal tariffs. Speaking to reporters, Trump said discussions are ongoing and hinted that India could face import duties as high as 25% if talks do not reach agreement."India trade deal not been finalised." When asked about the possibility of tariffs ranging from 20% to 25%, Trump responded, "Yeah, I think so. India is my friend. They ended the war with Pakistan at my request... The deal with India is not finalised. India has been a good friend, but India has charged basically more tariffs than almost any other country."advertisement In recent weeks, the US president has been repeating that both sides were close to striking a trade agreement. INDIA AWAITS VISIT FROM US DELEGATION IN MID-AUGUSTAccording to news agency Reuters, New Delhi is preparing for potential US tariffs on select exports -- expected to range between 20% and 25% -- if a deal is not finalised by the deadline. However, rather than rushing into new concessions, India is planning to restart trade negotiations when a US delegation visits in mid-August."Talks are progressing well, and a delegation is expected in Delhi by mid-August," one Indian official told Reuters. The official added that Trump could still issue a formal tariff notification imposing duties of up to 25% in a "worst-case scenario."He added, "We assume it would be a temporary measure, considering the five rounds of trade talks that have taken place. A deal will soon be worked out."Indian officials said that the objective is to work toward a comprehensive bilateral trade agreement by September or October. While discussions have been positive, certain sectors remain contentious, particularly agriculture and remains firm in its position against the import of genetically modified crops like soybean and corn, and it is unwilling to open its dairy EYES GLOBAL TARIFF PUSHOn Monday, Trump hinted at a wider tariff strategy, saying that most countries without bilateral trade deals could soon face US tariffs ranging from 15% to 20%. This would be significantly higher than the 10% baseline tariff he introduced in April. The administration plans to notify around 200 nations of the new "world tariff" to CNBC, US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer acknowledged that the talks with India still require further negotiation. "President Trump is more interested in good deals than quick deals," he said. He noted that India has demonstrated "strong interest in opening portions of its market," although its trade policies have traditionally prioritised domestic Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal also struck an optimistic tone, saying last week that progress in the ongoing trade discussions has been "fantastic."Trade between the two countries will reach approximately $129 billion in goods in 2024, with India enjoying a trade surplus of nearly $46 EndsWith inputs from Reuters