logo
Ejada system boosts govt efficiency

Ejada system boosts govt efficiency

Muscat Daily07-05-2025
Muscat – Ejada (Excellence) system has improved government performance, reducing employee resignations by 72% and increasing strategic partnerships by 233%, officials said on Tuesday.
The updates were shared at a ceremony marking institutional excellence for 2024, held under the patronage of H E Dr Mahad bin Saeed bin Ali Baowain, Minister of Labour.
The system has also strengthened leadership capabilities, with 45% of supervisory roles now qualified or in the process of qualification under the 'second line' leadership strategy.
In total, 64% of government employees, or 111,475 individuals, have benefited from competency development programmes.
Inter-agency collaboration has grown sharply, with partnerships and cooperation agreements rising to 2,579, while the value of funds disbursed to small and medium enterprises increased by 111% to over RO152mn.
The system has also improved operational efficiency, with 4,863 business procedures streamlined, while innovation funding increased by 153% to more than RO45mn.
Complaint handling has improved, with the average index reaching 94%, while environmental and community engagement initiatives surged by 247% and 642%, respectively.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Voters vent at Labour after disorganised first year
Voters vent at Labour after disorganised first year

Observer

time5 days ago

  • Observer

Voters vent at Labour after disorganised first year

Voters have delivered a withering verdict on the Labour government after a week in which the anniversary of their election victory was marred by shambolic U-turns and infighting. Voters' disapproval of the government appears to have intensified with a growing number of people opposing the government's high-tax-high-spending policies, according to the latest Freshwater Strategy poll. The poll of eligible voters found that more than half (55 per cent) believe the Chancellor Rachel Reeves should resign while prime minister, Keir Starmer, who has insisted Reeves will remain Chancellor for a 'very long time', is also facing the pressure. Starmer's approval ratings have crashed to minus 38; making him the least popular politician in a monthly survey with fully 61 per cent of Brits now reporting a negative opinion of the PM. The chancellor also slipped to an approval rating of minus 37. A majority of Brits (65 per cent) said Labour has done a good job on easing the cost of living with the same percentage unimpressed by efforts to reduce immigration. A similar percentage of voters said the government has done a poor job on welfare reform. The latest snapshot provides insight into the challenges facing the government just 12 months on from their election win, with more voters now seeing immigration as the most important issue facing the UK. Small boat crossings are 50 per cent higher this year than at the same point in 2024, while forecasters believe that overall levels of migration will only be cut to 250,000 entrants a year (pre-Brexit levels) by 2030. Labour ranked worse than the Conservative Party in terms of trust on reducing immigration. Voters also put inflation near the top of their list of most important issues. UK Chancellor, Rachel Reeves, speaks at the House of Commons, in this file photo. — Reuters Economists in the financial district and at the Bank of England have warned that Rachel Reeves' taxes on employers through higher national insurance contributions (NICs) was feeding through to higher prices in shops. The poll shows that only 25 per cent of voters have confidence in the government's effort to spark economic growth, with 72 per cent either not very or not at all confident. Treasury officials including Rachel Reeves have celebrated a string of interest rate cuts in the last year but global economic turmoil due to tariffs and higher taxes risks delaying further reductions in the coming months, policymakers have warned. Reeves could decide to hike taxes further in this year's autumn Budget given unfunded commitments on welfare spending and the partial restoration of winter fuel payments, altogether costing more than £5 billion. Meanwhile, Reeves is facing renewed pressure to scrap the ring-fencing regime imposed on British banking giants in a bid to bolster the sector's international competitiveness and bolster economic growth. The Chancellor has been lobbied by top banking chiefs to ditch the 'redundant' 15-year-old legislation which requires major banks to separate their retail banking operations from their investment banking activities. But Reeves has now been urged to re-think the regime by the wider financial services industry, KPMG data reveals. Almost two-thirds of financial services leaders have called for a 'ring-fence' which would adapt the current regime. Meanwhile one in five have called for the rules to be completely abolished. Global and UK head of financial services at KPMG, Karim Haji, said: 'Whichever side of the argument you sit on, the industry is calling out for fresh thinking on ring-fencing. It's not 2008 anymore. Everything has changed, from the state of geopolitics to the way the world does business and the rules need to reflect that'. A majority of leaders, 80 per cent, believe overhauling the system would help drive economic growth by enabling more efficient deployment of capital. Analysts have pegged NatWest and Lloyds as the top beneficiaries of a ring-fencing overhaul.

Rebuild aid consensus
Rebuild aid consensus

Observer

time09-06-2025

  • Observer

Rebuild aid consensus

In 2015, the United Kingdom's then-prime minister, David Cameron, stood before the United Nations General Assembly and challenged other donor countries to follow the UK's lead and back the newly-minted Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) for eradicating poverty with their aid money. 'We haven't just achieved the UN's 0.7 per cent [aid-to-GNI spending] target, we've enshrined it in law,' he declared. That was then. As heir to an extraordinary bipartisan consensus forged under the post-1997 Labour government, Cameron's Conservative government had established Britain as the most generous aid donor in the G7, and one of just four countries to meet the 0.7 per cent aid target. Now, a Labour government has torn up the remnants of that consensus, joined a global attack on aid, and set a course that will leave the UK among the world's least generous countries. The fact that a UK government led by the Labour Party, with its long tradition of internationalism and solidarity, has all but abandoned its leadership role on an issue encoded in its DNA illustrates the political forces shaping a new world order, notably US President Donald Trump's view of international cooperation as a zero-sum game played by losers. But it also challenges development advocates in the UK to focus on strategies aimed at minimising harm and rebuilding the case for aid. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced the decision to cut foreign aid and channel the savings to an expanded defence budget ahead of a meeting with Trump. The aid budget is set to fall from 0.5 per cent to 0.3 per cent of Gross Nation Income – the lowest level since the late 1990s. After removing the roughly one-quarter of the official development assistance spent on refugees in the UK, Britain will slip from ninth to 22nd in a ranking of countries' Overseas Development Assistance as a share of GNI. While there has been opposition to the aid cuts, a new consensus has taken root. Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch applauded the decision to convert ODA into defence spending. The far-right Reform UK party's election manifesto called for the aid budget to be halved. When Jenny Chapman, Britain's development minister, delivered ODA's death warrant, she told a parliamentary committee in May that 'the days of viewing the UK government as a global charity are over.' Some two-thirds of Britons, including most Labour supporters, support increased defence spending at the expense of overseas aid. The UK is hardly alone. The United States Agency for International Development (USAID), which accounted for more than 40 per cent of all humanitarian aid in 2024, has been dismantled. In Germany, the world's second-largest donor, Chancellor Friedrich Merz's new government will reduce an already-diminished aid budget. France is set to slash ODA by 40 per cent, while the recently collapsed right-wing government in the Netherlands, a longstanding member of the 0.7 per cent club, has decreased aid spending by more than two-thirds. The human toll of the cuts is already starting to emerge. The demolition of USAID has left acutely malnourished children without food, HIV/AIDS patients without antiretroviral drugs, and clinics unable to treat deadly diseases like childhood malaria. According to a recent study, Trump's suspension of aid could result in 14 million additional deaths, including 4.5 million children under five, by 2030. Cuts by the UK and other donors will inevitably add to these human costs. An already chronically under-financed humanitarian aid system now confronting famine threats and food emergencies from Sudan to Gaza and the Sahel has been pushed to the brink of collapse: less than 10 per cent of the 2025 UN appeal is funded. The political currents fuelling the attack on aid vary across countries. In the US, nihilistic anti-multilateralism has been a driving force. In Europe, fiscal pressures have interacted with right-wing populist narratives linking aid to migration, pressure on public services, waste, and corruption. Starmer now cites Russian security threats to justify deeper cuts. So, what can be done to rebuild an aid consensus? The first priority is to minimise harm. Maintaining the UK's £1.9 billion ($2.6 billion) commitment to the World Bank's International Development Association is critical because every dollar contributed can leverage $3-4 of financial support for the poorest countries. The UK could also make the most of a shrinking aid budget by channelling more humanitarian aid through local actors, rather than bureaucratic UN agencies. Still, tough choices must be made. There is a strong argument to protect spending on life-saving programmes, such as child nutrition, vaccinations, and HIV/AIDS, and for minimising cuts in areas where the UK is a global frontrunner, like girls' education and social protection. Even with a diminished aid budget, the UK could exercise greater leadership. With debt-service costs now crowding out spending on essential services in many low-income countries, Starmer's government could demand comprehensive debt relief at this month's UN International Conference on Financing for Development. Ultimately though, the case for aid must be fought and won in a public square increasingly dominated by right-wing populists. Political leaders in the UK and across the West need to communicate the hard truth that global challenges like climate change, war, and poverty require international cooperation. And they need to tap into the deep reservoirs of generosity, solidarity, and moral concern that define public sentiment even in the midst of our troubled times. Copyright: Project Syndicate, 2025. Kevin Watkins The author, a former CEO of Save the Children UK, is a visiting professor at the Firoz Lalji Institute for Africa at the London School of Economics.

New Oman national strategy to boost workforce skills
New Oman national strategy to boost workforce skills

Muscat Daily

time26-05-2025

  • Muscat Daily

New Oman national strategy to boost workforce skills

Muscat – Ministry of Labour launched the National Strategy for Occupational Standards on Monday, aimed at improving workforce skills, aligning training with labour market needs and improving professional practices in Oman. The strategy was unveiled under the patronage of H E Dr Mahad bin Saeed Ba'awin, Minister of Labour. It seeks to build an integrated professional system that supports productivity and meets the requirements of a dynamic labour market as part of the sultanate's broader economic development goals. H E Sayyid Salim bin Muslim al Busaidi, Undersecretary for Human Resources Development, said the ministry developed the strategy in collaboration with public and private stakeholders in alignment with national priorities. H E Sayyid Salim bin Muslim al Busaidi, Undersecretary for Human Resources Development 'Professional standards are the foundation for enhancing workforce quality across sectors, improving training outcomes and boosting productivity,' he said. 'Establishment of sector-specific skills units is key to ensuring the strategy addresses each industry's needs.' He also highlighted the progress made in implementing a professional licence card system under the broader National Professional Accreditation System. The system aims to verify individuals' competencies and ensure professional practices meet required standards. 'This system represents a critical step towards labour market governance, reinforcing the quality of professional practices and boosting employer and societal confidence in national talent,' he added. Zaher bin Abdullah al Sheikh, Project Director of the strategy, said, 'The ministry is working to develop and implement occupational standards across all sectors to promote quality, productivity and professional excellence. We are ready to provide technical and logistical support to ensure effective implementation.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store