Why Thailand's soft power splash is out of step with reality
Advertisement
On Monday, Thailand's Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra said her government had established the National Soft Power Strategy Committee, with the task of promoting 13 key industries.
These range from tourism, food, film and fashion to festivals, music, art, literature and the performing arts.
The Thai prime minister rightly pointed out that soft power not only strengthened global presence, but also created jobs, attracts investment and expands economic influence.
Thai Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra delivers an address on Thailand's vision for expanding its cultural and creative industries in Bangkok on Monday. Photo: EPA-EFE
The move came on the heels of Bangkok's attempts to promote Thai cooking during Paetongtarn's recent visit to Davos to attend the World Economic Forum and the news this week that Thailand leapt to 39th in the 2025 Global Soft Power Index.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
AllAfrica
an hour ago
- AllAfrica
Eye on rare earths, Trump handing Myanmar to China
The US Treasury Department's decision to lift sanctions on allies of Myanmar's military junta last Friday (July 25) marks a stark reversal of decades-long American foreign policy. These sanctions, imposed by the Biden administration on the anniversary of the 2021 coup, were a gesture of solidarity with Myanmar's pro-democracy movement and a country that has endured relentless bombing and repression at the hands of a brutal military regime. Lifting these sanctions marks the latest episode of 'Trump's craven war on Myanmar.' And they hand China yet another strategic victory in Southeast Asia. From a moral standpoint, this move is sadly unsurprising. Trump has already abandoned Ukraine to Russia's onslaught, advocated for the ethnic cleansing of Gaza and is actively dismantling what remains of American democracy. But this is not just a moral failure; it is a strategic blunder of the highest order. The rationale behind the policy shift remains opaque – the US government has offered no explanation. But the timing is curious. Just days earlier, Congress passed three bipartisan bills reaffirming support for Myanmar's resistance to military rule and pledging continued financial sanctions against the junta. Junta leader Senior General Min Aung Hlaing had also just lavished praise on Donald Trump during trade negotiations. Perhaps this is merely another instance of Trump's foreign policy being steered by personal flattery and narcissism. But the motives behind this move appear more calculated. Business lobbyists seem to have persuaded Trump that Myanmar's rare earth metals, vital for everything from smartphones to missile systems, could be a strategic asset for the US. Indeed, Myanmar has emerged as a key global supplier of these critical minerals, especially after China curtailed its own environmentally destructive mining operations and turned to Myanmar to fill the gap. But here's the catch: Myanmar's rare earth mines are not controlled by the junta. They are under the authority of powerful ethnic armed organizations (EAOs) that govern territory along the Chinese border. The Kachin Independence Organization (KIO), one of the world's oldest rebel movements, seized what may be the world's largest heavy rare earth mines last year. This development has not gone unnoticed in Washington. Some lobbyists are now advancing two proposals: either the US should work directly with the KIO to extract these resources, or it should broker a bilateral peace deal between the KIO and the junta to enable joint exploitation. The first idea is logistically absurd. Kachin State is landlocked and surrounded by junta-controlled territory, war zones with the presence of a myriad of other armed groups, remote regions of northeastern India, and China. The second proposal is even more misguided. It reflects the worldview of DC business lobbyists, who reduce a decades-old political movement to a mere business enterprise. If the KIO were motivated solely by profit, it would have already caved to Chinese pressure for a bilateral ceasefire. It has not, because its goals are political, not commercial. The KIO has long fought for autonomy and has been a key supporter of the countrywide resistance against the junta. Short of international recognition and the sale of sophisticated weapons, the US has little to offer that would make such a deal worthwhile. Certainly not enough to risk alienating China, whose relationship the KIO depends on for survival. Meanwhile, the sharpest increase in rare earth mining is occurring in areas controlled by the United Wa State Army (UWSA), Asia's most powerful non-state army. The group, which emerged from the remnants of the Communist Party of Burma, remains armed and supported by Beijing. The idea that the US could gain a meaningful foothold in Myanmar's rare earth sector is not just naïve; it is nonsensical. Worse, it risks playing directly into China's hands. Beijing already wields enormous influence over Myanmar. The brutal USAID cuts earlier this year have further strengthened China's position to manipulate Myanmar politics. The lifting of sanctions now risks cementing this dominance. Myanmar's generals will welcome the change. They will use it to legitimize their planned sham elections and bolster their propaganda, both at home and abroad. But they will not abandon China, which remains their most reliable source of weapons, funding and diplomatic cover. Meanwhile, the country's resistance movement, now controlling more than half of Myanmar's territory, has been left in the cold. Despite promises of non-lethal aid under the Burma Act, the Biden administration failed to deliver. Western support in general has been largely symbolic, limited to patchy sanctions, humanitarian relief, and words of sympathy. And now, even that symbolic support is being rolled back. After years of empty rhetoric, Myanmar's resistance fighters have little reason to trust the West. But this latest betrayal may force them to forge closer relations with China. This won't happen overnight. Beijing remains wary of the National Unity Government (NUG), formed by ousted lawmakers from the National League for Democracy. But among Myanmar's 20-plus EAOs, which field the strongest resistance armies, the calculus might shift. Some, like the UWSA, have long-standing ties to China. Others, like the KIO, have historically looked West. But the KIO is not a monolith. Like other EAOs, it is a complex political organisation comprising leaders with differing perspectives and strategic priorities. To some KIO leaders, reports that Trump plans to partner directly with the KIO in extracting rare earth minerals will surely sound appealing. We can expect them to use it in their own diplomatic strategy, including as leverage in relation to China. Ultimately, however, the KIO understands the futility of such misguided proposals, especially when they serve to ease pressure on the junta. Here too, Trump's policy then risks sidelining pro-Western voices and empowering those who favour closer ties with Beijing. This is the real danger of Trump's foreign policy. It is not simply immoral or incoherent. But it accelerates a tectonic shift in Southeast Asia, one that will leave China stronger, the US weaker and the people of Myanmar more isolated than ever. Dr David Brenner is associate professor in international relations at the University of Sussex. He is the author of Rebel Politics and has published widely on Myanmar's conflict and ethnic armed organizations.
South China Morning Post
2 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
China to convene gathering in October to discuss next 5-year plan
China's ruling Communist Party has set a date for a key annual conclave in October, with a main focus on deliberating the next five-year plan for the country's economic, political and social goals amid continued tension with the United States. The announcement came after a meeting of the Politburo on Wednesday that set the tone for the coming fourth plenary session to be attended by more than 370 Central Committee members of the party elite. The much-anticipated plenum will be held in Beijing, according to the official Xinhua news agency. No specific date was announced. In instructions on the new blueprint's formulation, President Xi Jinping said in May that the party's central leadership was 'organising the drafting of a proposal for the 15th five-year plan'. A one-month online public consultation on the formulation of the plan was also launched in May. According to official rules, the new five-year plan covering 2026-2030 must be endorsed by a plenary session of the party, after which it will be submitted to the annual legislative session in March for a final endorsement. China continues to face external uncertainties as it remains locked in a trade and tech rivalry with the United States. While Chinese and US negotiators have reached a series of agreements to halt an all-out trade war, most observers believe a protracted trade, tech and geopolitical competition between the world's two largest economies will continue to intensify.
HKFP
2 hours ago
- HKFP
US says President Trump has ‘final call' on China trade truce
China and the United States agreed Tuesday to hold further talks on extending their tariff truce, but a top US trade official stressed that President Donald Trump would make any 'final call.' The world's top two economies met for a second day of negotiations in Stockholm, with both sides seeking to avert tariffs from returning to sky-high levels that had ground trade between the rivals to an effective standstill. The meeting in a Swedish government building, led on the Chinese side by Vice Premier He Lifeng and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent for the Americans, ended without a resolution but with the US side voicing optimism. Neither government has made public any details from the talks, which started on Monday, although US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said Trump would have the 'final call' on any extension in the truce. 'Nothing has been agreed until we speak with President Trump,' added Bessent, calling the tone of the talks 'very constructive'. The negotiations are taking place in the wake of a trade deal struck over the weekend that set US tariffs on most European Union imports at 15 percent, but none on American goods going to the EU. The truce between China and the United States has temporarily set fresh US duties on Chinese goods at 30 percent, while Chinese levies on trade in the other direction stand at 10 percent. That accord, reached in Geneva in May, brought down triple-digit tariffs each side had levelled at the other after a trade war sparked by Trump spiralled into a tit-for-tat bilateral escalation. The 90-day truce is meant to end on August 12. But there are indications both delegations want to use the Stockholm talks to push the date back further. The South China Morning Post, citing sources on both sides, reported on Sunday that Washington and Beijing are expected to extend their tariff pause by a further 90 days. Trump said he would be briefed again by Bessent on Wednesday. 'We'll either approve it or not,' he told reporters aboard Air Force One as he returned from Scotland. Trump's threats Separately, Trump has threatened to hit dozens of other countries with stiffer tariffs from Friday this week unless they reach trade deals with Washington. Among them are Brazil and India, with the South American giant facing a threat of 50 percent tariffs. Asked about Friday's deadline, Bessent told CNBC: 'It's not the end of the world if these snapback tariffs are on for anywhere from a few days to a few weeks, as long as the countries are moving forward and trying to negotiate in good faith.' Trump has already announced deal outlines with five countries — Britain, Vietnam, Japan, Indonesia and the Philippines — as well as the one with the 27-nation EU. Beijing says it wants to see 'reciprocity' in its trade with the United States. Foreign ministry spokesman Guo Jiakun said dialogue was needed 'to reduce misunderstandings'. The previous round of China-US talks was held in London. Analysts said many of the trade deals Trump has been publicising were leaning more on optics than on details. Stephen Innes, managing partner at SPI Asset Management, a firm that advises on currency exchange and commodities, said an extension of the 90-day truce between China and the United States could reinforce that view. 'That truce could set the stage for a Trump – (President) Xi (Jinping) handshake later this year — another risk-on carrot for markets to chew,' he said.
