
Eye on rare earths, Trump handing Myanmar to China
These sanctions, imposed by the Biden administration on the anniversary of the 2021 coup, were a gesture of solidarity with Myanmar's pro-democracy movement and a country that has endured relentless bombing and repression at the hands of a brutal military regime.
Lifting these sanctions marks the latest episode of 'Trump's craven war on Myanmar.' And they hand China yet another strategic victory in Southeast Asia.
From a moral standpoint, this move is sadly unsurprising. Trump has already abandoned Ukraine to Russia's onslaught, advocated for the ethnic cleansing of Gaza and is actively dismantling what remains of American democracy. But this is not just a moral failure; it is a strategic blunder of the highest order.
The rationale behind the policy shift remains opaque – the US government has offered no explanation. But the timing is curious. Just days earlier, Congress passed three bipartisan bills reaffirming support for Myanmar's resistance to military rule and pledging continued financial sanctions against the junta.
Junta leader Senior General Min Aung Hlaing had also just lavished praise on Donald Trump during trade negotiations. Perhaps this is merely another instance of Trump's foreign policy being steered by personal flattery and narcissism.
But the motives behind this move appear more calculated. Business lobbyists seem to have persuaded Trump that Myanmar's rare earth metals, vital for everything from smartphones to missile systems, could be a strategic asset for the US.
Indeed, Myanmar has emerged as a key global supplier of these critical minerals, especially after China curtailed its own environmentally destructive mining operations and turned to Myanmar to fill the gap.
But here's the catch: Myanmar's rare earth mines are not controlled by the junta. They are under the authority of powerful ethnic armed organizations (EAOs) that govern territory along the Chinese border. The Kachin Independence Organization (KIO), one of the world's oldest rebel movements, seized what may be the world's largest heavy rare earth mines last year.
This development has not gone unnoticed in Washington. Some lobbyists are now advancing two proposals: either the US should work directly with the KIO to extract these resources, or it should broker a bilateral peace deal between the KIO and the junta to enable joint exploitation.
The first idea is logistically absurd. Kachin State is landlocked and surrounded by junta-controlled territory, war zones with the presence of a myriad of other armed groups, remote regions of northeastern India, and China.
The second proposal is even more misguided. It reflects the worldview of DC business lobbyists, who reduce a decades-old political movement to a mere business enterprise. If the KIO were motivated solely by profit, it would have already caved to Chinese pressure for a bilateral ceasefire. It has not, because its goals are political, not commercial.
The KIO has long fought for autonomy and has been a key supporter of the countrywide resistance against the junta. Short of international recognition and the sale of sophisticated weapons, the US has little to offer that would make such a deal worthwhile. Certainly not enough to risk alienating China, whose relationship the KIO depends on for survival.
Meanwhile, the sharpest increase in rare earth mining is occurring in areas controlled by the United Wa State Army (UWSA), Asia's most powerful non-state army. The group, which emerged from the remnants of the Communist Party of Burma, remains armed and supported by Beijing.
The idea that the US could gain a meaningful foothold in Myanmar's rare earth sector is not just naïve; it is nonsensical. Worse, it risks playing directly into China's hands.
Beijing already wields enormous influence over Myanmar. The brutal USAID cuts earlier this year have further strengthened China's position to manipulate Myanmar politics. The lifting of sanctions now risks cementing this dominance.
Myanmar's generals will welcome the change. They will use it to legitimize their planned sham elections and bolster their propaganda, both at home and abroad. But they will not abandon China, which remains their most reliable source of weapons, funding and diplomatic cover.
Meanwhile, the country's resistance movement, now controlling more than half of Myanmar's territory, has been left in the cold. Despite promises of non-lethal aid under the Burma Act, the Biden administration failed to deliver.
Western support in general has been largely symbolic, limited to patchy sanctions, humanitarian relief, and words of sympathy. And now, even that symbolic support is being rolled back.
After years of empty rhetoric, Myanmar's resistance fighters have little reason to trust the West. But this latest betrayal may force them to forge closer relations with China. This won't happen overnight.
Beijing remains wary of the National Unity Government (NUG), formed by ousted lawmakers from the National League for Democracy. But among Myanmar's 20-plus EAOs, which field the strongest resistance armies, the calculus might shift. Some, like the UWSA, have long-standing ties to China. Others, like the KIO, have historically looked West.
But the KIO is not a monolith. Like other EAOs, it is a complex political organisation comprising leaders with differing perspectives and strategic priorities. To some KIO leaders, reports that Trump plans to partner directly with the KIO in extracting rare earth minerals will surely sound appealing.
We can expect them to use it in their own diplomatic strategy, including as leverage in relation to China. Ultimately, however, the KIO understands the futility of such misguided proposals, especially when they serve to ease pressure on the junta.
Here too, Trump's policy then risks sidelining pro-Western voices and empowering those who favour closer ties with Beijing. This is the real danger of Trump's foreign policy. It is not simply immoral or incoherent.
But it accelerates a tectonic shift in Southeast Asia, one that will leave China stronger, the US weaker and the people of Myanmar more isolated than ever.
Dr David Brenner is associate professor in international relations at the University of Sussex. He is the author of Rebel Politics and has published widely on Myanmar's conflict and ethnic armed organizations.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


AllAfrica
33 minutes ago
- AllAfrica
Trump's new trade order is here. Will it work?
The beginning of August marks the latest deadline for US President Donald Trump's 'Liberation Day' tariff policy. This era of chaos and uncertainty began on April 2, and the situation remains fluid. With the deadline for partners to secure a deal with Washington now passed, it's a good time to take a broader view and consider if Trump's trade gamble is paying off. The objectives of the tariff policy include raising tax revenues, delivering lower prices for American consumers, and boosting American industry while creating manufacturing jobs. The president has also vowed to get better trade deals for the US to reduce its trade deficit and to face down China's growing influence on the world stage. But recently the US Federal Reserve voted to keep interest rates unchanged at 4.25% to 4.5%, despite pressure from Trump to lower them. In his monthly press briefing, Federal Reserve chair, Jerome Powell, said they were still in the early stages of understanding how the tariff policy would affect inflation, jobs and economic growth. On tariffs, Powell did say that revenues had increased substantially to US$30 billion a month. However, only a small portion of the tariffs are being absorbed by overseas exporters, with most of the cost being borne by US import companies. In comments that will concern the Trump administration, the Fed said the cost of the tariffs was beginning to show up in consumer prices. The Fed expects inflation to increase to 3% by the end of the year, above its 2% target. US unemployment remains low, with Powell saying the economy is at or very close to full employment. While Powell's decision to hold interest rates probably irritated Trump, economic theory suggests that lowering them with the US economic cycle at full employment would be likely to increase inflation and the cost of living for US consumers. A survey by Bloomberg economists suggests that US GDP growth forecasts are lower since April 2025, specifically because of its tariff policy. In terms of boosting US employment, the US administration can point to significant wins in the pharmaceutical sector. In July, British-Swedish drugmaker AstraZeneca announced plans to spend $50 billion expanding its US research and manufacturing facilities by 2030. The announcement follows a similar pledge from Swiss pharmaceuticals firm Roche in April to invest $50 billion in the US over the next five years. The impact of tariffs on traditional US manufacturing industries is less positive. The Ford Motor Company has warned that its profits will see a sharp drop. This is largely down to a net tariff impact that the firm says will cost it $2 billion this financial year. This is despite the company making nearly all of its vehicles in the US. Firms such as Ford are seeing an increase in tariff-related costs for imports. This dents their profits as well as dividends to shareholders. In recent weeks and months, the US has announced major new trade agreements, including with the UK, Japan, South Korea and the EU. Talks on a trade deal with China continue. But rather than trade deals, these announcements should be thought of as frameworks for trade deals. No legally binding documents have been signed to date. It will take many months before a clear picture emerges of how these bilateral deals will affect the US trade deficit overall. Meanwhile, in Washington, a federal appeals court will hear a case from two companies that are suing Trump over the use of his International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) of 1977. VOS Selections Inc, a wine and spirits importer, and Plastic Services and Products, a pipe and fittings company, are arguing that the president has 'no authority to issue across-the-board worldwide tariffs without congressional approval.' With so much in play, it is difficult to judge whether Trump's tariff policy can be viewed as a success. Higher tariff revenues from imports, as well as significant investments from the pharmaceutical industry, can be seen as clear wins. But increasing consumer costs through rising inflation, as well as tariff costs hurting US manufacturers, are clear negatives. While several framework trade deals have been announced, the real devil will, of course, be in the details. Perhaps the greatest impact of the tariff policy has been the uncertainty of this new approach to trade and diplomacy. The Trump administration views trade as a zero-sum game. If one side is winning, the other side must be losing. This view of international trade harks back to mercantilism, an economic system that predates capitalism. Adam Smith and David Riccardo, the founders of capitalist theory, advocated for free trade. They argued that if countries focused on what they were good at making, then both sides could benefit – a so-called positive-sum game. This approach has dominated global trade since the post-war period. Since then, the US has become the largest and wealthiest economy in the world. By creating the institutions of global trade (the IMF, World Bank and World Trade Organization), the US has advanced its interests – and American-based multinationals dominate, especially in areas such as technology. But China and others now threaten this US domination, and Trump is tearing up the economic rulebook. But economic theory clearly positions tariffs as the wrong policy path for the US to assert and further its economic interests in the medium to long term. That's why Trump's course of action remains such a gamble. Conor O'Kane is senior lecturer in economics, Bournemouth University This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.


RTHK
2 hours ago
- RTHK
US job growth weaker than expected
US job growth weaker than expected Employment in healthcare and social assistance continues to rise, but private sector firms are adopting a wait-and-see approach before hiring. File photo: Reuters US job growth missed expectations in July, official data showed on Friday, while revisions to hiring figures in recent months brought them to the weakest levels since the Covid-19 pandemic. The employment numbers point to risks in the key labour market as companies grapple with US President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs – putting pressure on the central bank as it mulls the best time to cut interest rates. The world's biggest economy added 73,000 jobs last month, while hiring numbers were revised significantly lower for May and June, the Labor Department said. The jobless rate nudged up from 4.1 percent to 4.2 percent. Experts have warned that private sector firms appear to be in a wait-and-see mode due to heightened uncertainty over Trump's rapidly changing trade policy. With tariff levels climbing since the start of the year, both on imports from various countries and on sector-specific products such as steel, aluminium and autos, many firms have faced higher business costs. On Friday, the Department of Labor said hiring numbers for May were revised down from 144,000 to 19,000. The figure for June was shifted from 147,000 to 14,000. This was notably lower than job creation levels in recent years. During the pandemic, the economy lost jobs. Average hourly earnings rose by 0.3 percent to US$36.44 in July, the Labor Department said. It added that employment continued rising in healthcare and in social assistance, while the federal government continued shedding jobs. The US economy has added an average of just 35,000 jobs per month since May, data showed. A sharp weakening in the labour market could push the Federal Reserve towards slashing interest rates sooner to shore up the economy. (AFP)


South China Morning Post
3 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
China denies FBI chief's accusation; customised robots for rent: SCMP daily highlights
Catch up on some of SCMP's biggest China stories of the day. If you would like to see more of our reporting, please consider subscribing Claims by the head of the FBI that China is a threat to the Indo-Pacific are groundless, Beijing said as the American security agency opened its first permanent office in New Zealand. The US government sent mixed messages on Thursday on where the latest trade agreement with China, including a possible extension of the pause on tariff hikes, is headed. The containerised launch system was seen in footage from President Donald Trump's visit to the US Army's Fort Bragg base in June. Photo: X/Dan Scavino China's military has warned that America's new containerised missile and rocket launch system could 'seriously undermine regional strategic stability'.