Britain's most stolen cars revealed with humble motor topping the list… where does your vehicle rank?
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
BRITAIN'S most stolen cars have been revealed with a humble motor topping the list from the Government's most recent car theft statistics.
The data shows which motors are the most commonly stolen in the UK.
Sign up for Scottish Sun
newsletter
Sign up
4
Range Rovers are stolen less frequently thanks to security upgrades
Credit: Nick Dimbleby 2022
4
Toyota Hilux' are a target for thieves selling into foreign markets
Credit: Getty
Range Rover owners can breathe easy but Hilux owners should be concerned after the sturdy Toyota pick up topped the list.
Thefts of the reliable Japanese four-by-four were up 549 per cent in 2024, equating to 584 missing motors in just a year.
Overall vehicle thefts were down 4.5 per cent last year but thefts of cars less than three-years-old rose by 6.6 per cent.
Land Rover models came out well in the statistics with Range Rover Evoque thefts down a whopping 77 per cent.
This brought the brand out of the list of top ten most stolen cars in Britain.
The firm has been focused on security improvements with recent models after receiving a slew of theft reports from customers.
Amidst the crime wave insuring a Range Rover, especially in the city, was nearly impossible for motorists.
In response Land Rover's parent company JLR invested a whopping £1 million to fund proactive policing.
This was aimed at tackling the organised crime groups suspected to be targeting the flash motors in the UK.
The firm went on to splash out an eye-watering £17 million on updating the security of its motors.
Watch moment brazen gang steals car from family driveway in under 20 seconds as thief claims robbing to order is like 'working for Amazon'
This included retrospectively upgrading the key systems on 300,000 cars to the latest technology.
As a result of the effort there are now no Land Rover models in the top 22 most stolen models for 2024.
But car thieves have seemingly pivoted to target another off-road SUV.
The near indestructible Toyota Hilux appears to be highly sought after by criminals who nick the motors using electronic bypasses to drive them off without a key.
4
BMW remained number two on the list of new cars stolen
Credit: Getty
4
Kia branded motors are being stolen more often, rising from fifth to third place
Credit: Getty
The Hilux has a ready market in foreign countries where its ruggedness is prized and buyers are less concerned about where the motors came from.
Richard Billyeald, chief research and operations officer at the insurance industry's Thatcham Research, said: 'Top destinations for stolen UK vehicles include the Democratic Republic of Congo, UAE, Cyprus, Jamaica and Georgia, driven by global shortages of car parts, high vehicle desirability and geopolitical disruption.'
With so many Hilux' being stolen police forces across the country have begun issuing warnings to owners.
After 11 were nicked overnight Bedfordshire Police urged owners to take extra care.
North Yorkshire Police and Nottinghamshire officers have issued similar warnings.
Toyota is fighting back though, a spokesman told the Telegraph: 'Toyota GB has invested millions of pounds in a variety of solutions that help protect cars from theft.
"These include protective plates, immobilisers, blockers and trackers."
BMW retained its second place in the most stolen list of younger cars and Korean brand Kia rose from fifth to third place.
Hyundai has claimed that in the market after February 2024 all received the latest hardware and software technology and should be safe from thieves.
Thefts by region varied with Greater Manchester seeing a 20 per cent reduction but Bedfordshire, Essex and Warwickshire saw increases.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
HMRC ‘catches pensioners off guard' with record number of tax bills
HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) is set to issue a record number of shock bills this year, as more pensioners are dragged into the tax net. The tax office said it will issue 1.4 million simple assessments for the 2024-25 tax year, a rise of 80,000 from 1.32 million the previous year. This marks the highest number on record and nearly double the average annual volume for the previous seven years. A simple assessment is a way of collecting tax without requiring the taxpayer to complete a self-assessment return. It is typically used for pensioners or employees who underpay tax. HMRC has previously said that one of the main reasons for the rising number of simple assessments was the freeze to income tax thresholds which have pulled more pensioners into the tax system. Experts have warned that the tax demands 'catch pensioners off guard' and that retirees have become a 'casualty' of the threshold freeze, which is due to remain in place until at least 2028. While income tax thresholds have failed to rise with inflation, the state pension 'triple lock' has pushed up retirees' weekly payments, meaning millions more have been dragged into the tax net – or higher tax brackets. Most retirees also receive income from private pensions, meaning the tax they owe is collected automatically via their tax code. However, those without private pensions may be sent a simple assessment tax demand. HMRC data shows a steep acceleration in the number of taxpayers being automatically assessed for underpaid tax in the four years. In 2021-22 – the year income tax thresholds were frozen – HMRC issued 675,000 simple assessments, less than half the current figure. The tax office issues a simple assessment when it believes the calculation is straightforward, often where it holds enough information about a taxpayer's income. While intended to streamline tax collection, their growing use reflects in part the increasing number of pensioners being drawn into the tax system. Jon Greer, of wealth management firm Quilter, said: 'Simple assessment letters are a prime example of the consequence of stealth taxes in action. 'Much of this rise is down to how frozen tax thresholds and higher state pensions are creating more tax liabilities for older people. 'A lot of these people will not even be aware that they may owe some sort of tax on their income and can catch many off guard.' Sir Steve Webb, a former pensions minister, now partner at pension consultants LCP, said: 'These figures highlight another casualty of the long-term freeze of personal tax thresholds. 'With every passing year, more and more pensioners on modest incomes are being dragged into the income tax net. 'With thresholds being frozen for years to come, more retired people will have to deal with this process in future'. Separate figures released by HMRC show that the total number of claims for overpaid tax on pension withdrawals has now surpassed 500,000 since 'pension freedoms' rules were introduced in 2015. The reforms allowed savers to take ad-hoc amounts from their pensions but meant they were charged an emergency rate with HMRC's systems assuming a one-off withdrawal would be repeated each month. Hundreds of thousands of retirees have overpaid tax as a result, with nearly £1.5bn reclaimed by pensioners who were overtaxed. A Treasury spokesman said: 'We are committed to help our pensioners live their lives with dignity and respect, which is why in April the basic and new state pension increased by 4.1pc. 'Pensioners will receive a boost of up to £470 to their income in 2025-26. Our commitment to the triple lock means millions will see their pension rise by up to £1,900 this parliament.'
The Herald Scotland
3 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Can Cooper flip Tillis' NC Senate seat? I think so
North Carolina has been MAGA country since 2016, when President Donald Trump first won the state. The past two U.S. Senate races were expensive and disappointing for Democrats. Within the state, partisan gerrymandering and a voter ID law make it harder for Democrats to win. While Cooper isn't the singular answer to slowing Republican dominance in the state, he is the first candidate in a long time who seems to have a fighting chance. Roy Cooper's economic track record is good for everybody North Carolina's economy, once burdened by the decline of factory and agriculture jobs, thrived under Cooper's leadership. During his two terms as governor, the state added more than 640,000 jobs from companies like Toyota, Apple and Eli Lilly. The state was also ranked America's Top State for Business by CNBC for two consecutive years based on economic investments, its workforce and the state's debt management. Opinion: Men don't like how Trump treats the economy. Democrats must cash in on that. "For too many Americans, the middle class feels like a distant dream," Cooper says in the video announcing his campaign. "Meanwhile, the biggest corporations and the richest Americans have grabbed unimaginable wealth at your expense." If his first ad is any indication, the Senate candidate seems to be running on a populist message that is likely to resonate. It's a move that Democrats have been shy to make as they crumble under the MAGA reign, but it's a move that could fare well in a state dominated by Republicans. Republicans cut Medicaid. Cooper expanded access for North Carolinians. A crowning achievement of Cooper's tenure as governor is the state's expansion of Medicaid in 2023, which brought coverage to an additional 600,000 North Carolinians. He fought for that expansion for years. Considering that Medicaid is one of the things Republicans in Congress placed on the chopping block recently, Cooper's hand in bringing access to more North Carolinians is sure to bode well for the former governor. Democrats, again, could learn from this: It's not enough to talk about social issues. Medicaid just got cut in the federal spending bill, and hundreds of thousands of North Carolinians will likely lose coverage, including those who benefited from Medicaid expansion. This is an issue they can win on, and one that would show they care about what everyday Americans are facing. The simplest reason? Roy Cooper's actually likable. Cooper's biggest draw, however, may be how deeply his roots are in the state. He grew up in Nash County and attended the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. He was a lawyer and Sunday School teacher in Rocky Mount before entering politics. He spent several Halloweens dressed up as Sheriff Andy Taylor from "The Andy Griffith Show." He's taken other Democrats to Cook Out for fast foods on the campaign trail. He's such a North Carolinian, in fact, that I wondered if he'd ever take the plunge into national politics. "I never really wanted to go to Washington," Cooper says in his announcement video. "I just wanted to serve the people of North Carolina right here, where I've lived all my life. But these are not ordinary times." Opinion: Tillis' departure signifies troubling shift. Can any Republican stand up to Trump? It's a reminder to the national Democratic Party that a quality candidate is also a candidate who loves where they're from. A candidate with deep roots in the community is a candidate who can win elections. There's still merit to the idea that a good candidate is someone you can imagine drinking a beer on the front porch with, especially in the South. Opinion alerts: Get columns from your favorite columnists + expert analysis on top issues, delivered straight to your device through the USA TODAY app. Don't have the app? Download it for free from your app store. Cooper is clearly a promising candidate who could break through the Republican stronghold in a state that's gone for Trump three elections in a row. But he'll face an uphill battle in the form of Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Whatley, who was selected by Trump. Republicans are already on the attack, accusing the former governor of "dragging North Carolina left," criticizing his vetoes and complaining that he competently handled the COVID-19 pandemic. Still, this is the same governor who got more votes than Trump in the 2020 election - his odds are better than one might expect for a purple state. Cooper's finances are already showing the promise of his Senate campaign, as he raised $3.4 million in the first 24 hours, setting a fundraising record. If people can get behind a liberal Democrat from rural North Carolina, imagine what would happen if there were candidates of this caliber in all battleground states. Follow USA TODAY columnist Sara Pequeno on X, formerly Twitter: @sara__pequeno
The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
Heathrow's third runway plan is wrong – and not just because of noise and pollution
Here we go again. To say there is a deja vu aspect to the latest proposal to build Heathrow's third runway is an understatement. For reasons that are not clear, Sir Keir Starmer has determined the airport's expansion to be a key plank in the government's economic growth strategy. Seemingly, he did not take into account the issues that grounded the plans in the past, as far back as 1968 – namely, Heathrow's unfortunate and unavoidable proximity to the M25, the rivers and their valleys that cross that part of west London, the additional noise pollution, and the need for improved and costly transport links to and from the centre of the capital that will result from the vast uplift in passengers. On the constant sound from the increased number of planes landing and taking off, the prime minister will insist that great technological strides have been made in curbing the din. It is true that new aircraft are less noisy. However, they are still extremely audible, there will be more of them, and they will be flying over a heavily residential area. As for the rest, nothing has altered fundamentally, environmentally and logistically, since Heathrow last submitted a scheme, pre-Covid. Inflation means the bill is now an eye-watering £49bn. The bill, ultimately, will be borne by the air passenger, and Heathrow is already the most expensive airport in the world. Will the airlines and their customers stomach at least a doubling in charges? There is the thorny problem, too, of public transport to and from London. The London mayor will be expected to find a way to enable an extra 60 million people a year to use Heathrow. Transport for London is strapped for cash, struggling to upgrade the Tube network. How the additional demand will be met is not clear. What has shifted as well is the nature of air travel. Post-pandemic, business travel is down and looks unlikely to recover – that, certainly, is what the industry is saying. During the outbreak, holding meetings remotely came into its own and employers took a hard look at their budgets – Zoom or Teams often represent a better alternative in executive time and expense. That therefore raises a major doubt about one of the main claims made for Heathrow's extension. It is said to be necessary to enhance London and the UK's standing in the business world, but how, if the commercial users are not there? There has been movement too, and not of the positive kind, in attitude towards Heathrow the operator. The power outage that shut down the plum in Starmer's vision for resurgence and global acclaim was a shocking episode; it not only highlighted a neglected infrastructure but also a failure of management. Thomas Woldbye, who is seeking permission to build this national project, is the same boss who slept through the night as Britain's busiest airport ceased to function. Heathrow's reputation in the sector was already poor, but this took it to a new low. Woldbye has an idea that is different from the one previously suggested, which is to build the third runway over the M25, taking the motorway underneath – and all without any disruption to road users. This is fanciful even without a track record that hardly inspires confidence. Which raises another question. Why? Why should Heathrow as a company get to preside over the airport's improvement and reap the benefits? If we're all agreed that it is a vital national asset, holding a pivotal place in the economy, then why should the incumbent be in charge, not to mention entrusted, with its development? Those who wax lyrical about Heathrow's importance like to reminisce about how Britain led the transformation of international aviation. Boosting the airport is seen as completing that journey. It is the case that we once did. That was in the Margaret Thatcher era, when British Airways was freed from the shackles of state ownership. Thatcher did more than that, though. She enabled and encouraged competition, giving a steer to the challengers and disruptors, notably to Richard Branson at Virgin and Michael Bishop at British Midland. The newly privatised BA was forced to raise its game, and together, these three set new standards. There appears to be an assumption that Woldbye's company must be given the job. But there is another option. Surinder Arora, the self-made billionaire who has masterminded the building of leading hotels at Heathrow and other airports and is a substantial Heathrow landowner, has his own remedy. His is much cheaper, envisaging a shorter runway that does not affect the M25. It is easy to dismiss Arora. But he is popular with the airlines, he rails rightly against Heathrow's pricing, and he knows a thing or two about customer service. He also possesses heavyweight advisers in the shape of Bechtel, the US engineering, construction and project management giant. He deserves to be taken seriously. Heathrow needs a competitor. Likewise, if neither the airport operator nor Arora is selected and the third runway is again kiboshed, then surely serious thought must be given to expanding rival airports. Heathrow has been resting on its laurels for too long. As for Starmer, he perhaps should ask himself how it is that someone who professes to be forensic legally is so capable of displaying rushes of blood to the head politically. Giving Heathrow such prominence smacks of impetuousness. He's done it and has been left with an almighty headache.
