
Israel-Iran war: A political lifeline for Netanyahu? – DW – 06/26/2025
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has gained credit for his actions against Iran. However, his political future will depend on what happens next in the Gaza war.
After a ceasefire between Israel and Iran took hold on Tuesday morning, albeit a fragile one, streets and coffee shops in Jerusalem were busy again. By evening, Israel's Home Front Command had lifted all public restrictions.
At an open-air market, people were back shopping. Some were simply relieved that the 12-day war, which had frequently sent Israelis to bomb shelters was over.
"I feel a little relieved that we are not at war anymore. But it could also be tricky because we never know whom to trust. One day we are in a ceasefire, the next day there won't be a ceasefire anymore," Liba Farkish told DW.
Many here said that they were satisfied with the attack on Iran and praised Prime Minister Netanyahu.
"I think we attacked them at a perfect time, exactly what we needed to do. I think Netanyahu did the best he could. They were really close to having a weapon against us, and honestly, we were saved at the last minute," Adina Bier, a high school student, told DW.
Shopowner Avraham Levy said that what "Netanyahu did is not just for Israel, it's for the whole world. Iran is a radical religious regime whose aim is to eradicate Israel," Levy, a veteran supporter of Netanyahu's Likud party, told DW.
About 82% of Jewish Israelis supported Israel's attack on Iran and the timing of the attack, according to a recent flash survey by the Viterbi Family Center for Public Opinion and Policy Research at the Israel Democracy Institute (IDI).
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Just a month ago, Netanyahu's political fortunes seemed to have taken a hit. Israel's longest-serving prime minister, often referred to as "the magician" because of his ability to maneuver political crises, had faced mounting domestic and international criticism over his handling of the war in Gaza and his apparent refusal to agree to a deal with Hamas to secure the release of the remaining hostages.
Netanyahu can argue that he has delivered on his threat to attack Israel's archenemy and its nuclear program. Iran has long insisted that its nuclear program is peaceful, and US intelligence agencies have concluded that Tehran is not currently seeking to develop nuclear weapons. However, Israeli leaders have argued that Iran was close to assembling a nuclear weapon.
The attack on Iran has helped to restore Netanyahu's image as a strongman after the massive security failures that led to the Hamas-led terror attacks on October 7, 2023.
"Regarding the Iran attack, there are many unknowns, and we don't know all the details. But all the things that we've seen here since October 7, it's basically a master plan by the Iranians. And everybody understood that this needed to be taken care of. Nobody really trusted the diplomatic solution with them, only a military solution," Tal Schneider, a political correspondent for online outlet , told DW.
While recent polls suggested that Netanyahu's Likud party gained more support in the wake of the perceived success of its military operation, the picture is more complicated. A closer look reveals that parties in Netanyahu's current coalition government are projected to fall far short of the 61-seat majority they would need to retain power.
"Those polls suggested the situation for Netanyahu remains the same. He may have gotten some seats for his own party, but this came on the account of a close ally of his, the extreme right-wing Jewish Power Party of [Itamar] Ben-Gvir. It means that for Netanyahu, it doesn't give him much leeway for a new coalition after the next election," said Schneider.
"He [Netanyahu] was not able to bring in voters from the center. So, people who oppose Netanyahu remained opposed to him. Even with the big military success and the big strategic success that no one is denying."
Iranian missile strikes killed 28 people and injured over 1,000, according to Israel's Public Diplomacy Directorate. In Iran, according to official numbers, 606 were killed, with 5,332 people wounded, although those figures are believed to be higher.
While Israeli commentators praised the military's performance in Iran, many questions remain as to whether the operation against the Iranian nuclear sites and its ballistic missile program was as successful as Netanyahu claimed. In a statement on Tuesday evening, he said that Israel had "achieved a historic victory, which will stand for generations."
Attention in Israel has now turned again to the war with Hamas in Gaza. On Wednesday morning, Israelis woke up to the news that seven soldiers were killed in southern Gaza. Israel's national broadcaster Kan reported that they were inside an armored personnel carrier that caught fire because of an explosive device that was attached to it.
"Sometimes you simply need to do the right thing. Trump did it. If Trump could do it, so can you. You need to put an end, here and now, to the needless war in Gaza," Ben Caspit, a veteran Israeli journalist, wrote in the daily newspaper, addressing Netanyahu in his article. "The best of our sons are dying there now, and for what? The destruction of more 'terrorist infrastructure'? Are you for real? Do you hear yourself?"
Polls have consistently shown large support for a hostage deal with Hamas in Gaza to return the remaining 50 hostages — alive and dead — and which would also include the cessation of hostilities.
"It's important for Netanyahu to get to some solution here because what we found out is a majority of his supporters think that the hostages should be brought home, even if this means a cessation of the war, not termination of the war," Tamar Herman, a senior research fellow at the Israel Democracy Institute (IDI) and the academic director of the Viterbi Family Center for Public Opinion and Policy Research, told DW. "So if he wants to increase his support, he should do something in this regard."
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
This was echoed by some people on the streets of Jerusalem.
"We lost just seven soldiers in Gaza. We are past that state with Hamas. We should try to make a deal, but on Israel's terms, we should not let them mess with us anymore. We own this land, it's our people, we need to get them back, we just need to find the right terms," Adina Bier said.
Netanyahu's critics have long accused him of not wanting to end the war, claiming that he was unwilling to agree to a new deal with Hamas that would secure the release of the remaining hostages. His far-right coalition partners threatened to leave the coalition if he ended the war without toppling Hamas, which would have triggered early elections in Israel.
"He needs to solve the problem in Gaza before he solves our problems in Iran. The most important thing: Gaza and the hostages," Inbal Leibovitch told DW.To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


DW
33 minutes ago
- DW
Germany to cut development aid – DW – 06/30/2025
Germany is ramping up defense spending — while cutting funds for development cooperation. Aid organizations warn of the consequences for millions, amid a world beset by wars and crises. Germany's draft federal budget for 2025 includes sweeping cuts. The Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) is set to receive just €10.3 billion ($12.1 billion) — nearly a billion less than in 2024. It's the second consecutive year of reductions. A glance back at 2022 underscores the scale of the decline: at that time, Germany was still spending €13.8 billion ($16.2 billion) on development aid. Michael Herbst, chair of the umbrella organization VENRO, which represents around 140 development NGOs in Germany, illustrated the human cost of these dramatic cuts amid growing global conflict: "More than 100 million people are displaced. At the same time, more and more donor countries are pulling back." That's why, he argues, Germany needs to ensure stable funding for development cooperation and humanitarian aid. But the opposite is occurring. Germany's cuts come at a time when US President Donald Trump, early in his second term, has also initiated deep reductions in development aid, reportedlyslashing around 80% of funding. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) agreed at its recent summit on June 25, 2025, that each member state should spend 5% of its economic output on defense annually. Against this backdrop, the global decline in development aid stands out all the more starkly. The consequences are already becoming clear, especially in the field of humanitarian assistance. The US has completely withdrawn its support for the UN-administered relief fund. Faced with sweeping international cutbacks, emergency aid coordinator Tom Fletcher says he is being forced to shut down numerous programs for the world's poorest. Just weeks ago, the UN representative warned that the impact on those in need and suffering from hunger would be devastating. Instead of the originally projected $44 billion, Fletcher now expects just $29 billion to be available for distributing food, water, medicine, shelter, and other essential aid. According to him, the reduced funding will only enable 114 million people to be reached — down from the 180 million originally targeted. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Due to the sharp reduction in the BMZ budget, Germany's so-called ODA ratio (Official Development Assistance) fell below its self-imposed goal of 0.7% of gross national income in 2024. It had consistently remained above that threshold since 2020. Humanitarian emergency aid is being slashed by 53% to around €1 billion ($1.2 billion). VENRO chair, Herbst, says the move is short-sighted: "As the world's third-largest economy, Germany can and must take responsibility here. It cannot continue cutting budgets in these areas." However, his push for a reversal was unsuccessful. As an export-driven nation, Germany depends on strong international ties and global stability. "The German economy benefits from a solid reputation and reliable relationships in countries of the Global South. That helps secure jobs here at home, as well," Herbst points out. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The NGOs Welthungerhilfe and Terre des Hommes give the federal government a poor overall assessment. However, the coalition agreement between the governing center-right Christian Democratic Union/Christian Social Union (CDU/CSU) and center-left Social Democratic Party (SPD) describes the cuts to development and humanitarian aid as "appropriate." In response, the aid organizations counter: "That contradicts the government's own stated goal of ensuring sustainable humanitarian funding — especially at a time when other donor countries are pulling out." All the same, German Development Minister Reem Alabali Radovan (SPD) affirmed that Germany remains committed to its global responsibilities – "despite painful budgetary constraints on development spending imposed by the coalition agreement."While you're here: Every Tuesday, DW editors round up what is happening in German politics and society. You can sign up here for the weekly email newsletter, Berlin Briefing.


DW
2 hours ago
- DW
European countries criticize Iran 'threats' to IAEA head – DW – 06/30/2025
France, Germany and the UK threw their weight behind the UN agency as Iran said it cannot guarantee IAEA inspectors' safety. Meanwhile, Israel expressed openness to normalization with Syria, Lebanon. Follow DW for signaled it was ready for more normalization deals with its Arab neighbors, amid a war in the devastated Gaza Strip, which has dragged on for over 20 months. "Israel is interested in expanding the Abraham Accord circle of peace and normalization," Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar said at a news conference, referring to US-sponsored agreements signed in 2020 by Israel with the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain and Morocco. "We have an interest in adding countries, Syria and Lebanon, our neighbors, to the circle of peace and normalization while safeguarding Israel's essential and security interests," he added. In parallel to the war in Gaza, Israel had been engaged in fighting with the Iran-backed Lebanese militant group Hezbollah since October 2023. In October 2024, Israeli forces launched a ground invasion, with a ceasefire coming into effect the next month that was meant to guarantee both Israel and Hezbollah's exit from southern Lebanon. Israel has also intensified strikes on Syrian locations since the ouster of dictator Bashar Assad in December 2024, with Israeli troops moving into a demilitarized zone inside Syria, including the Syrian side of the strategic Mount Hermon. "In any peace agreement, the Golan will remain part of the State of Israel," Saar said, referring to the territory Israel seized from Syria in 1967 and later annexed in a move not recognized by the United Nations. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Paris, Berlin and London have condemned what they called "threats" against the head of the United Nations' nuclear watchdog after Tehran turned down a request by the International Atomic Energy Agency to visit its bombed nuclear sites. "France, Germany and the United Kingdom condemn threats against the director general of the IAEA, Rafael Grossi, and reiterate our full support to the agency," Foreign Ministers Jean-Noel Barrot, Johann Wadephul and David Lammy said in a joint statement. The trio called on Tehran to "refrain from any steps to cease cooperation with the IAEA," and "immediately resume full cooperation in line with its legally binding obligations." The three countries comprise the E3 group, which coordinates on foreign and security matters, particularly Iran's nuclear program. On Friday, Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi had criticized IAEA chief Rafael Grossi's insistence on visiting the nuclear sites bombed by Israel and the US during the recent war, saying such insistence was "meaningless and possibly even malign in intent." Tehran reiterated its position on Monday but toned down its rejection, saying it could not guarantee the safety of the IAEA inspectors. "How can they expect us to ensure the safety and security of the agency's inspectors when Iran's peaceful nuclear facilities were attacked a few days ago?" Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei told a news conference. Israel struck Iranian nuclear and military sites on June 13, prompting a response from Tehran which started a 12-day war where the US also struck three Iranian nuclear sites, before US President Donald Trump announced a ceasefire. One day before the Israeli strikes, the IAEA's board passed a resolution that accused Iran of ignoring its nuclear obligations. Tehran has argued that the resolution was an "excuse" for the war. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Thanks for tuning in to our Middle East blog! Tensions remain high in the region after Tehran rejected a request by the United Nations International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to visit the facilities bombed by Israel and the US during the war earlier this month. European countries Britain, France and Germany lambasted Iran's "threats," while Tehran defended its position, saying it could not guarantee the safety of the watchdog's inspectors. In Israel, officials condemned an attack reportedly by settlers in the occupied West Bank on Israel Defense Forces (IDF) soldiers, while Foreign Minister Gideon Saar said the country was "interested" in normalizing ties with its Arab neighbors Syria and Lebanon. This blog will bring you the latest on the situation in the Middle East, including in Iran, Israel and Gaza.


Int'l Business Times
3 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
NGO Loses Bid To Block UK Export Of Military Equipment To Israel
The High Court in London rejected a legal challenge on Monday brought by a Palestinian rights group seeking to block the UK from supplying components for Israeli F-35 fighter jets. Israel has used the jets to devastating effect in its bombardment of Gaza. Both sides have been accused of atrocities during a conflict that has killed tens of thousands -- the vast majority of them Palestinian civilians, according to figures the United Nations deems reliable. The UK government suspended some export licences for military equipment after concluding there was a risk Israel could be breaching international humanitarian law but made an exemption for some parts for Lockheed Martin F-35 stealth jets. In its claim to the High Court, rights group Al-Haq called for a judicial review, saying the "carve out" was unlawful and alleging the government had misunderstood the applicable rules of international law. It was supported by Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, Oxfam and others in its case. Judges Stephen Males and Karen Steyn said they "reject all" of the grounds for challenging the government's decision. The case was not about "whether the UK should supply arms or other military equipment to Israel", said the judges. Rather, the case was concerned with "whether it is open to the court to rule that the UK must withdraw from a specific multilateral defence collaboration" because of the prospect that some UK manufactured components may be used by Israel in the Gaza war in actions that could break international humanitarian law. "Under our constitution that acutely sensitive and political issue is a matter for the executive, which is democratically accountable to parliament, and ultimately to the electorate, not for the courts," said the judges. "Once the true nature of the issue is identified, it is clear that the claim must fail. Accordingly, permission to bring a judicial review claim is refused," they added. Shawan Jabarin, General Director of Al-Haq said in a statement issued to AFP: "By exposing serious government failings in facilitating international crimes against Palestinians through its arms exports, civil society and human rights organisations have achieved a crucial breakthrough. "We will continue to persevere in the UK and beyond until governments are held accountable. Israel's impunity is challenged and justice for the Palestinian people is realised," he added. The UK contributes components to an international defence programme that produces and maintains the F-35s. Defence Secretary John Healey argued a suspension would impact the "whole F-35 programme" and have a "profound impact on international peace and security". Lawyers for Al-Haq said the government had known there was a "clear risk" Israel would use the jet parts to commit violations of international law. But government lawyer James Eadie said the court was not placed to rule on the legality of Israel's actions, and that attempting to do so could have a "potentially deleterious" effect on "foreign relations with a friendly state, namely Israel". In September 2024, the new Labour government announced it was suspending around 30 of 350 export licences following a review of Israel's compliance with international humanitarian law. But the partial ban did not cover British-made F-35 parts, which include refuelling probes, laser targeting systems, tyres and ejector seats, according to Oxfam. Healey has previously said suspending F-35 licences would "undermine US confidence in the UK and NATO" but lawyers for Al-Haq have described the exemption as a "loophole". UK-based NGO Campaign Against Arms Trade has said that licencing figures showed the government had made a "shocking increase in military exports to Israel" in the months after its September 2024 announcement of partial suspensions. It said the figures showed the UK approved GBP127.6 million ($170 million) in military equipment to Israel in single-issue licences from October to December 2024, saying this was more than for the period from 2020 to 2023 combined. Most of the licences were for military radars, components and software, as well as targeting equipment, according to the NGO, which was involved in the case against the government. Israel launched war on Gaza after an attack by militants from Palestinian group Hamas on October 7, 2023, which resulted in the deaths of 1,219 people, mostly civilians, according to an AFP tally based on Israeli official figures. Israel's retaliatory campaign has killed at least 56,500 people in Gaza, an occupied Palestinian territory, most of them civilians, according to the territory's health ministry. The UN considers these figures to be reliable.