
Labor's Hecs reduction bill not the fairest way to relieve student debt, economists say
Anthony Albanese will introduce legislation this week to deliver a key election commitment that helped secure his government a second term.
The fairer deal for students bill will cut a fifth from the outstanding student debt of about 3 million Australians, or provide the equivalent of $16bn in total relief, according to the government.
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
While the legislation is not expected to attract any opposition in Canberra, some experts remain critical.
Jack Buckley and Matthew Maltman, economists at the e61 Institute, looked at a 20% cut to student debts in 2012 as a way to assess the potential impact of Labor's plan in 2025.
Maltman and Buckley found that half of the benefits went to those who were in the top third of all income earners a decade later.
Unsurprisingly, the biggest winners were medicine, law and dentistry graduates, who received an average of $10,000 in debt relief. In contrast, recent teaching and nursing graduates would have only received $3,000 to $4,000.
They also found that timing was also a crucial factor in determining the biggest beneficiaries.
Someone finishing studies a year before the hypothetical 2012 debt relief received on average twice as much relief as somebody who graduated in 2007, and two-and-a-half times more than somebody who graduated in 2016.
Maltman and Buckley's final finding was that 80% of Australians with student debt would not have paid off their loans any sooner.
While they recogniseit is 'unrealistic' to expect the government to alter its legislation, they said 'a small tweak' to a flat $5,500 reduction to student loans would 'have the same overall effect on the debt burden of young Australians'.
'But it would help each former student with an outstanding Help debt the same amount, regardless of whether they studied law or teaching. Or whether they graduated in 2023, in 2025 or will graduate in 2027.'
Andrew Norton, a professor of higher education policy at Monash University, said Labor's policy provided a 'windfall' for those with student loans as at 1 June, and that it treated the symptom rather than the cause of graduates' increasingly unaffordable debt obligation.
'Clearly it helped them [Labor] win the election, and it will sail through the parliament. But it is a very expensive and poorly targeted program which delivers huge benefits to those with high debt, while delivering nothing to those starting next year and those who finished earlier,' Norton said.
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
'The question is whether that money could be spent on higher return policies. I would have thought dealing with the student contributions issue is more urgent for people still acquiring debt.'
The job-ready graduates scheme, introduced in 2021, was designed to push more students into disciplines that would drive the 'jobs of the future', by lowering the cost of degrees in courses such as computer programming and engineering.
The flipside was that it raised the cost of courses deemed less worthy by the then-Coalition government, led by Scott Morrison, and resulted in more than doubling fees for some degrees, such as humanities.
A University of Melbourne study in late 2023, however, found that the fee changes affected the enrolment decisions of only 1.5% of students, suggesting that the policy had failed to drive the behavioural shift it was designed to achieve.
Norton said breaking the previous link between course fees and future earning capacity for graduates in those fields has left many young Australians saddled with large debts they will struggle to ever pay off.
He said the Coalition changes were 'clearly a policy mistake'.
'Clearly there is an issue here with the job-ready graduates scheme, particularly in humanities, where many will never finish paying off their debt.'
The Albanese government has tasked the newly created Australian Tertiary Education Commission as an independent body to create a 'better and fairer' system that is expected to unwind the Coalition's 2021 changes.
'My concern about that it will be 2027 at the earliest before that happens, and by that time we will have had whole cohorts with their art degrees with large debts,' Norton said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Shoppers spot rare new Cadbury's chocolate bar on UK shelves combining two sweet treat favourites
EXCITED snack fans are in a frenzy after spotting a brand new bar, combining two popular flavours. Cadbury is one of the nation's best loved confectioners and is often wowing treat lovers with its inventive new chocolate flavours, such as Caramel Mudcake and Biscoff. Exciting new flavour And shoppers have recently discovered that Cadbury Dairy Milk Honeycomb & Peanut is available in the UK. Sharing a snap of the scrumptious treat to the Newfoodsuk Instagram account one shoppers said: "New Honeycomb & Peanut Cadbury Dairy Milk Bar! "Wow, the peanuts work so well with the creamy Cadbury chocolate!" The tasty treat is an import from Australia, and is being sold by World Snacks UK. It features mouthwatering chocolate, blended together with honeycomb and peanut pieces. Shoppers can buy the imported 100g bar for £4.99 from the World Snacks website. The post was flooded with comments from Instagram users, eager to try out the snack for themselves. One person said: "Sounds like a great combination for a chocolate bar." A second person said: "This gonna slap." A third added: "Why can't they sell this in shops!" 'So excited' say Cadbury Ireland fans as new chocolate bar flavour to hit shelves TODAY More new Cadbury flavours This comes as shoppers are racing to pick up a giant Cadbury Dairy Milk chocolate bar on UK supermarket shelves - and are praising the "banging" flavour. The snack is a collaboration with iconic sweet treat giant Biscoff - and fans have rushed to fill their trolleys with the huge bar which they say is worth every penny. A Facebook user flagged the incredible find on the Extreme Couponing and Bargains UK group. And it was discovered in major supermarket Tesco - with the store offering a 10 per cent discount to certain customers. How to save money on chocolate We all love a bit of chocolate from now and then, but you don't have to break the bank buying your favourite bar. Consumer reporter Sam Walker reveals how to cut costs... Go own brand - if you're not too fussed about flavour and just want to supplant your chocolate cravings, you'll save by going for the supermarket's own brand bars. Shop around - if you've spotted your favourite variety at the supermarket, make sure you check if it's cheaper elsewhere. Websites like let you compare prices on products across all the major chains to see if you're getting the best deal. Look out for yellow stickers - supermarket staff put yellow, and sometimes orange and red, stickers on to products to show they've been reduced. They usually do this if the product is coming to the end of its best-before date or the packaging is slightly damaged. Buy bigger bars - most of the time, but not always, chocolate is cheaper per 100g the larger the bar. So if you've got the appetite, and you were going to buy a hefty amount of chocolate anyway, you might as well go bigger. The user posted a picture of the behemoth chocolate bar in their hand. They captioned the post: "New giant Biscoff Cadbury Dairy Milk Bar at Tesco." And the limited-edition Cadbury Dairy Milk Caramel Mudcake has been spotted in budget retailer B&M, and sweet-toothed Brits are racing to get a taste. One eagle-eyed shopper shared the find on Facebook, posting: 'Cadbury Caramel mudcake spotted at B&M.' Others were quick to respond, with one user writing: 'I must try it ASAP' and another adding: 'I hope it's still there when I go.' The Caramel Mudcake bar doesn't appear to be stocked anywhere else in the UK, making it one of the rarest Cadbury imports around at the moment.


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Aussies exposed in Louis Vuitton data leak as hackers gain access to passport details, home addresses and phone numbers
Louis Vuitton has suffered a major data breach with customers' personal information such as home addresses and passport numbers compromised. The French luxury brand was subject to a breach by an unauthorised third party on July 2 and, on Tuesday, it was confirmed Australian customers had been affected. Customers in South Korea, Turkey, the United Kingdom, Italy and Sweden had previously been revealed as being impacted. While on Monday it was revealed Hong Kong had also been hit with more than 419,000 customers affected. Louis Vuitton confirmed clients' first and last name, gender, country, phone number, email address, postal address and date of birth had been exposed in the breach, in a client email seen by Customers' purchases and preferences data, along with passport numbers were also exposed in the breach. The high-end luxury brand, best known for its infamous monogram handbags, told affected clients that no financial information had been stolen. 'Dear Client, We regret to inform you that an unauthorised third party temporarily accessed our system and obtained some of your information,' the email read. 'On July 2, 2025, we became aware of a personal data breach resulting from the exfiltration of certain personal data of some of our clients following an unauthorised access to our system. The fashion brand assured customers that 'cybersecurity teams have taken care of the incident with the utmost diligence and attention.' Louis Vuitton confirmed measures were taken immediately to 'contain the incident' and blocked the unauthorised third party from accessing further data. The high-end label also warned those who had provided their details to be wary of any suspicious communication. Clients should remain vigilant of any unsolicited emails, phone calls or text messages. Louis Vuitton has told its customers there is currently no evidence their data has been misused, but warned fraud attempts may occur in the future. The email warned clients from revealing their Louis Vuitton password to anyone and clarified the company 'will never ask you to disclose it'. Louis Vuitton falls under the banner of French conglomerate LVMH. The luxury brand is one of several companies in the conglomerate, which also includes high-end labels Dior and Tiffany & Co. Both Dior and Tiffany & Co have been subject to similar data breaches in recent months.


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Australian Greens leader says she has not read reasons for party's expelling of co-founder
Greens leader Larissa Waters says she has not read documentation outlining why the party's co-founder, Drew Hutton, was expelled because she has been busy preparing for parliament. The decision to terminate Hutton's life membership of the Greens was upheld by delegates of the state branches on Sunday, over what the party considers his pursuit of debate harmful to trans people but that he has framed as an issue of free speech. Waters, a senator for Queensland, had backed the outcome of the appeal, saying it reflected 'good governance' and sent the message that 'nobody is above the rules'. Speaking to the ABC's 7.30 on Tuesday, Hutton doubled down on his position. He suggested some Greens members 'over the last decade or so' had aimed to 'convert it into the sort of party one of whose main preoccupations is with transgender rights'. He said he had 'no problem with transgender rights' but accused the party of harbouring 'an absolutely rigorous determination to stop any dissent'. Hutton claimed he had been contacted by 40 former party members, 'about half' of whom had been expelled, and the others 'forced out by being subjected to massive complaints'. He suggested a faction within the party – which he described this week as 'a cult' – had 'weaponised the complaint system'. Waters, appearing immediately after Hutton on the program, rejected his description of the party as 'authoritarian, aggressive and doctrinaire'. She insisted people inside the Greens were free to express their opinions – and do. 'You can have a robust debate and there's lots of differences of opinion when party members are actually debating and formulating our policies, but you can do that in a respectful manner,' she said. When host Sarah Ferguson asked whether Waters took issue with Hutton's views or the way he had expressed them – asking why Hutton had been expelled – Waters replied: 'Look, I wasn't part of that process, Sarah. That was a process that the party ran.' Pressed on the reasons for the expulsion, Waters revealed she had not read the documentation, dismissing responsibility for the decision. 'I haven't read the documentation because here I am in parliament hoping to talk tomorrow about introducing a climate trigger into our environmental laws and fixing the gender inequalities in our tax system amongst other things,' Waters said. 'This was a decision that was reviewed by the party, taken by volunteer party members, many of whom uphold the code of conduct on a regular basis.' Any future decision on whether Hutton could return to the party was 'not up to me', she added.