
Australian Greens leader says she has not read reasons for party's expelling of co-founder
The decision to terminate Hutton's life membership of the Greens was upheld by delegates of the state branches on Sunday, over what the party considers his pursuit of debate harmful to trans people but that he has framed as an issue of free speech.
Waters, a senator for Queensland, had backed the outcome of the appeal, saying it reflected 'good governance' and sent the message that 'nobody is above the rules'.
Speaking to the ABC's 7.30 on Tuesday, Hutton doubled down on his position.
He suggested some Greens members 'over the last decade or so' had aimed to 'convert it into the sort of party one of whose main preoccupations is with transgender rights'. He said he had 'no problem with transgender rights' but accused the party of harbouring 'an absolutely rigorous determination to stop any dissent'.
Hutton claimed he had been contacted by 40 former party members, 'about half' of whom had been expelled, and the others 'forced out by being subjected to massive complaints'. He suggested a faction within the party – which he described this week as 'a cult' – had 'weaponised the complaint system'.
Waters, appearing immediately after Hutton on the program, rejected his description of the party as 'authoritarian, aggressive and doctrinaire'. She insisted people inside the Greens were free to express their opinions – and do.
'You can have a robust debate and there's lots of differences of opinion when party members are actually debating and formulating our policies, but you can do that in a respectful manner,' she said.
When host Sarah Ferguson asked whether Waters took issue with Hutton's views or the way he had expressed them – asking why Hutton had been expelled – Waters replied: 'Look, I wasn't part of that process, Sarah. That was a process that the party ran.'
Pressed on the reasons for the expulsion, Waters revealed she had not read the documentation, dismissing responsibility for the decision.
'I haven't read the documentation because here I am in parliament hoping to talk tomorrow about introducing a climate trigger into our environmental laws and fixing the gender inequalities in our tax system amongst other things,' Waters said.
'This was a decision that was reviewed by the party, taken by volunteer party members, many of whom uphold the code of conduct on a regular basis.'
Any future decision on whether Hutton could return to the party was 'not up to me', she added.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Times
2 hours ago
- Times
Trans guidance from equality watchdog may foster distrust, SNP warns
Proposed transgender guidance from Britain's equalities watchdog will foster 'distrust' and lead to 'social policing of bodies', the SNP has warned. Ministers said the draft changes to the code of practice from the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC), made after the Supreme Court ruling that women are defined by biological sex under equalities law, 'may lead to abuse'. In a submission to the EHRC's consultation, the Scottish government repeated its acceptance of April's Supreme Court judgment, which came after it lost a legal challenge brought by campaigners. However, it raised concerns about proposals of how it should be implemented in practice, leading For Women Scotland, the group that won the case, to accuse the devolved government of echoing messaging from 'transactivist groups it heavily funds'. The EHRC draft guidance includes a biological definition of sex and states that this should be the basis for granting access to single-sex facilities and services. In practice, this would mean trans women being barred from female-only spaces. In the submission, the Scottish government said: 'We note that the impact of the guidance may lead to situations where some members of the public will take it upon themselves to judge appearances and assume someone's sex based on their perception of that person's sex or gender identity. 'This sense of distrust in others and social policing of bodies is detrimental not only for trans and non-binary people, but for those who are born male or female who may not fit into society's current expectations of what a man or woman looks like, which change over time, and in different contexts and places.' The SNP has faced criticism for its failure to implement the Supreme Court ruling, with a series of policies that allow gender self-ID still in operation throughout the public sector. These include guidelines for teachers, which state that biological boys should generally be allowed to participate in girls' sports and workplace guidance, which says trans staff should be allowed to use the toilets or changing facilities they feel most comfortable with. Ministers pledged to act once the final guidance is published, but faced claims they were attempting to delay a politically contentious issue until after next year's Holyrood elections. The submission added: 'Encouraging a situation where authority is given to question someone's biological sex and ask for proof thereof may lead to abuse if not done appropriately. 'At the same time this places an undue burden on individuals, requiring untrained staff or providers to make assumptions or judgments about whether a person appears to present as trans, which is potentially discriminatory and unfair.' The submission called for an emphasis on 'inclusion as opposed to exclusion,' noting that examples provided in the planned code update mainly 'provide guidance on where and how transgender people can be excluded from services and associations'. Trina Budge, a For Women Scotland director, said: 'This is a substandard response from the Scottish government, which fails to address the EHRC's specific questions, choosing instead to focus on areas raised by the transactivist groups it heavily funds. 'The government says it has accepted the Supreme Court's ruling and it may have done so far as keeping women's representation on public boards for biological women only, but it seems to be expecting the EHRC to tell it how to shoehorn men who say they are women into any other single-sex provision allowed under the Equality Act. 'We're not sure if the government is wilfully misunderstanding that this is not legally possible or if it intends to continue to defy the judgment of the Supreme Court. ' Tess White, the Scottish Conservative equalities spokeswoman, accused the SNP of putting 'women and girls in danger'. She said: 'The SNP aren't just failing to implement the Supreme Court's verdict, they now appear to be criticising the EHRC. 'The judgment from the UK's highest court was crystal clear, yet the nationalists are still desperately stalling for time and trying to pass the buck. This doesn't just send the wrong message, it puts women and girls in danger. 'The Sandie Peggie case shows exactly what happens when organisations pander to gender extremists instead of standing up for women's rights. 'Scots won't be fooled by the SNP's blatant attempts to run down the clock. John Swinney must act now and order all public bodies to follow the law and provide single-sex spaces.'


Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
The sneaky way Anthony Albanese will turn Australia into a high-taxing European nation with new super tax
Anthony Albanese risks turning Australia into a high-taxing European nation with his plan for a radical new tax on superannuation savings, an investment group warns. The federal government wants to impose a new 15 per cent tax on unrealised gains on super balances above $3million, where capital growth would be taxed before assets are sold. Wilson Asset Management chairman Geoff Wilson said this departure from taxing capital gains after assets are sold would see Australia share a similarity with European nations, which are renowned for their high taxes and targeting the rich. 'Australia is proving to be no different from Norway, Spain and Sweden, where taxing unrealised gains led to capital exodus and therefore lower than expected tax revenue,' he said. In 2023, the Labor government announced that from July 1, 2025, 0.5 per cent, or 80,000, of super balances with more than $3million would be hit with a new 15 per cent tax on unrealised gains. This would be in addition to the 15 per cent tax on earnings that already exists for all super during the accumulation or working phase. The debut of a new tax on unrealised gains also marks the biggest change to the capital gains tax since it was introduced in Australia in 1985. Previously, European nations have been the main enthusiasts for taxing the notional or paper value of assets, based on gains during a financial year. Norway applies a 38 per cent unrealised gains tax on the wealth of those who leave. Sweden does a similar thing, but with a 30 per cent exit tax on unrealised gains. Spain also has an exit tax, based on unrealised gains, if someone with a large investment portfolio leaves the country to become a tax resident elsewhere. Germany during the 1970s and 1980s taxed unrealised gains on wealth, but the policy was notoriously difficult to administer. France still has a wealth tax that applies on assets worth more than €1.3million (AU$2.1million) of real estate assets, but it stops short of taxing unrealised gains. Other European nations, renowned for having higher income taxes to fund more services, do not touch retirement savings in the way Labor is proposing to do. US Democrat presidential candidate Kamala Harris last year campaigned to tax unrealised gains on wealth - but only for the ultra rich with assets worth US$100million (AU$152million) or more. Australia would be the first to apply an unrealised gains tax to superannuation, in a bid to raise $2.3billion a year in Budget revenue. Left-leaning crossbench senators David Pocock and Jacqui Lambie last year declined to back Labor's Better Targeted Superannuation Concessions bill, because they are opposed to taxing unrealised gains. The Greens back taxing unrealised gains but want the threshold reduced to $2million, but indexed to inflation. They hold the balance of power in the Senate, and Labor is still negotiating amendments with the minor party. The government has previously flagged giving Australians a year's notice from the time legislation is passed, with Mr Wilson noting panic selling was already occurring in self-managed super funds to avoid the potential new tax. 'Despite requiring Senate approval, the proposed tax on unrealised gains has already prompted a rush to liquidate assets ahead of the 30 June 2026 implementation date,' he said. Wilson Asset Management has proposed an alternative super tax strategy to Labor's plan to tax unrealised gains, in a submission to the government's Economic Reform Roundtable, where it argued it would raise $2.433billion in revenue. 'The outcome of the proposal would allow the government to increase tax revenue from high balance accounts without breaching the realisation principle of the tax act,' Mr Wilson said. 'Our proposal is in the national interest and a Budget-positive alternative to the government's proposed policy to tax unrealised gains in superannuation.' He proposes to keep the existing structure of taxing realised capital gains, but adding a new 15 per cent tax to balances of $3million to $6million. A 17.5 per cent tax would apply for balances of $6million to $10million, rising to 20 per cent for balances of $10million to $20million and 25 per cent for balances above $20million.


Daily Mail
4 hours ago
- Daily Mail
MP's career in tatters after being found guilty of sexually abusing two men
A state MP is set to lose his seat after he was found guilty of sexually abusing two young men - one of whom was a teenager - during his time in office. Kiama MP Gareth Ward, 44, stood trial in the NSW District Court after pleading not guilty to sexual intercourse without consent and indecent assault charges. He was accused of inviting a drunk 18-year-old man - whom he had met a year prior - to his South Coast home in February 2013. The man told the jury that Ward plied him with drinks before indecently assaulting him three times in one night, despite his attempts to resist. Two years later, the long-time MP sexually assaulted an intoxicated political staffer after a mid-week event at NSW Parliament House in 2015. The man, who was 24 at the time but is now in his 30s, said Ward climbed into bed with him, groped his backside, and sexually assaulted him despite him repeatedly saying 'no'. After deliberating for two-and-a-half days, the jury on Friday returned unanimous guilty verdicts for the four sexual offences. A verdict on a fifth charge of common assault was not necessary because the jurors found the act amounted to an indecent assault. Ward will be sentenced at a later date. After the jury was dismissed, crown prosecutor Monika Knowles applied for Ward to be taken into custody. The application was adjourned until Wednesday but Ward will be restrained by strict bail conditions until then. He is required to report to police daily and notify officers when he is planning to move between his Sydney and South Coast homes. Ward didn't speak as he walked out of Darlinghurst Courthouse on Friday afternoon - a stark contrast to his usual smile at waiting photographers. His parliamentary position could become vacant as a result of the convictions, one of which carries a maximum penalty of 14 years in jail. The NSW Constitution states MPs will have their seat vacated if convicted of offences punishable with a term of more than five years' imprisonment. But Ward still has time to lodge an appeal. A NSW government spokesperson said the justice system had delivered a decisive outcome and Ward should resign from parliament immediately. 'Should Mr Ward refuse to resign, the government will take steps to protect the Legislative Assembly's integrity,' the spokesperson said in a statement. Liberal Party leader Mark Speakman has called for Ward's resignation. 'The Member for Kiama must resign from Parliament. If Mr Ward does not resign, then upon its resumption the Parliament should swiftly take all appropriate steps to protect its integrity,' Speakman said. Ward denied the allegations against him, claiming the incidents either didn't happen or didn't amount to sexual abuse. But Ms Knowles said there were too many similarities between the accounts of the two complainants - who didn't know each other - to be a coincidence. They were emotionally vulnerable and had been drinking when Ward invited them over, plied them with more drinks and sexually abused them without consent while they were lying down, she said. 'You might think what happened to (the complainants) did not happen by random chance or just dumb luck,' Ms Knowles told the jury. 'Similar behaviour, similar setting, same man, same conclusion. This is not a coincidence.' The evidence showed Ward had a tendency to act on his sexual interest in young men less powerful than he was by committing sexual offences against them, the prosecutor argued. 'These people weren't overtaken by force, they were taken by surprise,' Ms Knowles said. Ward has held the Kiama electorate since 2011, winning three elections under the Liberal banner before securing the 2023 poll as an independent.