Why 1 key Musk rival won't challenge him in Silicon Valley
The tech industry was once optimistic that Musk's appointment would give him the president's ear to defend long-held causes like expanding high-skilled immigration. Instead, his scorched-earth departure appears to have poisoned the well, turning those policy preferences into purity tests for some allies of President Donald Trump.
'If you're a tech bro, if you're a venture capitalist and you're a globalist, and you want open borders, and you want H-1Bs, and you want EV tax credits, and you want an EV mandate, we don't want your money,' said James Fishback, a pro-Trump investor whose FSD, or 'Full Support for Donald,' super PAC plans to protect MAGA candidates against Musk, in an interview with POLITICO.
'If you're not a real Republican, we don't want you.'
It's a notable rejection of the kind of tech personalities who helped buoy Trump's successful 2024 campaign and have stayed close to the president since taking office, from his inauguration to business trips abroad.
What's less clear is if anyone, that donor class included, takes Musk seriously outside of a few staunch Never Trumpers and businesspeople who flirted with the idea of a third-party run themselves last cycle.
POLITICO asked several of the major corporate donors who previously backed Musk's America PAC during the 2024 cycle — including the Winklevoss brothers, Palantir co-founder Joe Lonsdale, Sequoia Capital's Shaun Maguire, coal executive Joe Craft, and Founders Fund and PayPal co-founder Ken Howery — if they would consider supporting his third party. None responded.
Trump himself called Musk's new political party 'ridiculous' and predicted it would falter.
The president's favorite foil these days, California Gov. Gavin Newsom, was similarly dismissive on Wednesday.
'I've seen these efforts in the past fizzle out,' he told POLITICO in an interview during a swing through rural South Carolina. 'I just don't know how committed he is to it, and so it doesn't concern me.'
But Fishback, formerly an outside adviser to DOGE, has given more thought than most to the possibility that the America Party could pose a real political threat. FSD — a riff on Tesla's 'full self-driving' technology — launched last week as Musk revived his threats to primary Republican supporters of Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' and plans to pour money into any race where the billionaire funds a third-party run or targets a Trump-backed incumbent in the 2026 midterms.
His comments highlight an ongoing tension: Musk's break with Trump is fueling backlash within the MAGA movement against other tech world figures even as many continue to profess loyalty to the president, who hasn't cast them aside either.
'If you just conveniently backed Trump in the last 45 days before the election because you wanted to get a political favor and wanted to attend a Starlight dinner, this is not the movement for you,' said Fishback. 'It is a movement of people who are sick and tired of the people who joined the Republican Party five months ago because they wanted to use Donald Trump, people have been lifelong supporters of the America First movement, saying, 'kick out the tech bros.''
If the Trump factor alone keeps donor dollars from returning to Musk, his greatest advantage remains his own deep pockets. Most of the funding for America PAC came from the man himself.
'He's got one thing that others haven't had, and that's a sustainable funding stream,' Newsom said Wednesday, though not without a note of skepticism. 'Presumably sustainable, though knowing Elon, who knows? He could get overleveraged here, and he could be in a real place of hurt.'
Fishback acknowledged the America Party will no doubt outspend him, but argued that the Musk strategy of laser-focusing on just enough congressional districts to swing the vote on contentious bills is all about narrow human margins.
'You only need to convince one in 10 voters of Elon Musk's delusions of grandeur, and if you do, we lose the House. We lose the Senate,' he said. 'Boots on the ground, knocking on doors, showing up at churches, synagogues, and making that conversation known, hosting town halls, that's where we can really have an asymmetric impact against what's going to be a money machine.'
At this early stage, a trail of X content acknowledged by Musk in comments, emojis and reposts is the closest approximation to the America Party platform.
Although its loosely defined brand of tech-forward, fiscally restrained, pro-energy deregulation centrism could, in theory, appeal to voters disillusioned with both parties, most view the plan as a GOP spoiler. After all, Musk's popularity among Republicans has taken a hit but soars above his favorability with Democrats, surveyed at 3 percent in a Quinnipiac University national poll last month.
'Simply because of what the America Party is ostensibly based on — which is deficit reduction and government efficiency — that is something that more deeply resonates with conservatives and with Republicans,' Fishback said. 'It is a revenge plot against the president.'
Cooper Teboe, a Democratic consultant in Silicon Valley, shared that impression and was 'deeply skeptical' the party will go anywhere.
'If tech leaders wanted a third party or thought something like this would work, they would have done it years ago,' he said. 'Elon seems more interested in hurting Trump than he is in actually winning anything. I wish him tremendous success in doing so.'
That perception isn't helped by Musk confirming on Tuesday that another party priority will be to expose more information about the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein after a Justice Department and FBI review found no evidence of a secret client list.
A version of this story first appeared in California Decoded, POLITICO's morning newsletter for Pros about how the Golden State is shaping tech policy within its borders and beyond. Like this content? POLITICO Pro subscribers receive it daily. Learn more at www.politicopro.com.
The barriers to mounting a third party in the U.S. are well-documented. Tech leaders less eccentric than Musk have struggled with the unique challenge of translating the industry's specialized concerns to resonate with the masses, and there is a long line of entrepreneurs whose dreams to disrupt the two-party system have been dashed.
They include Andrew Yang, who has been in touch with Musk about the effort, and Mark Cuban, who offered to connect him to the Center for Competitive Democracy, a nonpartisan group he has worked with to eliminate obstacles to participation in political processes.
Oliver Hall, the center's founder, told POLITICO he'd be open to helping the America Party get on ballots. As of Tuesday, there's been 'no contact yet with Elon's team, but I wouldn't be surprised if that happens,' he said.
If Musk proceeds, he's also setting up a serious clash with other commitments. Earlier this week, Fishback sent a letter to Tesla's chair urging the board to confront Musk and assess whether there is a conflict between his political ventures and his role as CEO.
Fishback's investment firm, Azoria, holds its largest position in Tesla and delayed the launch of an exchange-traded fund that he says would have invested over a billion dollars in the automaker due to concerns raised by the announcement.
A resolution he could live with is Musk appointing a political operative to run the America Party instead. He has not received a response but expects one by Friday.
Tesla and Musk did not respond to requests for comment. The Tesla CEO told Wall Street analyst Dan Ives to 'shut up' when he, too, said the board needed to rein in Musk and recommended it have oversight over his political endeavors.
'Starting a political party means traveling, media engagements, candidate training, candidate recruiting, logistics, organizing, etc,' said Fishback. 'It is a distraction. Jensen Huang is not running a political party. Sam Altman is not running a political party because they have better things to do.'
Tyler Katzenberger contributed to this report.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US, China to launch new talks on tariff truce extension, easing path for Trump-Xi meeting
By David Lawder STOCKHOLM (Reuters) -Top U.S. and Chinese economic officials will resume talks in Stockholm on Monday to try to tackle longstanding economic disputes at the centre of a trade war between the world's top two economies, aiming to extend a truce by three months and keeping sharply higher tariffs at bay. China is facing an August 12 deadline to reach a durable tariff agreement with President Donald Trump's administration, after Beijing and Washington reached preliminary deals in May and June to end weeks of escalating tit-for-tat tariffs and a cut-off of rare earth minerals. Without an agreement, global supply chains could face renewed turmoil from U.S. duties snapping back to triple-digit levels that would amount to a bilateral trade embargo. The Stockholm talks come hot on the heels of Trump's biggest trade deal yet with the European Union on Sunday for a 15% tariff on most EU goods exports to the U.S., including autos. The bloc will also buy $750 billion worth of American energy and make $600 billion worth of U.S. investments in coming years. No similar breakthrough is expected in the U.S.-China talks but trade analysts said that another 90-day extension of a tariff and export control truce struck in mid-May was likely. An extension of that length would prevent further escalation and facilitate planning for a potential meeting between Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping in late October or early November. A U.S. Treasury spokesperson declined comment on a South China Morning Post report quoting unnamed sources as saying the two sides would refrain from introducing new tariffs or other steps that could escalate the trade war for another 90 days. Trump's administration is poised to impose new sectoral tariffs that will impact China within weeks, including on semiconductors, pharmaceuticals, ship-to-shore cranes and other products. "We're very close to a deal with China. We really sort of made a deal with China, but we'll see how that goes," Trump told reporters on Sunday before European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen struck their tariff deal. DEEPER ISSUES Previous U.S.-China trade talks in Geneva and London in May and June focused on bringing U.S. and Chinese retaliatory tariffs down from triple-digit levels and restoring the flow of rare earth minerals halted by China and Nvidia's H20 AI chips and other goods halted by the United States. So far, the talks have not delved into broader economic issues. They include U.S. complaints that China's state-led, export-driven model is flooding world markets with cheap goods, and Beijing's complaints that U.S. national security export controls on tech goods seek to stunt Chinese growth. "Geneva and London were really just about trying to get the relationship back on track so that they could, at some point, actually negotiate about the issues which animate the disagreement between the countries in the first place," said Scott Kennedy, a China economics expert at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington. "I'd be surprised if there is an early harvest on some of these things but an extension of the ceasefire for another 90 days seems to be the most likely outcome," Kennedy said. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has already flagged a deadline extension and has said he wants China to rebalance its economy away from exports to more domestic consumption -- a decades-long goal for U.S. policymakers. Analysts say the U.S.-China negotiations are far more complex than those with other Asian countries and will require more time. China's grip on the global market for rare earth minerals and magnets, used in everything from military hardware to car windshield wiper motors, has proved to be an effective leverage point on U.S. industries. TRUMP-XI MEETING? In the background of the talks is speculation about a possible meeting between Trump and Xi in late October. Trump has said he will decide soon on a landmark trip to China, and a new flare-up of tariffs and export controls would likely derail planning. Sun Chenghao, a fellow at Tsinghua University's Center for International Security and Strategy in Beijing, said that a Trump-Xi summit would be an opportunity for the U.S. to lower the 20% tariffs on Chinese goods related to fentanyl. In exchange, he said the Chinese side could make good on its 2020 pledge to increase purchases of U.S. farm products and other goods. "The future prospect of the heads of state summit is very beneficial to the negotiations because everyone wants to reach an agreement or pave the way in advance," Sun said. Still, China will likely request a reduction of multi-layered U.S. tariffs totaling 55% on most goods and further easing of U.S. high-tech export controls, analysts said. Beijing has argued that such purchases would help reduce the U.S. trade deficit with China, which reached $295.5 billion in 2024.

Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Hong Kong's CK Hutchison seeks Chinese investor to join Panama Ports deal
HONG KONG (AP) — A Hong Kong conglomerate that's selling ports at the Panama Canal said Monday it may seek a Chinese investor to join a consortium of buyers, a move that could please Beijing but bring more U.S. scrutiny to the geopolitically fraught deal. CK Hutchison Holdings' initial plan to sell its port assets to a group that includes U.S. investment firm BlackRock Inc. pleased President Donald Trump, who has alleged that China interferes with the critical shipping lane's operations in Panama. However, they apparently angered Beijing and drew a review from Chinese anti-monopoly authorities. A Beijing-backed newspaper posted scathing commentaries about the deal, with one describing it as a betrayal of all Chinese. Beijing's offices overseeing Hong Kong affairs have reposted some of these commentaries, widely seen as an indication of Chinese leaders' stance. A Hutchison subsidiary has operated ports at both ends of the Panama Canal since 1997. After months of uncertainty brought by tensions between Washington and Beijing, Hutchison said in a statement that the exclusive negotiations period with the consortium has expired. However, it added 'the Group remains in discussions with members of the consortium with a view to inviting major strategic investor from the PRC to join as a significant member of the consortium,' referring to the People's Republic of China. It said they needed to change the membership of the consortium and the structure of the transaction for the deal to be able to pass reviews by 'all relevant authorities." The awkward position Hutchison found itself in for months highlights the challenges Hong Kong business elites face in navigating Beijing's expectations of national loyalty, especially when relations between China and the United States are strained. Hong Kong has overhauled its electoral system to ensure the city is run by 'patriots.' CK Hutchison is owned by the family of Hong Kong's richest man, Li Ka-shing. It announced March 4 that it would sell all its shares in Hutchison Port Holdings and in Hutchison Port Group Holdings to the consortium that also includes BlackRock subsidiary Global Infrastructure Partners and Terminal Investment Limited, a subsidiary of the Mediterranean Shipping Company. In May, Hutchinson co-managing director, Dominic Lai told shareholders that Terminal Investment was the main investor. Its parent company is led by Italian shipping scion Diego Aponte, whose family reportedly has a longstanding relationship with Li's. The initial deal, valued at nearly $23 billion including $5 billion in debt, would have given the consortium control over 43 ports in 23 countries, including the ports of Balboa and Cristobal, located at either end of the canal. That agreement also required approval from Panama's government. The deadline for their exclusive negotiation period ended on July 27. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data


San Francisco Chronicle
27 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Hong Kong's CK Hutchison seeks Chinese investor to join Panama Ports deal
HONG KONG (AP) — A Hong Kong conglomerate that's selling ports at the Panama Canal said Monday it may seek a Chinese investor to join a consortium of buyers, a move that could please Beijing but bring more U.S. scrutiny to the geopolitically fraught deal. CK Hutchison Holdings' initial plan to sell port assets in dozens of countries to a group that includes U.S. investment firm BlackRock Inc. pleased President Donald Trump, who has alleged that China interferes with the critical shipping lane's operations in Panama. However, they apparently angered Beijing and drew a review from Chinese anti-monopoly authorities. A Hutchison subsidiary has operated ports at both ends of the Panama Canal since 1997. After months of uncertainty brought by tensions between Washington and Beijing, Hutchison said in a statement that the exclusive negotiations period with the consortium has expired. However, it added 'the Group remains in discussions with members of the consortium with a view to inviting major strategic investor from the PRC to join as a significant member of the consortium,' referring to the People's Republic of China. It said they needed to change the membership of the consortium and the structure of the transaction for the deal to be able to pass reviews by 'all relevant authorities." The awkward position Hutchison found itself in for months highlights the challenges Hong Kong business elites face in navigating Beijing's expectations of national loyalty, especially when relations between China and the United States are strained. Hong Kong has overhauled its electoral system to ensure the city is run by 'patriots.' CK Hutchison is owned by the family of Hong Kong's richest man, Li Ka-shing. It announced March 4 that it would sell all its shares in Hutchison Port Holdings and in Hutchison Port Group Holdings to the consortium that also includes BlackRock subsidiary Global Infrastructure Partners and Terminal Investment Limited, a subsidiary of the Mediterranean Shipping Company. In May, Hutchinson co-managing director, Dominic Lai told shareholders that Terminal Investment was the main investor. Its parent company is led by Italian shipping scion Diego Aponte, whose family reportedly has a longstanding relationship with Li's. The initial deal, valued at nearly $23 billion including $5 billion in debt, would have given the consortium control over 43 ports in 23 countries, including the ports of Balboa and Cristobal, located at either end of the canal. That agreement also required approval from Panama's government.