South Africa's budget 3. 0 predictions: tough choices lie ahead
Image: GCIS
As South Africa braces for the upcoming budget 3.0, industry experts are closely examining the fiscal landscape, drawing attention to the critical decisions poised to impact the nation's economic future. Frank Blackmore, Lead Economist at KPMG South Africa, has highlighted a key takeaway: the anticipated increase in Value Added Tax (VAT) will no longer materialise, forcing the government to recalibrate its revenue expectations.
Previously outlined in budget 2.0, the revenue anticipated from a VAT hike has now vanished. This development poses significant implications for the government's fiscal targets, particularly its commitment to achieving fiscal consolidation. Without the ability to increase public debt through borrowing to meet expenditure needs, the government finds itself cornered, necessitating cuts across various sectors.
The pressing question, as noted by Blackmore, is: 'Where will these expenditure cuts occur?'
With growth remaining a paramount objective for the budget—central to enhancing employment rates and boosting GDP—the government must tread cautiously. The infrastructure spending, fundamental to fostering long-term economic growth, cannot be sacrificed. Likewise, with a strong focus on the social wage, cuts to public services and grants are also off the table. This leaves limited avenues for budget slashing, underlining the complexity of the government's predicament.
'As we look forward, there are numerous opinions regarding potential cuts,' Blackmore stated. 'We anticipate scrutiny around the size and costs of the state, provoking essential debates on where reductions should take place.'
In the interim, the potential for policy adjustments remains in play. The proposals unveiled in budget 2.0 aimed at mitigating the impact of the now-derailed VAT hike, especially for lower-income households, are still on the table. This included considerations for tax adjustments on fuel, increases in zero-rated items, and only partial adjustments to personal income tax brackets.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
However, without the VAT increase, it's uncertain whether these provisions will proceed as planned. Blackmore predicts a rise in fuel prices and potential reductions in zero-rated items, as well as little to no change in tax brackets. This scenario presents a subtle yet impactful pathway for the government to bolster personal income tax revenues, thereby compensating for revenue shortfalls stemming from expenditure cuts.
As the nation awaits the unveiling of budget 3.0, the discussions surrounding these predictions highlight the intricate balance of maintaining economic growth while adhering to fiscal discipline. With various stakeholders eagerly watching, the pressure mounts on the government to deliver a budget that meets both its financial commitments and its societal responsibilities.
Frank Blackmore, Lead Economist at KPMG.
Image: Supplied.
BUSINESS REPORT
Visit: www.businessreport.co.za
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
4 hours ago
- IOL News
How to handle a SARS letter of demand before it's too late
South Africans who receive a SARS Letter of Demand are being urged to act fast Image: GCIS South Africans who receive a SARS Letter of Demand are being urged to act, as ignoring it could lead to frozen bank accounts, garnished salaries, or even court judgments. A letter of demand is a formal legal notice issued when SARS believes you owe outstanding tax. This could be due to incorrect IRP5s, unreported income, penalties, or reversed refunds following an audit. Tax experts warn that many individuals only become aware of these legal notices once enforcement has already begun, often because the letters are uploaded quietly to eFiling and easily missed. They urge taxpayers to ensure their contact information is updated to receive timely notifications. 'Unfortunately, many taxpayers only realise they've received this when their bank account is already frozen or their salary garnished. At that stage, it's very serious, but you can still solve the problem by acting immediately," Razael Manikus, COO at Latita Africa, said. According to Manikus, even in these critical moments, taxpayers still have options. "Log into your SARS eFiling profile to check the date when the letter of demand was issued (under 'Correspondence'). That's the start of your 10-business-day response window". Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading He advises taxpayers to 'review your statement of account to identify the source of your debt and the tax period involved. If the amount is correct and you're able to pay, do this immediately. Use the payment reference number on the letter to pay SARS.' However, Manikus also warned taxpayers against ignoring the revenue service's letter, saying that "SARS can, without further warning, deduct money from your income via garnishee orders to your employer or clients". "The Revenue Service can also attach your bank funds, withhold tax clearances and refunds, and get a court judgment that will blemish your credit record. In cases of repeat non-compliance, SARS can even refer you to the National Prosecuting Authority" If immediate payment isn't possible, Manikus says taxpayers can apply for a suspension of payment through eFiling. This pauses SARS's ability to collect while the matter is being resolved. "If you accept your debt but can't pay in full, SARS may agree to a deferred payment plan with instalments. Or you could negotiate a compromise of tax debt, where SARS reduces your debt if the full payment would cause you financial hardship. "You believe the assessment is wrong, lodge a formal notice of objection on eFiling. You have 30 business days from the original assessment. Clearly explain the reason for your objection, and attach supporting documentation (such as invoices, proof of payments, or bank statements)". IOL Business Get your news on the go, click here to join the IOL News WhatsApp channel
IOL News
7 hours ago
- IOL News
Mantashe promises to tackle fuel tampering after R3. 6 billion loss
Minister of Mineral and Petroleum Resources, Gwede Mantashe, has revealed that plans are in place to continuously root out petrol stations selling adulterated fuel across Image: GCIS Minister of Mineral and Petroleum Resources, Gwede Mantashe, has revealed that plans are in place to continuously root out petrol stations selling adulterated fuel across the country. The country has been struggling with widespread fuel adulteration and illegal smuggling for several years, costing the country around R 3.6 billion annually. According to the South African Revenue Service (SARS), criminals are mixing diesel with cheaper substances like paraffin and under-declaring fuel imports to evade taxes. In response, government agencies, including SARS and the police, have stepped up joint operations in recent years, shutting down illegal depots and seizing millions of litres of contaminated diesel. However, the problem still persists. 'The criminal syndicates engaged in these brazen acts have become emboldened to act callously with no restraint in pursuit of their rapacious and criminal gains," SARS Commissioner Edward Kieswetter said earlier this year. In a recent parliamentary reply, Mantashe revealed that the Department has established a fuel sampling and testing programme. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ "The Department of Mineral and Petroleum Resources (DMPR) has established a fuel sampling and testing programme, mandated by the Regulations Regarding Petroleum Products Specifications and Standards," Mantashe said. The minister added that the department also conducts both random and scheduled fuel sampling and testing to verify compliance. "As part of this programme, the department conducts random and scheduled fuel sampling and testing for compliance with the minimum specifications and standards at retail and wholesale depot outlets. This process is carried out routinely and operates independently of the petroleum industry's own fuel quality monitoring systems" Mantashe emphasised that the department's fuel testing and enforcement programmes will continue to protect consumers and ensure compliance throughout the fuel supply chain. "The Department, in collaboration with the South African Revenue Service (SARS), is responsible for ensuring that fuel distributed in the country complies with national fuel specifications and standards. Fuel distributed by licensed wholesalers and retailers, particularly illuminating paraffin, is marked with the Authentix A1 Marker 'A1 Marker'. "This chemical marker is used to trace the presence of Illuminating Paraffin (IP) in diesel. The A1 Marker is a multi-layered chemical security solution used to detect fuel tampering throughout the value chain, as required by the Customs and Excise Act" IOL Business Get your news on the go, click here to join the IOL News WhatsApp channel
IOL News
11 hours ago
- IOL News
US tariffs: Trump negotiated in bad faith
Minister Ronald Lamola says the SA government is still engaging with the US about the tariffs that are set to come into effect for the country later this month. Image: GCIS THE South African government has accused the Donald Trump administration of negotiating in bad faith in their engagements to strike a deal that will avert the impending 30 percent tariffs on local products. Trade and industry Minister Parks Tau and his international relations counterpart, Ronald Lamola said the US failed to honour an agreement to sign a confidentiality agreement that had been agreed upon. As a result, South Africa is now looking to expand its trade relations with Asia and the Middle East, whilst continuing to engage with Trump's administration over the hikes set for later this week. Minister Ronald Lamola says the SA government is still engaging with the US about the tariffs that are set to come into effect for the country later this month. Image: GCIS Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading 'We waited for the US to sign the confidentiality agreement after we had signed our agreement. We got to a point where there was an agreement to unlock the discussions. However, we did not get a signed confidentiality agreement from the US. We then went back almost on the eve of the tariffs and said we have been waiting for the confidentiality agreement, what do we do now, as we have two days, and the feedback was that at this point, let us look at the template as a response,' he stated. Addressing the media, Lamola echoed Tau's sentiments, saying South Africa had done all it could to ensure that the negotiations with Trump's administration bear fruit, adding that despite all these efforts, Trump decided to continue with the 30 percent retaliatory tariffs against some of the country's key export industries, which include motor and the agricultural sectors. "Since the beginning of the 7th Administration, South Africa has embarked on a process to stabilise and enhance mutually beneficial trade and investment relations with the US. The aim has been to address long-standing bilateral issues of concern for both sides in ways that move the trade relations forward... However, even with these efforts, the US decided to impose a 30 percent unilateral tariff on South Africa." Lamola said the government's efforts in resetting the relationship with the US have been undermined by some actors within South African society. "The unilateral tariffs have been implemented notwithstanding South Africa's submission of a comprehensive and ambitious Framework Deal in May 2025 aimed at addressing the US trade deficit, addressing tariffs, promoting digital trade, and eliminating non-tariff barriers to enhance mutually beneficial trade relations with the United States," he said. Reacting to the impending tariff hikes, economic expert Johann Els said the tariffs on SA exports will result in a loss of volume because of the higher pricing. 'There will be some employment losses. But it is also important to see the bigger picture as the tariffs will impact less than 5% of the country's total exports, as some industries are not affected, and they will not collapse to zero overnight." On Monday, via his weekly newsletter, President Cyril Ramaphosa stated that the decision by the United States to impose a 30% tariff on South African imports highlights the urgency with which the country has to adapt to increasingly turbulent headwinds in international trade. "The US is South Africa's second largest trading partner by country and these measures will have a considerable impact on industries that rely heavily on exports to that country and on the workers they employ, as well as on our fiscus. Domestic sectors such as agriculture, automotive, and textiles have historically benefited from duty-free access to the US market under the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA). Our trade relations have historically been complementary. South African exports do not compete with US producers and do not pose a threat to US industry," Ramaphosa said. Ryan Smith, DA spokesperson on international relations and cooperation said the country would not be in this position had Lamola pursued economic diplomacy in any meaningful and non-aligned manner. 'The interventions announced by Ministers Parks Tau and Ronald Lamola demonstrate that neither will take accountability for the 30% tariff imposed on South African exports to the United States of America in the absence of a solid trade deal. "Whereas our Southern African Development Community (SADC) neighbours have managed to negotiate their tariffs down to 15%, Ministers Tau and Lamola have left South African businesses and exporters vulnerable and exposed to the ongoing trade war. This diplomatic negligence and trade paralysis on South Africa's part demands an urgent shift in attitude and approach on both accounts.' Cape Times
