logo
FBI moving headquarters, top Trump official confirms

FBI moving headquarters, top Trump official confirms

Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Director Kash Patel confirmed on Tuesday that the agency will be closing its headquarters at the J. Edgar Hoover Building and opening a new headquarters at the Ronald Reagan Building and International Trade Center in Washington, D.C.
In a memo obtained by Fox News, Patel told FBI employees, 'Team, the FBI Headquarters will be moving down the street to the Ronald Reagan Building, and the Hoover building will be shut down.'
In Tuesday's memo, Patel explained that the FBI is the 'world's premier law enforcement agency' and claimed that the agency's new headquarters 'will reflect that fact.'
'After nearly 20 years of constant churn surrounding the matter, we've finally gotten it done,' Patel stated. The FBI director added that moving the agency's headquarters to the Ronald Reagan Building 'will be the most cost-effective way to best serve the American people while most efficiently using the resources available to us.'
Fox News reported that the FBI and the General Services Administration have considered options for a new agency headquarters for over 10 years.
In a post on X, formerly Twitter, General Services Administration Public Buildings Service Commissioner Michael Peters said, 'This move not only provides a world-class location for the FBI's public servants, but it also saves Americans billions of dollars on new construction and avoids more than $300 million in deferred maintenance costs at the J. Edgar Hoover facility.'
READ MORE: Video: FBI increases monitoring of Iran-backed operatives in US: Report
In the memo obtained by Fox News, Patel emphasized that while he is working 'closely with Congress and GSA' to move the agency's headquarters 'quickly,' there are 'a lot of moving pieces' involved in the transition.
'We need to ensure our security and technology requirements are in place before HQ employees can begin making the move, in phases,' Patel stated. 'Thanks in advance for your patience, and for staying the course.'
The FBI director also asked the agency's employees to join him in 'celebrating this historic milestone for the FBI.'
According to Fox News, a source with knowledge of the FBI's decision to relocate to the Ronald Reagan Building told the outlet, 'The Hoover building is a dump and not just unsafe for the FBI workforce, but unsafe for the country's national security.'
In a statement to Fox News, President Donald Trump described the Ronald Reagan Building as 'a wonderful building,' adding that the FBI is 'a wonderful group of people.'
'The FBI will finally have the kind of building they deserve,' Trump said. 'Congratulations to Kash Patel, Dan Bongino and all the great people at the FBI.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's tax plan won't help Tesla, but 2 other EV companies got a stock boost
Trump's tax plan won't help Tesla, but 2 other EV companies got a stock boost

Business Insider

timean hour ago

  • Business Insider

Trump's tax plan won't help Tesla, but 2 other EV companies got a stock boost

President Donald Trump's tax bill led to a big stock boost for two Tesla rivals. American electric vehicle makers Rivian and Lucid rose as much as 4.6% and 8.8%, respectively, on Thursday. The gains came after an analyst note from BNP Paribas said that the two companies stand to benefit from Trump's tax bill ending EV tax credits. On Thursday, the House passed the final version of the bill, which would extend the president's 2017 tax cuts and make key changes to the tax system. The bill would also end the $7,500 EV tax credit awarded to buyers on September 30. The tax credit removal is expected to lower demand for EVs, and bigger automakers could be hit harder. Per the new bill, cars made by companies that sold more than 200,000 accepted EVs between December 31, 2009, and December 31, 2025, do not qualify for the tax credit. Tesla delivered more than 336,000 vehicles in the first quarter of 2025 alone. Rivian delivered 8,000 vehicles in the same quarter, while Lucid delivered 3,109 vehicles. Like Tesla, Rivian has been struggling with cars don't qualify for the tax credit, but the company has relied on a leasing loophole for customers to use it. Rivian does not qualify because a requirement mandates that a significant portion of the car battery's materials should be sourced from the US or its trade partners. Lucid vehicles qualify for the $7,500 federal EV tax credit. Tesla and Lucid are down 22% and 28.5% so far this year. Rivian's stock is down 2% in the same time period. Big hit to Tesla The loss of the EV tax credit could be a big hit to Tesla, analysts say. Last month, Seth Goldstein, an equity strategist at Morningstar, told Business Insider that the expedited elimination of the EV tax credit would be "the biggest area that could impact Tesla." "Consumers have increased long-range EV choices at similar price points as Tesla," Goldstein said. "It's on Tesla to make the case for consumers to even slightly pay up today versus some other EVs." Goldstein added that tax credit elimination could decrease sales volume, which the automaker has been struggling with. JPMorgan analyst Ryan Brinkman wrote in a note last month that Trump's bill, combined with other proposed legislation, including ending the California Air Resources Board Program, threatened more than half of Tesla's 2025 profits. Brinkman said that the $7,500 consumer tax made up 19% of Tesla's 2024 earnings before interest and tax.

A year before declaring independence, colonists offered 'Olive Branch' petition to King George III
A year before declaring independence, colonists offered 'Olive Branch' petition to King George III

San Francisco Chronicle​

timean hour ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

A year before declaring independence, colonists offered 'Olive Branch' petition to King George III

NEW YORK (AP) — Alarmed by the policies of President Donald Trump, millions turned out last month for protests around the United States and overseas. Mindful of next year's 250th anniversary of American independence, organizers called the movement 'No Kings.' Had the same kind of rallies been called for in the summer of 1775, the response likely would have been more cautious. 'It ('No Kings') was probably a minority opinion in July 1775,' says H.W. Brands, a prize-winning scholar and chair of the history department at the University of Texas at Austin. 'There was a lot of passion for revolution in New England, but that was different from the rest of the country,' says Pulitzer Prize-winning historian Joseph Ellis. 'There were still people who don't want to drawn into what they feared was an unnecessary war.' This month marks the 250th anniversary — the semiquincentennial — of a document enacted almost exactly a year before the Declaration of Independence: 'The Olive Branch Petition,' ratified July 5, 1775 by the Continental Congress. Its primary author was John Dickinson, a Pennsylvanian whose writing skills led some to call him the 'Penman of the Revolution,' and would stand as a final, desperate plea to reconcile with Britain. They put forth a pre-revolutionary argument The notion of 'No Kings' is a foundation of democracy. But over the first half of 1775 Dickinson and others still hoped that King George III could be reasoned with and would undo the tax hikes and other alleged abuses they blamed on the British Parliament and other officials. Ellis calls it the 'Awkward Interval,' when Americans had fought the British in Lexington and Concord and around Bunker Hill, while holding off from a full separation. 'Public opinion is changing during this time, but it still would have been premature to issue a declaration of independence,' says Ellis, whose books include 'Founding Brothers,' 'The Cause' and the upcoming 'The Great Contradiction." The Continental Congress projected unity in its official statements. But privately, like the colonies overall, members differed. Jack Rakove, a professor of history at Stanford University and author of the Pulitzer Prize-winning 'Original Meanings,' noted that delegates to Congress ranged from 'radicals' such as Samuel Adams who were avid for independence to such 'moderates' as Dickinson and New York's John Jay. The Olive Branch resolution balanced references to 'the delusive pretences, fruitless terrors, and unavailing severities' administered by British officials with dutiful tributes to shared ties and to the king's 'royal magnanimity and benevolence.' '(N)otwithstanding the sufferings of your loyal Colonists during the course of this present controversy, our Breasts retain too tender a regard for the Kingdom from which we derive our Origin to request such a Reconciliation as might in any manner be inconsistent with her Dignity or her welfare,' the sometimes obsequious petition reads in part. The American Revolution didn't arise at a single moment but through years of anguished steps away from the 'mother' country — a kind of weaning that at times suggested a coming of age, a young person's final departure from home. In letters and diaries written in the months before July 1775, American leaders often referred to themselves as children, the British as parents and the conflict a family argument. Edmund Pendleton, a Virginia delegate to the Continental Congress, urged 'a reconciliation with Our mother Country.' Jay, who would later help negotiate the treaty formally ending the Revolutionary War, proposed informing King George that 'your majesty's American subjects' are 'bound to your majesty by the strongest ties of allegiance and affection and attached to their parent country by every bond that can unite societies.' In the Olive Branch paper, Dickinson would offer tribute to 'the union between our Mother country and these colonies.' An early example of 'peace through strength' The Congress, which had been formed the year before, relied in the first half of 1775 on a dual strategy that now might be called 'peace through strength,' a blend of resolve and compromise. John Adams defined it as 'to hold the sword in one hand, the olive branch in the other.' Dickinson's petition was a gesture of peace. A companion document, 'The Declaration of the Causes and Necessity of Taking Up Arms," was a statement of resolve. The 1775 declaration was drafted by Thomas Jefferson, who a year later would be the principal writer of the Declaration of Independence, revised by Dickinson and approved by the Congress on July 6. The language anticipated the Declaration of Independence with its condemnation of the British for 'their intemperate Rage for unlimited Domination' and its vows to 'make known the Justice of our Cause.' But while the Declaration of Independence ends with the 13 colonies 'absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown,' the authors in 1775 assured a nervous public 'that we mean not to dissolve that Union which has so long and so happily subsisted between us, and which we sincerely wish to see restored.' 'Necessity has not yet driven us into that desperate Measure, or induced us to excite any other Nation to war against them,' they wrote. John Adams and Benjamin Franklin were among the peers of Dickinson who thought him naive about the British, and were unfazed when the king refused even to look at the Olive Branch petition and ruled that the colonies were in a state of rebellion. Around the same time Dickinson was working on his draft, the Continental Congress readied for further conflict. It appointed a commander of the newly-formed Continental Army, a renowned Virginian whom Adams praised as 'modest and virtuous ... amiable, generous and brave." His name: George Washington. His ascension, Adams wrote, "will have a great effect, in cementing and securing the Union of these Colonies.'

Old Gaza blast picture falsely linked to Iran-Israel war
Old Gaza blast picture falsely linked to Iran-Israel war

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Old Gaza blast picture falsely linked to Iran-Israel war

"Israel's situation," reads Hindi-language text overlaid to a picture of a giant blast, shared June 24, 2025 on Facebook. Its caption includes a hashtag that says, "iran attack on israel". The most intense confrontation between the Middle East adversaries erupted on June 13, when Israel launched a bombing campaign in Iran that killed top military commanders and scientists linked to its nuclear programme (archived link). Tehran responded with ballistic missile attacks on Israeli cities. The United States subsequently joined its ally Israel's military campaign against Iran, bombing three key facilities used for Tehran's atomic program. A ceasefire announced on June 24 ended the war. Similar posts on Facebook and X also shared the picture but a reverse image search on Google traced it to EPA Images (archived link). "Smoke rises from Tuffah neighbourhood after Israeli air strikes in the east of Gaza City, 29 July 2014," reads the photo's caption. Keyword searches found similar pictures were also published by AFP and The Washington Post (archived link). At the time, Israel launched Operation Protective Edge, with the stated goal of stopping Palestinian rocket fire and destroying tunnels used by militants to infiltrate Israel. The seven-week conflict killed 2,251 Palestinians and 74 Israelis, including 68 soldiers. AFP has debunked more misinformation related to the Iran-Israel war here.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store