
Restaurant tipping dubbed 'out of control' as UK service charges quietly change
Name something more British than the awkward moment when one person wants to contest the service charge at dinner and the other just wants to pay the bill and skedaddle
The whole situation becomes ten times more uncomfortable when it happens on a first date…
This point of contention isn't going to get any easier any time soon, in fact, it might end up causing even more tension. That's because the UK's unwritten restaurant rules around service charges and tipping seem to be changing across the nation.
Service charges are being added to bills just about everywhere these days – from your local pub to the tiny cafe on the corner. And honestly, with the struggles the hospitality industry has been facing amid the cost of living crisis, it's not much of a surprise.
But what might come as a shock to some is that it's becoming the norm to see service charges of 15% these days on bills, instead of the 10 or 12.5% we'd all become accustomed to.
Experts have claimed that 15% is going to become the new industry standard when it comes to restaurant service charges, while some suggest we could see this moving more in-line with the 20 to 25% tipping rate that's standard across America in the future.
A number of popular restaurants have already started adding a 15% charge to bills so it's not difficult to see how this could quickly increase.
In London, European restaurant The Wolseley has a discretionary 15% service charge as well as a mandatory £2.50 cover charge.
Similarly, Fallow in St James's Market, a popular brunch spot, adds a 15% service charge to bills and a £1 charge to be donated to support the UN Women UK.
The story is also the same at Gordon Ramsay's Lucky Cat restaurants in Mayfair and Bishopsgate, plus Bob Bob Ricard and Bebe Bob in Soho.
Some believe the fees have been driven up by new government legislation that made it mandatory for all tips to be passed on to workers without any deductions.
Corin Camenisch, marketing and growth Lead at SumUp, tells Metro: 'The current economic climate presents challenges for consumers, hospitality workers and employers. Part of the reason for the rise in service charges is the Allocation of Tips Act, which dictated that all tips and service charges must be given to hospitality staff. The act aimed to to create a fairer playing field for those in the service industry, meaning employees get a fair slice of their well earned gratuity, while also giving consumers peace of mind that when they tip, their money is going to the right place.
'Cash tips are already protected by law, but the new legislation goes further to cover tips added to a card payment which are more and more becoming the norm. Many hospitality workers are on the national or living wage and rely on tips, so making sure they get their fair share of the pie is the right thing to do both for businesses and the wider economy.'
When it comes to the purpose of these charges, Kate Nicholls, chief executive of UK Hospitality, previously told Metro: 'Service charge policies are set and determined by individual businesses, so it is up to them to determine the level of charge.
'Service charges serve a variety of functions, but primarily reward staff and provide a boost to employees' earnings, ensuring that venues can continue to provide the highest standard of service possible.'
And while these charges might be a positive for hospitality employees, not all diners are happy about the changes.
Metro journalist Gergana Krasteva branded London's tipping culture 'out of control' after being charged a 12.5% service fee for just one glass of wine at a bar in High Street Kensington.
She said: 'I'm happy to tip if I sit down and have dinner at a restaurant, but not if the wine is poured in front of me at the actual bar and then I carry it to my table. Plus, they didn't give me an option. It was only after that I realised, which is the more annoying part. In general, I think tipping is out of control in London.'
And Tom Bourlet had strong feelings about the idea of 25% charges like in the US.
He told us: 'I've not seen any charge higher than 10% but it would be a shock to suddenly see 25% put on. Without wanting to sound harsh, I wouldn't exactly be happy, that's a huge amount to add. 10% being added to each drink in bars is bad.'
And it's clear from new research by SumUp, that people in the UK aren't keen to leave bigger tips.
Despite the number of businesses that have been applying suggested tips to digital payments increasing by 78% between 2022 and 2024, Brits haven't got on board with digital prompts to pay more. Instead, we've been sticking firmly at the familiar 10% rate.
The average tip given by customers over the last three years remained between 10.2% and 10.6% according to the data.
Corin comments: 'Unlike the US, where tipping is ingrained as the norm, British customers have historically been more reserved about tipping. Even as digital tipping simplifies the process, it seems this cultural reticence persists.
'To British punters' credit, they will go out and support venues and they'll tip the same 10% regardless of how bad the economy and inflation may hit them.'
Don't worry – if you're not happy with the idea of paying an extra 15% or 20% on top of your bill, we checked with an expert and, yes, you can ask for it to be removed without sounding like a dreadful person.
Etiquette coach John-Paul Stuthridge told Metro: 'The hospitality industry is often too turbulent at the best of times. It rarely has healthy cash flow or reserves other industries can depend on, not least the high turnover of staff and cost of recruitment. Throw in an extensive lockdown and a world cost of living crisis, restaurants have added service charges to help recoup their losses. Increasing the charge further helps them combat the crisis that is hard for some to say no to.
'You can much more easily not go to a restaurant that's upped its prices by 15%, but how many people will just accept a 15% service charge and politely say nothing? Many.' More Trending
He continues: 'Whether you should ask to remove it may depend on how charitable you feel, or if the service genuinely deserved it. It is your call.'
If you truly don't feel like the service is worthy of the charge on the bill, don't get mean about it, just be, as John-Paul recommends, 'direct and honest'.
'No reason needs to be given, however, if you are asked, then give your polite feedback in an honest, but short to-the-point manner,' he adds.
View More »
'The higher the figure for service charge, the less likely customers will oblige, but having it removed altogether, so guests can tip the individual server the amount they want to give remains a legitimate and more proper compromise.'
Do you have a story to share?
Get in touch by emailing MetroLifestyleTeam@Metro.co.uk.
MORE: Everything I ate in a weekend of pintxos hopping in San Sebastián
MORE: What's Cooking? I worked in cabin crew for 12 years — avoid these five foods on planes
MORE: Five people stabbed at late-night party in London are all arrested
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scottish Sun
5 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Energy giant with 5million customers in merger talks to create UK's 3rd BIGGEST gas & electricity supplier
The combined company could serve six million British households SAY WATT Energy giant with 5million customers in merger talks to create UK's 3rd BIGGEST gas & electricity supplier TWO major energy suppliers are in talks about a merger. If it goes ahead it would create the UK's third-largest gas and electricity retailer. Advertisement 3 Spanish-owned Scottish Power could be set to join Ovo Energy in a merger Credit: Alamy 3 The combined companies could serve six million British households Scottish Power, owned by Spain's Iberdrola, and Ovo Energy are in talks to create a merger. It would create a company serving more than six million households, Sky News reports. Talks are still in the early stages, and any formal agreement will take months if it goes ahead. With Ovo being the larger company, serving four million customers, they are likely to be the acquiring entity. Advertisement Iberdrola would potentially contribute cash and remain as a shareholder. If they do merge, it would create the third-largest supplier, behind Centrica-owned British Gas and Octopus Energy. Scottish Power currently serves around 2.4 million households. Alongside the potential merger, Ovo is aiming to raise £300 million from the sale of shares in the company. Advertisement Last year the company hired Rothschild to explore options around new investors or a sale. Rothschild has reportedly contacted financial investors in recent weeks. Stop Making This Air Conditioning Mistake: How to Slash Your Summer Energy Bill Ovo became one of the UK's leading suppliers in 2020 after it bought the retail supply arm of SSE. Since Justin King became Ovo's chair, the company has prioritised repairing its regulatory relationships. Advertisement Iberdrola bought Scottish Power in 2007 for over £11 billion.


Daily Mirror
5 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Chelsea could land huge transfer windfall from big-money Liverpool deal
Liverpool's summer spending spree is set to continue but their latest big-money move could also bring a tidy financial benefit for their fellow Premier League side Chelsea Liverpool's move for Marc Guehi could have a knock-on effect for Premier League rivals Chelsea. Mirror Football understands the Blues included a 20 percent sell-on clause when they allowed Guehi to join current club Crystal Palace, meaning an Anfield switch would net them a tidy sum. Guehi is expected to leave Palace this summer rather than leave for a free when his contract expires in 2026. A move to Anfield would see Premier League champions Liverpool continue a spending spree which has already gone past £200million. More than half of that sum can be attributed to the British record move for Florian Wirtz. Arne Slot's side have also added to their back line, with Milos Kerkez and Jeremie Frimpong on board, while Caoimhin Kelleher and Trent Alexander-Arnold are among those to have departed. Palace, who paid £18m for Guehi in 2021, value the centre-back at around £70m. Liverpool are unlikely to go that high, with a £40m sum suggested as a more likely middle-ground, and this would still see Chelsea net £8m. A move for Guehi could also allow Liverpool to approve an exit for Jarell Quansah. The academy graduate, who played 25 times in all competitions, has been linked with a move to Bayer Leverkusen. A windfall for Chelsea could allow them to make further additions to the squad this summer. They have already been busy, getting deals over the line in time for their Club World Cup campaign in the United States. Liam Delap, Dario Essugo and Mamadou Sarr all joined in time for the tournament, as did Mike Penders after a deal for the keeper was agreed last year. Enzo Maresca's side opted against a move for loanee Jadon Sancho, though, paying a penalty fee to send the winger back to Manchester United. Chelsea finished second in their Club World Cup group and are due to face Benfica in the round of 16. The Portuguese club topped their group after a win over Bayern Munich, and Maresca is keen not to underestimate them. "Now we're in a knockout game and in a knockout game anything can happen," he told reporters. "That is not just for us, it's for every club, and the players are aware that at this moment the team that makes the most mistakes will be the team that are back home the day after. "The most important thing is the way we prepare ourselves. It's very complicated at this moment, for many reasons, to see games where the difference between the two teams is big. They are more or less very close, and it's a game where the details are going to make the difference." Join our new WhatsApp community and receive your daily dose of Mirror Football content. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice.


Sky News
5 hours ago
- Sky News
Spanish-owned Scottish Power sparks merger talks with Ovo Energy
Why you can trust Sky News Scottish Power, the Spanish-owned energy supplier, and larger rival Ovo Energy have begun holding exploratory talks about a merger that would create a company serving more than 6 million British households. Sky News has learnt that executives from Iberdrola, which owns Scottish Power, and Ovo have been engaged in preliminary discussions in recent weeks about the possibility of a deal. The talks are at an early stage and any formal transaction would be months away, if it materialised at all. If the two companies do agree a merger of their residential gas and electricity operations, it would create the third-largest supplier behind Centrica-owned British Gas and Octopus Energy. As the larger company, with 4 million customers, Ovo would probably be the acquiring entity, but with Iberdrola potentially contributing cash and remaining as a shareholder in the enlarged group, according to one banking source. Scottish Power serves about 2.4 million households. The discussions between the two companies are running in parallel to a separate process through which Ovo is exploring the potential to raise roughly £300m from the sale of new shares in the company, according to industry sources. In recent weeks, a number of financial investors have been contacted by Rothschild, the investment bank advising Ovo, about the opportunity. Exactly a year ago, Sky News revealed that Ovo had hired Rothschild to explore options including bringing in a new investor or a sale, 15 years after it launched in a bid to challenge the industry's oligopoly. Founded by Stephen Fitzpatrick, the entrepreneur who now owns London's Kensington Roof Gardens, Ovo's shareholders include the private equity firm Mayfair Equity Partners, Morgan Stanley Investment Management and Mitsubishi Corporation, the Japanese conglomerate. Under Mr Fitzpatrick, who launched Ovo in 2009, the company positioned itself as a challenger brand offering superior service to the industry's established players. Ovo's transformational moment came in 2020, when it bought the retail supply arm of SSE, transforming it overnight into one of Britain's leading energy companies. Its growth has not been without difficulties, however, particularly in relation to its challenged relationship with Ofgem and a torrent of customer complaints about overcharging. Justin King, the former J Sainsbury chief who now chairs Ovo, has made repairing its regulatory relationships a priority for the company. He also oversaw the recruitment of David Buttress, who was briefly Boris Johnson's cost-of-living tsar after leaving the top job at Just Eat, as its chief executive. Key to Ovo's longer-term valuation will be the performance of its technology platform, Kaluza, which was set up to license software to other energy suppliers and provides customers with smart electric vehicle charging and heat pumps. Ovo announced last year that AGL Energy, one of Australia's biggest energy suppliers, had bought a 20% stake in Kaluza at a $500m (£395m) valuation. The British energy company has also entered the electric vehicle car charging sector under the brand Charge Anywhere, adding tens of thousands of public charging points across the UK. Iberdrola bought Scottish Power in 2007 in a deal valuing the company at more than £11bn. Next week, the UK's energy price cap will fall by 7% to £1,720 a year, following an announcement by Ofgem, the industry regulator. Ovo and Scottish Power both declined to comment. Please refresh the page for the latest version.