logo
Najib did not make reasonable effort to obtain 'royal addendum', apex court hears

Najib did not make reasonable effort to obtain 'royal addendum', apex court hears

The Stara day ago
PUTRAJAYA: Datuk Seri Najib Razak failed to exercise reasonable diligence to obtain the addendum he claims would allow him to be under house arrest when he filed for leave to initiate judicial review over the matter, the Federal Court heard.
Attorney General Tan Sri Mohd Dusuki Mokhtar submitted that Najib had every opportunity to obtain the addendum before the filing, but his action showed otherwise.
"The respondent failed to demonstrate any evidence of reasonable diligence having been exercised to obtain the fresh evidence during the proceedings at the High Court," he said here on Wednesday (July 2).
The AG was submitting at the hearing of an appeal he filed to set aside a 2-1 majority ruling by the Court of Appeal on Jan 6 that remitted Najib's case back to the High Court to be heard on its merits.
ALSO READ: Apex court rejects Najib's bid to block AG's appeal
Najib's application at the High Court was on his claim that the addendum exists and would allow him to serve the remainder of his prison sentence under house arrest.
Dusuki said Najib's son Mohd Nizar who was a member of the Pahang state executive council, could have obtained the addendum through reasonable diligence given his frequent attendance at meetings with His Royal Highness the Sultan of Pahang.
Despite this, the addendum was only obtained after the decision at the High Court.
"Non-compliance with this condition renders their application to adduce fresh evidence untenable," the AG said.
Meanwhile, Najib's lead counsel Tan Sri Muhammad Shafee Abdullah said that the Attorney General's Chambers was already aware of the addendum order as it was directly addressed to the then AG.
The hearing resumes before a three-judge panel chaired by Chief Judge of Malaya Justice Hasnah Mohammed Hashim on July 9.
The other judges on the bench are Federal Court judges Justices Zabariah Mohd Yusof and Hanipah Farikullah.
On April 28, the Federal Court granted leave to the AG to appeal over Najib's additional document.
ALSO READ: Najib allowed to attend hearing of AG's appeal over 'royal addendum'
On Jan 6, in a 2-1 majority decision, the Court of Appeal remitted the case on Najib's claim of the existence of an additional ­document purportedly allowing him to serve the remainder of his six-year prison sentence under house arrest to the High Court to be heard on its merits.
This decision overturned the High Court's earlier ruling, which had dismissed Najib's application for leave to commence a judicial review regarding the alleged additional document.
Najib is currently serving a six-year jail sentence in connection with the SRC International Sdn Bhd case, following the Federal Court's dismissal of his appeal and review application.
In February last year, the Pardons Board reduced his initial 12-year jail sentence and fine of RM210mil to six years and RM50mil.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ruling on civil servant's bribery appeal August 20
Ruling on civil servant's bribery appeal August 20

Borneo Post

time5 hours ago

  • Borneo Post

Ruling on civil servant's bribery appeal August 20

Photo for illustration purposes only. KOTA KINABALU (July 3): The High Court here has fixed August 20 to deliver its decision on an appeal by a civil servant who was convicted of using his position for personal gain. Justice Datuk Celestina Stuel Galid set the date to rule on the appeal filed by Herwan Malik, who is seeking to overturn his conviction and sentence handed down by the Sessions Court. Herwan was sentenced on August 29, 2023, to 12 months' imprisonment and fined RM10,000, in default three months' jail, for each of two charges involving abuse of power for bribes. The Sessions Court had ordered the 24-month total jail term to run concurrently. Following his conviction after a full trial, Herwan was granted a stay of execution pending the outcome of his appeal and is currently out on the original bail amount set for both charges. The 39-year-old was found guilty of abusing his position by certifying the selection of a wholesale company to carry out road maintenance works in Kota Marudu. The company was allegedly owned by his sister. The offences took place at the Kota Marudu District Office on February 28, 2013, and April 30, 2014. Thirteen prosecution witnesses were called during the trial, while Herwan, represented by counsel Shahlan Jufri, was the sole defence witness.

Military retirees seek Federal Court appeal on pension adjustments
Military retirees seek Federal Court appeal on pension adjustments

Free Malaysia Today

time5 hours ago

  • Free Malaysia Today

Military retirees seek Federal Court appeal on pension adjustments

A group of retired members of the armed forces had posed two questions for the Federal Court to determine. PETALING JAYA : A group of retired members of the armed forces (ATM) has applied for leave to appeal to the Federal Court against a Court of Appeal's decision which ruled that there was no discrimination or constitutional breach in the matter of pension adjustments. According to The Edge, the group's lawyer Haniff Khatri Abdulla confirmed filing the application today. The group posed two legal questions for the apex court to determine: Whether the Guidelines for Implementing Amendments to ATM Service Conditions dated Jan 17, 2013, and the Implementation Letter on Improvements to the Minimum-Maximum Salary Schedule prevented future pension adjustments for ATM members who retired prior to Jan 1, 2013. If the first question is answered in the affirmative, whether the respondents have breached Article 5, and/or Article 8, and/or Article 147 of the Federal Constitution. On June 4, a three-member panel, chaired by Justice Hashim Hamzah, had allowed the appeal by the government, armed forces council, and two other parties and reversed the High Court decision that ruled there was discrimination against armed forces veterans concerning pension adjustments. Also on the bench were Justices Wong Kian Kheong and Ismail Brahim. In the summary judgment, Wong said the government's actions were based on reasonable distinctions and did not violate Article 8(1) of the Federal Constitution, which guarantees equality before the law. He said the distinction between retirees before Jan 1, 2013, and those after that date was legally valid, as it stemmed from the implementation of the two key government documents. Wong also said the documents aimed to enhance and standardise the pay structure of serving members, not discriminate against retirees. The government, prime minister, defence minister, and armed forces council had appealed a High Court decision in favour of 50 ATM retirees who sued over the pension adjustments for those who retired before Jan 1, 2013. On Feb 5 last year, judicial commissioner Suzana Said ruled that ATM retirees who left service before Jan 1, 2013, were entitled to receive pension adjustments based on the rates and methods applied to those who retired after that date.

Man charged with murdering housemate
Man charged with murdering housemate

New Straits Times

time6 hours ago

  • New Straits Times

Man charged with murdering housemate

SHAH ALAM: A man was charged in the Magistrate's Court here with the murder of his housemate last month. Faisal Abdul Aziz, 41, nodded after the charge was read out to him before Magistrate Mohamad Redza Azhar Rezali. However, no plea was recorded as the case fell under the jurisdiction of the High Court. He is charged with murdering Muhammad Fakhrullah Pauzihal Ali, 33, at a house in Kampung Kubu Gajah, Sungai Buloh near here at 11.26pm on June 25. The charge, under Section 302 of the Penal Code, provides the death sentence or imprisonment for not less than 30 years or not more than 40 years and not less than 12 strokes of the cane, if convicted. The prosecution was conducted by deputy public prosecutor Alia Anisa Khairus Masnan while the accused was unrepresented. The court set Oct 10 for mention of the case for the submission of the chemist's report.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store