logo
From biryani to Bharat: How Zohran Mamdani is cooking up chaos, falsehood and division

From biryani to Bharat: How Zohran Mamdani is cooking up chaos, falsehood and division

First Post3 days ago
Zohran Mamdani's blood is Bharatiya, and he may relish a plate of biryani with his hands, but his mind seems consumed by disdain for Bharat and its civilisational identity read more
Zohran Mamdani, the Democratic nominee for New York City mayor, sparked controversy on social media after a video of him eating mutton biryani with his hands went viral. (Images: REUTERS/Mamdani's video screengrab)
Culture wars have found a bizarre new battleground — the humble plate of biryani. The trigger? Democratic nominee for New York City mayor, Zohran Mamdani, eating mutton biryani with his hands. Overnight, social media was ablaze with a debate on what was the correct way to eat the delicacy: with hands or via cutlery. A significantly large section of people residing in the west of the Atlantic, ironically home to the slogan 'Finger Lickin' Good', rose in fierce defence of cutlery, while many in the East, especially the metropolitans of Bharat — who for decades shamed hand-eating at prestigious venues — rediscovered pride in eating with fingers.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
This absurd battle reveals more than just culinary quirks. It exposes how identity can be weaponised, narratives twisted, and facts bent, all to feed divisive politics. And Zohran Mamdani stands right at this dangerous intersection, appropriating symbolic gestures to project a progressive persona while camouflaging his illiberal, divisive, and grievance-driven agenda.
Let's start with his rise. Mamdani, the son of a cerebral filmmaker mother and a socialist academic father, is celebrated in New York's political-socialite circles as a beacon of progressivism; he is hailed for championing the cause of the supposedly voiceless. Yet, scratch beneath this carefully constructed image, and a troubling pattern emerges: Exaggeration, fabrication and, worse, a dangerous tendency to manufacture convenient truth.
Last month, the 33-year-old Mamdani called Prime Minister Narendra Modi a 'war criminal' who orchestrated a 'mass slaughter of Muslims'. The result: 'There are no Muslims left in Gujarat,' he claims. This is indeed a sweeping, chilling assertion — except that they both are blatant, dangerous lies.
While Prime Minister Modi is a democratically elected leader of the world's largest democracy — not once but three times in a row — Gujarat remains home to over seven million Muslims, nearly 10 per cent of the state's population. Far from being wiped out, Gujarat's Muslims today run 22 per cent of the state's small and medium enterprises, despite forming just 9 per cent of the population. The Tendulkar Committee, set up by the previous Congress-led UPA government, found that only 7.7 per cent of Gujarat's rural Muslims lived below the poverty line — this is phenomenally better than the national average of 26.9 per cent. The Sachar Committee too acknowledged that Gujarat's welfare schemes extended robust support to Muslim communities.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Equally significant is what Mamdani doesn't say. Gujarat, once notorious for periodic communal riots (1969, 1985, 1987, 1992, to name a few), has not seen a single major communal violence in more than two decades. The Supreme Court, after exhaustive investigations, gave Narendra Modi a clean chit in the 2002 post-Godhra violence. But inconvenient truths find no place in Mamdani's narrative. His story needs villains, not nuanced facts. This also explains why he would repeatedly talk about Gujarat, but Godhra would be conspicuous by its absence in his statements.
Mamdani wears his opposition to 'Hindutva forces' like a badge of honour, constantly highlighting the plight of minorities (for him, and so many Left-'liberals', minority means Muslim) in Bharat. He is seen to be routinely criticising Bharat's democratic credentials, calling it on multiple occasions a state teetering toward fascism. Yet, he has nothing to say on the exodus of Kashmiri Pandits or the political violence faced by Hindus in West Bengal. The sorry state of minority affairs in Bharat's immediate neighbourhood—Pakistan and Bangladesh — rarely bothers him.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Even his association with Khalistani elements in the West doesn't bother him. He is more than happy to overlook their history of violence — from the Air India Kanishka bombing in 1985, which was the deadliest aviation terror attack before 9/11, to the bombings of Hindu temples across North America in recent years.
Why would a New York politician be so invested in demonising Bharat? The answer is as simple as it is cynical. By painting Bharat as a Hindu majoritarian dystopia and Modi as a villain, Mamdani secures instant celebrity status and applause from the global Left-'liberal' ecosystem. What would otherwise require years of grassroots work — conducting mass outreach programmes, building coalitions, and delivering local results — he achieves overnight by positioning himself as a moral crusader against the alleged fascism in a faraway land.
This is narrative politics at its most dangerous. It thrives on half-truths, selective empathy, and historical amnesia. Worse, it is designed to perpetuate victimhood. Mamdani's real genius lies not in policy, but in optics. Whether eating biryani with his hands or issuing sweeping pronouncements on another country's internal affairs, he has mastered the art of narrative over substance. It is a reel persona overtaking the real one — a carefully curated act designed to harvest outrage and votes.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Zohran Mamdani's blood may be Bharatiya, and he may relish a plate of biryani with his hands, but his mind seems consumed by disdain for Bharat and its civilisational/Sanatana identity — an idea far more inclusive and diverse than the bleak picture he paints. In the end, the real tragedy is not that a local politician in New York peddles convenient falsehoods and manufactured truths. It is that in doing so, he keeps real wounds from healing, real conversations from happening, and more importantly, real democracies from flowering.
Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Russia's Ex-Transport Minister Kills Self Hours After Putin Fired Him
Russia's Ex-Transport Minister Kills Self Hours After Putin Fired Him

NDTV

time7 minutes ago

  • NDTV

Russia's Ex-Transport Minister Kills Self Hours After Putin Fired Him

Moscow: Russia's former Transport Minister Roman Starovoit killed himself on Monday, hours after President Vladimir Putin fired him from the job. Starovoyt shot himself in a Moscow suburb after the dismissal was announced, Russian news agencies reported. The country's Investigative Committee said his body was found in his car. Putin's decree, published on Russia's legal information portal, gave no reason for the dismissal of Starovoit after barely a year on the job. He was appointed transport minister in May 2024 after spending almost five years as the governor of the Kursk region bordering Ukraine. Andrei Nikitin, a former governor of the Novgorod region, had been appointed acting transport minister, the Kremlin said. Asked about Starovoit's sudden departure and Nikitin's swift appointment, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said: "At present, in the president's opinion, Andrei Nikitin's professional qualities and experience will best contribute to ensuring that this agency, which the president described as extremely important, fulfils its tasks and functions." Two transport industry sources told Reuters that plans to replace Starovoit with Nikitin had been in the works since before last month's International Economic Forum in St Petersburg. Starovoit's dismissal followed a series of high-profile disruptions to Russia's aviation and shipping sectors. Days before his departure, nearly 300 flights were grounded at major Russian airports on July 5-6 due to security threats from Ukrainian drone attacks. Adding to the turmoil, an explosion occurred aboard a tanker at the Ust-Luga port in Leningrad Oblast. The blast caused an ammonia leak on July 6, prompting an emergency response. But, a transport industry source told Reuters that Starovoit's position had been in question for months, linked not to transport issues specifically but to the corruption scandals in Kursk. A few months after he left his role as governor of the Kursk Region, Ukrainian troops crossed the border into Kursk as Kyiv launched the biggest foreign incursion into Russian territory since World War Two. Ukrainian forces were pushed out of Kursk earlier this year. Some regional officials in Kursk were subsequently arrested on abuse of office charges. In April this year, Starovoit's successor as governor, Alexei Smirnov, was charged with embezzling money earmarked for defence purposes.

US-backed aid group proposed 'Humanitarian Transit Areas' for Palestinians in Gaza
US-backed aid group proposed 'Humanitarian Transit Areas' for Palestinians in Gaza

Hindustan Times

time14 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

US-backed aid group proposed 'Humanitarian Transit Areas' for Palestinians in Gaza

* US-backed aid group proposed 'Humanitarian Transit Areas' for Palestinians in Gaza US-backed aid group proposed building camps for displaced people in Gaza * The 'Humanitarian Transit Areas' would be located inside and outside of Gaza * Gaza Humanitarian Foundation says the plan is 'not under consideration' By Jonathan Landay and Aram Roston July 7 - A controversial U.S.-backed aid group proposed building camps called 'Humanitarian Transit Areas' inside - and possibly outside - Gaza to house the Palestinian population, according to a proposal reviewed by Reuters, outlining its vision of "replacing Hamas' control over the population in Gaza." The $2 billion plan, created sometime after February 11 for the U.S.-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, or GHF, was submitted to the Trump administration and recently discussed in the White House, according to a source familiar with the matter. The plan, reviewed by Reuters, describes the camps as "large-scale" and "voluntary" places where the Gazan population could 'temporarily reside, deradicalize, re-integrate and prepare to relocate if they wish to do so.' The Washington Post made a reference to GHF plans to build housing compounds for Palestinian non-combatants in May. A slide deck seen by Reuters goes into granular detail on the "Humanitarian Transit Zones," including how they would be implemented and what they would cost. It calls for using the sprawling facilities to "gain trust with the local population" and to facilitate U.S. President Donald Trump's "vision for Gaza." Reuters could not independently determine the status of the plan, who submitted it, or whether it is still under consideration. The aid group, responding to questions from Reuters, denied that it had submitted a proposal and said the slides "are not a GHF document." GHF said it had studied "a range of theoretical options to safely deliver aid in Gaza," but that it "is not planning for or implementing Humanitarian Transit Areas ." Rather, the organization said it is solely focused on food distribution in Gaza. A spokesperson for SRS, a for-profit contracting company that works with GHF, told Reuters "we have had no discussions with GHF about HTAs, and our 'next phase' is feeding more people. Any suggestion otherwise is entirely false and misrepresents the scope of our operations." The document included the GHF name on the cover and SRS on several slides. RELOCATION FEARS On February 4 Trump first publicly said that the U.S. should "take over" the war-battered enclave and rebuild it as "the Riviera of the Middle East" after resettling the population of 2.3 million Palestinians elsewhere. Trump's comments angered many Palestinians and humanitarian groups about the possible forced relocation from Gaza. Even if the GHF proposal is no longer under consideration, the idea of moving a large portion of the population into camps will only deepen such worries, several humanitarian experts told Reuters. The White House did not respond to a request for comment. The proposal was laid out in a slide presentation that a source said was submitted to the U.S. embassy in Jerusalem earlier this year. The U.S. State Department declined to comment. A senior administration official said, "nothing of the like is under consideration. Also, no resources are being directed to that end in any way." The source working on the project said that it had not moved forward due to a lack of funds. Reuters previously reported that GHF had attempted to set up a Swiss bank account from which to solicit donations, but UBS and Goldman Sachs declined to work with the organization. The Israeli Embassy in the U.S. did not respond to a request for comment. Ismail Al-Thawabta, director of the Hamas-run Gaza government media office, to told Reuters it "categorically" rejects the GHF, calling it "not a relief organization but rather an intelligence and security tool affiliated with the Israeli occupation, operating under a false humanitarian guise." 'LARGE-SCALE' CAMPS The undated slide presentation, which includes photos dated February 11, said that the GHF is "working to secure" over $2 billion for the project, to "build, secure and oversee large-scale Humanitarian Transit Areas inside and potentially outside Gaza strip for the population to reside while Gaza is demilitarized and rebuilt." The Humanitarian Transit Areas described in the slides would be the next phase in an operation that began with GHF opening food distribution sites in the enclave in late May, according to two sources involved in the project. GHF coordinates with the Israeli military and uses private U.S. security and logistics companies to get food aid into Gaza. It is favored by the Trump Administration and Israel to carry out humanitarian efforts in Gaza as opposed to the U.N.-led system which it says let militants divert aid. Hamas denies this and says Israel is using hunger as a weapon. In June U.S. State Department approved $30 million in funding for the GHF and called on other countries to also support the group. The United Nations has called GHF's operation "inherently unsafe" and a violation of humanitarian impartiality rules. The U.N. human rights office says it has recorded at least 613 killings at GHF aid points and near humanitarian convoys run by other relief groups including the U.N. One slide outlining a timeline said a camp would be operational within 90 days of the launch of the project and that it would house 2,160 people, along with a laundry, restrooms, showers and a school. A source working on the project said that the slide deck is part of a planning process that began last year and envisions a total of eight camps, each one capable of sheltering hundreds of thousands of Palestinians. The proposal did not specify how the Palestinians would be relocated into the camps, or where the camps could be built outside Gaza, but a map shows arrows pointing to Egypt and Cyprus as well as other points labeled "Additional Destination?" GHF would 'oversee and regulate all civil activities required for construction, deradicalization and temporary voluntary relocation,' the proposal said. Responding to questions from Reuters, three humanitarian experts expressed alarm over details of the plan to build camps. 'There is no such thing as voluntary displacement amongst a population that has been under constant bombardment for nearly two years and has been cut off from essential aid,' said Jeremy Konyndyk, president of the Refugees International advocacy group and a former senior U.S. Agency for International Development official who reviewed the plan. The source who worked on planning for the camps told Reuters that the intent "is to take the fear factor away," enabling Palestinians to "escape control of Hamas" and providing them "a safe area to house their families." The latest bloodshed in the decades-old Israeli-Palestinian conflict was triggered on October 7, 2023, when Hamas attacked southern Israel, killing around 1,200 people and taking 251 hostages, according to Israeli tallies. Gaza's health ministry says Israel's retaliatory military assault on the enclave has killed over 57,000 Palestinians, caused a hunger crisis, and displaced nearly Gaza's entire population internally. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.

"We Aren't In Habit Of Fleeing...": A Owaisi, Kiren Rijiju Spar Over Minorities
"We Aren't In Habit Of Fleeing...": A Owaisi, Kiren Rijiju Spar Over Minorities

NDTV

time17 minutes ago

  • NDTV

"We Aren't In Habit Of Fleeing...": A Owaisi, Kiren Rijiju Spar Over Minorities

New Delhi: On Monday Union Minority Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju and All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen chief Asaduddin Owaisi sparred on X (formerly Twitter) over the condition of minorities in India, after the former said such communities had more benefits and protection than the majority Hindus. To make his point, Rijiju declared that minority community members don't migrate to neighbouring nations - i.e., Indian Muslims do not leave for Pakistan or Bangladesh, though he didn't mention names - because the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party"provides additional benefits to minorities". "Prime Minister Narendra Modi ji 's welfare schemes are for all. The schemes of the Ministry of Minority Affairs provide additional benefits to the minorities," he told Owaisi on X. Owaisi hit back swiftly. The AIMIM boss said Indian Muslims chose to stay in India, not because of 'comforts' but because they are courageous enough to continue to fight for their rights. "We don't flee... we fight for our rights. Don't compare India to failed states." "According to the Minister Against Minorities, if we don't migrate it means we are happy. Actually, we are not in the habit of fleeing," Owaisi said, "... we did not run away from the British, we did not run away during Partition... our history is proof we neither collaborate with our oppressors nor hide from them." Rijiju made his original remark in an interview with the Indian Express and then posted an excerpt from that discussion on X; he said that in the past 11 years Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government had "championed the principle of ' sabka saath, sabka vikas...' Ok... How come Minorities from our neighbouring countries prefer to come to India & our Minorities don't migrate? Prime Minister @narendramodi ji's welfare schemes are for all. The schemes of the Ministry of Minority Affairs provide additional benefits to the Minorities. — Kiren Rijiju (@KirenRijiju) July 7, 2025 This, he claimed, had "ensured that minority communities are active and equal participants in India's growth story". And to underline his point Rijiju said, "...minority communities are receiving more funds and support from the government than the majority community... i.e., the Hindus." The minister's remarks were contested fiercely by Owaisi, who had offered the ruling BJP unstinted support after the Pahalgam terror attack and during the military conflict with Pakistan. The AIMIM chief pointed out that "India's minorities are not even second-class citizens anymore", and referred to the bulldozing of buildings owned by Muslims despite Supreme Court orders. "Is it a 'benefit' to be called Pakistani, Bangladeshi, jihadi, or Rohingya every single day? Is it 'protection' to be lynched? Is it protection that Indians were pushed into Bangladesh?" "Is it a privilege to watch our homes, masjids, and mazaars being bulldozed illegally? To be made socially, politically, and economically invisible? Is it an 'honour' to be the target of hate speeches from no less than the Prime Minister of India?" he asked. "Indian Muslims are the only group whose children are now worse off than their parents or grandparents. Intergenerational mobility has reversed. Muslim-concentrated areas are the ones most starved of public infrastructure and basic services," Owaisi thundered. He also grilled Rijiju over controversial changes to the Waqf law, including provisions that will see non-Muslim members on the central and state waqf boards. The government has insisted these and other changes to the waqf boards will only ensure fairness and transparency.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store