More soldiers, more money. Canada's top soldier extols benefits of spending boost
NATO leaders — including Canada — have approved a plan to dramatically increase defence spending across the Western alliance to five per cent of gross domestic product over the next decade.
Prime Minister Mark Carney said the move to five per cent of GDP — 3.5 per cent for core military spending and 1.5 per cent for defence-related infrastructure — will take place over the next 10 years.
In an interview with The Canadian Press Saturday, Chief of the Defence Staff Gen. Jennie Carignan said work is underway to figure out how to distribute the almost 20 per cent pay hikes promised by Defence Minister David McGuinty.
'It's an envelope that will be adapting to what we need. Some of it will be a pay increase, some of it will be for benefit allowances for specific trades or specific functions,' Carignan said.
'Yes there will be a raise this year. Yes that's the aim so we want everything to be ready for the fall and winter time.'
Carignan said the amount of the pay hike will depend on a soldier's rank and allowances will be allocated to specific trades where CAF needs more people.
'For example recruiting and training is a priority. We want to make sure we encourage instructors in our schools so they're going to be additional benefits as an example,' she said.
Chief Warrant Officer Bob McCann said the extra pay and benefits will be a morale booster for military personnel.
'We're in a great space right now where there's a lot of attention on defence. For the troops this is outstanding because this is why we joined. We want to serve. We want to be part of Canada's defence,' McCann said.
'We want to have equipment to train so everything that's coming is truly positive and we do have 107 trades that are highly competitive with the civilian industry so getting folks in, getting them trained, takes the pressure off the troops that are already there.'
Carignan said it's been a good year for recruiting with the CAF surpassing its objective by 2,000 for the first time in 10 years. She said fewer people are leaving the service as well. About 18 per cent of the new recruits are women.
'A very good retention rate and a lot more people coming in which means we are growing at CAF at the moment and very positive.'
Carignan said plans are in place to boost the number of military personnel.
'We are focusing on going back to our full complement of regular Canadian Armed Forces members and reserve force so it's 30,000 reserves we are aiming for and 71,500 regular forces,' she said.
'We have additional positions that are also approved and as time goes by and we are close to our ceiling we will add additional forces.'
Carignan said the extra funding will help keep Canada safe.
'Our geography does not protect us as well as it used to. We need to have more investment to actually exercise our own sovereignty here in Canada and of course this implies the Arctic,' she said.
Monday Mornings
The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week.
'It is getting more contested, more traffic, more people interested in this area so of course we have to invest more in the Arctic to make sure our sovereignty is respected.'
Carignan wants to see more radar bases and being able to scramble jets or ships if required.
'We have to have the sensors in place — once you have seen you have to have the ability to intercept or actually act,' she said.
'This is all building blocks that goes to our providing that defensive posture we need to have in the Arctic.'
This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 6, 2025.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Ottawa Citizen
an hour ago
- Ottawa Citizen
Today's letters: NIMBYism is hurting Lowertown and vulnerable people
Article content This is a classic Canadian government own-goal. The estimated repair costs would buy 4,000 new rifles of established provenance at $2,500 each. Doing the repairs may again turn out to be an attempt to save face by throwing good money after bad. Article content I believe that Mark Carney DOES have a choice and that is to say no to Donald Trump's demands to drop supply management. The terms of this clause in the USMCA do not impact the US as exports to Canada have never reached the level where the tariff kicks in. If Canada blinks at this one, you can be sure Trump will follow up with a never-ending list of demands that will eventually destroy Canada. Article content Trump cannot be trusted to keep his word, ever. Besides power and money, winning at whatever challenge comes his way is the only thing he cares about. I greatly fear that his end game is to make us the 51st state by any means necessary. I've been afraid of what he might do since he started campaigning in 2016; he has destroyed and corrupted, stoked hated and fear and spread lies far more than my worst-case-scenario mind could ever have imagined. Article content Article content It is certainly noteworthy to ponder the prime minister's winking behaviour and to speculate on its meaning. But, hey who would know except himself, and furthermore, how does it affect his leadership performance? Article content It could be understood in the context of his demonstrated desire and effort to communicate with people and to connect with those of us who appreciate being considered important enough to feel part of a community worth reaching. There is a familiarity to the use of winks and that is achieved by this presentation. Article content It may be an issue that troubles some skeptics but it challenges our trust to accept it at, pardon the pun, face value. Article content Celia M. Carter, Brockville Article content Summer travel season is upon us. The Canadian government has issued a warning: 'Exercise a high degree of caution' when travelling to these countries: Mexico, Cuba, Thailand, Qatar (watch out for the $400-million jet that might hit you en route to Mar-a-Lago), Panama, Peru, India, Germany, Costa Rica. Article content Article content And then this. USA: 'Take normal safety precautions.' OK, don't go to L.A.; might run into some problems there. Don't have any anti-Orange Head crap on your phone at the border. Also beware the high rate of firearm violence and mass shootings (even if tourists are not typically targeted). I think a 'high degree of caution' is advised for the U.S. too. Article content Does the Canadian government issue a summer travel warning for Canadians travelling inside Canada? 'Take normal safety precautions': seatbelts, bike helmets, sun screen. Article content The other day, I locked my keys in my car in the Kanata Staples parking lot. I eventually spotted a booth set up for windshield repairs and approached the young person manning it to ask if he had a piece of wire with which I might reach the keys through the partially open window. He didn't, but immediately offered to help and accompanied me back to my car. He found a stick in the nearby bushes and, after many tries, managed to open the car door.
Winnipeg Free Press
3 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Politicians overstating benefits of scrapping internal trade barriers: think tank
OTTAWA – A new report by the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives is dismissing moves by the federal government and Canada's premiers to break down internal trade barriers as little more than 'political theatre.' It lands just ahead of the country's internal trade ministers meeting in Quebec City this week, where they are expected to talk about their next steps as they rush to remove rules hampering cross-provincial trade. Prime Minister Mark Carney vowed throughout the spring election to forge 'one Canadian economy' with the premiers by eliminating internal barriers to trade and labour mobility in response to U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs. Internal Trade Minister Chrystia Freeland has pointed to studies that say internal trade barriers amount to a seven per cent tariff that Canada imposes on itself, and that removing them could boost the economy by up to $200 billion. But the left-leaning think tank's report released this morning reviews the steps taken by Ottawa and the provinces to remove red tape and argues they will do little to mitigate the tariff threat or significantly boost the economy. Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. The study authors say federal and provincial politicians have only been able to point to a handful of examples where getting rid of overlapping regulations could have an impact. This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 7, 2025.
Winnipeg Free Press
3 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Elbows up, even when you're holding a book
Opinion Taylor Swift recently made headlines when she purchased back her musical catalogue, after re-recording masters that shot to the top of the Billboard charts. Swifties collectively understand that ownership equals control, and that to be in a position of not having control over your work is somehow sad, and merits economic allyship. These headlines about the popstar coincided with anxieties about 'ownership' north of the border, too, as U.S. President Donald Trump began threatening annexation with his '51st state' comments. 'Canada is not for sale,' declared Prime Minister Mark Carney in a visit to the White House. Canadian book buyers who happily hem and haw over labels at the grocery store seem blissfully unaware of the elephant in the room— that 95 per cent of the Canadian book market is already controlled by foreign-owned multinational publishers. Russell Wangersky / Free Press Trying to keep from buying American products? Consider who is publishing the books you're reading. Mark Carney's Values was published by the Canadian branch of Penguin Random House (headquartered in New York City, themselves a holding of German-owned Bertelsmann), so was Wab Kinew's memoir, The Reason You Walk. I don't blame the authors. Multinational publishing houses offer them a megaphone that amplifies their work a thousandfold. For the biggest names, the most BookTok-worthy titles, and the lucky few who are published by the branch plants, their advances (money offered upon signing a contract, before a book is published) far exceed what Canadian independent publishers can offer. Books published by The Big Five (Penguin Random House, Harper Collins, Simon & Schuster, Hachette and Macmillan) are regular fixtures on awards and bestseller lists, so my quarrel isn't with the books themselves, or with their authors, or even with the people who work on those books in the glass towers of Toronto offices. It's with those Five's complete and utter dominance of the publishing industry. Roughly 115 independent English-language publishers operate in Canada. According to the BookNet report The State of Publishing in Canada 2023, Canadian companies published an average of 35 books in 2023, while multinationals published an average of 752 books — a few token Canadian-authored titles, and a veritable firehose of books authored elsewhere, distributed into Canada, and marketed with budgets that far exceed those of their Canadian-owned and operated 'competitors.' So why, when branch plants exist, are indies important at all? Indies push the envelope. As an industry, we have a collective track record of recognizing cultural and historic value before multinationals recognize the commercial potential of the same authors/topics. Debut authors are risky, while those with an existing platform represent a surer return on investment. University of Manitoba Press published John Milloy's A National Crime in 1999 — years before truth and reconciliation became part of the national discourse. Even working at a small university press, I've seen agents and editors browsing our digital review copies and buying from our website. I met a Big Five editor recently who came to our booth at a conference book fair, no doubt scoping out the university presses to see if any titles held trade-crossover appeal. I don't doubt the intentions of the editors and publishers working for the branch plants. They're doing good work. But at some point, the further up the chain you go, somebody's (likely New York-based) boss cares more about shareholders than readers. In the book business, which teeters on razor-thin margins, and in a country where the total population is roughly the size of a single U.S. state (California) — that's a dangerous problem. To be a branch is to be vulnerable. As any arborist will tell you, you don't make cuts from the trunk. To be sure, fears over foreign ownership are long-lived and perhaps easy to dismiss as nationalistic pearl clutching, but I question whether the C-suite has any sort of genuine concern for the cultural value of stories from Canada. Valuations are more central to their philosophies. The Big Five all have far-right imprints under their domain, suggesting that the corporate powers-that-be are equal opportunists when it comes to ideology. Just look at the websites of imprints Forum, Signal or Broadside Books: their author lists read like a veritable who's-who of American conservatism. If book buyers seek out a Canadian-authored book published by a branch plant — in the same spirit of 'sticking it to the man,' that one might select a Canadian alternative to Cheez-Its — I'm afraid they are putting their loonies far closer to the regime most of us are trying to resist than if they had indulged their cravings at the grocery store. I spent much of my 20s working in the Toronto office of an American-owned multinational education publisher. During my years of service, I watched that company shrink as subsequent restructurings designed to 'optimize' and 'introduce efficiency' shuttered first the warehouse, then the trade division, then accounting, then the Higher Ed Division's Canadian editorial department, and eventually closed the office leaving a handful of sales reps scattered across the country, whose job is now mostly to sell American textbooks to Canadian students. Talk to anyone at a multinational publisher — education or otherwise — you'd be hard pressed to find a branch plant that hasn't been restructured in the last decade. The once venerable bastion of Canadian literature, McClelland and Stewart — copyright holders of the works of Margaret Atwood, Leonard Cohen, Michael Ondaatje and Mordecai Richler (to name but a few) is now an imprint of Penguin Random House. They continue their rich tradition of publishing great Canadian writers, but they're doing so in much smaller numbers than they once did. Weekday Mornings A quick glance at the news for the upcoming day. Where once they published a list of more than 100 books per year and were leaders in publishing new Canadian voices, their fall catalogue boasts 17 currently announced Canadian-authored titles — nine of which are by Margaret Atwood. For the C-suite, valuations proceed values — and they always will. That imprint recently announced an exciting forthcoming title Elbows Up, ostensibly a collection of reflections about Canadian sovereignty from a collection of well-known Canadians (including Margaret Atwood — so make that 10/17). The irony of a multinational publisher issuing this work was lost on all who excitedly commented on the social media announcement, pledging their Canadian pride and promising to order a copy. Canadians do not own the bulk of their cultural output. Our stories are not our own. To be sure, the Big Five are unlikely to exit the Canadian marketplace any time soon. Their books (Canadian-authored and otherwise) will continue to dominate Indigo shelves, media coverage and bestseller lists. Indie publishers will continue to do the important work of lifting debut and midlist authors, and doing so in a marketplace that does them no favours. But if mention of the 51st state churns your stomach enough that you make choices at the grocery or liquor store, consider adding an independently published book to your summer reading list. Stephanie Paddey is the sales and marketing supervisor at University of Manitoba Press.
