Korean unification: A new nation rooted in the Korean Dream
However, the recent political turmoil around the impeachment of President Yoon has revealed deep-seated flaws in the nation's governance, economy and social fabric.
Similarly, North Korea continues to suffer under a totalitarian regime that stifles its people's potential and isolates the nation from global progress.
The dysfunction on both sides of the peninsula transcends mere political struggles, reflecting a fundamental crisis that threatens the long-term stability and prosperity of the Korean people.
The ultimate solution to these challenges lies in the peaceful unification of the Korean Peninsula, creating a new nation rooted in the vision of the Korean Dream, based on the Hongik Ingan ideal.
A new nation recognizing the source of human rights and freedom
A truly free and just society must acknowledge that the origin of human rights and freedom is God -- a transcendent being who grants dignity and liberty to all people. A unified Korea must be a nation that not only protects these rights, but also harmonizes the best of the East and the West.
By integrating Korea's rich cultural heritage of moral responsibility and collective harmony with Western traditions of individual freedom and democracy, this new nation can set an example for the world in building a just and prosperous nation.
A society divided and fractured
South Korea's current turmoil has exposed deep-rooted fragmentation within its society. Political discourse has devolved into a battleground of ideological extremes, where progressives and conservatives prioritize factional victories over the common good.
This division, arising from the Cold War framework, extends beyond politics, influencing social interactions, media narratives and corporate decision-making. It has led to a fractured nation, unable to forge a cohesive vision for the future. Meanwhile, North Korea remains isolated, exacerbating the disunity that prevents a shared national identity.
Institutional erosion and distrust
In this environment, the judiciary and prosecutorial systems, instead of serving as pillars of justice, have been weaponized to serve political and corporate interests. Successive administrations either have fallen victim to judicial crackdowns or used legal mechanisms to target opponents, creating an environment in which the rule of law is perceived as arbitrary and politically motivated.
This erosion of institutional integrity has diminished public trust in the nation's ability to uphold fairness and transparency. In North Korea, political oppression and the absence of rule of law further deepens the crisis, leaving its people without recourse to justice or political representation.
Economic inequality and structural corruption
While South Korea's economic rise is often praised, the dominance of chaebols (large family-controlled conglomerates) underscores the nation's deep structural inequality. These corporate giants, entrenched in political favoritism, stifle competition and perpetuate an economic hierarchy that marginalizes smaller businesses and entrepreneurs.
Corruption, cronyism and economic monopolization hinder innovation and social mobility, exacerbating inequality and social unrest. In North Korea, the state-controlled economy fosters extreme poverty and dependence on illicit activities for survival. The economic disparities between the two Koreas highlight the need for unification under a just economic system that empowers all citizens.
Reforming the financial and banking system
A unified Korea must reform its financial and banking systems to ensure that all citizens -- not just chaebols or political elites -- can access capital and opportunities. The current system, which concentrates financial power in a few large conglomerates, stifles creativity and economic mobility.
By decentralizing financial resources, encouraging entrepreneurship and enabling easy access to funding, a unified Korea can foster a thriving economy in which young people and small businesses drive innovation and growth. Contrary to concerns about the cost of unification, this new nation will attract private investment from around the world, creating unparalleled economic opportunities, especially for the younger generation.
Decline of the traditional family model
A well-functioning constitutional republic requires moral and ethical citizens, yet South Korea has seen a deterioration in its traditional family structure, which has historically served as the foundation for character development and social harmony.
The decline of the three-generational family model has weakened the cultivation of moral values, interpersonal relationships and a sense of responsibility across generations. As family bonds erode, so too does the ethical foundation upon which a stables society depends.
In North Korea, family structures have been severely damaged by state interference, forced separations and economic hardship. Reviving the traditional family model, in which all members can cultivate healthy character and relationships through a three-generational structure, must be a core foundation for a unified Korea.
An identity crisis: The need for a unifying national vision
The chaos in South Korea's political sphere and the oppression in North Korea are symptomatic of a larger crisis of identity. The Korean peninsula lacks a unified vision rooted in fundamental and universal principles that transcend partisan interests and ideological divides. The absence of a shared ethos has led to inconsistent policies, wavering approaches to inter-Korean relations and unpredictable domestic reforms.
Without a clear sense of national purpose, Korea remains vulnerable to internal discord and external pressures. Unification offers the opportunity to establish a new national ethos based on the Korean Dream --one that aspires to fulfill the Hongik Ingan ideal of benefiting all humanity by creating a just and moral society.
Conclusion: The path to true national renewal
South and North Korea stand at a critical juncture where superficial political reforms will not suffice. The Korean people must undergo a comprehensive renewal that addresses systemic weaknesses across all aspects -- political, economic and social --through the peaceful unification of the peninsula.
A new Korea must recognize that true freedom and human rights originate from God, ensuring a government that protects these rights while harmonizing the strengths of Eastern moral heritage and Western democratic values. Reviving the traditional family model, restoring moral values and creating a just economic system that empowers all citizens will be essential to building this new nation.
Far from being a financial burden, unification will attract private investment and generate unprecedented opportunities, especially for young people. By reforming the financial and banking systems, enabling broad access to capital and fostering a truly free and competitive economy, a unified Korea will unlock the full potential of its people.
By embracing the Korean Dream based on the Hongik Ingan ideal, a unified Korea can overcome its historical limitations and dysfunctions, paving the way for true and lasting peace and prosperity. Now is the time for the Korean people to reclaim their shared providential destiny and forge a new future through peaceful unification rooted in the Korean Dream.
Youngjun Kim is vice chairman of UPI. The views expressed in this article are his own and are not a statement of UPI's editorial views.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NBC News
18 minutes ago
- NBC News
Going Dutch: LGBTQ Americans find Trump-free life in Netherlands
AMSTERDAM — It had been months since Alex and Lucy, a trans couple from Arizona, felt safe enough to hold hands in public. They rediscovered that pleasure after moving to Amsterdam this year. The couple, who did not want to give their last names because of the sensitivity of the subject, decided to leave the United States soon after Donald Trump was re-elected last year. They arrived in the Netherlands on Jan. 19, the day before Trump was inaugurated and swiftly issued an executive order saying the government would only recognize two sexes — male and female. 'We're both visibly trans and faced growing discrimination. It ramped up right after the election,' said Lucy, sitting alongside Alex in their De Pijp apartment in Amsterdam's south. 'It felt like people had taken off their masks — waiting for an excuse to finally say what they wanted. We went from being tolerated to openly despised,' she added. Alex, who is disabled, feared staying put might also mean losing access to their federal health insurance. 'In the end, it became a matter of life and death,' Alex said. In his first six months in office, Trump has enacted multiple policies affecting the lives of LGBTQ Americans in areas from healthcare to legal recognition and education. In the face of this rollback of rights, some LGBTQ people have voted with their feet. While there is little official data, LGBTQ people and activists told the Thomson Reuters Foundation that many people head to Portugal and Spain, while Costa Rica and Mexico are also popular destinations, alongside France and Thailand. The Netherlands stands out, though, for its strong legal protections, its record on LGBTQ+ inclusivity, and due to a Dutch–American Friendship Treaty (DAFT) and its affiliated visa. DAFT — established as a 1956 act of Cold War cooperation — enables U.S. citizens to live and work in the Netherlands if they start a small business investing at least 4,500 euro ($5,200), can secure Dutch housing, and are able to prove they have enough money to live on. The permit is valid for two years and can be renewed. 'Europe was always on the cards, but the Netherlands had a really high percentage of queer folks, and we knew people here (who) were trans and happy,' said Lucy, who got a DAFT visa. 'Numbers increasing' While the Dutch Immigration and Naturalization Service (IND) does not keep statistics on the sexual orientation or gender identity of DAFT applicants, overall applications have increased since 2016, with January 2025 registering the highest number of any single month on record — 80. 'The numbers are increasing. We don't know why,' said Gerard Spierenburg, IND spokesperson. Immigration lawyers also report an increase. 'From the day after the election, my inbox began filling up with requests of U.S. citizens wanting to move to the Netherlands,' said lawyer Jonathan Bierback, adding that about a fifth came from the LGBTQ+ community. Three other lawyers in Amsterdam confirmed the trend in interviews with the Thomson Reuters Foundation. Jack Mercury, a trans adult performer from California, moved to Amsterdam almost a year and a half ago — 'literally the moment I knew Trump was going to be re-elected'. He said the DAFT visa was 'one of the few financially accessible visas' for him. He now lives in west Amsterdam with a partner and two cats. 'The words to describe the U.S. in the last 100 days are uncertainty and fear. For trans people, it's fear that they'll lose access to healthcare, rights like housing or the ability to work. And for gay people and lesbians, it's that they will become the next targets,' Mercury said. This year, more than 950 anti-trans bills were introduced in U.S. state legislatures, according to the Trans Legislation Tracker, of which 120 have passed, 647 failed, and 186 are still under consideration. 'I feel very lucky. I know many people who cannot afford to move, because they're not high earners, they are sick, have family or children,' said Mercury. His friend Topher Gross, a trans hair stylist from New York who has been in Amsterdam for four years, offered housing tips and recommended a lawyer. 'Everyone's exploring any possible way to get out,' said Gross. 'But not everyone can — many trans people of colour can't afford to leave. It's terrifying.' He noted that the climate of fear was exacerbated by deportations under Trump's crackdown on illegal immigration. 'Basic rights are being stripped away.' Jess Drucker, an LGBTQ relocation expert with U.S.-based Rainbow Relocation, said many U.S. clients choose to go Dutch. 'People see how quickly rights can erode, with the global rise of right-wing extremism, and want to move somewhere where those rights are more likely to hold,' Drucker said. 'We've seen a major increase in requests for consultations. We are absolutely full.' Because not everyone can afford a DAFT visa, the Dutch NGO LGBT Asylum Support is urging the government to consider asylum options for LGBTQ Americans. Spokesperson Sandro Kortekaas said about 50 trans Americans had contacted the group since Trump's inauguration. In June, the group asked the government to reassess the status of the United States as a safe country for queer asylum seekers. However, Bierback does not expect success as such a shift would be seen 'as a provocation towards the U.S.' Spierenburg from the IND said there had been more asylum applications from the United States this year than last, although the numbers were still low — 33 against 9 in 2024. Lucy and Alex are grateful for their new life. 'When I came here, I felt more at home than I ever did. I have so much hope,' said Lucy. But she does worry that a future Dutch administration — a right-wing coalition collapsed in June — could kill off DAFT. 'I'm really concerned that the treaty is going to be damaged by current political agendas. And so I'm doing everything I can to make sure that I stay within the rules. I don't want to be extradited for any reason.'
Yahoo
44 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The questionable experts with the Global Fact-Checking Network, Russia's verification organisation
Russian organisation the Global Fact-Checking Network (GFCN), which was launched in April 2025, claims to fight disinformation. But a number of the 60-odd members of the network regularly share disinformation online. We take a look. It was to be a platform 'uniting experts dedicated to exposing unreliable information', according to the spokesperson for the Russian ministry of foreign affairs, Maria Zakharova. On April 9, she announced during a press conference the launch of the Global Fact-checking Network (GFCN), a platform promoting the verification of information 'that fosters an honest and open approach to fact-checking'. And yet, according to Reporters Without Borders (RSF), the GFCN is the 'Kremlin's latest propaganda tool'. 'This initiative is part of a well-established Kremlin strategy: mimicking independent institutions to better spread its propaganda,' the international non-profit dedicated to press freedom said in a report published on June 24 about the GFCN. GFCN is upfront that it wants to serve as a counterpoint to Western fact-checking services, including the International Fact-checking Network (IFCN), an initiative founded in 2015 that brings together 170 fact-checking organisations [including our team at the FRANCE 24 Observers] from across the world around a shared code of ethics about fact-checking practices. At first glance, GFCN seems to resemble a fact-checking organisation like IFCN: the network has, for example, a 'code of responsible fact-checking", which includes values like objectivity and impartiality and the use of verified data. Since early June, it has also offered courses on fact-checking techniques as well as an "international contest" to help people learn to better detect AI-generated videos. Co-founded by Tass and an NGO under sanction However, critics of GFCN say that the organisations behind it aren't necessarily poster children for these values. GFCN was cofounded by the Russian state press agency TASS, the New Media School – a government-run training programme for Russian journalists – and the NGO Ano Dialog. A number of specialists and Western governments have described this NGO, which is currently under US sanctions, as being closely linked to the Kremlin – as well as a number of different disinformation operations. Its director general, Vladimir Tabak, who has been placed under sanctions by a number of Western countries, is now president of GFCN as well. Maxime Audinet and Colin Gérard, researchers specialised in Russian influence, say that Tabak is one of the main actors in the disinformation operation Doppelgänger, which creates fake websites that resemble Western news outlets to share false information. 'Our goal within the Network is to unite experts, journalists, and media representatives who are ready to jointly defend the right to reliable information,' said Tabak in mid-July 2025. At that point, GFCN was made up of 65 members from 40 different countries. Eight fake news items in 12 days However, a number of the experts who appear on GFCN's website regularly share false information online and draw from unverified, unsourced content. "Many of the voices on this list are extremely biased and lack legitimacy,' says Darren Linvill, a professor at Clemson University in the United States and author of a number of reports about Russian online disinformation networks. When our team took a look at the X account of Tim Anderson, the first name on the list of so-called experts, we noticed a number of fake news items on his feed. Anderson used to be a professor at an Australian university and founded an organisation called the Center for Counter Hegemonic Studies. From our count, Anderson shared eight false news items during the 12-day war between Israel and Iran last June. Among the fake news items he shared that are still online: images taken from video games or generated by artificial intelligence that Anderson claimed were proof that Iran had shot down Israeli F-35 bombers. And yet, as our team reported, there is still no viable proof to date that Iran downed any of these planes. Anderson also shared a video that claimed that Mossad chief David Barnea had died – which is also not true. These errors run counter to GFCN's purported code, which stipulates that it is important to 'verify information sources to make sure that they are reliable and authentic'. You can see our analysis of the eight fake news items shared by Anderson by following this link. Other GFCN experts have also shared false claims based on unverified sources. Pakistani journalist Furqan Rao, for example, shared on two separate occasions photos that were either false or taken out of context about the conflict between India and Pakistan last May. In one case, he shared a video of a military simulation game that made it look like Pakistan had destroyed a military base. He also shared a video filmed in Dubai in 2021 and falsely claimed that it showed a cache of Indian missiles that had been targeted. He did not publish corrections about his posts. The list of experts also includes people who are not journalists, like Roigar López Rivas. GFCN says that López Rivas is the president of the National Institute for the Development of Small and Medium Industry in Venezuela. Yet he appeared on a panel of experts at a GFCN event held in June. Between November 2023 and July 2025, this fervent supporter of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro got 33 Community Notes – notes added by users of the platform X to add context to false or misleading posts –, according to the tool Community-Notes-Leaderboard. These notes include a false montage criticising Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, a false poster calling for the FBI to capture Venezuelan opposition figure Juan Guaido – which was investigated by our fact-checking partner IFCN Cazadores – as well as a video that he claimed was a strike on Moscow and which was actually an Iranian strike on Israel. Experts with links to 'Storm-1516' GFCN's list of experts also includes names of people known to work within other pro-Russian online disinformation networks. This includes Dutch independent journalist Sonja Van den Ende and Brazilian analyst Lucas Leiroz, both identified by the Clemson Institute or the French government agency for the defence against foreign digital interference Viginum as important figures within the Russian disinformation operation "Storm-1516". Storm-1516 is a complex operation whose main aim is to spread false information, primarily about the war in Ukraine and Western countries. They employ various methods of dissemination, but most often transmit these stories through fake news sites or websites that regularly share fake news. Both Sonja Van den Ende and Lucas Leiroz shared eight different narratives from this operation between 2023 and 2024, according to a report from the Clemson Institute. One that they shared was a fake news story from a Nigerian media outlet claiming that Zelensky had purchased a house in Egypt. Though Zelensky denied this and numerous fact-checking articles were published debunking this story, their X posts featuring the fake news story are still online (see links here and here). Leiroz is also known for his work in the BRICS Journalists Association (BJA), which claims to represent non-Western journalists. However, this organisation was just placed under European sanctions on July 15 for 'disseminating pro-Russian narratives and disinformation under the guise of independent journalism' following reports describing the involvement of several BJA members in Storm-1516. Leiroz has also publicly defended Irish RT journalist Chay Bowes, who is considered one of the main actors within Operation Storm-1516, as our team has documented on numerous occasions. "Russia's main success is that it has managed to build up a collection of voices that disseminate false information and give it legitimacy,' says Linvill, who describes organisations like the BRICS Journalists Association as 'tools for legitimising disinformation', in the same way as GFCN. Chay Bowes also has the support of Timofey V, whose real name is Vasiliev. Vasiliev, who is presented on GFCN's site as the head of the NGO ANO Dialog, is also behind the media outlet War on Fakes, which disseminated Russian propaganda under the guise of fact-checking. In February 2025, Timofey V shared a fake video posted by Bowes about an alleged electoral fraud carried out against the far-right German political party AfD. Our fact-checking colleagues at AFP Factuel reported that this video was staged. Our team contacted GFCN, which said that 'the experts in the articles posted under the aegis of GFCN respect the ethical and professional norms outlined in the Code of the association.' 'Communicating' on the international level "GFCN is not a structure that operates independently from the rest of the Russian influence network,' Pauline Maufrais, the RSF Regional Officer for Ukraine and author of the report on GFCN, told our team. "We see the same figures from the pro-Kremlin propaganda, who have been bouncing around in these circles for years and who pop up again when there are new projects.' Another GFCN participant is the media outlet International Reporters, founded in late 2023. This project is primarily run by French journalist Christelle Néant, who has been working in the Donbass region since 2016 and speaks out against what she says are Western 'lies' about Russia. Linvill says that the choice to bring in influential figures from across the globe is part of Russia's strategy of global influence. "Russia is very talented at giving the impression of being inclusive,' he says. 'This serves several functions – not only does this give them a good image, but it also enables them to communicate effectively in these communities.' "It's not insignificant that the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs is so involved,' Maufrais says. "The aim is to go and find new audiences to share their narrative with the aim of being visible on the international stage.' Russian embassies in Bangladesh and South Africa have also been known to tout the GFCN. An African press agency that has bought into GFCN The African Initiative, a Russian press agency created in 2023 that aims to be the main 'information bridge between Russia and Africa', joined the list of GFCN participating organisations – another sign of the collaboration between different bodies of Russian influence. The structure is an agency that promotes anti-Western and pro-Kremlin propaganda across the African continent, according to a report published by Viginum and the European External Action Service (SEAE) in May 2025. Like GFCN, the African Initiative also offers training sessions about disinformation so that it can 'independently counter the propaganda imposed by the West'. "Most Russian disinformation and propaganda aims to delegitimize the West politically, culturally, and institutionally,' says Linvill. "An organisation like the GFCN does these three things at once.'

Los Angeles Times
an hour ago
- Los Angeles Times
Trump orders U.S. nuclear subs repositioned over statements from ex-Russian leader Medvedev
WASHINGTON — In a warning to Russia, President Donald Trump said Friday he's ordering the repositioning of two U.S. nuclear submarines 'based on the highly provocative statements' of the country's former president Dmitry Medvedev. Trump posted on his social media site that based on the 'highly provocative statements' from Medvedev he had 'ordered two Nuclear Submarines to be positioned in the appropriate regions, just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that.' The president added, 'Words are very important, and can often lead to unintended consequences, I hope this will not be one of those instances.' It wasn't immediately clear what impact Trump's order would have on U.S. nuclear subs, which are routinely on patrol in the world's hotspots, but it comes at a delicate moment in the Trump administration's relations with Moscow. Trump has said that special envoy Steve Witkoff is heading to Russia to push Moscow to agree to a ceasefire in its war with Ukraine and has threatened new economic sanctions if progress is not made. He cut his 50-day deadline for action to 10 days, with that window set to expire next week. The post about the sub repositioning came after Trump, in the wee hours of Thursday morning, had posted that Medvedev was a 'failed former President of Russia' and warned him to 'watch his words.' Medvedev responded hours later by writing, 'Russia is right on everything and will continue to go its own way.' Medvedev was president from 2008 to 2012 while Putin was barred from seeking a second consecutive term but stepped aside to let him run again. Now deputy chairman of Russia's National Security Council, which Putin chairs, Medvedev has been known for his provocative and inflammatory statements since the start of the war in 2022, a U-turn from his presidency, when he was seen as liberal and progressive. He has frequently wielded nuclear threats and lobbed insults at Western leaders on social media. Some observers have argued that with his extravagant rhetoric, Medvedev is seeking to score political points with Putin and Russian military hawks. Trump and Medvedev have gotten into online spats before. On July 15, after Trump announced plans to supply Ukraine with more weapons via its NATO allies and threatened additional tariffs against Moscow, Medvedev posted, 'Trump issued a theatrical ultimatum to the Kremlin. The world shuddered, expecting the consequences. Belligerent Europe was disappointed. Russia didn't care.' Earlier this week, he wrote, 'Trump's playing the ultimatum game with Russia: 50 days or 10' and added, 'He should remember 2 things: 1. Russia isn't Israel or even Iran. 2. Each new ultimatum is a threat and a step towards war. Not between Russia and Ukraine, but with his own country.' Weissert writes for the Associated Press. AP writer Dasha Litvinova in Tallinn, Estonia, contributed to this report.