TCS layoffs: MeitY takes note; staff union writes to labour minister
Also in the letter:
TCS layoffs draw government attention
Context:
Why it matters:
What's next:
TCS faces union heat over 12,000 job cuts
What they said:
Also Read:
Backdrop:
Why it matters:
With automation and realignment reshaping roles, concerns around job security and fair practice are bubbling to the surface, while also forcing the government to take a closer look at how India's tech sector handles disruption.
TCS job cuts may set precedent for India's IT sector
The signal:
AI not the culprit (yet)
No status quo:
Samsung exports slump 20% as PLI benefits lapse
Why it matters:
Also Read:
The bigger picture:
The company is seeking credit for FY22, which it claims was impacted by Covid-19.
What to watch:
Also Read:
Google deposes before ED in online betting probe
The case:
Google may have to submit internal records and compliance statements as part of the investigation.
Google's response:
Why it matters:
What's next:
The union government is taking an interest in the TCS layoffs that spooked employees and investors. This and more in today's ETtech Top 5.■ Broader IT shakeup■ Samsung in slow lane■ ED grills GoogleTCS CEO K KrithivasanIndia's IT Ministry is closely monitoring Tata Consultancy Services' (TCS) decision to cut 12,261 jobs – roughly 2% of its global workforce – as alarm grows over job losses at India's largest tech firm. Government officials are in touch with TCS, seeking clarity on the rationale behind the move.TCS said the layoffs are part of its drive to become a 'future-ready organisation', involving the adoption of artificial intelligence, global expansion, and a reorganisation of its workforce. Most of the cuts target mid- and senior-level roles.Job creation remains a key political priority, and the government is weighing whether schemes like the Employment Linked Incentive can soften the blow. The episode also highlights the growing urgency for IT firms to reskill at scale.The ministry may push for more aggressive skilling interventions and wants clearer insight into existing talent gaps. TCS, for its part, said it will offer severance packages, counselling support, and outplacement services to affected employees.Employee union Nascent IT Employees Senate (NITES) has urged labour minister Mansukh Mandaviya to halt TCS's plan to axe over 12,000 jobs , calling the move 'illegal' and demanding the reinstatement of affected employees.In its letter, NITES accused the IT giant of sidelining over 600 lateral hires and questioned the fairness of the layoffs, pointing to hefty executive pay packets. The union also called on the government to hold senior leadership accountable.TCS had framed the cuts as being part of a broader transformation drive. CEO K Krithivasan insisted the decision wasn't AI-led, but stemmed from a skill mismatch , particularly among senior employees.The standoff reflects the growing friction between India's tech majors and their workforce, as companies chase agility and cost savings.TCS's move to cut 12,000 jobs has rattled nerves in India's IT industry, raising concerns about a broader shakeout . No other firm has followed suit yet, but the hiring chill is hard to ignore.TCS added just 5,000 employees in Q1 FY26, while rivals like Infosys have slowed onboarding . The company has also cracked down on idle time , capping non-billable days at 35 annually. The message is becoming clearer: Productivity is now non-negotiable.: While TCS is investing heavily in automation, its CEO insists that the layoffs stem from role overlaps and outdated skills, not machines replacing people. Still, the pace of tech disruption is unmistakable.If others adopt TCS's strategy, job security, particularly for mid-career professionals, could be affected. Expect boardrooms to prioritise workforce agility, reskilling, and internal redeployment.Samsung's smartphone exports from India tumbled 20% year-on-year in Q1 FY26 to $950 million after the South Korean electronics giant stopped receiving incentives under the government's production-linked incentive (PLI) scheme, industry executives told us.The sharp drop has sparked concern over India's cost competitiveness in electronics manufacturing. Without PLI support, India's export costs are estimated to be 10–15% higher than those of Vietnam and China. Apple, Dixon, and other firms could hit a similar wall after FY26, when their PLI cycle comes to an end.Samsung was one of PLI's biggest beneficiaries, scaling exports from $1.2 billion in FY21 to $4.4 billion in FY25. That momentum now risks stalling.A new Rs 22,919-crore components PLI scheme is on the table. But for anchor players like Samsung to stay committed, policy continuity may be just as important as fresh incentives.Google executives appeared before the Enforcement Directorate (ED) on Monday as part of a probe into alleged promotion of illegal online betting and gambling platforms. Meta officials, who were also summoned, skipped the hearing.The ED is examining whether digital platforms enabled ads for unlawful betting sites, potentially violating the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA).The company said it prohibits illegal gambling ads and is cooperating fully with the authorities. 'We are committed to keeping our platforms safe and secure,' a spokesperson told the news agency Press Trust of India.This marks one of the first PMLA-linked cases scrutinising the ad practices of Big Tech companies in India. With the upcoming Digital India Act, the government is pushing for tighter oversight and platform accountability.The investigation could widen if more violations surface. Advertising rules may soon become far more stringent, particularly for sectors such as gaming, cryptocurrency, and high-risk finance, where regulatory grey areas have long been the norm.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
22 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
CPI(M) leader raises alarm over honour killings, slams Modi govt's policies and ECI bias
"The foreign policy of the Narendra Modi-led government has failed. Prime Minister Narendra Modi has not spoken out against the imposition of 25% tariff on Indian goods. So far, there has been no debate even in the Parliament. This move could severely impact many MSMEs and small-scale industries across the country," Balakrishnan said. Citing the row over the Special Intensive Revision of electoral lists in Bihar, Balakrishnan said, "The ECI has effectively been turned into a subservient wing of the BJP. In Bihar 69 lakh voters have been removed from the voters' list. Our basic "Right to Vote' is under threat. There are also rumours that many voters will be removed from West Bengal, Assam, and Tamil Nadu too. The minorities, especially Muslims and others, will be denied their voting rights. The ECI is even opposing the Supreme Court's advice. The INDIA bloc will conduct a protest on August 8 and the CPI(M) will hold a protest on August 12." Speaking about the NDA alliance in Tamil Nadu, he said, "Edappadi K Palaniswami has repeatedly stated that an NDA government will form in Tamil Nadu. The NDA is crumbling. O Panneerselvam has already announced that he is not with the BJP alliance. It is a good thing for Tamil Nadu."
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
22 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Trump says June jobs data 'rigged', Wall Street and economists disagree
The monthly jobs report is already closely-watched on Wall Street and in Washington but has taken on a new importance after President Donald Trump on Friday fired the official who oversees it. Trump claimed that June's employment figures were "RIGGED" to make him and other Republicans "look bad". Yet he provided no evidence and even the official Trump had appointed in his first term to oversee the report, William Beach, condemned the firing of Erika McEntarfer, the director of the Bureau of Labour Statistics appointed by former President Joe Biden. The firing followed Friday's jobs report that showed hiring was weak in July and had come to nearly a standstill in May and June, right after Trump rolled out sweeping tariffs. Economists and Wall Street investors have long considered the job figures reliable, with share prices and bond yields often reacting sharply when they are released. Yet Friday's revisions were unusually large -- the largest, outside of a recession, in five decades. And the surveys used to compile the report are facing challenges from declining response rates, particularly since COVID, as fewer companies complete the surveys. Nonetheless, that has not led most economists to doubt them. "The bottom line for me is, I would not take the low collection rate as any evidence that the numbers are less reliable," Omair Sharif, founder and chief economist at Inflation Insights, a consulting firm, said. Many academics, statisticians and economists have warned for some time that declining budgets were straining the government's ability to gather economic data. There were several government commissions studying ways to improve things like survey response rates, but the Trump administration disbanded them earlier this year. Heather Boushey, a top economic adviser in the Biden White House, noted that without Trump's firing of McEntarfer, there would be more focus on last week's data, which points to a slowing economy. "We are having this conversation about made-up issues to distract us from what the data is showing," Boushey said. "Revisions of this magnitude in a negative direction may indicate bad things to come for the labour market." Here are some things to know about the jobs report: Economists and Wall Street trust the data Most economists say that the Bureau of Labour Statistics is a nonpolitical agency staffed by people obsessed with getting the numbers right. The only political appointee is the commissioner, who does not see the data until it is finalised, two days before it is issued to the public. Erica Groshen, the BLS commissioner from 2013 to 2017, said she suggested different language in the report to "liven it up", but was shot down. She was told that if asked to describe a cup as half-empty or half-full, BLS says "it is an eight ounce cup with four ounces of liquid". The revised jobs data that has attracted Trump's ire is actually more in line with other figures than before the revision. For example, payroll processor ADP uses data from its millions of clients to calculate its own jobs report, and it showed a sharp hiring slowdown in May and June that is closer to the revised BLS data. Trump and his White House have a long track record of celebrating the jobs numbers -- when they are good. These are the figures Trump is attacking Trump has focussed on the revisions to the May and June data, which on Friday were revised lower, with job gains in May reduced to 19,000 from 144,000, and for June to just 14,000 from 147,000. Every month's jobs data is revised in the following two months. Trump also repeated a largely inaccurate attack from the campaign about an annual revision last August, which reduced total employment in the United States by 818,000, or about 0.5 per cent. The government also revises employment figures every year. Trump charged that the annual revision was released before the 2024 presidential election to "boost" Vice President Kamala Harris's "chances of Victory", yet it was two months before the election and widely reported at the time that the revision lowered hiring during the Biden-Harris administration and pointed to a weaker economy. Here's why the government revises the data The monthly revisions occur because many companies that respond to the government's surveys send their data in late, or correct the figures they have already submitted. The proportion of companies sending in their data later has risen in the past decade. Every year, the BLS does an additional revision based on actual job counts that are derived from state unemployment insurance records. Those figures cover 95 per cent of US businesses and are not derived from a survey but are not available in real time. These are the factors that cause revisions Figuring out how many new jobs have been added or lost each month is more complicated than it may sound. For example, if one person takes a second job, should you focus on the number of jobs, which has increased, or the number of employed people, which has not? (The government measures both: The unemployment rate is based on how many people either have or do not have jobs, while the number of jobs added or lost is counted separately). Each month, the government surveys about 121,000 businesses and government agencies at over 630,000 locations -- including multiple locations for the same business -- covering about one-third of all workers. Still, the government also has to make estimates: What if a company goes out of business? It likely will not fill out any forms showing the jobs lost. And what about new businesses? They can take a while to get on the government's radar. The BLS seeks to capture these trends by estimating their impact on employment. Those estimates can be wrong, of course, until they are fixed by the annual revisions. The revisions are often larger around turning points in the economy. For example, when the economy is growing, there may be more startups than the government expects, so revisions will be higher. If the economy is slowing or slipping into a recession, the revisions may be larger on the downside. Here's why the May and June revisions may have been so large Ernie Tedeschi, an economic adviser to the Biden administration, points to the current dynamics of the labour market: Both hiring and firing have sharply declined, and fewer Americans are quitting their jobs to take other work. As a result, most of the job gains or losses each month are probably occurring at new companies, or those going out of business. And those are the ones the government uses models to estimate, which can make them more volatile. Groshen also points out that since the pandemic, there has been a surge of new start-up companies, after many Americans lost their jobs or sought more independence. Yet they may not have created as many jobs as startups did pre-COVID, which throws off the government's models. Revisions seem to be getting bigger The revisions to May and June's job totals, which reduced hiring by a total of 258,000, were the largest -- outside recessions -- since 1967, according to economists at Goldman Sachs. Kevin Hassett, Trump's top economic adviser, went on NBC's "Meet the Press" on Sunday and said, "What we have seen over the last few years is massive revisions to the jobs numbers." Hassett blamed a sharp drop in response rates to the government's surveys during and after the pandemic: "When COVID happened, because response rates went down a lot, then revision rates skyrocketed." Yet calculations by Tedeschi show that while revisions spiked after the pandemic, they have since declined and are much smaller than in the 1960s and 1970s. Other concerns about the government's data Many economists and statisticians have sounded the alarm about things like declining response rates for years. A decade ago, about 60 per cent of companies surveyed by BLS responded. Now, only about 40 per cent do. The decline has been an international phenomenon, particularly since COVID. The United Kingdom has even suspended publication of an official unemployment rate because of falling responses. And earlier this year, the BLS said that it was cutting back on its collection of inflation data because of the Trump administration's hiring freeze, raising concerns about the robustness of price data just as economists are trying to gauge the impact of tariffs on inflation. US government statistical agencies have seen an inflation-adjusted 16-per cent drop in funding since 2009, according to a July report from the American Statistical Association. "We are at an inflection point," the report said. "To meet current and future challenges requires thoughtful, well-planned investment ... In contrast, what we have observed is uncoordinated and unplanned reductions with no visible plan for the future. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Hindustan Times
22 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
'It's been coming soon for a full year,' Google mocks Apple for Siri AI delay in Pixel 10 teaser
Google Pixel 10 series launch is just a few days away, and the Mountain View giant has started to tease the launch. Not only has the company revealed the Pixel 10 and Pixel 10 Pro design, but it is also teasing some early launch benefits, creating curiosity among buyers. However, the Pixel 10 teaser is not limited only to the launch, as this time Google takes a shot at Apple, delaying Siri's AI features. In the latest teaser, the tech giant silently mocks Apple about delaying crucial features, saying, 'It's been coming soon for a full year.' While Google did not highlight Apple's name but the company is currently in the limelight for not delivering promised features. Here's everything you need to know about the teaser. Google Pixel 10 new teaser, encourages buyers to change their phones from iPhone to Pixel, here's how.(Google) Google mocks Apple delaying Siri's AI upgrade in Pixel 10 teaser Google has recently shared a 30-second teaser video of the upcoming Pixel 10 model, flaunting smartphone design in the new Moonstone shade. However, the video also consists of a voice-over, which cleverly mocks Apple for delaying Siri's AI upgrade, which was first introduced at WWDC24. Now, we have completed a year since the announcement, and Apple has failed to deliver the promised AI upgrade on time. Mocking Apple for the delay, Google, in the teaser video, said, 'If you buy a new phone because of a feature that's coming soon, but it's been coming soon for a full year. You could change your definition of soon. Or you could just change your phone.' As per Apple's promise, the Siri AI upgrade, which consisted of capabilities like personal context, onscreen awareness, and cross-app actions, was expected to ship with iOS 18.4 to the iPhone 16 models. Now, just in time for release, Apple announced that the feature is not ready, and left iPhone users with a vague commitment. Now, the company has also showcased the iOS 26 update, and it is expected to roll out next month, with Siri AI features expected to roll out in 2026. Despite the new generation OS update, Apple has not confirmed when iPhone users can expect the delayed AI upgrade. Therefore, Google is now taking a dig and is encouraging consumer to simply change their phone with the tagline 'Ask more of your phone.'
