Team Dubois to hold 'inquest' after 'gathering'
'Dubois wasn't unsettled by gathering'
There are unconfirmed reports the gathering was organised by Dubois' father, and suggestions the fighter left during the event to go for a short drive. Charles rejected claims this was a sign of distress."To put logic to it, the father mainly replicated the recipe that worked against AJ to hopefully get a victory last Saturday. And it didn't work. Consequently, there is now a big highlight on this party, which was a gathering," he said."Daniel went for a drive, like you do. He's a fighter who's fighting on that day. If he wanted to get some fresh air or whatever, it's not unusual to say 'I'm going for a drive.'"It is also alleged that some members of Dubois' entourage were refused entry to the venue, contributing to the late arrival. Charles said he was unaware of that situation but was content with how Dubois presented himself on arrival."I had 90 minutes to prepare him - the duration of a football game - and I was satisfied," he said. "I didn't see a fighter unsettled. He seemed the Daniel Dubois that I knew, who I see every day in the gym."Usyk - who also stopped Dubois in the ninth round of their 2023 bout - floored the Londoner twice in the fifth round of the rematch, with Dubois unable to beat the count after the second knockdown.Dubois has previously faced criticism for "quitting" in defeats to Joe Joyce and Usyk, but Charles insisted his fighter showed bravery."He went out on his sword," he said. "He took a punch - a horrible punch - and made the count. The referee waved it off. I'd already thrown the towel in anyway. I didn't want any more for him. I want him to live to fight another day. That's what I'm paid for."Despite the defeat, Charles praised Usyk as "an all-time great" and said Dubois remains determined to bounce back.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
9 minutes ago
- The Independent
Joe Root clashes with Prasidh Krishna in another fiery England-India confrontation
Tempers flared again in this riveting England - India Test series as Joe Root clashed with Prasidh Krishna out in the middle on day two of the fifth Test match. Entering the field at 124-2 after Zak Crawley was dismissed for 64, Root entered the fray and was immediately under pressure amid cloudy skies and a swinging pitch. With Root getting the start of his innings going, Root and Krishna exchanged some angry words, with the England batsman visibly irked with the India bowler. Umpire Kumar Dharmasena was forced to step in, seemingly telling the Indian bowlers to calm down. The exact reason for Root's anger is unclear, though Krishna did earlier in the afternoon session throw the ball rashly and unnecessarily at Crawley. Root and Krishna, in the next over, then both enjoyed a stare down out in the middle before Mohammed Siraj trapped Ollie Pope lbw after a review. Ex-England captain Michael Atherton said on commentary for Sky Sports: 'It's highly unusual to see Joe Root as animated in that moment. 'He's usually a very cheery soul but not on that occasion.' This morning, Ben Duckett was goaded by Akash Deep after being dismissed trying a reverse scoop. The two teams have regularly clashed throughout this enthralling five-test series, not least last time out at Old Trafford when Washington Sundar and Ravindra Jadeja refused Ben Stokes' offer of a handshake to end the match. The teams also butted heads at the third test at Lord's, with India initially unhappy with Crawley's time-wasting at the end of the day's play.
The Independent
9 minutes ago
- The Independent
What FA statement really tells us about Lucas Paqueta's ‘nightmare' betting case
The headline rather downplayed the significance of the news. ' Lucas Paqueta update' was found on the FA website, a story ranked below 'New clubs ready for FA Cup debuts'. Update? It could have been the end, given the existential threat to the Brazilian's career. Indeed, until news broke last Friday that he was likely to be cleared, the expectation was that a lengthy – perhaps even lifetime – ban beckoned. The FA's language was rather dry; it was also different to Paqueta's. The governing body described the allegations – that the West Ham midfielder had got booked deliberately in four different games, in instances of spot-fixing to influence the betting markets – as 'not proven' rather than declaring him not guilty. They also said the regulatory commission had proved two breaches of Rule F3, relating to a failure to answer questions and provide information. A punishment will be determined in the future. Paqueta, meanwhile, was more emphatic and emotional. 'Since the first day of this investigation, I have maintained my innocence against these extremely serious allegations,' he said in a social-media post. After two years in limbo, he could be forgiven for declaring victory. In the wait for the written reasons, and further explanations surrounding three cautions in the 2022/23 season and one at the start of the 2023/24 campaign, some things can be said. It has been a long and damaging saga, for Paqueta personally and West Ham. His tears when booked against Tottenham in May were indicative of the toll it took. He has played under suspicion and under pressure. It is understandable that a hugely gifted player's performances have been mixed. He was better in 2023/24 than last season. Remarkably, he completed it without a Premier League assist, even if that was partly a consequence of teammates' faulty finishing. It would be wrong to trace West Ham's dismal campaign purely to Paqueta – not among a poor choice of manager, director of football and signings – but it scarcely helped. Before he was charged, Paqueta supplied the defence-splitting pass for Jarrod Bowen's winner in the 2023 Conference League final to secure West Ham's first trophy since 1980. After it, they had the hugely accomplished trio of Bowen, Paqueta and Mohammed Kudus for two seasons: the first was underwhelming, the second egregious underachievement, so it amounts to a missed opportunity. Now Kudus is gone. Paqueta could have been, two years ago, when it seemed he was bound for Manchester City in an £85m deal. When the FA started to investigate Paqueta, City swiftly switched targets. It arguably came at a cost to everyone: Paqueta, 25 then, is 27 now and West Ham will never get £85m for him. Given some of their misadventures in the transfer market, some may say it would scarcely have benefited them if they did, but their budget seems smaller now. Paqueta missed the chance to join the champions, potentially win the title that year, and perhaps take over from Kevin De Bruyne as the creator in chief. He could look from afar at City's rebuild, see Tijjani Reijnders and Rayan Cherki bought – the latter from his old club Lyon – to form part of the new midfield, wonder if it would have been him and reflect his chance had disappeared. This was a fork in the road in his career. City, meanwhile, scarcely found a like-for-like replacement. They signed the undistinguished Matheus Nunes who, Pep Guardiola later concluded, could not play in midfield in his team. It is safe to assume that Paqueta would not have spent swathes of the last year playing right back, as Nunes has. Now there are suggestions Paqueta could rejoin Flamengo, flush with their funds from the Club World Cup, if not £85m of them. It is easy to understand why home could have an appeal after the last two years. There is talk, too, of potential legal action, though even if Paqueta and West Ham have a case, that would bring no immediate return nor rewind time. Yet it is also worth remembering that the FA have a duty to investigate credible allegations, even if the bets in question seemed so small that no one was likely to make a fortune. It may hardly have helped his cause that some of the wagers came from Paqueta island in Brazil. Sometimes, too, such things do take time, even if not necessarily two years. It was, the lawyers Blackstone Chambers claimed, the longest case in FA history. This would appear to be one with no winners, with the possible exception of the successful QC Nick de Marco, and certainly not the FA. But Paqueta threatened to be the biggest loser and, after 'living through this nightmare for two years', as his wife put it on Instagram, at least he can play on.
Daily Mail
10 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Tyson Fury leads tributes to former cutman Frank Hopkins after boxing legend's death aged 78
Legendary boxing cutman Frank Hopkins has sadly passed away with Tyson Fury and other renowned names of the sport paying their respects. Hopkins, known to many as Frankie, cornered Fury and a number of other successful British fighters during his long career. He died on Friday at the age of 78 and will be fondly remembered as 'one of boxing's good guys'. The tributes came flooding in on social media after the news was announced with Fury leading the way. Former world champion Fury posted a video on his Instagram story, saying: 'just like to say a special rest in peace to Frank Hopkins, my old cutman. 'What he didn't know about cuts in boxing, nobody knew. He forgot more then most men knew about cuts. 'He was one of the best and greatest in the game and it was a pleasure to have him as part of my team towards the end of my career. 'All the best, Frank. God bless you and may God make you a good bed in heaven. All the best, see you soon brother.' Promoter Eddie Hearn also posted, writing: 'lovely man! Rest in peace Frank.' Fellow promoter Frank Warren also took to X, saying : 'everyone at Queensberry are saddened to learn of the passing of Frank Hopkins. 'A top man who worked with many of our fighters across the years. Condolences to his family and friends for their loss. Rest in Peace Frank.' Hopkins' career saw him travel across the world for over 40 world title bouts. He was in Fury's corner for his first defeat to Oleksandr Usyk last year but not the rematch in December.
