Iran decries ‘destructive' conduct by IAEA chief
TEHRAN: Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian told his French counterpart Emmanuel Macron that Tehran halted cooperation with the UN nuclear watchdog due to what he called the agency chief's 'destructive' behaviour towards the Islamic republic, his office said Monday.
'The action taken by parliament members... is a natural response to the unjustified, unconstructive, and destructive conduct of the Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency,' Pezeshkian told Macron in a phone call late Sunday, according to a presidency statement.
On Wednesday, Iranian lawmakers voted in favour of a bill to suspend cooperation with the IAEA, citing Israel's June 13 attack on the Islamic republic and later strikes by the United States on nuclear facilities.
A ceasefire between Iran and Israel took hold on June 24.
Since the start of the war with Israel, Iranian officials have sharply criticised the agency for failing to condemn the strikes.
Iran has also criticised the watchdog for passing a resolution on June 12 accusing it of non-compliance with its nuclear obligations.
In a Sunday post on X, Macron said he called for 'respect for the ceasefire' and a return to negotiations to address 'ballistic and nuclear issues.'
He further called for 'the swift resumption of the IAEA's work in Iran to ensure full transparency.'
On Monday, France, Germany, and Britain condemned what they called 'threats' against the IAEA chief Rafael Grossi after Iran rejected its request to visit nuclear facilities bombed during the war.
None specified which threats they were referring to, but Iran's ultra-conservative Kayhan newspaper recently claimed documents showed Grossi was an Israeli spy and should be executed.
Iran has said Grossi's request to visit bombed sites signalled 'malign intent' but insisted that no threats were posed against Grossi or the agency's inspectors.
On Monday, Iranian foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei said the Iranian parliament's decision to halt cooperation with the IAEA reflected the 'concern and anger of the Iranian public opinion.'
He further criticised the United States and European powers for maintaining what he described as a 'political approach' toward Iran's nuclear programme during his weekly press conference.
Baqaei also questioned how the safety of IAEA inspectors could be ensured while the extent of the damage to Iran's nuclear facilities -- targeted by Israel and the United States during the 12-day war -- remains unknown.
'One aspect of this issue is how to ensure the safety and security of the agency's inspectors, in a situation where there is still no accurate assessment of the severity of the damage,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
Moscow bans 15 EU media outlets as counter-restrictions
MOSCOW, June 30 (Xinhua) -- Moscow has decided to impose reciprocal restrictions on 15 European media outlets operating in Russia in response to EU sanctions against several Russian media outlets, the Russian Foreign Ministry said Monday. "In a countermeasure to the EU's latest restrictions on eight Russian publications and information channels approved by the EU Council as part of the so-called 16th sanctions package in February this year, the Russian side has decided to impose counter-restrictions within its territory to web resources of 15 EU member state media outlets involved in spreading disinformation," the ministry said in a statement. "If these restrictions imposed on Russian media outlets and information channels are lifted, the Russian side will also revise its decision in respect of the European media outlets," the ministry added.
The Star
5 hours ago
- The Star
The bombing of Iran may teach an unwelcome lesson on nuclear weapons
IT has been nearly two decades since any country elbowed its way into the club of nuclear- armed nations. US President Donald Trump, with his bombing of three Iranian nuclear installations last weekend, has vowed to keep the door shut. Whether Trump's pre-emptive strike will succeed in doing that is hard to predict, so soon after the attack and the fragile ceasefire that has followed. But already it is stirring fears that Iran, and other countries, will draw a very different conclusion than the one the White House intended: that having a bomb is the only protection in a threatening world. The last country to get one, North Korea, has never faced such an attack. After years of defying demands to dismantle its nuclear programme, it is now viewed as largely impregnable. Trump exchanged friendly letters with its dictator, Kim Jong Un, and met him twice in a fruitless effort to negotiate a deal. In Iran's case, Trump deployed B-2 bombers just weeks after making a fresh diplomatic overture to its leaders. 'The risks of Iran acquiring a small nuclear arsenal are now higher than they were before the events of last week,' said Robert J. Einhorn, an arms control expert who negotiated with Iran during president Barack Obama's administration. 'We can assume there are a number of hardliners who are arguing that they should cross that nuclear threshold.' Iran would face formidable hurdles to producing a bomb even if it made a concerted dash for one, Einhorn said, not least the knowledge that if the United States and Israel detect such a move, they will strike again. It is far from clear that Iran's leaders, isolated, weakened, and in disarray, want to provoke them. Yet the logic of proliferation looms large in a world where the nuclear-armed great powers – the US, Russia and China – are viewed as increasingly unreliable and even predatory towards their neighbours. From the Persian Gulf and Central Europe to East Asia, analysts said, non-nuclear countries are watching Iran's plight and calculating lessons they should learn from it. 'Certainly, North Korea doesn't rue the day it acquired nuclear weapons,' said Christopher R. Hill, who led lengthy, ultimately unsuccessful, talks with Pyong-yang in 2007 and 2008 to try to persuade it to dismantle its nuclear programme. The lure of the bomb, Hill said, has become stronger for America's allies in the Middle East and Asia. Since World War II, they have sheltered under a US security umbrella. But they now confront a president, in Trump, who views alliances as incompatible with his vision of 'America first'. 'I'd be very careful with the assumption that there is a US nuclear umbrella,' said Hill, who served as ambassador to South Korea, Iraq, Poland, and Serbia under Democratic and Repub-lican presidents. 'Countries like Japan and South Korea are wondering whether they can rely on the US.' Support for developing nuclear weapons has risen in South Korea, though its newly elected president, Lee Jae-myung, has vowed to improve relations with North Korea. In 2023, US president Joe Biden signed a deal with Seoul to involve it more in nuclear planning with the US, in part to head off a push by South Korean politicians and scientists to develop their own nuclear weapons capability. In Japan, the public has long favoured disarmament, a legacy of the US atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945. But it has begun debating whether to store nuclear weapons from the US on its soil, as some members of Nato (North Atlantic Treaty Organisation) do. Shinzo Abe, a former prime minister, said that if Ukraine had kept some of its Soviet-era bombs, it might have avoided a Russian invasion. Russian President Vladimir Putin's threats to use tactical nuclear weapons early in that conflict gave pause to the Biden administration about how aggressively to arm the Ukrainian military. It also deepened fears that other revisionist powers could use nuclear blackmail to intimidate their neighbours. The lesson of Ukraine could end up being, 'If you have nuclear weapons, keep them. If you don't have them yet, get them, especially if you lack a strong defender like the US as your ally and if you have a beef with a big country that could plausibly lead to war,' wrote Bruce Riedel and Michael E. O'Hanlon, analysts at the Brookings Institution, a research group in Washington, in 2022. Saudi Arabia, an ally of the US and arch rival of Iran, has watched Tehran's nuclear ambitions with alarm. Experts say it would feel huge pressure to develop its own weapon if Iran ever obtained one. The US has tried to reassure the Saudis by dangling assistance for a civil nuclear programme, but those negotiations were interrupted by Israel's war against Hamas in the Gaza Strip. And yet, for all the predictions of a regional arms race, it has yet to occur. Experts say that is a testament to the success of non-proliferation policies, as well as to the chequered history of countries that pursued weapons. The Middle East is a messy landscape of dashed nuclear dreams. Iraq, Syria, and Libya all had their programmes dismantled by diplomacy, sanctions or military force. In the category of cautionary tales, Libya's is perhaps the most vivid: Moammar Gadhafi gave up his weapons of mass destruction in 2003. Eight years later, after a Nato-backed military operation toppled his government, he crawled out of a drainpipe to face a brutal death at the hands of his own people. Iran's strategy of aggressively enriching uranium, while stopping short of a bomb, did not ultimately protect it either. 'To the extent that people are looking at Iran as a test case, Trump has shown that its strategy is not a guarantee that you will prevent a military attack,' said Gary Samore, a professor at Brandeis University who worked on arms control negotiations in the Obama and Clinton administrations. Samore said it is too soon to say how the Israeli and American strikes on Iran would affect the calculus of other countries. 'How does this end?' he said. 'Does it end with a deal? Or is Iran left to pursue a nuclear weapon?' Experts on proliferation are, by nature, wary. But some are trying to find a silver lining in the events of the last week. Einhorn said that in delivering on his threat to bomb a nuclear- minded Iran, Trump had sent a reassuring message to US allies facing their own nuclear insecurities. 'In Moscow, Pyongyang, and Beijing,' Einhorn said, 'they've taken notice not just of the reach and capacity of the US military, but the willingness of this president to use that capability.' — 2025 The New York Times Company This article originally appeared in The New York Times.
Barnama
5 hours ago
- Barnama
Lebanon Urges Israeli Pullout From Five Border Outposts
BEIRUT/ISTANBUL, June 30 (Bernama-Anadolu) -- Lebanon accused Israel on Monday of violating UN Security Council Resolution 1701 by occupying five hills in the country's south, Anadolu Ajansi (AA) reported. Lebanese President Joseph Aoun met in Beirut with Major General Diodato Abagnara, the newly appointed commander of the UN peacekeeping mission UNIFIL, the presidency said in a statement. During the meeting, Aoun called for Israel's withdrawal from the five hills to enable the Lebanese army to complete its deployment to the internationally recognised borders. bootstrap slideshow He emphasised the importance of UNIFIL's role in the region and reaffirmed his country's commitment to Resolution 1701, which calls for the deployment of UN peacekeepers in Lebanon. 'The current regional conditions require, more than ever, the continued presence of international forces working alongside our army to preserve stability in the south, which is inseparable from regional stability,' Aoun said. UNIFIL has operated in southern Lebanon since 1978 and was significantly reinforced after the 2006 war between Israel and the Lebanese group Hezbollah. Its current mandate expires on August 31, 2025, unless renewed by the UN Security Council. The Lebanese president said that the number of army personnel in southern Lebanon will be increased to ensure security and safety in the area. Israel launched a wide-scale assault on Lebanon on Oct 8, 2023, that escalated into a full-scale war by Sept 23, 2024. The conflict has killed more than 4,000 people, wounded over 17,000, and displaced nearly 1.4 million, according to official data. Israeli forces have conducted near-daily attacks in southern Lebanon, claiming to target Hezbollah's activities despite a ceasefire between Israel and Lebanon that was reached in November. The truce ended months of cross-border warfare between Israel and the Lebanese resistance group.
