
Seconds to disaster: How the Air India flight crashed and what are the fuel switches under scrutiny?
Here is the sequence of events - by the seconds - on Jun 12, as detailed by Indian investigators in their preliminary report released on Saturday (Jul 12). All times in GMT.
TIMELINE
5.47am GMT (11.17am IST): Air India Dreamliner VT-ANB landed in Ahmedabad from New Delhi as AI423.
7.48.38am: The aircraft was observed departing from Bay 34 at the airport.
7.55.15am: The aircraft requested taxi clearance, which was granted by air traffic control. A minute later the aircraft taxied from the bay to Runway 23 via Taxiway R4, backtracked and lined up for take-off.
8.02.03am: The aircraft was transferred from ground to tower control.
8.07.33am: Take-off clearance issued.
8.07.37am: The aircraft started rolling.
8.08.39am: Aircraft lifted off. "The aircraft air/ground sensors transitioned to air mode, consistent with liftoff," the report said.
8.08.42am: Aircraft reached max airspeed of 180 knots. "Immediately thereafter, the Engine 1 and Engine 2 fuel cutoff switches transitioned from RUN to CUTOFF position one after another with a time gap of 01 sec," the report said.
"The Engine N1 and N2 began to decrease from their take-off values as the fuel supply to the engines was cut off.
"In the cockpit voice recording, one of the pilots is heard asking the other why did he cutoff. The other pilot responded that he did not do so.
"The CCTV footage obtained from the airport showed Ram Air Turbine (RAT) getting deployed during the initial climb immediately after lift-off
"The aircraft started to lose altitude before crossing the airport perimeter wall."
8.08.47am: Both engines' values "passed below minimum idle speed", and the RAT hydraulic pump began supplying hydraulic power.
8.08.52am: Engine 1 fuel cutoff switch transitioned from CUTOFF to RUN.
8.08.56: Engine 2 fuel cutoff switch also transitions from CUTOFF to RUN.
"When fuel control switches are moved from CUTOFF to RUN while the aircraft is inflight, each engines full authority dual engine control (FADEC) automatically manages a relight and thrust recovery sequence of ignition and fuel introduction," the report stated.
"Engine 1's core deceleration stopped, reversed and started to progress to recovery. Engine 2 was able to relight but could not arrest core speed deceleration and reintroduced fuel repeatedly to increase core speed acceleration and recovery."
8.09.05am: One of the pilots transmitted 'MAYDAY MAYDAY MAYDAY".
8.09.11am: Data recording stopped.
8.14.44am: Crash fire tender left the airport premises for rescue and firefighting.
WHAT ARE FUEL SWITCHES?
They are switches that regulate fuel flow into a plane's engines. They are used by pilots to start or shut down engines on the ground or to manually shut down or restart engines if an engine failure occurs during a flight.
Aviation experts say a pilot would not be able to accidentally move the fuel switches that feed the engines. But if moved, the effect would be immediate, cutting off engine power.
There are independent power systems and wiring for the fuel cutoff switches and the fuel valves controlled by those switches, according to US aviation safety expert John Cox.
WHERE ARE THE FUEL SWITCHES LOCATED?
The two fuel control switches on a 787, in Air India's case equipped with two GE engines, are located below the thrust levers.
The switches are spring-loaded to remain in position. To change one from run to cutoff, a pilot has to first pull the switch up and then move it from run to cutoff or vice versa.
There are two modes: "CUTOFF" and "RUN".
At the crash site, both fuel switches were found in the run position, and there had been indications of both engines relighting before the low-altitude crash.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


International Business Times
37 minutes ago
- International Business Times
Air India Pilots Made Fatal Error as Probe Reveals Plane's Fuel Supply Was Cut Off Moments Before It Crashed Killing More Than 270 People
A preliminary report on last month's Air India crash, which killed 241 people, with a sole survivor miraculously walking away, found that the aircraft's engine fuel cutoff switch was flipped just three seconds after takeoff. The pilots of the plane were heard questioning one another about whether the plane's fuel supply had been turned off just moments before the aircraft crashed, according to the report. the Boeing 787 Dreamliner likely lost power when the fuel cutoff switches were flipped almost simultaneously, cutting off fuel to the engines. This meant the aircraft began losing thrust and started sinking moments after taking off from Ahmedabad for London, according to Indian accident investigators. Pilots Made Major Blunder It is unclear how or why the switch was flipped, cutting off fuel to the engines and causing the London-bound Boeing 787 Dreamliner to rapidly lose thrust and crash on June 12. "The Engine N1 and N2 began to decrease from their take-off values as the fuel supply to the engines was cut off," the report said. The pilots of Air India Flight 171 may have played a role in the tragic crash, as the fuel cutoff switch is not something that can be easily flipped by mistake, according to The US Sun. These switches are typically used to shut down both engines simultaneously — either after arriving at the airport gate or in emergency situations that demand an immediate shutdown. However, the investigation report by India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau found no evidence of any emergency prior to the crash that would justify using the fuel cutoff. The crash also claimed the lives of 19 additional people on the ground when the aircraft crashed into a medical college in Ahmedabad, India. Cockpit Audio Reveals Everything The report cited cockpit audio in which one pilot questioned the other about why the fuel had been shut off. The other pilot responded, claiming he hadn't done it. Moments later, one of the pilots issued a panicked mayday call before the aircraft went down, though the report did not identify which pilot made the distress call. Investigators at the crash site found that the fuel cutoff switches were in the "run" position, suggesting that both engines restarted shortly before the impact. The experienced flight crew—a captain and a first officer—had a combined total of 19,000 hours of flight experience. U.S. aviation expert Anthony Brickhouse said that the ongoing investigation will likely focus on why the switches moved in a manner that doesn't align with standard flight operations. "Did they move on their own or did they move because of the pilots? And if they were moved because of a pilot, why?" Brickhouse said. Both black boxes from the ill-fated flight — containing the cockpit voice recordings and flight data — were recovered from the debris a few days after the accident. Investigators will now analyze the data to uncover any additional factors that may have led to the crash. British citizen Vishwash Kumar Ramesh was the only person to survive the Air India tragedy, which also claimed the life of one of his brothers, who had been seated just a few rows away. The 40-year-old, bruised and shaken, was seen limping away from the wreckage, still holding onto his boarding pass. "When I opened my eyes, I realized I was alive," he said from his hospital bed the day after the tragedy.


AsiaOne
10 hours ago
- AsiaOne
Who were the two pilots who flew the Air India jet that crashed?, Asia News
NEW DELHI - Investigators probing a deadly Air India crash said in a preliminary report that the aircraft's engine fuel switches were flipped to an off position briefly, leading to confusion in the cockpit and putting focus on the pilots flying the Boeing 787. Below is a brief profile of the two pilots based on the preliminary investigation report and media reports: Captain Sumeet Sabharwal The 56-year-old had an airline transport pilot's licence that was valid until May 14, 2026. He had obtained clearances to fly as pilot-in-command on several aircraft including the Boeing 787 and 777 and the Airbus A310. He had total flying experience of 15,638 hours, of which 8,596 hours were on a Boeing 787. Sabharwal had called his family from the airport, assuring them he would ring again after landing in London, according to a Times of India report. A pilot who had briefly interacted with him told Reuters he was a "gentleman." First Officer Clive Kunder The 32-year-old had a commercial pilot license which was issued in 2020 and valid until Sept 26, 2025. He had obtained clearances to fly Cessna 172 and Piper PA-34 Seneca aircraft as pilot-in-command and as co-pilot on Airbus A320 and Boeing 787 jets. He had total flying experience of 3,403 hours. Of that, 1,128 hours of experience were as a 787 co-pilot. Since his school-going days Kunder was passionate about flying, and in 2012, began serving as a pilot, Indian media reported, citing his relatives. He joined Air India in 2017. [[nid:720108]]


Independent Singapore
10 hours ago
- Independent Singapore
Commuter upset after seeing an elderly man with a prosthetic standing on crowded MRT
SINGAPORE: A commuter felt upset after witnessing an elderly uncle with a prosthetic leg forced to stand on a packed MRT train, while younger passengers stayed seated and looked away. Sharing the incident on the r/SMRTRabak forum on Friday (July 11), the commuter uploaded a photo of the uncle standing near the train doors, holding a walking cane in one hand and gripping the handrail tightly with the other. According to the post, an SMRT staff member eventually stepped in to help and asked a younger man to give up his seat, but the man 'shook his head and ignored the staff.' 'Luckily, Uncle got off at the next station,' the commuter said. 'But it felt like with the Stomp saga of the pregnant lady who didn't ask for seats, same as this uncle.' He went on to question whether the issue might go beyond just people lacking empathy. 'It really makes me wonder what the root of the problem is… Is it that our train cabins are designed with too much standing room and not enough seats in the first place, forcing these uncomfortable situations to happen so often, or what?' he said. 'Technically, it's not illegal to not give up seats, right? Probably just will feel bad or something?' he added. '…there are not enough people with empathy.' In the comments, many others shared that they've had similar experiences. One user said they had a broken leg and were on crutches, but people still rushed ahead to take empty seats before they could even reach them. They added, 'Oftentimes, only the auntie/uncle will offer me a seat, but I feel too bad to take their seat, so I just stand.' Another wrote, 'It's sad, man, to see an uncle that old age plus wearing prosthetics and not having a seat on a train… (Shakes head). Where is the humanity?!' A third remarked, 'The root of the problem is, there are not enough people with empathy.' On the other hand, there were also those who defended the young man who declined to give up his seat. One user explained, 'What if… the young fella also got issues but not as visible. Giving up a seat should be done out of one's own will. Not being asked to do so. I got asked to give up my seat once by an angmoh tourist and was met with a look of disgust when I refused. I was recovering from breaking my back. It felt damn offensive.' Another commented, 'I'm assuming the young chap was in a non-reserved seat, right? He's not obligated to give up.' In other news, a Singaporean man who was laid off earlier this year from his role as a tech project manager shared on Reddit that he's been unemployed for over five months and is starting to feel discouraged about his job search. Posting on the r/singaporefi subreddit, he explained that since losing his job, he has been actively applying for roles, customising his resume for each position, and doing everything people typically advise during a job hunt. However, despite all his efforts, he has received only three interview calls so far, and unfortunately, none of them have led to a job offer. Read more: 'They mind my gap': Laid-off tech worker says 5 months of job hunting have led to only 3 interviews