How Is Camden Property Trust's Stock Performance Compared to Other REIT - Residential Stocks?
Companies worth $10 billion or more are generally described as 'large-cap' stocks, and Camden Property Trust fits this criterion perfectly. The company operates a portfolio of high-quality apartment properties across major U.S. markets, with a focus on the Sunbelt region.
Super Micro Computer Just Struck a Deal with Ericsson. Should You Buy SMCI Stock Here?
CEO Jensen Huang Just Sold Nvidia Stock. Should You?
Broadcom Just Got a New Street-High Price Target. Should You Buy AVGO Stock Here?
Markets move fast. Keep up by reading our FREE midday Barchart Brief newsletter for exclusive charts, analysis, and headlines.
Shares of Camden Property Trust have declined 9.5% from its 52-week high of $127.69. CPT stock has dropped 5% over the past three months, a steeper decline than the iShares Residential and Multisector Real Estate ETF's (REZ) 2.9% decrease.
Longer term, shares of CPT have decreased marginally on a YTD basis, underperforming REZ's 2.3% uptick over the same time frame. Moreover, Camden Property Trust's stock has risen 4% over the past 52 weeks, compared to REZ's 7.5% gain.
Despite some fluctuations, the stock has been trading below its 50-day and 200-day moving averages since early April. However, the stock has risen above its 50-day moving average since May.
Camden Property Trust's stock surged 5.3% following the release of its solid Q1 2025 results on May 1. Quarterly operating revenue rose 1.9% from the year-ago quarter to $390.6 million, exceeding Street forecasts. The same-property occupancy improved to 95.4%, up 40 basis points (bps) from the prior year quarter. Its core FFO grew 1.2% year-over-year to $1.72 per share, also topping the consensus estimate by 2.4%.
Looking ahead, the company raised its full-year 2025 guidance, now expecting core FFO per share in the range of $6.63 to $6.93, up from the previous outlook of $6.60 to $6.90, further boosting investor confidence.
Compared to its rival, Essex Property Trust, Inc. (ESS) has underperformed the CPT stock over the past 52 weeks, gaining 2.5%. Nevertheless, shares of ESS have increased marginally on a YTD basis, slightly outpacing CPT stock.
While CPT has underperformed, analysts are moderately optimistic about its prospects. The stock has a consensus rating of 'Moderate Buy' from the 26 analysts covering the stock. As of writing, the stock is trading below the mean price target of $129.77.
On the date of publication, Sohini Mondal did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Barchart.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
5 hours ago
- CNBC
Delta Air assures US lawmakers it will not personalize fares using AI
Delta Air Lines said on Friday it will not use artificial intelligence to set personalized ticket prices for passengers after facing sharp criticism from U.S. lawmakers and broad public concern. Last week, Democratic Senators Ruben Gallego, Mark Warner and Richard Blumenthal said they believed the Atlanta-based airline would use AI to set individual prices, which would "likely mean fare price increases up to each individual consumer's personal 'pain point.'" Delta said it has not used AI to set personalized prices but previously said it plans to deploy AI-based revenue management technology across 20% of its domestic network by the end of 2025 in partnership with Fetcherr, an AI pricing company. "There is no fare product Delta has ever used, is testing or plans to use that targets customers with individualized prices based on personal data," Delta told the senators in a letter on Friday, seen by Reuters. "Our ticket pricing never takes into account personal data." Senators praised Delta's commitment not to use AI for personal pricing but expressed many questions and want more details about what data Delta is collecting to set prices. "Delta is telling their investors one thing, and then turning around and telling the public another," Gallego said. "If Delta is in fact using aggregated instead of individualized data, that is welcome news." Delta declined comment on Gallego's statement. The senators cited a comment in December by Delta President Glen Hauenstein that the carrier's AI price-setting technology is capable of setting fares based on a prediction of "the amount people are willing to pay for the premium products related to the base fares." Last week, American Airlines CEO Robert Isom said using AI to set ticket prices could hurt consumer trust. "This is not about bait and switch. This is not about tricking," Isom said on an earnings call, adding "talk about using AI in that way, I don't think it's appropriate. And certainly from American, it's not something we will do." Democratic lawmakers Greg Casar and Rashida Tlaib last week introduced legislation to bar companies from using AI to set prices or wages based on Americans' personal data and would specifically ban airlines raising individual prices after seeing a search for a family obituary. They cited a Federal Trade Commission staff report in January that found "retailers frequently use people's personal information to set targeted, tailored prices for goods and services -- from a person's location and demographics, down to their mouse movements on a webpage." The FTC cited a hypothetical example of a consumer profiled as a new parent who could intentionally be shown higher-priced baby thermometers and collect behavioral details to forecast a customer's state of mind. Delta said airlines have used dynamic pricing for more than three decades, in which pricing fluctuates based on a variety of factors like overall customer demand, fuel prices and competition, but not a specific consumer's personal information. "Given the tens of millions of fares and hundreds of thousands of routes for sale at any given time, the use of new technology like AI promises to streamline the process by which we analyze existing data and the speed and scale at which we can respond to changing market dynamics," Delta's letter said.
NBC News
7 hours ago
- NBC News
Delta Air Lines assures U.S. lawmakers it will not personalize fares using AI
WASHINGTON - Delta Air Lines said on Friday it will not use artificial intelligence to set personalized ticket prices for passengers after facing sharp criticism from U.S. lawmakers and broad public concern. Last week, Democratic Senators Ruben Gallego, Mark Warner and Richard Blumenthal said they believed the Atlanta-based airline would use AI to set individual prices, which would 'likely mean fare price increases up to each individual consumer's personal 'pain point.'' Delta said it has not used AI to set personalized prices but previously said it plans to deploy AI-based revenue management technology across 20% of its domestic network by the end of 2025 in partnership with Fetcherr, an AI pricing company. 'There is no fare product Delta has ever used, is testing or plans to use that targets customers with individualized prices based on personal data,' Delta told the senators in a letter on Friday, seen by Reuters. 'Our ticket pricing never takes into account personal data.' Senators praised Delta's commitment not to use AI for personal pricing but expressed many questions and want more details about what data Delta is collecting to set prices. 'Delta is telling their investors one thing, and then turning around and telling the public another,' Gallego said. 'If Delta is in fact using aggregated instead of individualized data, that is welcome news.' Delta declined comment on Gallego's statement. The senators cited a comment in December by Delta President Glen Hauenstein that the carrier's AI price-setting technology is capable of setting fares based on a prediction of 'the amount people are willing to pay for the premium products related to the base fares.' Last week, American Airlines CEO Robert Isom said using AI to set ticket prices could hurt consumer trust. 'This is not about bait and switch. This is not about tricking,' Isom said on an earnings call, adding 'talk about using AI in that way, I don't think it's appropriate. And certainly from American, it's not something we will do.' Democratic lawmakers Greg Casar and Rashida Tlaib last week introduced legislation to bar companies from using AI to set prices or wages based on Americans' personal data and would specifically ban airlines raising individual prices after seeing a search for a family obituary. They cited a Federal Trade Commission staff report in January that found 'retailers frequently use people's personal information to set targeted, tailored prices for goods and services -- from a person's location and demographics, down to their mouse movements on a webpage.' The FTC cited a hypothetical example of a consumer profiled as a new parent who could intentionally be shown higher-priced baby thermometers and collect behavioral details to forecast a customer's state of mind. Delta said airlines have used dynamic pricing for more than three decades, in which pricing fluctuates based on a variety of factors like overall customer demand, fuel prices and competition, but not a specific consumer's personal information. 'Given the tens of millions of fares and hundreds of thousands of routes for sale at any given time, the use of new technology like AI promises to streamline the process by which we analyze existing data and the speed and scale at which we can respond to changing market dynamics,' Delta's letter said.
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
China cites ‘backdoor safety risk' in Nvidia's H20 AI chip; company denies allegation
Chinese authorities have summoned U.S. chip giant Nvidia Corp. over alleged security vulnerabilities in its H20 processor, a move that could complicate the company's efforts to re-enter the Chinese market just as Washington and Beijing struggle to make progress on a renewed trade truce. The Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC) called Nvidia representatives to a meeting to discuss 'serious security risks' tied to its H20 AI chip, Bloomberg reported, citing a statement from the internet watchdog. The agency pointed to comments from U.S. lawmakers advocating for tracking capabilities in advanced chips sold overseas, and asked Nvidia staff to explain potential vulnerabilities and provide supporting documentation. The probe casts a shadow over Nvidia's China business weeks after co-founder and CEO Jensen Huang visited Beijing and met with local AI firms and officials. While the company has denied any wrongdoing, saying its chips do not contain so-called 'backdoors', the timing of the investigation has raised eyebrows in the tech and policy communities. Security doubts cloud comeback 'The CAC's scrutiny over H20 security risks could further erode Nvidia's Chinese market share amid rising domestic competition, and immediate H20 sales resumption may face delays due to regulatory uncertainty,' Forrester analyst Charlie Dai told Bloomberg. 'It also aligns with China's broader push to accelerate domestic semiconductor alternatives for technological self-reliance amid U.S. export controls.' The H20 chip was designed specifically to comply with U.S. export restrictions on advanced semiconductors. Washington recently lifted some of those curbs, reportedly in return for increased access to Chinese rare earth minerals, just as trade talks in Stockholm aimed to extend a temporary tariff truce. While those negotiations were described as 'constructive,' no concrete resolution emerged. U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick had framed the resumption of H20 sales as a breakthrough following earlier discussions in London, a claim that now appears increasingly uncertain. Domestic rivals gain ground The CAC's move also boosts local competitors. Huawei's Ascend 910C chip is now seen as a viable domestic alternative to the H20, particularly for inference workloads. According to Bloomberg, Huawei Technologies Co. now spearheads a nationwide effort to develop homegrown technologies to reduce China's reliance on American hardware and circuitry, and catch the U.S. in potentially game-changing technologies. Nvidia, meanwhile, reiterated in a statement that 'cybersecurity is critically important to us' and denied any claims of remote access or tracking features. 'Nvidia does not have 'backdoors' in our chips that would give anyone a remote way to access or control them,' the company said. As both countries tiptoe through fragile trade negotiations and navigate semiconductor nationalism, Nvidia's experience could signal deeper fault lines in tech diplomacy. While the H20 was initially hailed as a compromise chip to satisfy both regulators and customers, its future now hinges on a political equation that continues to shift. Solve the daily Crossword
